Appendix D_AKM 10.23.2024__submittal 132 power system studies commission wells 15 and 18.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Arc Flash Study of All Off-Site Facilities
Solicitation number
UD-26-348
Issued by
Los Angeles County, California

About this file

This submittal package contains a Power System Study for the Long Beach Water Department's Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18 project (Contract WD-09-20/EO-3489). The study was prepared by TERRA Power Solutions and submitted by Best Drilling and Pump, Inc., with KYLE Groundwater, Inc. serving as the engineer. Submittal No. 132 was transmitted on October 4, 2024, as a new administrative submittal for power system studies under Specification Section 26 05 00. The document was reviewed by KYLE Groundwater with remarks indicating "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" and marked for approval on October 23, 2024.

The Power System Study addresses three primary analytical components: short circuit analysis, protective device coordination, and arc flash hazard evaluation for the electrical distribution systems at both well locations (5501 Parkcrest Street for Well 15 and 6682 Carson Street for Well 18). The study utilized Power*Tools for Windows Software version 11.0.0.1 and was conducted in accordance with ANSI C37.13 standards and IEEE Standard 1584-2018 for arc flash calculations. All 16 protective devices evaluated passed rating requirements, with calculated interrupting currents ranging from 0.99 kA to 23.45 kA against ratings of 30 to 100 kA. The utility fault level contribution from Southern California Edison was established at 30,000 amperes for both locations. The analysis confirmed good coordination with recommended circuit breaker settings and identified six locations with incident energy levels below 40 cal/cm², requiring arc-rated clothing and appropriate personal protective equipment for personnel working on energized equipment. All recommended device settings and coordination curves are detailed in appendices, with arc flash warning labels specified for installation at each identified location.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONTRACTOR’S SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM

Project Name: Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and 18

Contract Docs No. WD-09-20 / EO-3489 P.O. No. 32200333

Submittal No.: 132 ☒ New Submittal ☐ Resubmittal ☐ Additional Information

Date of Submittal: 10-4-2024

Contractor: Best Drilling and Pump, Inc. Contractor PM: Chris Brown

Owner: Long Beach Water Department Owner PM: Myung Chun

Engineer: KYLE Groundwater, Inc. Engineer PM: Russell Kyle

Submittal Type: ☐ Shop Drawing ☒ Administrative ☐ As-Builts ☐ Sample ☐ Data ☐ Additional Information

Item No. ITEM DESCRIPTION

N o.

C op ie s/

(E le ct ro ni c/

Ha rd co py

CONTRACT

REFERENCE ACTION

Spec. Section Number and

Paragraph

Drawing Sheet No.

Action Code

Red-line Comments

(Y or N)

Engineer Attachment

(Y or N)

1 Power System studies for commission wells 15 and 18 E 26 05 00

Contractor hereby certifies that (i) Contractor has complied with the requirements of Contract Documents in preparation, review and submission of designated submittal and (ii) the submittal is completed and in accordance with the Contract Documents and requirements of laws and regulations and governing agencies.

Submittal Response / Comments:

Russell Kyle, KYLE Groundwater, Inc. Date

☐ No Exceptions Taken ☐ Make Corrections Noted ☐ Revise as Noted / Resubmit ☐ Rejected Resubmit ☐ No Action Required

☐ OTHER:

Acceptance is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and the information given in the Contract Documents. The Contractor is responsible for dimensions to be confirmed and correlated at the job site, information that pertains soley to the fabrication process or to the means and methods of construction, and performing all work in a safe and satisfactory manner. Acceptance does not modify the Contractor’s duty to comply with the Contract Documents.

10/23/2024

Submittal No. 132

X

13138 Arctic Circle Phone: (562) 270-9500 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Fax: (562) 863-5723

Long Beach Water Department Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 & 18

Contract Documents WD-09-20

Product Submittal Power System Study (Wells 15 & 18)

Specification Division 26

Document # SUB-C22-016-026 Rev - Submittal Date: 10/2/2024

Item No. Description of Item Number of Copies Contract Reference Spec. Section or Drawing

Sheet No.

Revision Page

1 Power System Study eFile Specification No: 26 05 10 - 2

13138 Arctic Circle Tel: (562) 270-9500 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Fax: (562) 863-5723

For Approval

Resubmittal

As Built

For Record

We certify that the items shown and marked in this submittal are that proposed to be incorporated into the project. These items comply with the contract documents and can be installed in the allocated spaces. This submittal has been reviewed in conformance to Drawings and Specifications.

Jerry Romero, Project Manager Date: 10/2/2024

LEED ELECTRIC INC.

Power, Control and Instrumentation Contractor

Power System Study

POWER SYSTEM STUDY

Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18 5501 Parkcrest Street & 6682 Carson Street, Long Beach, CA 90808

Rev. 0

September 2024

By: Nenad Kostic, P.E.

Table of content

1. INTRODUCTION 4

1.1 MAJOR OBJECTIVES 4

1.2 INPUT DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS 4

1.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

2 ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION 5

2.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 5

2.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 6

2.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS EVALUATION 6

2.3.1 110-16 FLASH PROTECTION 6

2.3.2 1910.132 (D) HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION 7

2.3.3 1910.335 (A) (1) (I) PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 7

2.3.4 1910.132 (F) TRAINING 7

2.3.5 1910.132 (F) (3) PROFICIENCY & RETRAINING 7

2.4 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO IEEE STD 1584TM-2018 8

2.4.1 MODEL CONFIGURATIONS 8

2.4.2 ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS 9

2.4.3 EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS FOR THIS REPORT 10

3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11

3.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 11

3.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 11

3.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS 11

4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 12

4.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 12

4.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 12

4.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS 12

APPENDIX 1. DEVICE EVALUATION TABLE 14

APPENDIX 2. RECOMMENDED DEVICE SETTINGS 15

APPENDIX 3. COORDINATION CURVES 16

APPENDIX 4. INPUT DATA 17

APPENDIX 5. OUTPUT DATA 18

APPENDIX 6. ARC FLASH SUMMARY AND DATA LABELS 19

APPENDIX 7. ONE-LINE DIAGRAM 20

1. Introduction

This report documents the results and recommendations for the short circuit, protective device coordination and arc flash evaluation for the electrical power distribution system at Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18, Long Beach, CA. All calculations were performed using Power*Tools for Windows Software version 11.0.0.1 published by SKM System Analysis.

1.1 Major objectives

Evaluate new protective device short circuit ratings in comparison to the calculated short circuit current.

Recommend settings for all protective devices under the scope of this project.

Identify incident energy levels and what level of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for safe energized work.

Note area of deficiency and make general recommendations for corrective measures to improve electrical distribution performance. The scope of our study is limited to recommendations only. We are not responsible for any issues arising from design errors.

1.2 Input data and assumptions

Utility fault levels are per SCE indicated value of 30000A.

1.3 Executive Summary

All protective devices are properly rated. More detailed calculations in Appendix 1.

Good coordination is achieved with recommended settings.

2 Analysis Description

2.1 Short Circuit Analysis

The short circuit calculations were made utilizing Power*Tools for Windows software.

The calculation procedures are based on recommendations included in ANSI standards C37.13.

The A_FAULT module of Power*Tools module used for the analysis uses with the ANSI/IEEE C3713 standard for calculations of fault currents. This analysis differs from a classical short circuit calculation in that it addresses the initial fault current that is asymmetrical and has a DC offset. The initial current asymmetry can last up to several cycles and is seen by the short time and instantaneous trip components in circuit breakers.

A fault can generate three types of short circuit report

Fault report – mainly for low voltage Momentary duty report – for medium and high voltage evaluation Interrupting duty report - for medium and high voltage evaluation

In the practice the fault currents are not purely symmetrical. If the system is more inductive, measured by the system X/R ratio, the more asymmetrical the fault current can be. If the calculated value for X/R exceeds the test X/R ratio, then the increased asymmetrical value has to be taken into account when circuit breaker rating is evaluated.

Interrupting capability of the protective devices can be expressed in self or series rating.

Self rating is typically the manufacturer`s nameplate. If the calculated short circuit current exceeds this rating, protective device can fail during operation.

If one or more devices in series are tested combination, for fault levels that exceed the rating of device, simultaneous operation can limit the current to a level below the protective device self-rating. When series rating is used, the National Electrical Code (NEC), Section 110-22, requires that equipment be field marked to indicate the equipment has been applied with a series combination rating. The marking must be legible to personnel who work on the equipment.

For the medium voltage equipment evaluation two components are used: momentary and interrupting ratings. ANSI allows a simplified momentary rating calculation of 1.6 times the symmetrical fault duty.

There can be a several scenarios for short-circuit available current (based on different sources) and the worst-case scenario is used to verify a proper protective devices rating.

2.2 Protective Device Coordination Study

The main goal for protective device coordination study is to provide an optimal compromise between the desired system protection and system continuity goals. For the maximum system continuity, the protective devices have to be selected and adjusted so that only overcurrent protective devices nearest to the fault open and isolate the fault.

The PTW Captor module was used for all analysis in this report. The TCC are plotted on a log-log graphs which represents device operating versus current.

Lack of the selectivity mainly occurs when the devices are not adjustable or where there are a large number of devices in series. For the high-level faults, typically in instantaneous region of protective device characteristic, the lack of selectivity between the devices in series is more common and is not usually a problem. The reason is that the most faults involve a resistance to ground and thus the smaller in magnitude.

Selectivity for the ground fault protective devices is different from the phase fault protection since ground fault devices cannot be set above the load level

Time Current Curves lack of selectivity is evaluated in section 4.2 of this report.

2.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Evaluation

The PTW Arc-Flash module used for this analysis incorporates results from the short circuit and coordination calculations to yield the arcing fault duties at locations where arc flash evaluations are to be performed and the clearing time for the protective devices nearest the location. Incident energy evaluations are used to determine the required level personal protective equipment (PPE). If the calculated incident energy is above 40cal/cm2 it is prohibited to work on the energized equipment. This information must be incorporated in the site safety manual to provide personnel with the information required by NFPA and OSHA standards. The relevant standards can be summarized as follows:

2.3.1 110-16 Flash protection

Switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, and motor control centers in commercial and industrial occupancies that are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized must be field marked to warn qualified persons of the danger of electric arc flash. The marking must be clearly visible to qualified persons before they examine, adjust, service, or perform maintenance on the equipment.

NFPA 70E-2018, Standard for electrical Safety in the Workplace, states that “employees shall wear clothing resistant to flash flame wherever there is possible exposure to an electric arc-flash”. In addition, OSHA standard 1910.269 prohibits synthetic materials (acetate, nylon, polyester, rayon or blends) unless the fabrics has been treated to withstand conditions that may be encountered. OSHA regulations represent the other major source of standards that apply to arc flash hazard. The primary regulations are in

29CFR 1910 Subparts I and S. These can be broken down into three general areas, hazard identification and PPE selection, training and proficiency.

2.3.2 1910.132 (d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection

The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazard present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazard are present, of likely to be present the employer shall: Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazard identified in the hazard assessment; Communicate selection decision to each affected employee; and, Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.

The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.

2.3.3 1910.335 (a) (1) (i) Personal Protective Equipment

Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shell be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.

2.3.4 1910.132 (f) Training

The employer shall provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE. Each such employee shall be trained to know at least the following. When PPE is necessary; what PE is necessary; How to properly don, doff, adjust and wear PPE;

The limitation of the PPE; and, the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE.

Each affected employee shall demonstrate an understanding of the training specified in paragraph (f) (1) of this section, and the ability to use PPE properly, before being allowed to perform work requiring the use of PPE.

2.3.5 1910.132 (f) (3) Proficiency & Retraining

When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (f) (2) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where: Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete: or inadequacies in an affected employee’s knowledge or use of assigned PPE indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.

The employer shall verify that each affected employee has received and understood the required training through a written certification that contains the name of each employee trained, the date(s) o training, and that identifies the subject of the certification.

In locations where no safe level of PPE exists, if extension tools cannot be used the equipment can only be work on in de-energized state. This condition is indicated in the data output as a "Dangerous!" condition (See Appendix 6.).

2.4 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis According to IEEE Std 1584TM-2018

IEEE Std 1584 provides the computational formulae for calculating incident energy and arc-flash boundary. All commercial software, Power*Tools for Windows included, use equations in IEEE Std 1584 to perform arc flash calculations for voltages between 200V and 15,000V. Until recently IEEE Std 1584TM-2002 was used in all calculations. IEEE Std

1584TM-2018 has superseded IEEE Std 1584TM-2002.

The 2018 standard in different than IEEE Std 1584TM-2002 in many ways; and generally calculates lower incident energies. Some input data from 2002 model are irrelevant now; i.e. system grounding is not considered anymore: “test results did not find any significant impact of system grounding or bounding on the incident energy released by the arc.” Major novelties in IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 are model configuration and dimensions of the enclosures.

2.4.1 Model Configurations

Configuration is an important factor in determining incident IE. New configurations are introduced the 2018 standard:

VCB - vertical conductors inside a box VCBB - vertical conductors inside a box terminated in a barrier HCB - horizontal electrodes inside a box VOA - vertical conductors inside of open air HOA - horizontal conductor in open air.

The orientation of electrodes determines direction of arc plasma flow as shown in Figures G6 and G7 of the standard. Horizontal electrode orientation transmits more heat toward the person’s working on the equipment. As explained in Annex C of the standard one piece of equipment, may exhibit different configuration depending of the place arc occurs. Annex C shows the following examples:

C.1 LV drawout Switchgear Case 1: CB present but stabs not securely connected: VCBB configuration Case 2: CB not present: HCB configuration Case 3: CB present and has internal fault: VCB configuration

C.2 LV MCC

Case 1: VCB configuration, Case 2: VCBB configuration, Case 3: VCBB configuration Cases are explained in detail in IEEE Std 1584TM-2018.

C.3 NEMA 600V Panelboard Analysis in 1584TM-2018 concludes that VCBB is the most conservative configuration.

C.4 Enclosed Switch Analysis in 1584TM-2018 concludes that VCBB is the most conservative configuration.

Due to various possible configurations it is important to select the most conservative configuration for each piece of equipment while. Flash study. Comparison of different configurations is presented in https://etap.com/arc-flash/arc-flash-ieee1584-2018 .

shows HCB energy higher than VCBB energy which is higher than VCB energy. This in general follows the logic presented in the standard that horizontal electrodes direct arc plasma towards person’s torso.

2.4.2 Enclosure Dimensions

The following enclosures were either tested or validated for IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 model:

Equipment Class Enclosures size (H x W x D) 15 kV Switchgear 45” x 30” x 30”

15 kV MCC 36” x 36” x 36”

5 kV Switchgear 36” x 36” x 36”

5 kV Switchgear 45” x 30” x 30”

5 kV MCC 26” x 26” x 26” LV Switchgear 20” x 20” x 20”

Shallow LV MCC & panelboard 14” x 12” x <=8”

Typical LV MCC & panelboard 14” x 12” x > 8”

Cable Junction box 14” x 12” x <=8” or 14” x 12” x > 8”

The depth, D, of enclosure is ONLY considered in the model if all the following conditions are met. Otherwise, the depth is irrelevant.

a) V < 600 V, and

b) W < 20”, and

c) H < 20”, If all three above are true, and D <= 8’’, the enclosure is treated as shallow.

If all three above are true, and D > 8’’, the enclosure is treated as typical

Section G.9.6 of IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 provides interesting discussion on choosing the equipment enclosure sizes. In general, for voltages above 600V, using the exact https://etap.com/arc-flash/arc-flash-ieee1584-2018 enclosure sizes would provide less conservative results. However, selecting the next smaller available size from the above table will provide more conservative results. For voltages between 208 and 600V selecting next larger enclosure size from the table above will provide more conservative results. This anomaly is also explained and confirmed by figure G.35 of the standard.

2.4.3 Equipment selections for this report

Based on the above discussion, which was confirmed by other available on-line sources, and sensitivity analysis performed in PTW software, the following configurations were used in this report:

Configuration Selection:

LV SWGR – HCB

LV MCC – VCBB or VCB LV Panelboard – VCBB or VCB Enclose switch – VCBB or VCB

Enclosure Dimensions Selection:

5 < V ≤ 15 kV – (36”x36”)

2.7 < V ≤ 5kV – (26”x26”)

0.6 < V ≤ 2.7kV – (20”x20”)

0.208 ≤ V ≤ 0.6kV – (20”x20” - switchgears, 14”x12”x10” - panelboards and MCCs)

3 Discussion and Recommendations

3.1 Short Circuit Analysis

A table summarizing the ratings of the equipment analyzed versus the available fault duties is contained in Appendix 1. Complete computer output of the input data and fault cases is contained in Appendix 4&5.

All protective devices are properly rated. More detailed calculations in Appendix 1.

3.2 Protective Device Coordination Study

Good coordination is achieved with recommended circuit breaker settings.

3.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results

The Arc-Flash incident energy calculations are based on the recommended settings. All settings MUST be successfully implemented or confirmed prior the Arc-Flash hazard labels installation.

One power system scenario was analyzed for this report:

o Utility Available

A summary table and individual data labels detailing calculations for each location studied are included in Appendix 6. At each location, the worst-case incident energy values were used to generate PPE labels. These data labels include the flash boundary and incident energy at the working distance and are designated to be posted at the location. This data is used to determine the required PPE at various distances from the location.

The NFPA 70E requirements state that the electrical system should have been properly installed and properly maintained as per the NEC, manufacturers’ recommendations, or NETA guidelines. If the system has not been properly maintained or has improperly installed equipment, this study and the guidelines provided by the NFPA 70E, as well as the proposed arc flash PPE, may not adequately protect electrical workers.

4 Glossary of terms

4.1 Short Circuit Analysis

Series ratings: A tested combination of protective devices that allow the use of protective devices in locations that exceeds the nameplate rating by operation of an upstream protective device. Operation of the protecting device limits that fault current to below the self-protected rating of the lower rated device.

4.2 Protective Device Coordination Study

Each component on the single line diagram is identified by a unique label that corresponds to the type of equipment and the equipment served by that device. For example a component designated as “CB MSB’’ is a circuit breaker that serves MSB.

Common identifiers used in these report are as follows:

TX - Transformer

FS - Fused switch

MAIN - Main device

FDR - Feeder

CB - Circuit Breaker

GF - Ground Fault (both external or internal)

TCC - Time Current Curve is a graphical representation of the operating characteristic of a portion of an electrical system

AIC - Available Interrupting Capacity

4.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results

ATPV (Arc thermal Performance Exposure Value): A rating (in cal/cm2) given to PPE in terms of its ability to protect against the thermal energies resulting from an arcing fault. The incident energy from an arcing fault can be compared with ATVP values to determine what amount of PPE is required for safe energized work.

PPE (Personal Protective Equipment): Clothing or tools used to protect personnel from potentially hazardous condition while working.

Flash suit: A three piece multiple layer FR outfits that includes pants (with bib), jacket, and face shield with hood to offer protection in areas where arc flash levels are high. Also referred to as Blast Suit or Switchgear Suit.

Natural Fiber Clothing: Long sleeve shirts and pants made of cotton or wool. This clothing is not flame-resistant NON FR), but will char instead of melting like synthetic fibers.

Flame resistant (FR) clothing: Aramid (i.e. Dupont Nomex) or treated natural fiber (Indura or Proban) clothing of various types and weights that are resistant to ignition when exposed to flames.

Incident Energy: The thermal energy measured in calories per square centimeter (cal/cm2) seen by a person or object as a result of exposure to an electric arc.

Flash Boundary: The distance from a location to where the incident energy from an arc is less then 1.2cal/cm2. This is considered the minimum distance to unqualified personnel.

Flash Hazard Analysis; A method to determine the risk of personal injury as a result of exposure to incident energy from an electrical arc flash.

Shock Hazard: A dangerous condition associated with the possible release of energy caused by contact of approach to live parts.

Working distance: The dimension between the possible arc point and the head and body of the worker positioned in place to perform the assigned task.

Energized: Electrically connected to or having a source of voltage

Exposed (live parts): Capable of being inadvertently touched or approached nearer than a safe distance by a person. It is applied to parts that are not suitably guarded, isolated or insulated.

Electrical Hazard: A dangerous condition in which inadvertent or unintentional contact or equipment failure can result in shock, arc-flash burn, thermal burn, or blast.

Electrical Shock: Physical stimulation that occurs when electrical current passes through the body.

Appendix 1.

Device Evaluation table

Date:

Passed: 16

Marginal: 0

Failed: 0

Bus Name Device Name Voltage Description Interrupting Series Calculated % Momentary Calculated % Evaluation Note

Rating kA Rating kA Int kA Interrupting Rating kA Mom kA Momentary

EXISTING DIST PANEL 15 CB MCC WELL 15 480 SQUARE D MA 30.00 22.28 74.25% Passed

EXISTING DIST PANEL 18 CB MCC WELL 18 480 SQUARE D LJ 65.00 23.45 36.08% Passed

MCB LP A 15 240 SIEMENS HBL 65.00 0.99 1.53% Passed

240 LV Panelboard 65.00 0.99 1.53% Passed

MCB LP A 18 240 SIEMENS HBL 65.00 0.99 1.52% Passed

240 LV Panelboard 65.00 0.99 1.52% Passed

CB T LP A 15 480 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15 480 SIEMENS HLD6-A 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed

MCB MCC WELL 15 480 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed

480 LV MCC 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed

CB T LP A 18 480 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 480 SIEMENS HJD6-A 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed

MCB MCC WELL 18 480 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed

480 LV MCC 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed

VFD WELL PUMP 15 FD WELL PUMP 15 500 SIEMENS HRC 3NA1 100.00 18.88 18.88% Passed

VFD WELL PUMP 18 FD WELL PUMP 18 500 SIEMENS HRC 3NA1 100.00 14.67 14.67% Passed

LP A 18

MCC WELL 15

MCC WELL 18

Device Evaluation 9/29/24

LP A 15

Appendix 2.

Recommended device settings

Date : 9/29/24

Device Location Device Name In Model / Device Manufacturer / Frame / Frame / Recommended Settings Type (Range)

Trip Type Description / Model Sensor / Setting (Value)

Ampacity Plug

EXISTING DIST PANEL 15 CB MCC WELL 15 SQUARE D MA 600.0A Thermal Curve

Thermal Magnetic 125-1200A 500.0A INST 4 (4555A)

500.0A

EXISTING DIST PANEL 18 CB MCC WELL 18 SQUARE D LJ 400.0A Ir (125-400A); tr (Fixed) 300 (300A); Fixed

Static Trip LSI, 400AS 400.0A Isd (1.5 - 10 x Ir); tsd 8 (2400A); Fixed

400.0A Ii (1.5 - 12 x In) 12 (4800A)

LP A 15 MCB LP A 15 SIEMENS HBL 50.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)

Thermal Magnetic 15-100A 50.0A INST Fixed (425A)

50.0A

LP A 18 MCB LP A 18 SIEMENS HBL 50.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)

Thermal Magnetic 15-100A 50.0A INST Fixed (425A)

50.0A

MCC WELL 15 CB T LP A 15 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 125.0A Thermal Fixed (20A)

Thermal Magnetic 125AF, 20AS 20.0A INST 300A (300A)

20.0A

MCC WELL 15 CB VFD WELL PUMP 15 SIEMENS HLD6-A 450.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)

Thermal Magnetic 250-600A 400.0A INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)

400.0A

MCC WELL 15 MCB MCC WELL 15 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 600.0A Phase

Static Trip LSI, 600A, li = 10.5x 600.0A LTPU (Ir) 500 (500A)

600.0A LTD (tld) 20

STPU (Isd) 8 (4000A)

STD (tsd) 0.1 (I^s T Off)

INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A)

Ground

GFPU (Ig) 36 (360A)

GFD (tg) 0.2 (I^s T On)

MCC WELL 18 CB T LP A 18 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 125.0A Thermal Fixed (20A)

Thermal Magnetic 125AF, 20AS 20.0A INST 300A (300A)

20.0A

MCC WELL 18 CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 SIEMENS HJD6-A 300.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)

Thermal Magnetic 200-400A 250.0A INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)

250.0A

Protective Device

Settings

Circuit Breaker

Device Location Device Name In Model / Device Manufacturer / Frame / Frame / Recommended Settings Type (Range)

Trip Type Description / Model Sensor / Setting (Value)

Ampacity Plug

MCC WELL 18 MCB MCC WELL 18 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 600.0A Phase

Static Trip LSI, 600A, li = 10.5x 600.0A LTPU (Ir) 300 (300A)

600.0A LTD (tld) 20

STPU (Isd) 8 (2400A)

STD (tsd) 0.1 (I^s T Off)

INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A)

Ground

GFPU (Ig) 24 (240A)

GFD (tg) 0.2 (I^s T On)

Appendix 3.

Coordination curves

310 A

5 10 1

K

K

K

0.01

0.10

CURRENT IN AMPERES

T

IM

E

IN

S E C O

N D

S

CB MCC WELL 15

CB T LP A 15

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

MCB MCC WELL 15 - Phase

F MCC WELL 15

CB MCC WELL 15

CB T LP A 15

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

MCB MCC WELL 15 - Phase

F MCC WELL 15

EXISTING DIST PANEL 15

3P LV 30.000 kA SLG LV 30.000 kA

CB MCC WELL 15

SQUARE D

MA

Sensor/Trip 500.0 A Plug 500.0 A Settings Thermal Curve

INST 4 (4555A)

F MCC WELL 15

MCC WELL 15

3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA

CB T LP A 15

SIEMENS

HFAS/HFAM

Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)

INST 300A (300A)

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

SIEMENS

HLD6-A

Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)

INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)

MCB MCC WELL 15

SIEMENS

SHLD6-B

Sensor/Trip 600.0 A Plug 600.0 A Settings Phase LTPU (Ir) 500 (500A) LTD (tld) 20 STPU (Isd) 8 (4000A) STD (tsd) 0.1 (Î s T Off) INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A) Ground GFPU (Ig) 36 (360A) GFD (tg) 0.2 (Î s T On)

Voltage:480 Scale: x 1

001 MCC WELL 15

TX Inrush

15.6 A

5 10 1

K

K

K

0.01

0.10

CURRENT IN AMPERES

T

IM

E

IN

S E C O

N D

S

CB T LP A 15

MCB LP A 15

T LP A 15

CB T LP A 15

MCB LP A 15

T LP A 15

SAME CURVE FOR

T LP A 18

SAME CURVE FOR

T LP A 18

CB T LP A 15

SIEMENS

HFAS/HFAM

Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)

INST 300A (300A)

S

P

T LP A 15

LP A 15

3P LV 0.359 kA SLG LV 0.359 kA

MCB LP A 15

SIEMENS

HBL

Sensor/Trip 50.0 A Plug 50.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed) INST Fixed (425A)

MCC WELL 15

3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA

Voltage:480

002 T LP A

5 10 1

K

K

K

0.01

0.10

CURRENT IN AMPERES

T

IM

E

IN

S E C O

N D

S

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

FD WELL PUMP 15

F VFD WELL PUMP 15

F WELL PUMP 15

M WELL PUMP 15

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

FD WELL PUMP 15

F VFD WELL PUMP 15

F WELL PUMP 15

M WELL PUMP 15

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

SIEMENS

HLD6-A

Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)

INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)

F VFD WELL PUMP 15

VFD WELL PUMP 15'

VFD WELL PUMP 15

3P LV 28.346 kA SLG LV 27.553 kA

F WELL PUMP 15

M WELL PUMP 15

FD WELL PUMP 15

SIEMENS

HRC 3NA1

Sensor/Trip 400.0 A

MCC WELL 15

3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA

Voltage:480

003 WELL PUMP 15

230 A

5 10 1

K

K

K

0.01

0.10

CURRENT IN AMPERES

T

IM

E

IN

S E C O

N D

S

CB MCC WELL 18

CB T LP A 18

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

MCB MCC WELL 18 - Phase

F MCC WELL 18

CB MCC WELL 18

CB T LP A 18

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

MCB MCC WELL 18 - Phase

F MCC WELL 18

CB MCC WELL 18

SQUARE D

LJ

Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Ir (125-400A); tr (Fixed) 300 (300A); Fixed Isd (1.5 - 10 x Ir); tsd 8 (2400A); Fixed Ii (1.5 - 12 x In) 12 (4800A)

F MCC WELL 18

MCC WELL 18

3P LV 28.623 kA SLG LV 27.942 kA

CB T LP A 18

SIEMENS

HFAS/HFAM

Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)

INST 300A (300A)

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

SIEMENS

HJD6-A

Sensor/Trip 250.0 A Plug 250.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)

INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)

MCB MCC WELL 18

SIEMENS

SHLD6-B

Sensor/Trip 600.0 A Plug 600.0 A Settings Phase LTPU (Ir) 300 (300A) LTD (tld) 20 STPU (Isd) 8 (2400A) STD (tsd) 0.1 (Î s T Off) INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A) Ground GFPU (Ig) 24 (240A) GFD (tg) 0.2 (Î s T On)

EXISTING DIST PANEL 18

3P LV 29.447 kA SLG LV 29.161 kA

Voltage:480

004 MCC WELL 18

5 10 1

K

K

K

0.01

0.10

CURRENT IN AMPERES

T

IM

E

IN

S E C O

N D

S

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

FD WELL PUMP 18

F VFD WELL PUMP 18

F WELL PUMP 18

M WELL PUMP 18

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

FD WELL PUMP 18

F VFD WELL PUMP 18

F WELL PUMP 18

M WELL PUMP 18

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

SIEMENS

HJD6-A

Sensor/Trip 250.0 A Plug 250.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)

INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)

F VFD WELL PUMP 18

VFD WELL PUMP 18'

VFD WELL PUMP 18

3P LV 27.764 kA SLG LV 26.668 kA

F WELL PUMP 18

M WELL PUMP 18

FD WELL PUMP 18

SIEMENS

HRC 3NA1

Sensor/Trip 250.0 A

MCC WELL 18

3P LV 28.623 kA SLG LV 27.942 kA

Voltage:480

005 WELL PUMP 18

Appendix 4.

Input Data

Project:

Project No.:

Contractor:

Address:

To: Long Beach Water Department 1800 E. Wardlow Road Long Beach, CA 90807-4931

Date:

Attention:

Phone No.:

Fax No.:

e-mail:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RFI No.:

INFORMATION REQUESTED:

BY: REQUESTED DATE OF REPLY:

REPLY:

BY: DATE:

LBWD Wells Commission 15 & 18

E0-3489

Best Drilling and Pump Inc.

1640 Pellisier Road

Colton, CA 92324

6-7-2022

Russ Kyle

626-379-7569 russell.kyle@kylegroundwater.com

Best Drilling and Pump Inc.

1640 Pellisier Road Colton, CA 92324

PH: 951-684-1952

6-21-2022

Please see attached RFI from Lead Electric. They need feed electrical information to complete the Arc Flash Study. Information is needed for both Wells 15 & 18.

See attached from SCE

John Loague 8-11-22

To: Customer Name JOHN LOAGUE – 949-533-8983

Telephone No:

From: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DISTRICT/DIVISION Long Beach

Address

2800 E. Willow

Long Beach CA

Subject: Southern California Edison Company’s Contribution to Short Circuit Current at the Point of

Connection of the Company’s Service Conductors to the Customer’s Service Entrance Facilities.

Project: Name WELL COMMISSION 18

6682 CARSON

(1) The voltage to be utilized for this project will be 277/480 volts 3PH phase

4W wire, to serve your 400A Ampere main switch/switches.

(2) The Edison Company’s contribution to short circuit current, at the time of calculation, based on Edison Company’s demand factors for transformer sizing, will be approximately 30,000A

BEHNAM AFSARI 07/08/2022

CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANNER

DATE

Telephone No. 562-233-0732

Service Cables

Sets of 1/0

Distance from Trans. 30

Transformer

KVA

Phase

75 3

Response to Letter of Request for Short Circuit Current Value

To: Customer Name JOHN LOAGUE – 949-533-8983

Telephone No:

From: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DISTRICT/DIVISION Long Beach

Address

2800 E. Willow

Long Beach CA

Subject: Southern California Edison Company’s Contribution to Short Circuit Current at the Point of

Connection of the Company’s Service Conductors to the Customer’s Service Entrance Facilities.

Project: Name WELL COMMISSION 15

5501 PARKCREST

(1) The voltage to be utilized for this project will be 277/480 volts 3PH phase

4W wire, to serve your 600A Ampere main switch/switches.

(2) The Edison Company’s contribution to short circuit current, at the time of calculation, based on Edison Company’s demand factors for transformer sizing, will be approximately 30,000A

BEHNAM AFSARI 07/08/2022

CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANNER

DATE

Telephone No. 562-233-0732

Service Cables

Sets of 350

Distance from Trans. 55

Transformer

KVA

Phase

225 3

Response to Letter of Request for Short Circuit Current Value

13138 ARCTIC CIRCLE

SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670

TEL: (562) 270-9500

FAX: (562) 863-5723 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

PROJECT: LBWD Wells 15 & 18 LEI JOB NO. C22-016 LEI RFI NO. 002

OWNER: Long Beach Water DATE: 05/27/2022 RESPONSE REQUIRED BY: 06/10/2022

TO: Chris Brown Best Drilling 1640 W. Pellisier Rd.

Colton, CA. 92324

Tel: 951-684-1952 Fax: 951-654-3852

FROM: Jerry Romero Leed Electric, Inc.

REASON FOR REQUEST:

INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION

ENGINEERING CONFLICT

ALTERNATE PROPOSAL

ACTION REQUESTED:

CLARIFICATION

DIRECTION

APPROVAL

PROBABLE COST EFFECT:

INCREASE COST

DECREASE COST

UNKNOWN

PROBABLE TIME EFFECT:

INCREASE TIME

DECREASE TIME

UNKNOWN

SUBJECT:

Utility Fault Information.

REFERENCE/ATTACHMENTS:

DRAWINGS: EO-3489 16 & 29

DETAILS: N/A

SPEC DIV: 26-05-10, 1.6 C & D

OTHER:

INFORMATION NEEDED:

In order to compile the arc flash and coordination studies, utility information is needed.

Please provide the information requested on the attached.

One for well 15 and the other for well 18.

CONTRACTOR RECOMMENDATIONS:

REPLY:

BY: DATE:

Well 15 Utility Distribution Line Data

* Line Voltage (KV)

Max. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Min. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps

3 Phase X/R Ratio

Max. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Min. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Line to Ground X/R Ration

Well 15 Utility Transformer Primary Feeder Data (If Applicable)

* Feeder Length (FT)

Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or Kcmil)

Number of Conductors Per Phase

Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)

Conductor Insulation Class (THWN, THHN or Class A/B)

Well 15 Utility Transformer Feeder Protective Device (Fuse)

Manufacturer Type Description

Well 15 Utility Transformer Data (Nameplate Data)

* Transformer Nominal KVA

* Transformer Rated L-L PRY/SEC Voltage (KV)

Transformer Connection Type (Delta/WYE)

Transformer Type (Dry or Distribution of Oil Air)

Transformer Impedance (%Z)

Transformer X/R Radio

Well 15 Secondary Feeder Data (From Transformer to Service Disconnect)

* Secondary Feeder Length (FT)

Secondary Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or kcmil)

Number of Secondary Conductors Per Phase

Secondary Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)

Secondary Conductor Insulation Class (THWN/THHN or Class A/B)

Well 18 Utility Distribution Line Data

* Line Voltage (KV)

Max. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Min. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps

3 Phase X/R Ratio

Max. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Min. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps

Line to Ground X/R Ration

Well 18 Utility Transformer Primary Feeder Data (If Applicable)

* Feeder Length (FT)

Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or Kcmil)

Number of Conductors Per Phase

Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)

Conductor Insulation Class (THWN, THHN or Class A/B)

Well 18 Utility Transformer Feeder Protective Device (Fuse)

Manufacturer Type Description

Well 18 Utility Transformer Data (Nameplate Data)

* Transformer Nominal KVA

* Transformer Rated L-L PRY/SEC Voltage (KV)

Transformer Connection Type (Delta/WYE)

Transformer Type (Dry or Distribution of Oil Air)

Transformer Impedance (%Z)

Transformer X/R Radio

Well 18 Secondary Feeder Data (From Transformer to Service Disconnect)

* Secondary Feeder Length (FT)

Secondary Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or kcmil)

Number of Secondary Conductors Per Phase

Secondary Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)

Secondary Conductor Insulation Class (THWN/THHN or Class A/B)

DAPPER Fault Analysis Input Report (English)

Project: Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commision 18

Utilities

Contribution

From Name

Bus

Name

In/Out

Service

Nominal

Voltage

-------- Contribution Data -------- PU (100 MVA Base)

X PUR PUX/RUnitsDuty

UTILITY WELL 15 UTILITY WELL 15 BUS 480 Amps 8.00In 30,000

SLG:

3P:

Amps 8.00

Pos:

Zero:30,000

0.4973

0.4973

3.9784

3.9784

UTILITY WELL 18 UTILITY WELL 18 BUS 480 Amps 8.00In 30,000

SLG:

3P:

Amps 8.00

Pos:

Zero:30,000

0.4973

0.4973

3.9784

3.9784

Motors

Contribution

From Name

Bus

Name

In/Out

Service

Nominal

Voltage

--------- Contribution Data --------

Base kVA Xd" X/R

PU (100 MVA Base)

R PU X PU

# of

Motors

M WELL PUMP 15 WELL PUMP 15 480 200.54 0.1507 4.90 15.343 75.167In1 M WELL PUMP 18 WELL PUMP 18 480 125.34 0.1507 4.90 24.549 120.267In1

Cables

Cable

Name

From Bus

To Bus

Qty

/Ph

Length

Feet

------ Cable Description ------

Size Cond. Type Duct Type Insul

Per Unit (100 MVA Base)

R pu jX pu

In/Out

Service

EXISTING SERVIC

EXISTING DIST P

2 5 350 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.0410 0.0533

0.1312

F EXISTING DIST PA In

0.1292

MagneticCopper

EXISTING MTS

EXISTING DIST P

2 1 4/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.0139 0.0108

0.0266

F EXISTING DIST PA In

0.0438

MagneticCopper

EXISTING SERVIC

EXISTING MTS

2 5 4/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.0694 0.0539

0.1328

F EXISTING MTS N In

0.2189

MagneticCopper

UTILITY WELL 15

EXISTING SERV

1 55 350 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.9023 1.1721

2.8861

F EXISTING SERVIC In

2.8431

MagneticCopper

Cable

Name

From Bus

To Bus

Qty

/Ph

Length

Feet

------ Cable Description ------

Size Cond. Type Duct Type Insul

Per Unit (100 MVA Base)

R pu jX pu

In/Out

Service

UTILITY WELL 18

EXISTING SERV

1 30 1/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

1.6667 0.7031

1.7305

F EXISTING SERVIC In

5.2526

MagneticCopper

EXISTING DIST P

MCC WELL 15

2 55 350 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.4512 0.5860

1.4430

F MCC WELL 15 In

1.4215

MagneticCopper

EXISTING DIST P

MCC WELL 18

2 160 4/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

2.2222 1.7257

4.2500

F MCC WELL 18 In

7.0035

MagneticCopper

MCC WELL 15

VFD WELL PUM

2 22 350 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.1805 0.2344

0.5772

F VFD WELL PUMP 1 In

0.5686

MagneticCopper

MCC WELL 18

VFD WELL PUM

2 20 4/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

0.2778 0.2157

0.5313

F VFD WELL PUMP 1 In

0.8754

MagneticCopper

VFD WELL PUMP 1

WELL PUMP 15

1 85 350 PVC Pos:

Zero:

1.3945 1.8114

4.4603

F WELL PUMP 15 In

4.3939

MagneticCopper

VFD WELL PUMP 1

WELL PUMP 18

1 170 4/0 PVC Pos:

Zero:

4.7222 3.6671

9.0313

F WELL PUMP 18 In

14.8824

MagneticCopper

2-Winding Transformers

Xformer

Name Bus Conn. Volts FLA

Nominal kVA

Z PU (100 MVA Base)

R pu jX pu

In/Out

Service

------------------Primary & Secondary---------------

T LP A 15 MCC WELL 15 D 480 9

LP A 15 D 240 18

7.5 Pos:

Zero:

89.9778

89.9778

203.1911

203.1911

In

T LP A 18 MCC WELL 18 D 480 9

LP A 18 D 240 18

7.5 Pos:

Zero:

89.9778

89.9778

203.1911

203.1911

In

Appendix 5.

Output Data

ANSI Complete Fault Report

A_FAULT Settings

Faulted Bus

Fault Type 3 Phase+Unbalanced

All Buses

Include Tap No

Pre-fault Voltage 1.0000

LV Duty Yes

LV Report Complete

Mom Duty Yes

Mom Report Complete

Int Duty

Int Report

Solution Method

NACD Option

Complete

Yes

E/Z

Interpolated

Project: Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commision 18

Fault Location

Bus Name

Bus

Voltage

Equivalent

R +jXkA MVA

X/R Sequence

Impedance pu

-----Asym kA-----

Max RMS Avg RMS

Low Voltage 3 Phase and Unbalanced

Fault Duty

EXISTING DIST

PANEL 15

480 0.00 0.0130.00 24.9 8.003 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

30.00

35.92

41.4841.481

14.4

17.2

19.9

8.00

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.01

4.01

4.01

Z2:

Z0:

41.48 35.99

41.48

Z1:

EXISTING DIST

PANEL 18

480 0.00 0.0129.45 24.5 6.963 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

29.16

34.32

39.5638.547

14.0

16.5

19.0

6.36

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.08

4.08

4.21

Z2:

Z0:

39.63 34.74

38.52

Z1:

EXISTING MTS 480 0.00 0.0129.54 24.6 7.113 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

29.30

34.58

39.8639.006

14.1

16.6

19.1

6.58

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.07

4.07

4.17

Z2:

Z0:

39.93 34.94

38.98

Z1:

LP A 15 240 0.16 0.350.36 0.1 2.273 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

0.36

0.33

0.380.382

0.1

0.1

0.1

2.27

LLG Gnd Return kA:

670.64

670.64

666.67

Z2:

Z0:

0.36 0.37

0.36

Z1:

LP A 18 240 0.18 0.090.69 0.3 0.513 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

0.69

0.60

0.700.696

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.51

LLG Gnd Return kA:

347.12

347.12

344.65

Z2:

Z0:

0.69 0.69

0.69

Z1:

MCC WELL 15 480 0.00 0.0129.15 24.2 7.053 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

28.74

34.06

39.1637.933

13.8

16.4

18.8

6.48

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.13

4.13

4.31

Z2:

Z0:

39.33 34.45

38.11

Z1:

Fault Location

Bus Name

Bus

Voltage

Equivalent

R +jXkA MVA

X/R Sequence

Impedance pu

-----Asym kA-----

Max RMS Avg RMS

Low Voltage 3 Phase and Unbalanced

Fault Duty

MCC WELL 18 480 0.00 0.0128.62 23.8 6.263 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

27.94

32.63

37.5135.465

13.4

15.7

18.0

5.42

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.20

4.20

4.52

Z2:

Z0:

37.68 33.32

35.64

Z1:

VFD WELL PUMP

480 0.00 0.0128.35 23.6 6.343 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

27.55

32.40

37.1534.940

13.2

15.6

17.8

5.51

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.24

4.24

4.62

Z2:

Z0:

37.41 33.05

35.28

Z1:

VFD WELL PUMP

480 0.00 0.0127.76 23.1 5.313 Phase:

SLG:

LL:

LLG:

26.67

30.53

35.1131.965

12.8

14.7

16.9

4.31

LLG Gnd Return kA:

4.33

4.33

4.89

Z2:

Z0:

35.26 31.63

32.28

Z1:

Appendix 6.

Arc Flash Summary and data labels

< 40 cal/cm^2: 6 Date:

>= 40 cal/cm^2: 0

Under-rated: 0

Bus Name Protective Bus Bus Bus Prot Dev Prot Dev Trip/ Breaker Equip Electrode Equip Box Box Box Altitude Gap Arc Working Incident PPE

Device kV Bolted Arcing Bolted Arcing Delay Opening Type Config Category Width Height Depth (feet) (mm) Flash Distance Energy Level/

Name Fault Fault Fault Fault Time Time/Tol (in) (in) (in) Boundary (in) (cal/cm^2) Notes

(kA) (kA) (kA) (kA) (sec.) (sec.) (in) (*N)

LP A 15 MCB LP A 15 0.24 0.61 0.33 0.61 0.33 2 0 PNL VCBB LV Panelboard 12 14 10 25 0 17.36 18 1.12 (*N9) (*N15c) (*N24)

LP A 18 MCB LP A 18 0.24 0.61 0.32 0.61 0.32 2 0 PNL VCBB LV Panelboard 12 14 10 25 0 17.31 18 1.12 (*N9) (*N15c) (*N24)

MCC WELL 15 (MCB MCC WELL 15 LineSide) CB MCC WELL 15 0.48 19.75 16.2 19.75 16.2 0.03 0 MCC VCBB LV MCC 12 14 10 25 0 18.06 18 1.21

MCC WELL 18 (MCB MCC WELL 18 LineSide) CB MCC WELL 18 0.48 15.29 12.48 15.29 12.48 0.05 0 MCC VCBB LV MCC 12 14 10 25 0 23.26 18 1.91

VFD WELL PUMP 15 MCB MCC WELL 15 (Phase) 0.48 18.88 15.48 18.88 15.48 0.02 0 PNL VCBB VFD 12 14 10 25 0 13.68 18 0.73 (*N5)

VFD WELL PUMP 18 CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 0.48 14.67 11.96 14.67 11.96 0.02 0 PNL VCBB VFD 12 14 10 25 0 11.68 18 0.55

Arc Flash Summary - AC

9/29/24

LP A 15

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

1.12 cal/cm^2 18 in

17 in

42 in

12 in

240 VAC

0.61 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

LP A 18

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

1.12 cal/cm^2 18 in

17 in

42 in

12 in

240 VAC

0.61 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

MCC WELL 15

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

1.21 cal/cm^2 18 in

18 in

42 in

12 in

480 VAC

19.75 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

MCC WELL 18

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

1.91 cal/cm^2 18 in

23 in

42 in

12 in

480 VAC

15.29 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

VFD WELL PUMP 15

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

0.73 cal/cm^2 18 in

14 in

42 in

12 in

480 VAC

18.88 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

VFD WELL PUMP 18

Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2

0.55 cal/cm^2 18 in

12 in

42 in

12 in

480 VAC

14.67 kA

09/29/2024

WARNING

Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk

Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary

Shock Hazard when cover is removed

Glove Class

Limited Approach

Restricted Approach

Flash Hazard at

Fault Current

Appendix 7.

One-line Diagram

UTILITY WELL 15

Isc 3P 30000.0 Amps Isc SLG 30000.0 Amps

EXISTING DIST PANEL 15

480.0 V

CB MCC WELL 15

SQUARE D

MA

500.0 A

F MCC WELL 15

(2) Size 350 kcmil

55.0 ft Ampacity 620.0 A

MCC WELL 15

480.0 V

CB T LP A 15

SIEMENS

3VA5, TM230

20.0 A

S

P

T LP A 15

Size 7.5 kVA Pri Delta Sec Delta %Z 5.0000 %

LP A 15

240.0 V

MCB LP A 15

SIEMENS

HBL, 2 & 3-Pole

50.0 A

CB VFD WELL PUMP 15

SIEMENS

HLD6-A Sentron

400.0 A

F VFD WELL PUMP 15

(2) Size 350 kcmil

22.0 ft Ampacity 620.0 A

VFD WELL PUMP 15'

VFD WELL PUMP 15

480.0 V

F WELL PUMP 15

(1) Size 350 kcmil

85.0 ft Ampacity 310.0 A

M WELL PUMP 15

200 hp Load Factor 1.00 X"d 0.15 pu

FD WELL PUMP 15

SIEMENS

HRC 3NA1

400.0 A

UTILITY WELL 18

Isc 3P 30000.0 Amps Isc SLG 30000.0 Amps

CB MCC WELL 18

SQUARE D

PowerPact L-Frame, 3.3S

400.0 A

F MCC WELL 18

(2) Size 4/0 AWG

160.0 ft Ampacity 460.0 A

MCC WELL 18

480.0 V

CB T LP A 18

SIEMENS

3VA5, TM230

20.0 A

S

P

T LP A 18

Size 7.5 kVA Pri Delta Sec Delta %Z 5.0000 %

LP A 18

240.0 V

MCB LP A 18

SIEMENS

HBL, 2 & 3-Pole

50.0 A

CB VFD WELL PUMP 18

SIEMENS

HJD6-A Sentron

250.0 A

F VFD WELL PUMP 18

(2) Size 4/0 AWG

20.0 ft Ampacity 460.0 A

VFD WELL PUMP 18'

VFD WELL PUMP 18

480.0 V

F WELL PUMP 18

(1) Size 4/0 AWG

170.0 ft Ampacity 230.0 A

M WELL PUMP 18

125 hp Load Factor 1.00 X"d 0.15 pu

FD WELL PUMP 18

SIEMENS

HRC 3NA1

250.0 A

MCB MCC WELL 18

SIEMENS

LD, Sensitrip IV, GF Mod

600.0 A

EXISTING MTS

480.0 V

Open

EXISTING DIST PANEL 18

480.0 V

MCB MCC WELL 15

SIEMENS

LD, Sensitrip IV, GF Mod

600.0 A

F EXISTING SERVICE METER 15

(1) Size 350 kcmil

55.0 ft Ampacity 310.0 A

EXISTING SERVICE METER 15

480.0 V

F EXISTING SERVICE METER 18

(1) Size 1/0 AWG

30.0 ft Ampacity 150.0 A

EXISTING SERVICE METER 18

480.0 V

ONE LINE

WD-09-20 LBWD Power system studies com wells 15 and 18
CONTRACTOR’S SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
Project Name:
Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and 18
Contract Docs No.
WD-09-20 / EO-3489
P.O. No.
32200333
Submittal No.:
132 ☒ New Submittal ☐ Resubmittal ☐ Additional Information
Date of Submittal:
10-4-2024
Contractor:
Best Drilling and Pump, Inc.
Contractor PM:
Chris Brown
Owner:
Long Beach Water Department
Owner PM:
Myung Chun
Engineer:
KYLE Groundwater, Inc.
Engineer PM:
Russell Kyle
Submittal Type:
☐ Shop Drawing ☒ Administrative ☐ As-Builts ☐ Sample ☐ Data ☐ Additional Information

Submittal Response / Comments:

SUB-C22-016-026 Rev -
C22-016 Cover Page
1. Introduction
1.1 Major objectives
1.2 Input data and assumptions
1.3 Executive Summary
2 Analysis Description
2.1 Short Circuit Analysis
2.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
2.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Evaluation
2.3.1 110-16 Flash protection
2.3.2 1910.132 (d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection
2.3.3 1910.335 (a) (1) (i) Personal Protective Equipment
2.3.4 1910.132 (f) Training
2.3.5 1910.132 (f) (3) Proficiency & Retraining
2.4 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis According to IEEE Std 1584TM-2018
2.4.1 Model Configurations
2.4.2 Enclosure Dimensions
2.4.3 Equipment selections for this report
3 Discussion and Recommendations
3.1 Short Circuit Analysis
3.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
3.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results
4 Glossary of terms
4.1 Short Circuit Analysis
4.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
4.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results
Appendix 1. Device Evaluation table
Appendix 2. Recommended device settings
Appendix 3. Coordination curves
Appendix 4. Input Data
Appendix 5. Output Data
Appendix 6. Arc Flash Summary and data labels
Appendix 7. One-line Diagram
Insert from: "Utility Fault Information_RFI 1 BDPI 6-7-2022.pdf"
RFI 1 BDPI 6-7-2022
C22-016-RFI-002

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .