Atch 2 California Group_FY21_PWS_20210128.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

CALIFORNIA GROUP

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT

AT

AIR FORCE PLANT 42, CALIFORNIA

TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA

CONTRACT NUMBER:

28 JANUARY 2021

FY21 Version 1.4

Contents

1.0 SCOPE

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 OVERVIEW OF ORC SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long Term Management (as appropriate)

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

1.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN AND WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

4.2 SCHEDULE AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS – INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

4.3 MILESTONE PAYMENT SCHEDULE

4.4 COST AND STATUS REPORTING

4.5 ORC DOCUMENT REPOSITORY

4.6 MEETING AND CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS

4.6.1 Meeting/Teleconference Support

4.6.2 Public Meetings and Hearings

4.7 SPATIAL DATA (MAP) REQUIREMENTS

4.8 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

4.9 PERMITS

4.9.1 Environmental Permits

4.9.2 Rights of Access to Non-AF Real Property

4.10 PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

4.11 REMOTE AND/OR AUSTERE SITES

4.12 SITE ACCESS

4.13 WORKSITE ACTIVITIES AND COORDINATION

4.13.1 Coordination of Activities

4.13.2 Hazardous Material, and Hazardous Waste Permitting and Reporting

5.0 CHEMISTRY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE

5.2 LABORATORY SELECTION

5.3 ANALYTICAL DATA MANAGEMENT

5.4 RECORD KEEPING

5.5 PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONATE AND PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID SAMPLING

6.0 PLANS AND REPORTS

6.1 QUALITY PROGRAM PLANS

6.1.1 Work Plans

6.1.2 Health and Safety Plan

6.1.3 Construction Quality Plan

6.2 TECHNICAL PLANS AND REPORTS

7.0 SITE WORK

7.1 CONSERVATION

7.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD INVESTIGATION

7.3 SITE PREPARATION

7.4 DEMOLITION

7.5 SITE RESTORATION

8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROCESS APPLICATION

8.1.1 Conceptual Site Model Guidance

8.1.2 Exit Strategy

8.1.3 Optimization and Performance

8.2 TRANSITION OF WORK

8.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION

8.3.1 Design

8.3.3 Delivery and Warranty

8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

8.5 INNOVATIVE AND PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES

8.6 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

8.7 ORDNANCE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.8 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.9 STUDY EFFORT INCIDENTAL TO REMEDY OR CORRECTIVE ACTION

8.10 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUPPORT

9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

10.0 POINTS OF CONTACT

11.0 KEY PERSONNEL

12.0 CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

1.0 SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Air Force Plant (AFP) 42 and Travis Air Force Base (AFB). This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration under the Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). The range of activities includes maintenance of established remedies, optimization at applicable sites, and achievement of site specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at twenty-seven (27) Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the Air Force has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators”.

1.1 Introduction

AFP 42

AFP 42 is located in Palmdale, CA, north of Pasadena in Los Angeles County. It is located in the northeastern portion of Los Angeles County, California, within the Antelope Valley of the Mojave Desert, approximately 80 miles north of Los Angeles. It covers over 6,600 acres and includes approximately 4.2 million square feet of floor space. AFP 42 includes multiple high bay buildings and airfield access with flyaway capability. The facility also has one of the heaviest load-bearing runways in the world.

AFP 42 is segregated into eight different Plant Sites. Site 1 is currently being operated by Boeing. Sites 2, 7 East (7E) and 7 West (7W) are being operated by Lockheed Martin. Sites 3, 4, 7W and 8 are being operated by Northrup Grumman. Sites 5 and 6 are common areas and are being run by the Air Force.

Remediation activities at AFP 42 is being conducted pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), with the California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) and the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) providing regulatory oversight.

Travis AFB Travis AFB is located in northern California, 50 miles northeast of San Francisco, and it is home to the 60th Air Mobility Wing, the largest airlift organization in the United States Air Force (USAF). Travis AFB is named in honor of Brigadier General Robert F. Travis. Travis AFB currently covers approximately 6,368 acres and is bordered by the cities of Vacaville to the north, Fairfield to the northwest, and Suisun City to the west, and by agricultural land to the south and east.

Remediation activities at Travis AFB are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA, as amended by SARA; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the California State Water Resources Control Board. Regulatory oversight is provided by DTSC, successor to the California Health Services; the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 9, acting as the lead regulatory agency; and RWQCB, San Francisco Bay Area Region.

The USAF began an effort to identify contaminated sites at Travis AFB in 1983. Contaminated areas and specific sites on base were identified and a Phase II confirmation study was performed in 1986. The USEPA Region 9 placed Travis AFB on the National Priority List (NPL) in 1989.

The USAF signed a Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) with the US EPA Region 9 and DTSC in 1990. The FFA was renegotiated in May 1993 to identify four (4) specific Operable Units (OUs) and a corresponding schedule for each OU. The FFA schedule was renegotiated in October 1995 to combine the North, East Industrial and West Industrial Operable Units (NEWIOU) for the Feasibility Study, Proposed Plan and Record of Decision. The FFA schedule was again renegotiated in July 1996 to separate the groundwater actions from the soil, sediment and surface water actions. Schedules are currently reviewed and updated at each monthly Restoration Program Managers (RPM) meeting and recorded in the Master Meeting and Document Schedule as part of the meeting minutes available at http://www.travis.af.mil/enviro/library/index.asp.

1.2 Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities required to achieve the POs of this PWS. This PWS and enclosures listed below include requirements of the project to meet the AF objectives:

• Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions

• Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI) o Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet o Enclosure 2B – GFI CD o Enclosure 2C – NOT APPLICABLE

• Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Property (GFP) The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance (POP) in the most efficient and cost-effective manner as supported by a cost benefit analysis and exit strategy that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. The AF is required to implement remedies as necessary to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) mission, while effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost-conscious framework.

The AF desires that all sites be cleaned up to standards that allow for the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. Hand in hand, accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are critical adjuncts to optimization success. In keeping with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32- 7020, the AF defines optimization, under the ORC, as the reduction of contaminant mass and concentrations, reduction in LCC, or any combination of activities leading to acceleration of Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC), as a result of remedial implementation the Contractor undertakes, above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved Decision Document (DD).

The Contractor shall maintain compliance with all DDs/Records of Decision (RODs) and Proposed Plans (currently in place or to be approved)/RCRA Permits until no longer required or an alternate approach is approved. Conduct DD/ROD amendments or modifications as required to implement new approach(es).

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission to include the sharing of information with USACE, other AFCEC Contractors, and AF personnel; and cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the achievement of the POs in the Performance Period (PP) per Table 1 of this PWS, and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within PP specified for each site.

AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during the execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the POP.

Site specific POs are identified in Section 1.3 Table 1: Performance Table. POs that are in keeping with standard DERP milestones are defined in Enclosure 1. In addition, for certain categories of sites, the AF has set POs based on current site conditions and consistent with the POP of the contract and ORC goal.

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

The scope of this contract is to perform environmental restoration services for the sites listed in Table 1. The ORC Contractor shall assume contractual liability and responsibility for achieving the POs. If the selected technical approach is not working, as demonstrated by the trends in the performance model, the Contractor shall develop and implement a revised technical approach to achieve the POs, including DD amendments if required to implement the remedial approach.

This scope includes all known contaminants linked to the specific sites (includes contaminants on, under, or sourced at/migrating from the specific sites) without regard to quantity (e.g., plume size, concentrations). The AF remains statutorily responsible for all sites listed in Table 1.

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial

Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

Table 1 of the PWS identifies Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI), Remedial Investigation (RI) or RI/Feasibility Study (FS) (including Supplemental Investigations, and DDs as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these POs as identified in Table 1. See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in Enclosure 1.

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RC or SC as PO for selected sites. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these objectives as identified in Table 1. See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in Enclosure 1. The performance components are described in Section 8.1.

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

Table 1 of the PWS identifies the following POs utilizing with optimization as follows: 1.

Remedy in Place (RIP) and Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) with Optimization, 2. DD Amendment (or Explanation of Significant Difference [ESD]) with Remedy Implementation and RA-O with Optimization, or 3. RA-O with Optimization as POs for selected sites in accordance with the optimization initiative. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these POs as identified in Table 1. See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in Enclosure 1. The optimization and performance components are described in Section 8.1.

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term

Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O and Reduce LCC or Long Term Management (LTM) and Reduce LCC as the PO for selected sites. The goal of these POs is to minimize future AF liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. Reduce LCC sites have achieved RIP or RC, have remedies that are effective (source control, risk mitigation, and plume stability), and have the potential for LCC reduction by optimizing some component of the existing remedy, by, for example:

• Reducing sampling frequency

• Reducing system operations

• Reducing number of wells sampled per event

• Reducing number of analytes per sampling event The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each Reduce LCC site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the POP.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all Contaminants of Concern (COCs) and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

• Deliver a Reduce LCC Plan, as a stand-alone plan or in the Project Management Plan (PMP), that identifies opportunities to improve cost efficiency of RA-O or LTM activities, and the planned approach for implementation. The Reduce LCC Plan shall:

o Provide a basis for proposed reductions in LCC throughout the POP compared to the cost of status-quo RA-O activities (those required to maintain compliance).

The planned reduction can be illustrated using a line graph (current, planned, achieved) or verbiage describing the current and planned reductions.

o Document risk and mitigation strategies for implementing optimization activities to reduce LCC.

• Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

• Deliver Reduce LCC Reports to document progress in achieving the planned reductions when those reductions are achieved. Reduce LCC Reports may be combined with monitoring reports. Reductions in required RA-O activities are contingent upon regulatory approval.

• Deliver an RA-O & Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report two years prior to the POP end date. The Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report shall:

o Document optimization activities to date and forecast remaining activities and assumptions to further reduce LCC 10 years post-POP.

Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint). See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in Enclosure 1.

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long Term Management (as appropriate) Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or LTM in accordance with the approved ROD as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and LTM site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the PP. Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

• Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint).

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

NOT APPLICABLE

1.3 Performance Requirements

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

Table 1 presents POs, PPs and Performance Standards associated with all installations/sites under this ORC. The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub- Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both Government and regulator) per the Performance Standard are required in writing. Additional scope discussions and limits can be found in section 1.3.2.

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard N/A Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Draft PMP within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and update as necessary throughout the POP. The AF and USACE will determine when whole document PMP updates are warranted.

AF and USACE approval of

PMP.

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

N/A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

(QASP)

Draft QASP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

QASP.

N/A Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS)

Draft IMS/MPS within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final IMS/MPS within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

IMS/MPS.

N/A Basewide Quality Program Plans (QPP) for each Installation

Draft Basewide QPP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE and regulatory approval of Basewide QPP.

AFP 42

DP016 LTM in accordance with the approved

October 2012 ROD for 25 IRP Sites Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

FT005 LTM in accordance with the approved May 2013 ROD for IRP Site FT005

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

OT029 Response Complete (RC)

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the ROD throughout the duration of the POP

Pending achievement of RC, continue interim remedial action (IRA) with optimization in accordance with the Remedial Action Plan/Interim Action for the Interim Remedial Action at IRP Site 29, Jan 2009 throughout the duration of the

POP

Ten (10) Years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of IRA-O documentation (e.g., Quarterly Reports and Annual Reports).

SS019 LTM in accordance with the approved October 2012 ROD for 25 IRP Sites

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS020 LTM in accordance with the approved October 2012 ROD for 25 IRP Sites

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS028 LTM in accordance with the approved July 2013 ROD for IRP Site SS028

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

Travis AFB DP039 RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly Operations and Maintenance [O&M] Reports, etc.).

FT004 Record of Decision Amendment and

Remedy Implementation

RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved ROD (existing and amended ROD) throughout the duration of the POP

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of ROD Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on Final ROD Amendment).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of Remedy Implementation (e.g., Construction Completion Report and first RA-O Report demonstrating remedy is operating properly and successfully).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation and optimization performance milestones (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

FT005 RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

LF006 Site Closeout Ten (10) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

LF007 RA-O with optimization in accordance with

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

LF008 RA-O in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

LF044 LTM in accordance with the approved WABOU Soil ROD and LUCIP

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD031 Record of Decision

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD (existing and new ROD) throughout the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of ROD (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on Final ROD Amendment).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation and optimization performance milestones (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SD033 RA-O in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, Reduce LLC Summary Report, etc.).

SD034 Record of Decision Amendment and Remedy Implementation

RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved ROD (existing and amended ROD) throughout the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of ROD Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on Final ROD Amendment).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, Reduce LLC Summary Report, etc.).

SD036 RA-O with optimization in accordance with

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SD037 RA-O with optimization in accordance with

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M

SS014 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and Remedy in Place (RIP)

Upon achievement of RIP, continue RA-O with optimization in accordance with the CAP throughout the duration of the POP

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RIP (e.g., Construction Completion Report and first RA-O Report demonstrating remedy is operating properly and successfully).

SS015 RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SS016 RA-O in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, Reduce LLC Summary Report, etc.).

SS029 RA-O in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, Reduce LLC Summary Report, etc.).

SS030 RA-O in accordance with the approved 2014 Groundwater ROD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, Reduce LLC Summary Report, etc.).

ST018 RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved Correction Action Plan for POCO Site.

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

ST027 RA-O with optimization in accordance with

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M

ST028 LTM in accordance with the approved Land Use Control Implementation Plan

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM

ST032 LTM in accordance with the approved Land

Use Control Implementation Plan Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM

1.3.2 Additional Scope and Discussion Limits

In addition to the requirements identified in Table 1, the Contractor shall be responsible for:

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) of all wells associated with requirements in this PWS and well abandonment with AF, USACE, and regulatory acceptance (if required) when the well is no longer necessary.

• Performing a well survey, inspecting treatment and well field, recommending repairs and implementing approved recommendations at AFP 42 and Travis AFB.

Establishing a quality control/quality process to ensure documents are of an acceptable quality and do not contain typos, formatting issues, contradictory information in tables and text, etc.

Contaminants for which there are promulgated federal, state, or local standards.

In the case of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate/Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOS/PFOA), Office of the General Counsel (OGC) approval for use of promulgated state or local Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) standards as Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements at the time of final solicitation.

Contaminants which become regulated under new or revised federal, state, or local standards, or OGC approval for PFOS/PFOA, after award (e.g., reduction in MCL levels, promulgation of emerging contaminants, etc.) may be managed via modification.

Management and disposal of waste media associated with PFOS/PFOA in accordance with the “AF Guidance Memorandum Establishing Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)-Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance” dated 05 September 2019. The following sites have confirmed PFOS/PFOA contamination and/or are in close proximity to sites with confirmed PFOS/PFOA contamination; therefore, the Contractor shall test waste media for PFOS/PFOA and dispose of in accordance with the guidance.

• AFP 42: FT005

• Travis AFB: FT005, SD034 and SS030 Implementing phase 1 sampling as described in “Interim Air Force Guidance On

Sampling and Response Actions for 1,4-Dioxane at Operational and [Base Realignment and Closure] BRAC Installations,” dated 24 May 2013. The Contractor shall perform the phase 1 sampling as described in the interim guidance for the following sites: AFP 42, OT029.

The Contractor shall present results in one Tech Memo/Report per installation documenting the analytical methods and maps depicting sampling locations within the trichloroethene (TCE) plume and sample analysis results.

Preparing, submitting, revising and updating the following documents for approval by the AF and USACE as appropriate:

• AFP 42: Community Involvement Plan (CIP) and Land Use Control (LUC) Implementation Plan update. This includes but is not limited to preparation and submission of annual LUC/IC Checklists/Reports for AF properties.

• Travis AFB: Community Relations-Plan (CRP) and a LUC Implementation Plan.

This includes but is not limited to preparation and submission of annual LUC/IC Checklists/Reports for AF properties.

Ensuring that remedial actions do not negatively impact the distribution of any other contaminants and/or emerging contaminants (e.g., PFOA, PFOS, 1,4-dioxane).

Operating and maintaining Pump and Treat (P&T) and Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) systems at AFP 42 Site OT029.

Annual inspection, maintain engineering controls at AFP 42 Site FT005, and reporting of long term LUCs at AFP 42.

The Contractor shall NOT be responsible for:

Reasonably unanticipated contaminants at sites identified in Table 1 (e.g., previously undetected mercury within a TCE plume); however, Contractors would be responsible for reasonably anticipated contaminants (e.g., vinyl chloride in a TCE plume).

Remediation or treatment of contaminants for which there are no promulgated federal, state, or local standards or AF agreements at time of contract award unless included via modification.

Sites not identified in Table 1.

Execution of modification of deeds or other real property documentation unless otherwise specified.

Remediation of sites with unexploded ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions

(DMMs), munitions constituents (MCs) present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard, and chemical warfare material (CWM).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes;

Department of Defense (DoD) and AF instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters (including AF policy and guidance for IRP, and MMRP); Executive Orders (EOs), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), American Petroleum Institute (API) Codes, National Association of Corrosions Engineers (NACE), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), applicable United Facility Criteria, Steel Structures and Painting Counsel (SSPC), National Electrical Code (NEC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and International Building Code (IBC) including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this contract. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to identify and comply with all applicable requirements. In addition, the Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the DoD Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing and The United States AF Construction Management Implementation Guide.

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable documents for the Installations including RODs, ROD Amendments, ESDs, RCRA Permits and subsequent modifications, Risk Evaluation Corrective Action Program (RECAP) documents, the Endangered Species Act, other Decision Documents, Deeds, and conveyance notices.

The information provided in this PWS is not intended as a substitute for complete analysis of technical data available, nor is it intended to be a guide on how the Contractor should address achievement of the POs.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

Government Furnished Information is contained in the Administrative Record (https://armgm.afcec-cloud.af.mil/ARSearch.aspx) or listed in Enclosure 2. The AF believes the documentation provided represents the most recent and appropriate documentation available for the Installation(s) and sites identified in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract.

Specific documents not included in the Administrative Record or in Enclosure 2 may be made available following a request to the USACE Contracting Officer (KO), if the documentation can be distributed in a timely manner. Electronic format is not guaranteed.

The Contractor shall properly account for and manage all new and existing GFP procured and utilized at the Installations as-is where-is in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Lists of current GFP are provided in Enclosure 3. All Real Property installed during the contract shall be turned over to the Government consistent with procedures identified in section 8.3.3.

The Contractor is responsible for providing all other supplies and equipment, not already installed and not listed in Enclosure 3, that are required to achieve the POs of this contract. At Travis AFB, this includes a job trailer or portable office and depending on available laydown area may require a portable toilet. All AF-owned property, including real property used for remediation purposes must be maintained by the Contractor in accordance with applicable maintenance requirements and usability for the intended purpose. The Contractor is responsible for disposal of unneeded, unusable, or obsolete GFP as required, and transition of remaining GFP to other AF Contractors at the end of the contract POP. Prior to disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment listed in Enclosure 3, the Contractor shall coordinate activities with the USACE KO for disposition instructions.

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall implement a full range of environmental remediation activities as required to meet objectives of this contract and in accordance with all applicable or relevant and appropriate federal, state, and local laws and regulations; DoD policies; and Installation-specific orders, agreements or rules. The Contractor shall supply all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to accomplish the work through the entire POP of the contract. The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, including performance measurement and fund status reporting. The Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS), and PMP shall be consistent.

4.1 Project Management Plan and Work Breakdown Structure

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed PMP. The PMP shall specify the project’s resources and tasks corresponding to the Sub-CLINs for this contract as required for the planning, execution, control, and completion of the stated POs. At a minimum, the PMP shall include the following sections: technical approach for achieving the POs in accordance with the PWS, organization and integration of the project team, schedule management and project controls, transitional activities, risk management, quality management, health and safety management, procurement management, and security management. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance” Version 1 as well as standard industry practice.

Clarification on PMP content and the level of detail required to address the ORC program shall be provided by the USACE COR.

The PMP shall include the approved ORC Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and WBS Dictionary. In addition, the WBS shall demonstrate a comprehensive decomposition of each work package/PO deliverable and exhibit a clear and concise correlation between the PWS, IMS, and MPS. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the guidance for the Development of Contract Line Item Number Structures, Work Breakdown Structures, Integrated Master Schedules, and Milestone Payment Schedules (CLIN, WBS, IMS, MPS Guidance) in Chapter 4 of the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance” Version 1.

Each ORC has a designated WBS Level 3 Element code that is unique to this ORC. This designation will be retained, at a minimum, for the life of the contract. For this California Group ORC, the Level 3 designation is 1.2.4.

The first draft of the PMP shall be due within sixty (60) calendar days of contract award (or a more aggressive schedule if agreed upon). The Draft PMP and subsequent revisions shall be subject to AF and USACE review and approval. The Final PMP shall be due within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the Draft versions. The Contractor shall maintain the PMP throughout the duration of the contract utilizing dated page changes and track change deletions and insertions (electronic copies) as practicable. Whole document PMP updates during the life of the ORC may be necessary based on the accumulation of small incremental changes or significant changes (e.g., contract requirements, technical approaches, risk and issue management, or key personnel). The Contractor shall prepare two whole document updates during the POP of the ORC. The AF and USACE will determine when PMP updates are warranted.

4.2 Schedule and Planning Requirements – Integrated Master Schedule The Contractor shall prepare and submit an IMS in hardcopy and in electronic format (Microsoft Project, Adobe Acrobat portable document file (.pdf), and Microsoft Excel for AFP 42 only.

The following are minimum AF requirements for the IMS:

• Presents a realistic sequence and timing of all activities and documents necessary to demonstrate achievement of the PO within the PP.

• Organized in a WBS aligned with the CLINs/Sub-CLINs in Section B and includes the following columns in the prescribed order shown below:

o Installation Name: Identify Enterprise Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health Management Information System (EESOH-MIS) Installation Name per Table 1.

o Site Number: Identify EESOH-MIS Site Number per Table 1 and Site Alias, if applicable.

o CLIN/Sub-CLIN: Identify CLIN and/or Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

Note Sub-CLINs for compliance activities (routine regulatory requirements to comply with binding agreements) are denoted as ####CX and Sub-CLINs for performance activities (remedial advancement or progress towards the PO) are denoted as ####AX.

o WBS Element number designation/code.

o Task Description: Include detailed description of all activities (e.g., meetings, permitting, site access, work plans, mobilization, field work, documents, reviews, coordination with stakeholders, etc.) associated with achievement of the PO and a clear indication of regulatory CERCLA/State Program phase completions (e.g., RIP Achieved, RC Achieved, etc.) and PO achievement.

o Start and Finish Dates: Document Start date and Finish date for each required activity and document including appropriate durations and realistic Government and Regulatory review periods.

a. Include an obligation date, notice to proceed date, or projected award date as the first activity for each Sub-CLIN.

b. Include a clearly identified final field work (e.g., FINAL FIELD ACTIVITY) Start date and Finish Date for each site (i.e., indicate when the final set of field activities such as injections, groundwater sampling, or others will be complete).

o Milestone Payment Amount: Include negotiated amount consistent with the approved MPS ensuring the sum of all milestone payments equals the value of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

o Percent Complete: Record completion status of all activities and documents as approved by the USACE COR.

o Predecessor and Successor: Define relationships and constraints associated with activities and documents.

The Contractor shall maintain and submit an IMS monthly in electronic format in accordance with the requirements above and include updates to progress and approved changes (e.g., Government or regulatory review periods, technical approaches, milestone payment updates, or contract requirements). The IMSs shall be submitted electronically to the Contractor’s ORC document repository and in accordance with instructions from the USACE COR. The Contractor shall prepare and maintain the IMS in accordance with the CLIN, WBS, IMS, and MPS Guidance.

4.3 Milestone Payment Schedule

The Contractor shall prepare and submit an MPS monthly (along with the IMS) in hardcopy and in electronic format (Microsoft Excel). The MPS will be negotiated during development of the PMP and approved by the USACE COR.

The following are minimum AF requirements for the MPS:

• Presents appropriate milestone payments considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the POs.

• Ties interim and final milestone payments to performance models for RA-O with optimization sites as described in Section 8.1.3.1 (also see Sections 1.2.4 through 1.2.5).

• Includes a reasonable number of milestone payments per CLIN/Sub-CLIN based on the scope and anticipated duration to achieve CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective and/or PO.

• Organized in a WBS aligned with the CLINs/Sub-CLINs in Section B and includes the following columns:

o Installation Name: Identify EESOH-MIS Installation Name per Table 1.

o Site Number: Identify EESOH-MIS Site Number per Table 1 and Site Alias, if applicable.

o CLIN/Sub-CLIN: Identify CLIN and/or Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

Note Sub-CLINs for compliance activities (routine regulatory requirements to comply with binding agreements) are denoted as ####CX and Sub-CLINs for performance activities (remedial advancement or progress towards the PO) are denoted as ####AX.

o Milestone Payment Identification Number: Include unique number assigned to each milestone payment for tracking purposes.

o Milestone Payment Description: Include detailed description of definable and measurable step considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective and/or PO.

o Milestone Payment Amount: Include negotiated amount ensuring the sum of all milestone payments equals the value of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

o Milestone Payment Percentage: Include percentage of the milestone payment in relation to the total CLIN/Sub-CLIN value. The final payment milestone(s) within a CLIN/Sub-CLIN demonstrating achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective must be a minimum of 20% of the total CLIN/Sub-CLIN value. This may include both the AF and USACE approved and regulator approved versions.

o Completion Date: Document completion date for each milestone payment consistent with the Finish date presented in the IMS.

o Percent Complete: Identify completion status (0% or 100%) of all milestone payments as approved by the USACE COR.

o Invoice Number: Clearly indicate the invoice number associated with the milestone payment as approved by the USACE COR for the purposes of tracking payment. This information can be completed as invoices are prepared.

• Excludes unacceptable milestone payments representing a “progress” payment or a monthly payment for level of effort expended including:

o Submittal of documents o Site mobilization/demobilization (unless exempted by USACE KO) o Accomplishment of field activities o Submittal of a monthly status o Management and overhead type costs (e.g., program/project management, monthly reporting, etc.)

o Allocation of PMP, Basewide Quality Program Plan (QPP), or other Basewide costs to specific sites The Contractor shall maintain and submit an MPS monthly, in electronic format in accordance with the requirements above and include updates to progress (e.g., Percent Complete, Invoice Number) (see Section 4.4 Cost and Status Reporting). The MPS shall be submitted electronically to the Contractor’s ORC document repository and in accordance with instructions from the USACE COR. The Contractor shall prepare and maintain the MPS in accordance with the CLIN, WBS, IMS, and MPS Guidance.

Milestone payments within a CLIN/Sub-CLIN may be revised in response to changes in the approach for achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective without a contract modification so long as the changes do not impact the total value or objective of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN. All changes to the MPS, with the exception of tracking invoicing of completed milestone payments, must be approved by the USACE COR. Milestone payments will not be renegotiated if the Contractor is unable to achieve the milestones, CLIN/Sub-CLIN objectives, and/or POs.

Completion of milestones shall demonstrate payment is appropriate and warranted. USACE COR approval of the documentation supporting the completion of the milestone is required for payment. Where regulatory acceptance/concurrence is required for this documentation, AF and USACE acceptance will occur following regulatory acceptance/concurrence of the documentation. Acceptance/concurrence occurs upon final signature of documents requiring signature by the AF and/or regulators. Final decisions regarding the adequacy of milestone completion resides with the AF and USACE. The USACE COR will take into consideration the appropriate acceptance and/or concurrence of necessary documentation by regulators consistent with the applicable regulatory drivers of this PWS.

For milestones where regulatory acceptance/concurrence is required and regulatory acceptance/concurrence cannot be obtained, the AF and USACE will evaluate the Contractor’s supporting documents to determine if they are legally and technically acceptable to warrant payment for achieving that milestone.

The Contractor is limited to one invoice submitted to USACE per month. The invoice must itemize the milestone payments for each CLIN/Sub-CLIN associated with the invoice. The

Contractor will not receive payment until milestones are achieved in accordance with the MPS.

The AF and USACE will not approve partial payments.

4.4 Cost and Status Reporting

The Contractor shall prepare and submit a monthly Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report (CPSMR). The CPSMR shall be used to review and evaluate the overall progress of the project, along with any existing or potential problem areas. The report shall be prepared and submitted in an electronic format to the Contractor’s ORC document repository and/or in accordance with the CPSMR Template. The CPSMR shall also be used to indicate whether efforts for each site are on target for meeting the PO. The Contractor shall submit an updated IMS each month with the CPSMR.

4.5 ORC Document Repository

The Contractor shall maintain a document repository for all ORC documents. The repository is intended to be a single access point repository for all ORC documentation. It shall be accessible to stakeholders during the life of the ORC. The Contractor shall provide notifications to AFCEC, USACE COR, and Installation POC(s) at the time data is included in the repository. At close-out, all repository documents will be transferred to DVD media and delivered to AFCEC and

USACE.

The Contractor shall create and maintain a Master Document List (MDL) that includes all documents, whether the document is a deliverable or not, prepared during the course of this contract. The Contractor shall maintain the project documents for the duration of this contract and transfer custody to the AF within 90 calendar days prior to POP expiration.

4.6 Meeting and Conference Requirements

4.6.1 Meeting/Teleconference Support

The Contractor shall participate in post-award meetings and Project Management Review (PMR) meetings and teleconferences with the AF and USACE as necessary to achieve the POs in this PWS. The Contractor shall coordinate meetings, provide logistical support (e.g., facilities, audio/visual), create and present materials, and lead technical discussions.

The Contractor also shall attend and/or support meetings and teleconferences to discuss technical or regulatory issues and project progress and status with the AF and regulatory agency representatives. Specifically, the Contractor shall host an internal kick-off meeting with the AF and USACE within fifteen (15) calendar days from contract award. In keeping with the AF’s commitment to the regulators, the Contractor shall host a kick-off meeting with the AF and regulators within thirty (30) calendar days from contract award. At a minimum, the following topics will be discussed at the regulatory kick-off meeting: project schedules for field work and deliverables; achieve a mutual understanding of expected review times; identify standards, criteria, and guidance to be used during site characterization and remediation; identify potential points of compliance; identify regulatory processes and other applicable state agency programs (i.e., Water Protection, Department of Health, Air Pollution, etc.); identify site constraints and dependencies (i.e., site access, right of entry, security, ongoing site activities, topography, slope stability, etc.); and determine potential community interests.

The Contractor shall also attend and provide both technical and logistical support for Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) meetings (if needed), Tier 1/Tier II regulatory partnering meetings and teleconferences. Monthly teleconferences shall also be required to discuss in detail progress and any technical or management issues. Also, other periodic meetings/teleconferences shall be required, as necessary. Currently, regulatory meetings occur monthly for AFP 42 and Travis AFB. However, the frequency of meetings may change based on the status of the environmental restoration program. The AF will be present for all technical and public meetings with the regulatory agencies however, the Contractor shall coordinate the meetings, provide logistical support (e.g., facilities, audio/visual), create and present materials, and lead technical discussions. The Contractor shall clearly identify themselves as “Contractors” in all situations involving stakeholders.