Atch 4-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- San Clemente Air Transportation Shuttle Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC71125RC005
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template (Attachment 4) for solicitation HTC71125RC005 issued by USTRANSCOM for San Clemente Air Transportation Shuttle Services. The questionnaire must be completed and returned by February 11, 2025 via email to specified USTRANSCOM personnel.
The questionnaire consists of four sections: contract identification, respondent information, performance ratings, and narrative questions. It evaluates contractors' performance across 15 quality metrics including personnel qualifications, aircraft maintenance, security processes, mission responsiveness, and safety records. Performance is rated on a scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Key areas of evaluation focus on air transportation services, program management, cost control, and overall contract performance. The form specifically addresses capabilities related to passenger and cargo transportation using both rotary and fixed-wing aircraft, with respondents required to provide specific workload metrics such as pounds of cargo transported or number of passengers/missions flown.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HTC71125RC005 A0003.pdf | ||
| RFP - HTC71125RC005 A0003 Conformed Copy.pdf | ||
| HTC71125RC0005 A0002 Attach QA Responses.pdf | ||
| QA Responses - HTC71125RC005 San Clemente PAX.docx | DOCX document | |
| HTC71125RC005 A00001 Fix 52.212-1 and Atch 4.pdf | ||
| RFP - HTC71125RC005.pdf | ||
| Atch 1-PWS San Clemente.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 2-Aircraft Identification Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 7-Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Atch 3-Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch 5-RFP Offeror Information Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 6-Basic Eligibility.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Source Selection Information When Filled In
| HTC71125RC005 |
| Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror submitting a proposal to USTRANSCOM in response to solicitation number HTC71125RC005 completes this section prior to sending to the Respondent.
A. Contractor Name: __________________________________________________________________________
B. Contract Title/Number: ______________________________________________________________________
C. Brief Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates):
D. Location (countries) where service was performed under this contract:_________________________________
E. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: ______ Prime or ______ Subcontractor (Mark one)
F. Contract Type: ___ Fixed Price ___ Cost ___ IDIQ ___ Single Award ___ Multiple Award
Other: ______________________________________________________________________________
G. Total Period of Performance (month/year – month/year): __________________________________________
H. Annual Contract Value (amount awarded): _____________________________________________________
I. Total Contract Value (including unexercised options): _____________________________________________
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The remaining sections are to be completed by Respondent.
The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the contractor will successfully perform. Therefore, it is important the responses be candid, factual, and as complete as possible. The contractor will not be provided with this form, once completed, or the name of the respondent.
If you do not have knowledge of, or experience with, the contract referenced above, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who can provide the information. Also, if offeror holds or has held other relevant contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Questionnaires must be returned no later than 11 February 2025 USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office via E-mail: ryan.c.lafever.mil@mail.mil; shawn.m.creedon.mil@mail.mil; barbara.wolf@us.af.mil; Please indicate “Performance Survey” in the subject. Note, this information is to be received directly from the respondent and will not be considered if received from the Offeror.
A. Respondent’s name: _________________________________________________________________________
B. Respondent’s title: ___________________________________________________________________________
C. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________
D. Respondent’s phone number: ___________________________________________________________________
E. Respondent’s Email: _________________________________________________________________________
F. Description of Work Performed. Please mark the appropriate boxes to indicate the services provided under this reference. In the space below, provide workload estimates (such as pounds of cargo, number of passengers or missions flown, etc.) and any other services not listed. Note: If any of the information in Section 1 is incorrect, please provide the correct information here.
| Cargo |
| Passengers |
| Passengers and Cargo |
Rotary Wing
Fixed Wing
G. Was contract performance assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?
________ Yes ________ No
NOTE: The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) may be reviewed for the referenced contract as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: Place a mark in the block that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
In responding to the survey, please justify and explain Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. As the Respondent, you may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. For the government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the offeror’s performance on your contract or project:
Exceptional (E) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Very Good (VG) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (US) - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Unknown (U) - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Not Applicable (NA) – The requested information was not related to the referenced contract effort.
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| NA |
| A |
| Provided qualified/experienced personnel and management with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| B |
| Provided scheduled maintenance on aircraft to ensure limited interruption of service. |
| C |
| Provided security processes to safeguard aircraft and personnel |
| D |
| Responsive to aircraft mission changes |
| E |
| Provided service with minimum oversight. |
| F |
| Complied with contract terms and conditions. |
| G |
| Complied with contract transit time and on-time percentages. |
| H |
| Demonstrated effective flight planning. |
| I |
| Demonstrated accurate and timely billing processes. |
| J |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period, ensuring attrition did not result in a degradation of services. |
| K |
| Reacted to and overcame stressful situations caused by unforeseen events. |
| L |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| M |
| Provide accurate and timely reports. |
| N |
| Worked with established sequence of events to facilitate on-time aircraft departures and tracked delays to determine the root cause. |
| O |
| Demonstrated an acceptable record of safety of flight and ground operations. |
| 2. OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| NA |
| A |
| Contractor’s overall performance providing air transportation services |
| B |
| Contractor’s overall program/contract management. |
| C |
| Contractor’s overall performance in forecasting and controlling costs |
| D |
| Overall performance of the contractor. |
Rating Comments. Please discuss each response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory performance in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
SECTION 4: NARRATIVE QUESTIONS
INSTRUCTIONS: Respond to the questions and provide explanations as necessary.
1. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations? ________ Yes ________ No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
2. Would you have any reservations with awarding to this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your most critical and demanding programs? If so, please explain why.
3. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
CUI
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .