Attach 09_Relevancy Table.pdf

RELEVANCY TABLE

RFP Attachment 09

(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation)

This table will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the TH-1H DLM Competitive Source Selection Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor, if applicable, shall only complete column three. Offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s answers are applicable only to the effort identified on the FACTS sheet/PP Questionnaire (RFP, Attachments 07/08), not the offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet to your response (limited to two pages). Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

If the contract being submitted is an ordering type contractual vehicle (for example, including but not limited to an Indefinite Delivery “D” type contract per FAR 16.5), only after issuance of a delivery/task order does performance occur. The Contract Number, Total Contract Dollar Value, Period of Performance, Quantities produced/repaired, Type and Complexity of Data Deliverable submitted here should be for the order or series of orders, the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle.

If a series of orders is being submitted, the offeror shall include a list that includes the order numbers, each order’s Total Contract Dollar Value, each order’s Period of Performance, each order’s Quantity Repaired, and the Type and Complexity of Data Deliverables on each order. If the series of orders contains more than 5 orders, include this information on a separate attachment. See Section L-900 Paragraph II. D for more information on proposal submission and Section M-900 Paragraph II. D. for evaluation information.

Offeror Name:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Basic Contract Number and each Order Number or Order Number within the Series of Orders)

Program Title:

Contractor/Agency/Customer:

Original Total Contract Dollar Value:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Original Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Current Total Contract Dollar Value:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Current Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Period of Performance:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Period of Performance for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Quantities Repaired:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Quantity Delivered/Repaired for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Category Fill-in for the Proposed Effort (Government has completed this column)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill-in for the Effort Identified Above

(Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ Critical Subcontractor completes). The effort identified above required:

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Helicopter teardown, inspection, maintenance, and repair

2. Required Levels of Technology

Computerized information system for Manufacturing Resources Planning

3. Materials and Production Processes

Experience in working with Aluminum, Titanium, steel, and composite materials performing sheet metal, machining, forming, and NDI capabilities

4. Performance Location Within continental United States

5. Contract Type(s) FFP, LH, CRNF

6. Program Similarity Helicopter maintenance

7. Program Complexity Depot level disassembly, inspections, repairs, and reassembly, including function check flight

8. Program Phase Sustainment

9. Extent of Subcontractor involvement

10. Other Frequency of Work performed (i.e. quantity per year)

Was this contract effort submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement:

Yes:

If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

No: _______