ChBA Phase 1_Attachment 2 - Self-Score Worksheet_Update_2026-03-04.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Accelerated Transformation of Legacy Applications and Systems (ATLAS) Challenge Based Acquisition (ChBA)
- Solicitation number
- ATLAS-1
About this file
This is a Self-Score Worksheet template for the Federal Aviation Administration's Accelerated Transformation of Legacy Applications and Systems (ATLAS) Challenge Based Acquisition (ChBA), updated as of March 4, 2026. The worksheet enables offerors to self-assess and claim points across nine evaluation elements demonstrating their capability to modernize legacy applications and systems.
The scoring framework allocates up to 51,500 total points across the following elements: Element 1 (Size and Scale) awards up to 3,000 points for contracts with annual values exceeding $100 million; Element 2 (Portfolio Volume Management) awards up to 2,000 points for managing portfolios with at least 200 applications and three enterprise shared services platforms; Element 3 (Data Estate Scale Management) awards 1,000 points for managing data estates exceeding 2,000 databases or one petabyte of data; Element 4 (Human Capital) awards 1,000 points for maintaining at least 200 FTE simultaneous development staff on a single program; Element 5 (Rationalization Success) awards up to 3,000 points for successfully rationalizing at least 50 percent of a portfolio containing at least 100 applications; Element 6 (Cloud-Native Transformation) awards up to 4,000 points for migrating at least 100 applications to cloud-native architecture; Element 7 (Demonstrated Application Cost Reduction) awards up to 2,000 points for achieving greater than 25 percent annual cost reductions post-modernization; Element 8 (Production AI Implementation) awards up to 6,000 points for deploying generative AI/ML for code refactoring and testing on more than ten production systems; and Element 9 (Safety-Critical Context) awards 1,500 points for experience modernizing safety-critical or life-safety systems. Offerors must provide supporting documentation, cite specific contract or task order numbers, and include authorized representative certification of accuracy.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self-Score Model
| Accelerated Transformation of Legacy Applications and Systems (ATLAS) |
| Challenge Based Acquisition (ChBA) |
| Attachment 2 - Self Score Model |
| Element | Point Value | Offeror Provided Example (Yes/No) | Offeror's Points Claimed | Cited Contract or Task Order Number | Cited Contract or Task Order Performed By | Supporting Documentation File Name(s) |
| Element 1 - Size and Scale | ||||||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $25M - Example 1 | 1000 | e.g., 692M15-24-D-00XXX | e.g., "ABC Co_F1_Element1_Ex1.pdf" | |||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $25M - Example 2 | 1000 | |||||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $50M - Example 3 | 2000 | |||||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $50M - Example 4 | 2000 | |||||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $100M - Example 5 | 3000 | |||||
| Example with annual dollar amount greater than $100M - Example 6 | 3000 | |||||
| Element 2 - Portfolio Volume Management | ||||||
| Portfolio with at least 100 applications and 3 enterprise shared services platforms - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Portfolio with at least 100 applications and 3 enterprise shared services platforms - Example 2 | 1000 | |||||
| Portfolio with at least 200 applications and 3 enterprise shared services platforms - Example 3 | 2000 | |||||
| Portfolio with at least 200 applications and 3 enterprise shared services platforms - Example 4 | 2000 | |||||
| Element 3 - Data Estate Scale | ||||||
| Management of a data estate exceeding 2,000 databases or 1 Petabyte of data - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Element 4 - Human Capital | ||||||
| Example with at least 200 FTE simultaneous development staff on a single program - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Example with at least 200 FTE simultaneous development staff on a single program - Example 2 | 1000 | |||||
| Element 5 - Rationalization Success | ||||||
| Successfully rationalized at least 20% of a portfolio containing at least 100 applications - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Successfully rationalized at least 50% of a portfolio containing at least 100 applications - Example 2 | 3000 | |||||
| Element 6 - Cloud-Native Transformation | ||||||
| Migrated at least 25 applications to a cloud-native architecture - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Migrated at least 50 applications to a cloud-native architecture - Example 2 | 2000 | |||||
| Migrated at least 100 applications to a cloud-native architecture - Example 3 | 4000 | |||||
| Element 7 - Demonstrated Application Cost Reduction | ||||||
| Achieved a reduction of greater than 15% annually post-modernization - Example 1 | 1000 | |||||
| Achieved a reduction of greater than 25% annually post-modernization - Example 2 | 2000 | |||||
| Element 8 - Production Artificial Intelligence (AI) Implementation | ||||||
| Deployment of Generative AI/ML for code refactoring/testing on at least one production system - Example 1 | 2000 | |||||
| Deployment of Generative AI/ML for code refactoring/testing on greater than five production systems - Example 2 | 4000 | |||||
| Deployment of Generative AI/ML for code refactoring/testing on greater than ten production systems - Example 3 | 6000 | |||||
| Element 9 - Safety-Critical Context | ||||||
| Experience modernizing safety-critical or life-safety systems - Example 1 | 1500 | |||||
| Experience modernizing safety-critical or life-safety systems - Example 2 | 1500 | |||||
| Experience modernizing safety-critical or life-safety systems - Example 3 | 1500 | |||||
| Total Number of Points | 51500 | 0 | ||||
| Offeror Endorsement & Certification | ||||||
| The undersigned hereby certifies that the representations made herein are accurate and true. I authorize my electronic signature to carry the same weight and legal effect as my written signature. |
| Offeror Name: |
| Offeror UEI: |
| Authorized Representative Signature |
| Authorized Representative Name: |
| Authorized Representative Title: |
| Authorized Representative Phone & Email: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .