Appendix D_AKM 10.23.2024__submittal 132 power system studies commission wells 15 and 18.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Arc Flash Study of All Off-Site Facilities
- Solicitation number
- UD-26-348
- Issued by
- Los Angeles County, California
About this file
This submittal package contains a Power System Study for the Long Beach Water Department's Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18 project (Contract WD-09-20/EO-3489). The study was prepared by TERRA Power Solutions and submitted by Best Drilling and Pump, Inc., with KYLE Groundwater, Inc. serving as the engineer. Submittal No. 132 was transmitted on October 4, 2024, as a new administrative submittal for power system studies under Specification Section 26 05 00. The document was reviewed by KYLE Groundwater with remarks indicating "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" and marked for approval on October 23, 2024.
The Power System Study addresses three primary analytical components: short circuit analysis, protective device coordination, and arc flash hazard evaluation for the electrical distribution systems at both well locations (5501 Parkcrest Street for Well 15 and 6682 Carson Street for Well 18). The study utilized Power*Tools for Windows Software version 11.0.0.1 and was conducted in accordance with ANSI C37.13 standards and IEEE Standard 1584-2018 for arc flash calculations. All 16 protective devices evaluated passed rating requirements, with calculated interrupting currents ranging from 0.99 kA to 23.45 kA against ratings of 30 to 100 kA. The utility fault level contribution from Southern California Edison was established at 30,000 amperes for both locations. The analysis confirmed good coordination with recommended circuit breaker settings and identified six locations with incident energy levels below 40 cal/cm², requiring arc-rated clothing and appropriate personal protective equipment for personnel working on energized equipment. All recommended device settings and coordination curves are detailed in appendices, with arc flash warning labels specified for installation at each identified location.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR’S SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
Project Name: Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and 18
Contract Docs No. WD-09-20 / EO-3489 P.O. No. 32200333
Submittal No.: 132 ☒ New Submittal ☐ Resubmittal ☐ Additional Information
Date of Submittal: 10-4-2024
Contractor: Best Drilling and Pump, Inc. Contractor PM: Chris Brown
Owner: Long Beach Water Department Owner PM: Myung Chun
Engineer: KYLE Groundwater, Inc. Engineer PM: Russell Kyle
Submittal Type: ☐ Shop Drawing ☒ Administrative ☐ As-Builts ☐ Sample ☐ Data ☐ Additional Information
Item No. ITEM DESCRIPTION
N o.
C op ie s/
(E le ct ro ni c/
Ha rd co py
CONTRACT
REFERENCE ACTION
Spec. Section Number and
Paragraph
Drawing Sheet No.
Action Code
Red-line Comments
(Y or N)
Engineer Attachment
(Y or N)
1 Power System studies for commission wells 15 and 18 E 26 05 00
Contractor hereby certifies that (i) Contractor has complied with the requirements of Contract Documents in preparation, review and submission of designated submittal and (ii) the submittal is completed and in accordance with the Contract Documents and requirements of laws and regulations and governing agencies.
Submittal Response / Comments:
Russell Kyle, KYLE Groundwater, Inc. Date
☐ No Exceptions Taken ☐ Make Corrections Noted ☐ Revise as Noted / Resubmit ☐ Rejected Resubmit ☐ No Action Required
☐ OTHER:
Acceptance is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and the information given in the Contract Documents. The Contractor is responsible for dimensions to be confirmed and correlated at the job site, information that pertains soley to the fabrication process or to the means and methods of construction, and performing all work in a safe and satisfactory manner. Acceptance does not modify the Contractor’s duty to comply with the Contract Documents.
10/23/2024
Submittal No. 132
X
13138 Arctic Circle Phone: (562) 270-9500 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Fax: (562) 863-5723
Long Beach Water Department Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 & 18
Contract Documents WD-09-20
Product Submittal Power System Study (Wells 15 & 18)
Specification Division 26
Document # SUB-C22-016-026 Rev - Submittal Date: 10/2/2024
Item No. Description of Item Number of Copies Contract Reference Spec. Section or Drawing
Sheet No.
Revision Page
1 Power System Study eFile Specification No: 26 05 10 - 2
13138 Arctic Circle Tel: (562) 270-9500 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Fax: (562) 863-5723
For Approval
Resubmittal
As Built
For Record
We certify that the items shown and marked in this submittal are that proposed to be incorporated into the project. These items comply with the contract documents and can be installed in the allocated spaces. This submittal has been reviewed in conformance to Drawings and Specifications.
Jerry Romero, Project Manager Date: 10/2/2024
LEED ELECTRIC INC.
Power, Control and Instrumentation Contractor
Power System Study
POWER SYSTEM STUDY
Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18 5501 Parkcrest Street & 6682 Carson Street, Long Beach, CA 90808
Rev. 0
September 2024
By: Nenad Kostic, P.E.
Table of content
1. INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 MAJOR OBJECTIVES 4
1.2 INPUT DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS 4
1.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
2 ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION 5
2.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 5
2.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 6
2.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS EVALUATION 6
2.3.1 110-16 FLASH PROTECTION 6
2.3.2 1910.132 (D) HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION 7
2.3.3 1910.335 (A) (1) (I) PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 7
2.3.4 1910.132 (F) TRAINING 7
2.3.5 1910.132 (F) (3) PROFICIENCY & RETRAINING 7
2.4 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO IEEE STD 1584TM-2018 8
2.4.1 MODEL CONFIGURATIONS 8
2.4.2 ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS 9
2.4.3 EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS FOR THIS REPORT 10
3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11
3.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 11
3.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 11
3.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS 11
4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 12
4.1 SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS 12
4.2 PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY 12
4.3 ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS 12
APPENDIX 1. DEVICE EVALUATION TABLE 14
APPENDIX 2. RECOMMENDED DEVICE SETTINGS 15
APPENDIX 3. COORDINATION CURVES 16
APPENDIX 4. INPUT DATA 17
APPENDIX 5. OUTPUT DATA 18
APPENDIX 6. ARC FLASH SUMMARY AND DATA LABELS 19
APPENDIX 7. ONE-LINE DIAGRAM 20
1. Introduction
This report documents the results and recommendations for the short circuit, protective device coordination and arc flash evaluation for the electrical power distribution system at Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commission 18, Long Beach, CA. All calculations were performed using Power*Tools for Windows Software version 11.0.0.1 published by SKM System Analysis.
1.1 Major objectives
Evaluate new protective device short circuit ratings in comparison to the calculated short circuit current.
Recommend settings for all protective devices under the scope of this project.
Identify incident energy levels and what level of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for safe energized work.
Note area of deficiency and make general recommendations for corrective measures to improve electrical distribution performance. The scope of our study is limited to recommendations only. We are not responsible for any issues arising from design errors.
1.2 Input data and assumptions
Utility fault levels are per SCE indicated value of 30000A.
1.3 Executive Summary
All protective devices are properly rated. More detailed calculations in Appendix 1.
Good coordination is achieved with recommended settings.
2 Analysis Description
2.1 Short Circuit Analysis
The short circuit calculations were made utilizing Power*Tools for Windows software.
The calculation procedures are based on recommendations included in ANSI standards C37.13.
The A_FAULT module of Power*Tools module used for the analysis uses with the ANSI/IEEE C3713 standard for calculations of fault currents. This analysis differs from a classical short circuit calculation in that it addresses the initial fault current that is asymmetrical and has a DC offset. The initial current asymmetry can last up to several cycles and is seen by the short time and instantaneous trip components in circuit breakers.
A fault can generate three types of short circuit report
Fault report – mainly for low voltage Momentary duty report – for medium and high voltage evaluation Interrupting duty report - for medium and high voltage evaluation
In the practice the fault currents are not purely symmetrical. If the system is more inductive, measured by the system X/R ratio, the more asymmetrical the fault current can be. If the calculated value for X/R exceeds the test X/R ratio, then the increased asymmetrical value has to be taken into account when circuit breaker rating is evaluated.
Interrupting capability of the protective devices can be expressed in self or series rating.
Self rating is typically the manufacturer`s nameplate. If the calculated short circuit current exceeds this rating, protective device can fail during operation.
If one or more devices in series are tested combination, for fault levels that exceed the rating of device, simultaneous operation can limit the current to a level below the protective device self-rating. When series rating is used, the National Electrical Code (NEC), Section 110-22, requires that equipment be field marked to indicate the equipment has been applied with a series combination rating. The marking must be legible to personnel who work on the equipment.
For the medium voltage equipment evaluation two components are used: momentary and interrupting ratings. ANSI allows a simplified momentary rating calculation of 1.6 times the symmetrical fault duty.
There can be a several scenarios for short-circuit available current (based on different sources) and the worst-case scenario is used to verify a proper protective devices rating.
2.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
The main goal for protective device coordination study is to provide an optimal compromise between the desired system protection and system continuity goals. For the maximum system continuity, the protective devices have to be selected and adjusted so that only overcurrent protective devices nearest to the fault open and isolate the fault.
The PTW Captor module was used for all analysis in this report. The TCC are plotted on a log-log graphs which represents device operating versus current.
Lack of the selectivity mainly occurs when the devices are not adjustable or where there are a large number of devices in series. For the high-level faults, typically in instantaneous region of protective device characteristic, the lack of selectivity between the devices in series is more common and is not usually a problem. The reason is that the most faults involve a resistance to ground and thus the smaller in magnitude.
Selectivity for the ground fault protective devices is different from the phase fault protection since ground fault devices cannot be set above the load level
Time Current Curves lack of selectivity is evaluated in section 4.2 of this report.
2.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Evaluation
The PTW Arc-Flash module used for this analysis incorporates results from the short circuit and coordination calculations to yield the arcing fault duties at locations where arc flash evaluations are to be performed and the clearing time for the protective devices nearest the location. Incident energy evaluations are used to determine the required level personal protective equipment (PPE). If the calculated incident energy is above 40cal/cm2 it is prohibited to work on the energized equipment. This information must be incorporated in the site safety manual to provide personnel with the information required by NFPA and OSHA standards. The relevant standards can be summarized as follows:
2.3.1 110-16 Flash protection
Switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, and motor control centers in commercial and industrial occupancies that are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized must be field marked to warn qualified persons of the danger of electric arc flash. The marking must be clearly visible to qualified persons before they examine, adjust, service, or perform maintenance on the equipment.
NFPA 70E-2018, Standard for electrical Safety in the Workplace, states that “employees shall wear clothing resistant to flash flame wherever there is possible exposure to an electric arc-flash”. In addition, OSHA standard 1910.269 prohibits synthetic materials (acetate, nylon, polyester, rayon or blends) unless the fabrics has been treated to withstand conditions that may be encountered. OSHA regulations represent the other major source of standards that apply to arc flash hazard. The primary regulations are in
29CFR 1910 Subparts I and S. These can be broken down into three general areas, hazard identification and PPE selection, training and proficiency.
2.3.2 1910.132 (d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection
The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazard present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazard are present, of likely to be present the employer shall: Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazard identified in the hazard assessment; Communicate selection decision to each affected employee; and, Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.
The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
2.3.3 1910.335 (a) (1) (i) Personal Protective Equipment
Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shell be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.
2.3.4 1910.132 (f) Training
The employer shall provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE. Each such employee shall be trained to know at least the following. When PPE is necessary; what PE is necessary; How to properly don, doff, adjust and wear PPE;
The limitation of the PPE; and, the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE.
Each affected employee shall demonstrate an understanding of the training specified in paragraph (f) (1) of this section, and the ability to use PPE properly, before being allowed to perform work requiring the use of PPE.
2.3.5 1910.132 (f) (3) Proficiency & Retraining
When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (f) (2) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where: Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete: or inadequacies in an affected employee’s knowledge or use of assigned PPE indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.
The employer shall verify that each affected employee has received and understood the required training through a written certification that contains the name of each employee trained, the date(s) o training, and that identifies the subject of the certification.
In locations where no safe level of PPE exists, if extension tools cannot be used the equipment can only be work on in de-energized state. This condition is indicated in the data output as a "Dangerous!" condition (See Appendix 6.).
2.4 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis According to IEEE Std 1584TM-2018
IEEE Std 1584 provides the computational formulae for calculating incident energy and arc-flash boundary. All commercial software, Power*Tools for Windows included, use equations in IEEE Std 1584 to perform arc flash calculations for voltages between 200V and 15,000V. Until recently IEEE Std 1584TM-2002 was used in all calculations. IEEE Std
1584TM-2018 has superseded IEEE Std 1584TM-2002.
The 2018 standard in different than IEEE Std 1584TM-2002 in many ways; and generally calculates lower incident energies. Some input data from 2002 model are irrelevant now; i.e. system grounding is not considered anymore: “test results did not find any significant impact of system grounding or bounding on the incident energy released by the arc.” Major novelties in IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 are model configuration and dimensions of the enclosures.
2.4.1 Model Configurations
Configuration is an important factor in determining incident IE. New configurations are introduced the 2018 standard:
VCB - vertical conductors inside a box VCBB - vertical conductors inside a box terminated in a barrier HCB - horizontal electrodes inside a box VOA - vertical conductors inside of open air HOA - horizontal conductor in open air.
The orientation of electrodes determines direction of arc plasma flow as shown in Figures G6 and G7 of the standard. Horizontal electrode orientation transmits more heat toward the person’s working on the equipment. As explained in Annex C of the standard one piece of equipment, may exhibit different configuration depending of the place arc occurs. Annex C shows the following examples:
C.1 LV drawout Switchgear Case 1: CB present but stabs not securely connected: VCBB configuration Case 2: CB not present: HCB configuration Case 3: CB present and has internal fault: VCB configuration
C.2 LV MCC
Case 1: VCB configuration, Case 2: VCBB configuration, Case 3: VCBB configuration Cases are explained in detail in IEEE Std 1584TM-2018.
C.3 NEMA 600V Panelboard Analysis in 1584TM-2018 concludes that VCBB is the most conservative configuration.
C.4 Enclosed Switch Analysis in 1584TM-2018 concludes that VCBB is the most conservative configuration.
Due to various possible configurations it is important to select the most conservative configuration for each piece of equipment while. Flash study. Comparison of different configurations is presented in https://etap.com/arc-flash/arc-flash-ieee1584-2018 .
shows HCB energy higher than VCBB energy which is higher than VCB energy. This in general follows the logic presented in the standard that horizontal electrodes direct arc plasma towards person’s torso.
2.4.2 Enclosure Dimensions
The following enclosures were either tested or validated for IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 model:
Equipment Class Enclosures size (H x W x D) 15 kV Switchgear 45” x 30” x 30”
15 kV MCC 36” x 36” x 36”
5 kV Switchgear 36” x 36” x 36”
5 kV Switchgear 45” x 30” x 30”
5 kV MCC 26” x 26” x 26” LV Switchgear 20” x 20” x 20”
Shallow LV MCC & panelboard 14” x 12” x <=8”
Typical LV MCC & panelboard 14” x 12” x > 8”
Cable Junction box 14” x 12” x <=8” or 14” x 12” x > 8”
The depth, D, of enclosure is ONLY considered in the model if all the following conditions are met. Otherwise, the depth is irrelevant.
a) V < 600 V, and
b) W < 20”, and
c) H < 20”, If all three above are true, and D <= 8’’, the enclosure is treated as shallow.
If all three above are true, and D > 8’’, the enclosure is treated as typical
Section G.9.6 of IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 provides interesting discussion on choosing the equipment enclosure sizes. In general, for voltages above 600V, using the exact https://etap.com/arc-flash/arc-flash-ieee1584-2018 enclosure sizes would provide less conservative results. However, selecting the next smaller available size from the above table will provide more conservative results. For voltages between 208 and 600V selecting next larger enclosure size from the table above will provide more conservative results. This anomaly is also explained and confirmed by figure G.35 of the standard.
2.4.3 Equipment selections for this report
Based on the above discussion, which was confirmed by other available on-line sources, and sensitivity analysis performed in PTW software, the following configurations were used in this report:
Configuration Selection:
LV SWGR – HCB
LV MCC – VCBB or VCB LV Panelboard – VCBB or VCB Enclose switch – VCBB or VCB
Enclosure Dimensions Selection:
5 < V ≤ 15 kV – (36”x36”)
2.7 < V ≤ 5kV – (26”x26”)
0.6 < V ≤ 2.7kV – (20”x20”)
0.208 ≤ V ≤ 0.6kV – (20”x20” - switchgears, 14”x12”x10” - panelboards and MCCs)
3 Discussion and Recommendations
3.1 Short Circuit Analysis
A table summarizing the ratings of the equipment analyzed versus the available fault duties is contained in Appendix 1. Complete computer output of the input data and fault cases is contained in Appendix 4&5.
All protective devices are properly rated. More detailed calculations in Appendix 1.
3.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
Good coordination is achieved with recommended circuit breaker settings.
3.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results
The Arc-Flash incident energy calculations are based on the recommended settings. All settings MUST be successfully implemented or confirmed prior the Arc-Flash hazard labels installation.
One power system scenario was analyzed for this report:
o Utility Available
A summary table and individual data labels detailing calculations for each location studied are included in Appendix 6. At each location, the worst-case incident energy values were used to generate PPE labels. These data labels include the flash boundary and incident energy at the working distance and are designated to be posted at the location. This data is used to determine the required PPE at various distances from the location.
The NFPA 70E requirements state that the electrical system should have been properly installed and properly maintained as per the NEC, manufacturers’ recommendations, or NETA guidelines. If the system has not been properly maintained or has improperly installed equipment, this study and the guidelines provided by the NFPA 70E, as well as the proposed arc flash PPE, may not adequately protect electrical workers.
4 Glossary of terms
4.1 Short Circuit Analysis
Series ratings: A tested combination of protective devices that allow the use of protective devices in locations that exceeds the nameplate rating by operation of an upstream protective device. Operation of the protecting device limits that fault current to below the self-protected rating of the lower rated device.
4.2 Protective Device Coordination Study
Each component on the single line diagram is identified by a unique label that corresponds to the type of equipment and the equipment served by that device. For example a component designated as “CB MSB’’ is a circuit breaker that serves MSB.
Common identifiers used in these report are as follows:
TX - Transformer
FS - Fused switch
MAIN - Main device
FDR - Feeder
CB - Circuit Breaker
GF - Ground Fault (both external or internal)
TCC - Time Current Curve is a graphical representation of the operating characteristic of a portion of an electrical system
AIC - Available Interrupting Capacity
4.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results
ATPV (Arc thermal Performance Exposure Value): A rating (in cal/cm2) given to PPE in terms of its ability to protect against the thermal energies resulting from an arcing fault. The incident energy from an arcing fault can be compared with ATVP values to determine what amount of PPE is required for safe energized work.
PPE (Personal Protective Equipment): Clothing or tools used to protect personnel from potentially hazardous condition while working.
Flash suit: A three piece multiple layer FR outfits that includes pants (with bib), jacket, and face shield with hood to offer protection in areas where arc flash levels are high. Also referred to as Blast Suit or Switchgear Suit.
Natural Fiber Clothing: Long sleeve shirts and pants made of cotton or wool. This clothing is not flame-resistant NON FR), but will char instead of melting like synthetic fibers.
Flame resistant (FR) clothing: Aramid (i.e. Dupont Nomex) or treated natural fiber (Indura or Proban) clothing of various types and weights that are resistant to ignition when exposed to flames.
Incident Energy: The thermal energy measured in calories per square centimeter (cal/cm2) seen by a person or object as a result of exposure to an electric arc.
Flash Boundary: The distance from a location to where the incident energy from an arc is less then 1.2cal/cm2. This is considered the minimum distance to unqualified personnel.
Flash Hazard Analysis; A method to determine the risk of personal injury as a result of exposure to incident energy from an electrical arc flash.
Shock Hazard: A dangerous condition associated with the possible release of energy caused by contact of approach to live parts.
Working distance: The dimension between the possible arc point and the head and body of the worker positioned in place to perform the assigned task.
Energized: Electrically connected to or having a source of voltage
Exposed (live parts): Capable of being inadvertently touched or approached nearer than a safe distance by a person. It is applied to parts that are not suitably guarded, isolated or insulated.
Electrical Hazard: A dangerous condition in which inadvertent or unintentional contact or equipment failure can result in shock, arc-flash burn, thermal burn, or blast.
Electrical Shock: Physical stimulation that occurs when electrical current passes through the body.
Appendix 1.
Device Evaluation table
Date:
Passed: 16
Marginal: 0
Failed: 0
Bus Name Device Name Voltage Description Interrupting Series Calculated % Momentary Calculated % Evaluation Note
Rating kA Rating kA Int kA Interrupting Rating kA Mom kA Momentary
EXISTING DIST PANEL 15 CB MCC WELL 15 480 SQUARE D MA 30.00 22.28 74.25% Passed
EXISTING DIST PANEL 18 CB MCC WELL 18 480 SQUARE D LJ 65.00 23.45 36.08% Passed
MCB LP A 15 240 SIEMENS HBL 65.00 0.99 1.53% Passed
240 LV Panelboard 65.00 0.99 1.53% Passed
MCB LP A 18 240 SIEMENS HBL 65.00 0.99 1.52% Passed
240 LV Panelboard 65.00 0.99 1.52% Passed
CB T LP A 15 480 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15 480 SIEMENS HLD6-A 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed
MCB MCC WELL 15 480 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed
480 LV MCC 65.00 19.75 30.38% Passed
CB T LP A 18 480 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 480 SIEMENS HJD6-A 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed
MCB MCC WELL 18 480 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed
480 LV MCC 65.00 15.29 23.53% Passed
VFD WELL PUMP 15 FD WELL PUMP 15 500 SIEMENS HRC 3NA1 100.00 18.88 18.88% Passed
VFD WELL PUMP 18 FD WELL PUMP 18 500 SIEMENS HRC 3NA1 100.00 14.67 14.67% Passed
LP A 18
MCC WELL 15
MCC WELL 18
Device Evaluation 9/29/24
LP A 15
Appendix 2.
Recommended device settings
Date : 9/29/24
Device Location Device Name In Model / Device Manufacturer / Frame / Frame / Recommended Settings Type (Range)
Trip Type Description / Model Sensor / Setting (Value)
Ampacity Plug
EXISTING DIST PANEL 15 CB MCC WELL 15 SQUARE D MA 600.0A Thermal Curve
Thermal Magnetic 125-1200A 500.0A INST 4 (4555A)
500.0A
EXISTING DIST PANEL 18 CB MCC WELL 18 SQUARE D LJ 400.0A Ir (125-400A); tr (Fixed) 300 (300A); Fixed
Static Trip LSI, 400AS 400.0A Isd (1.5 - 10 x Ir); tsd 8 (2400A); Fixed
400.0A Ii (1.5 - 12 x In) 12 (4800A)
LP A 15 MCB LP A 15 SIEMENS HBL 50.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)
Thermal Magnetic 15-100A 50.0A INST Fixed (425A)
50.0A
LP A 18 MCB LP A 18 SIEMENS HBL 50.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)
Thermal Magnetic 15-100A 50.0A INST Fixed (425A)
50.0A
MCC WELL 15 CB T LP A 15 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 125.0A Thermal Fixed (20A)
Thermal Magnetic 125AF, 20AS 20.0A INST 300A (300A)
20.0A
MCC WELL 15 CB VFD WELL PUMP 15 SIEMENS HLD6-A 450.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)
Thermal Magnetic 250-600A 400.0A INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)
400.0A
MCC WELL 15 MCB MCC WELL 15 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 600.0A Phase
Static Trip LSI, 600A, li = 10.5x 600.0A LTPU (Ir) 500 (500A)
600.0A LTD (tld) 20
STPU (Isd) 8 (4000A)
STD (tsd) 0.1 (I^s T Off)
INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A)
Ground
GFPU (Ig) 36 (360A)
GFD (tg) 0.2 (I^s T On)
MCC WELL 18 CB T LP A 18 SIEMENS HFAS/HFAM 125.0A Thermal Fixed (20A)
Thermal Magnetic 125AF, 20AS 20.0A INST 300A (300A)
20.0A
MCC WELL 18 CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 SIEMENS HJD6-A 300.0A Thermal Curve (Fixed)
Thermal Magnetic 200-400A 250.0A INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)
250.0A
Protective Device
Settings
Circuit Breaker
Device Location Device Name In Model / Device Manufacturer / Frame / Frame / Recommended Settings Type (Range)
Trip Type Description / Model Sensor / Setting (Value)
Ampacity Plug
MCC WELL 18 MCB MCC WELL 18 SIEMENS SHLD6-B 600.0A Phase
Static Trip LSI, 600A, li = 10.5x 600.0A LTPU (Ir) 300 (300A)
600.0A LTD (tld) 20
STPU (Isd) 8 (2400A)
STD (tsd) 0.1 (I^s T Off)
INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A)
Ground
GFPU (Ig) 24 (240A)
GFD (tg) 0.2 (I^s T On)
Appendix 3.
Coordination curves
310 A
5 10 1
K
K
K
0.01
0.10
CURRENT IN AMPERES
T
IM
E
IN
S E C O
N D
S
CB MCC WELL 15
CB T LP A 15
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
MCB MCC WELL 15 - Phase
F MCC WELL 15
CB MCC WELL 15
CB T LP A 15
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
MCB MCC WELL 15 - Phase
F MCC WELL 15
EXISTING DIST PANEL 15
3P LV 30.000 kA SLG LV 30.000 kA
CB MCC WELL 15
SQUARE D
MA
Sensor/Trip 500.0 A Plug 500.0 A Settings Thermal Curve
INST 4 (4555A)
F MCC WELL 15
MCC WELL 15
3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA
CB T LP A 15
SIEMENS
HFAS/HFAM
Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)
INST 300A (300A)
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
SIEMENS
HLD6-A
Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)
INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)
MCB MCC WELL 15
SIEMENS
SHLD6-B
Sensor/Trip 600.0 A Plug 600.0 A Settings Phase LTPU (Ir) 500 (500A) LTD (tld) 20 STPU (Isd) 8 (4000A) STD (tsd) 0.1 (Î s T Off) INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A) Ground GFPU (Ig) 36 (360A) GFD (tg) 0.2 (Î s T On)
Voltage:480 Scale: x 1
001 MCC WELL 15
TX Inrush
15.6 A
5 10 1
K
K
K
0.01
0.10
CURRENT IN AMPERES
T
IM
E
IN
S E C O
N D
S
CB T LP A 15
MCB LP A 15
T LP A 15
CB T LP A 15
MCB LP A 15
T LP A 15
SAME CURVE FOR
T LP A 18
SAME CURVE FOR
T LP A 18
CB T LP A 15
SIEMENS
HFAS/HFAM
Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)
INST 300A (300A)
S
P
T LP A 15
LP A 15
3P LV 0.359 kA SLG LV 0.359 kA
MCB LP A 15
SIEMENS
HBL
Sensor/Trip 50.0 A Plug 50.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed) INST Fixed (425A)
MCC WELL 15
3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA
Voltage:480
002 T LP A
5 10 1
K
K
K
0.01
0.10
CURRENT IN AMPERES
T
IM
E
IN
S E C O
N D
S
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
FD WELL PUMP 15
F VFD WELL PUMP 15
F WELL PUMP 15
M WELL PUMP 15
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
FD WELL PUMP 15
F VFD WELL PUMP 15
F WELL PUMP 15
M WELL PUMP 15
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
SIEMENS
HLD6-A
Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)
INST (LO-HI) LO (2000A)
F VFD WELL PUMP 15
VFD WELL PUMP 15'
VFD WELL PUMP 15
3P LV 28.346 kA SLG LV 27.553 kA
F WELL PUMP 15
M WELL PUMP 15
FD WELL PUMP 15
SIEMENS
HRC 3NA1
Sensor/Trip 400.0 A
MCC WELL 15
3P LV 29.153 kA SLG LV 28.735 kA
Voltage:480
003 WELL PUMP 15
230 A
5 10 1
K
K
K
0.01
0.10
CURRENT IN AMPERES
T
IM
E
IN
S E C O
N D
S
CB MCC WELL 18
CB T LP A 18
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
MCB MCC WELL 18 - Phase
F MCC WELL 18
CB MCC WELL 18
CB T LP A 18
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
MCB MCC WELL 18 - Phase
F MCC WELL 18
CB MCC WELL 18
SQUARE D
LJ
Sensor/Trip 400.0 A Plug 400.0 A Settings Ir (125-400A); tr (Fixed) 300 (300A); Fixed Isd (1.5 - 10 x Ir); tsd 8 (2400A); Fixed Ii (1.5 - 12 x In) 12 (4800A)
F MCC WELL 18
MCC WELL 18
3P LV 28.623 kA SLG LV 27.942 kA
CB T LP A 18
SIEMENS
HFAS/HFAM
Sensor/Trip 20.0 A Plug 20.0 A Settings Thermal Fixed (20A)
INST 300A (300A)
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
SIEMENS
HJD6-A
Sensor/Trip 250.0 A Plug 250.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)
INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)
MCB MCC WELL 18
SIEMENS
SHLD6-B
Sensor/Trip 600.0 A Plug 600.0 A Settings Phase LTPU (Ir) 300 (300A) LTD (tld) 20 STPU (Isd) 8 (2400A) STD (tsd) 0.1 (Î s T Off) INST (Ii) 10.5 (6300A) Ground GFPU (Ig) 24 (240A) GFD (tg) 0.2 (Î s T On)
EXISTING DIST PANEL 18
3P LV 29.447 kA SLG LV 29.161 kA
Voltage:480
004 MCC WELL 18
5 10 1
K
K
K
0.01
0.10
CURRENT IN AMPERES
T
IM
E
IN
S E C O
N D
S
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
FD WELL PUMP 18
F VFD WELL PUMP 18
F WELL PUMP 18
M WELL PUMP 18
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
FD WELL PUMP 18
F VFD WELL PUMP 18
F WELL PUMP 18
M WELL PUMP 18
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
SIEMENS
HJD6-A
Sensor/Trip 250.0 A Plug 250.0 A Settings Thermal Curve (Fixed)
INST (LO-HI) LO (1250A)
F VFD WELL PUMP 18
VFD WELL PUMP 18'
VFD WELL PUMP 18
3P LV 27.764 kA SLG LV 26.668 kA
F WELL PUMP 18
M WELL PUMP 18
FD WELL PUMP 18
SIEMENS
HRC 3NA1
Sensor/Trip 250.0 A
MCC WELL 18
3P LV 28.623 kA SLG LV 27.942 kA
Voltage:480
005 WELL PUMP 18
Appendix 4.
Input Data
Project:
Project No.:
Contractor:
Address:
To: Long Beach Water Department 1800 E. Wardlow Road Long Beach, CA 90807-4931
Date:
Attention:
Phone No.:
Fax No.:
e-mail:
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RFI No.:
INFORMATION REQUESTED:
BY: REQUESTED DATE OF REPLY:
REPLY:
BY: DATE:
LBWD Wells Commission 15 & 18
E0-3489
Best Drilling and Pump Inc.
1640 Pellisier Road
Colton, CA 92324
6-7-2022
Russ Kyle
626-379-7569 russell.kyle@kylegroundwater.com
Best Drilling and Pump Inc.
1640 Pellisier Road Colton, CA 92324
PH: 951-684-1952
6-21-2022
Please see attached RFI from Lead Electric. They need feed electrical information to complete the Arc Flash Study. Information is needed for both Wells 15 & 18.
See attached from SCE
John Loague 8-11-22
To: Customer Name JOHN LOAGUE – 949-533-8983
Telephone No:
From: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DISTRICT/DIVISION Long Beach
Address
2800 E. Willow
Long Beach CA
Subject: Southern California Edison Company’s Contribution to Short Circuit Current at the Point of
Connection of the Company’s Service Conductors to the Customer’s Service Entrance Facilities.
Project: Name WELL COMMISSION 18
6682 CARSON
(1) The voltage to be utilized for this project will be 277/480 volts 3PH phase
4W wire, to serve your 400A Ampere main switch/switches.
(2) The Edison Company’s contribution to short circuit current, at the time of calculation, based on Edison Company’s demand factors for transformer sizing, will be approximately 30,000A
BEHNAM AFSARI 07/08/2022
CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANNER
DATE
Telephone No. 562-233-0732
Service Cables
Sets of 1/0
Distance from Trans. 30
Transformer
KVA
Phase
75 3
Response to Letter of Request for Short Circuit Current Value
To: Customer Name JOHN LOAGUE – 949-533-8983
Telephone No:
From: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DISTRICT/DIVISION Long Beach
Address
2800 E. Willow
Long Beach CA
Subject: Southern California Edison Company’s Contribution to Short Circuit Current at the Point of
Connection of the Company’s Service Conductors to the Customer’s Service Entrance Facilities.
Project: Name WELL COMMISSION 15
5501 PARKCREST
(1) The voltage to be utilized for this project will be 277/480 volts 3PH phase
4W wire, to serve your 600A Ampere main switch/switches.
(2) The Edison Company’s contribution to short circuit current, at the time of calculation, based on Edison Company’s demand factors for transformer sizing, will be approximately 30,000A
BEHNAM AFSARI 07/08/2022
CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANNER
DATE
Telephone No. 562-233-0732
Service Cables
Sets of 350
Distance from Trans. 55
Transformer
KVA
Phase
225 3
Response to Letter of Request for Short Circuit Current Value
13138 ARCTIC CIRCLE
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670
TEL: (562) 270-9500
FAX: (562) 863-5723 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
PROJECT: LBWD Wells 15 & 18 LEI JOB NO. C22-016 LEI RFI NO. 002
OWNER: Long Beach Water DATE: 05/27/2022 RESPONSE REQUIRED BY: 06/10/2022
TO: Chris Brown Best Drilling 1640 W. Pellisier Rd.
Colton, CA. 92324
Tel: 951-684-1952 Fax: 951-654-3852
FROM: Jerry Romero Leed Electric, Inc.
REASON FOR REQUEST:
INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION
ENGINEERING CONFLICT
ALTERNATE PROPOSAL
ACTION REQUESTED:
CLARIFICATION
DIRECTION
APPROVAL
PROBABLE COST EFFECT:
INCREASE COST
DECREASE COST
UNKNOWN
PROBABLE TIME EFFECT:
INCREASE TIME
DECREASE TIME
UNKNOWN
SUBJECT:
Utility Fault Information.
REFERENCE/ATTACHMENTS:
DRAWINGS: EO-3489 16 & 29
DETAILS: N/A
SPEC DIV: 26-05-10, 1.6 C & D
OTHER:
INFORMATION NEEDED:
In order to compile the arc flash and coordination studies, utility information is needed.
Please provide the information requested on the attached.
One for well 15 and the other for well 18.
CONTRACTOR RECOMMENDATIONS:
REPLY:
BY: DATE:
Well 15 Utility Distribution Line Data
* Line Voltage (KV)
Max. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Min. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps
3 Phase X/R Ratio
Max. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Min. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Line to Ground X/R Ration
Well 15 Utility Transformer Primary Feeder Data (If Applicable)
* Feeder Length (FT)
Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or Kcmil)
Number of Conductors Per Phase
Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)
Conductor Insulation Class (THWN, THHN or Class A/B)
Well 15 Utility Transformer Feeder Protective Device (Fuse)
Manufacturer Type Description
Well 15 Utility Transformer Data (Nameplate Data)
* Transformer Nominal KVA
* Transformer Rated L-L PRY/SEC Voltage (KV)
Transformer Connection Type (Delta/WYE)
Transformer Type (Dry or Distribution of Oil Air)
Transformer Impedance (%Z)
Transformer X/R Radio
Well 15 Secondary Feeder Data (From Transformer to Service Disconnect)
* Secondary Feeder Length (FT)
Secondary Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or kcmil)
Number of Secondary Conductors Per Phase
Secondary Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)
Secondary Conductor Insulation Class (THWN/THHN or Class A/B)
Well 18 Utility Distribution Line Data
* Line Voltage (KV)
Max. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Min. 3 Phase Short Circuit KVA or Amps
3 Phase X/R Ratio
Max. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Min. Line to Ground Short Circuit KVA or Amps
Line to Ground X/R Ration
Well 18 Utility Transformer Primary Feeder Data (If Applicable)
* Feeder Length (FT)
Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or Kcmil)
Number of Conductors Per Phase
Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)
Conductor Insulation Class (THWN, THHN or Class A/B)
Well 18 Utility Transformer Feeder Protective Device (Fuse)
Manufacturer Type Description
Well 18 Utility Transformer Data (Nameplate Data)
* Transformer Nominal KVA
* Transformer Rated L-L PRY/SEC Voltage (KV)
Transformer Connection Type (Delta/WYE)
Transformer Type (Dry or Distribution of Oil Air)
Transformer Impedance (%Z)
Transformer X/R Radio
Well 18 Secondary Feeder Data (From Transformer to Service Disconnect)
* Secondary Feeder Length (FT)
Secondary Feeder Size (AWG or MCM or kcmil)
Number of Secondary Conductors Per Phase
Secondary Conductor Type (Aluminum or Copper)
Secondary Conductor Insulation Class (THWN/THHN or Class A/B)
DAPPER Fault Analysis Input Report (English)
Project: Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commision 18
Utilities
Contribution
From Name
Bus
Name
In/Out
Service
Nominal
Voltage
-------- Contribution Data -------- PU (100 MVA Base)
X PUR PUX/RUnitsDuty
UTILITY WELL 15 UTILITY WELL 15 BUS 480 Amps 8.00In 30,000
SLG:
3P:
Amps 8.00
Pos:
Zero:30,000
0.4973
0.4973
3.9784
3.9784
UTILITY WELL 18 UTILITY WELL 18 BUS 480 Amps 8.00In 30,000
SLG:
3P:
Amps 8.00
Pos:
Zero:30,000
0.4973
0.4973
3.9784
3.9784
Motors
Contribution
From Name
Bus
Name
In/Out
Service
Nominal
Voltage
--------- Contribution Data --------
Base kVA Xd" X/R
PU (100 MVA Base)
R PU X PU
# of
Motors
M WELL PUMP 15 WELL PUMP 15 480 200.54 0.1507 4.90 15.343 75.167In1 M WELL PUMP 18 WELL PUMP 18 480 125.34 0.1507 4.90 24.549 120.267In1
Cables
Cable
Name
From Bus
To Bus
Qty
/Ph
Length
Feet
------ Cable Description ------
Size Cond. Type Duct Type Insul
Per Unit (100 MVA Base)
R pu jX pu
In/Out
Service
EXISTING SERVIC
EXISTING DIST P
2 5 350 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.0410 0.0533
0.1312
F EXISTING DIST PA In
0.1292
MagneticCopper
EXISTING MTS
EXISTING DIST P
2 1 4/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.0139 0.0108
0.0266
F EXISTING DIST PA In
0.0438
MagneticCopper
EXISTING SERVIC
EXISTING MTS
2 5 4/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.0694 0.0539
0.1328
F EXISTING MTS N In
0.2189
MagneticCopper
UTILITY WELL 15
EXISTING SERV
1 55 350 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.9023 1.1721
2.8861
F EXISTING SERVIC In
2.8431
MagneticCopper
Cable
Name
From Bus
To Bus
Qty
/Ph
Length
Feet
------ Cable Description ------
Size Cond. Type Duct Type Insul
Per Unit (100 MVA Base)
R pu jX pu
In/Out
Service
UTILITY WELL 18
EXISTING SERV
1 30 1/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
1.6667 0.7031
1.7305
F EXISTING SERVIC In
5.2526
MagneticCopper
EXISTING DIST P
MCC WELL 15
2 55 350 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.4512 0.5860
1.4430
F MCC WELL 15 In
1.4215
MagneticCopper
EXISTING DIST P
MCC WELL 18
2 160 4/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
2.2222 1.7257
4.2500
F MCC WELL 18 In
7.0035
MagneticCopper
MCC WELL 15
VFD WELL PUM
2 22 350 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.1805 0.2344
0.5772
F VFD WELL PUMP 1 In
0.5686
MagneticCopper
MCC WELL 18
VFD WELL PUM
2 20 4/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
0.2778 0.2157
0.5313
F VFD WELL PUMP 1 In
0.8754
MagneticCopper
VFD WELL PUMP 1
WELL PUMP 15
1 85 350 PVC Pos:
Zero:
1.3945 1.8114
4.4603
F WELL PUMP 15 In
4.3939
MagneticCopper
VFD WELL PUMP 1
WELL PUMP 18
1 170 4/0 PVC Pos:
Zero:
4.7222 3.6671
9.0313
F WELL PUMP 18 In
14.8824
MagneticCopper
2-Winding Transformers
Xformer
Name Bus Conn. Volts FLA
Nominal kVA
Z PU (100 MVA Base)
R pu jX pu
In/Out
Service
------------------Primary & Secondary---------------
T LP A 15 MCC WELL 15 D 480 9
LP A 15 D 240 18
7.5 Pos:
Zero:
89.9778
89.9778
203.1911
203.1911
In
T LP A 18 MCC WELL 18 D 480 9
LP A 18 D 240 18
7.5 Pos:
Zero:
89.9778
89.9778
203.1911
203.1911
In
Appendix 5.
Output Data
ANSI Complete Fault Report
A_FAULT Settings
Faulted Bus
Fault Type 3 Phase+Unbalanced
All Buses
Include Tap No
Pre-fault Voltage 1.0000
LV Duty Yes
LV Report Complete
Mom Duty Yes
Mom Report Complete
Int Duty
Int Report
Solution Method
NACD Option
Complete
Yes
E/Z
Interpolated
Project: Rehabilitation of Water Wells Commission 15 and Commision 18
Fault Location
Bus Name
Bus
Voltage
Equivalent
R +jXkA MVA
X/R Sequence
Impedance pu
-----Asym kA-----
Max RMS Avg RMS
Low Voltage 3 Phase and Unbalanced
Fault Duty
EXISTING DIST
PANEL 15
480 0.00 0.0130.00 24.9 8.003 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
30.00
35.92
41.4841.481
14.4
17.2
19.9
8.00
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.01
4.01
4.01
Z2:
Z0:
41.48 35.99
41.48
Z1:
EXISTING DIST
PANEL 18
480 0.00 0.0129.45 24.5 6.963 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
29.16
34.32
39.5638.547
14.0
16.5
19.0
6.36
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.08
4.08
4.21
Z2:
Z0:
39.63 34.74
38.52
Z1:
EXISTING MTS 480 0.00 0.0129.54 24.6 7.113 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
29.30
34.58
39.8639.006
14.1
16.6
19.1
6.58
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.07
4.07
4.17
Z2:
Z0:
39.93 34.94
38.98
Z1:
LP A 15 240 0.16 0.350.36 0.1 2.273 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
0.36
0.33
0.380.382
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.27
LLG Gnd Return kA:
670.64
670.64
666.67
Z2:
Z0:
0.36 0.37
0.36
Z1:
LP A 18 240 0.18 0.090.69 0.3 0.513 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
0.69
0.60
0.700.696
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.51
LLG Gnd Return kA:
347.12
347.12
344.65
Z2:
Z0:
0.69 0.69
0.69
Z1:
MCC WELL 15 480 0.00 0.0129.15 24.2 7.053 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
28.74
34.06
39.1637.933
13.8
16.4
18.8
6.48
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.13
4.13
4.31
Z2:
Z0:
39.33 34.45
38.11
Z1:
Fault Location
Bus Name
Bus
Voltage
Equivalent
R +jXkA MVA
X/R Sequence
Impedance pu
-----Asym kA-----
Max RMS Avg RMS
Low Voltage 3 Phase and Unbalanced
Fault Duty
MCC WELL 18 480 0.00 0.0128.62 23.8 6.263 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
27.94
32.63
37.5135.465
13.4
15.7
18.0
5.42
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.20
4.20
4.52
Z2:
Z0:
37.68 33.32
35.64
Z1:
VFD WELL PUMP
480 0.00 0.0128.35 23.6 6.343 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
27.55
32.40
37.1534.940
13.2
15.6
17.8
5.51
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.24
4.24
4.62
Z2:
Z0:
37.41 33.05
35.28
Z1:
VFD WELL PUMP
480 0.00 0.0127.76 23.1 5.313 Phase:
SLG:
LL:
LLG:
26.67
30.53
35.1131.965
12.8
14.7
16.9
4.31
LLG Gnd Return kA:
4.33
4.33
4.89
Z2:
Z0:
35.26 31.63
32.28
Z1:
Appendix 6.
Arc Flash Summary and data labels
< 40 cal/cm^2: 6 Date:
>= 40 cal/cm^2: 0
Under-rated: 0
Bus Name Protective Bus Bus Bus Prot Dev Prot Dev Trip/ Breaker Equip Electrode Equip Box Box Box Altitude Gap Arc Working Incident PPE
Device kV Bolted Arcing Bolted Arcing Delay Opening Type Config Category Width Height Depth (feet) (mm) Flash Distance Energy Level/
Name Fault Fault Fault Fault Time Time/Tol (in) (in) (in) Boundary (in) (cal/cm^2) Notes
(kA) (kA) (kA) (kA) (sec.) (sec.) (in) (*N)
LP A 15 MCB LP A 15 0.24 0.61 0.33 0.61 0.33 2 0 PNL VCBB LV Panelboard 12 14 10 25 0 17.36 18 1.12 (*N9) (*N15c) (*N24)
LP A 18 MCB LP A 18 0.24 0.61 0.32 0.61 0.32 2 0 PNL VCBB LV Panelboard 12 14 10 25 0 17.31 18 1.12 (*N9) (*N15c) (*N24)
MCC WELL 15 (MCB MCC WELL 15 LineSide) CB MCC WELL 15 0.48 19.75 16.2 19.75 16.2 0.03 0 MCC VCBB LV MCC 12 14 10 25 0 18.06 18 1.21
MCC WELL 18 (MCB MCC WELL 18 LineSide) CB MCC WELL 18 0.48 15.29 12.48 15.29 12.48 0.05 0 MCC VCBB LV MCC 12 14 10 25 0 23.26 18 1.91
VFD WELL PUMP 15 MCB MCC WELL 15 (Phase) 0.48 18.88 15.48 18.88 15.48 0.02 0 PNL VCBB VFD 12 14 10 25 0 13.68 18 0.73 (*N5)
VFD WELL PUMP 18 CB VFD WELL PUMP 18 0.48 14.67 11.96 14.67 11.96 0.02 0 PNL VCBB VFD 12 14 10 25 0 11.68 18 0.55
Arc Flash Summary - AC
9/29/24
LP A 15
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
1.12 cal/cm^2 18 in
17 in
42 in
12 in
240 VAC
0.61 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
LP A 18
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
1.12 cal/cm^2 18 in
17 in
42 in
12 in
240 VAC
0.61 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
MCC WELL 15
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
1.21 cal/cm^2 18 in
18 in
42 in
12 in
480 VAC
19.75 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
MCC WELL 18
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
1.91 cal/cm^2 18 in
23 in
42 in
12 in
480 VAC
15.29 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
VFD WELL PUMP 15
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
0.73 cal/cm^2 18 in
14 in
42 in
12 in
480 VAC
18.88 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
VFD WELL PUMP 18
Arc Rated Clothing Required (See NFPA 70E 130.5(G) for additional PPE). NO SAFE PPE OVER 40Cal/cm2
0.55 cal/cm^2 18 in
12 in
42 in
12 in
480 VAC
14.67 kA
09/29/2024
WARNING
Arc Flash and Electric Shock Risk
Appropriate PPE Required Flash Hazard Boundary
Shock Hazard when cover is removed
Glove Class
Limited Approach
Restricted Approach
Flash Hazard at
Fault Current
Appendix 7.
One-line Diagram
UTILITY WELL 15
Isc 3P 30000.0 Amps Isc SLG 30000.0 Amps
EXISTING DIST PANEL 15
480.0 V
CB MCC WELL 15
SQUARE D
MA
500.0 A
F MCC WELL 15
(2) Size 350 kcmil
55.0 ft Ampacity 620.0 A
MCC WELL 15
480.0 V
CB T LP A 15
SIEMENS
3VA5, TM230
20.0 A
S
P
T LP A 15
Size 7.5 kVA Pri Delta Sec Delta %Z 5.0000 %
LP A 15
240.0 V
MCB LP A 15
SIEMENS
HBL, 2 & 3-Pole
50.0 A
CB VFD WELL PUMP 15
SIEMENS
HLD6-A Sentron
400.0 A
F VFD WELL PUMP 15
(2) Size 350 kcmil
22.0 ft Ampacity 620.0 A
VFD WELL PUMP 15'
VFD WELL PUMP 15
480.0 V
F WELL PUMP 15
(1) Size 350 kcmil
85.0 ft Ampacity 310.0 A
M WELL PUMP 15
200 hp Load Factor 1.00 X"d 0.15 pu
FD WELL PUMP 15
SIEMENS
HRC 3NA1
400.0 A
UTILITY WELL 18
Isc 3P 30000.0 Amps Isc SLG 30000.0 Amps
CB MCC WELL 18
SQUARE D
PowerPact L-Frame, 3.3S
400.0 A
F MCC WELL 18
(2) Size 4/0 AWG
160.0 ft Ampacity 460.0 A
MCC WELL 18
480.0 V
CB T LP A 18
SIEMENS
3VA5, TM230
20.0 A
S
P
T LP A 18
Size 7.5 kVA Pri Delta Sec Delta %Z 5.0000 %
LP A 18
240.0 V
MCB LP A 18
SIEMENS
HBL, 2 & 3-Pole
50.0 A
CB VFD WELL PUMP 18
SIEMENS
HJD6-A Sentron
250.0 A
F VFD WELL PUMP 18
(2) Size 4/0 AWG
20.0 ft Ampacity 460.0 A
VFD WELL PUMP 18'
VFD WELL PUMP 18
480.0 V
F WELL PUMP 18
(1) Size 4/0 AWG
170.0 ft Ampacity 230.0 A
M WELL PUMP 18
125 hp Load Factor 1.00 X"d 0.15 pu
FD WELL PUMP 18
SIEMENS
HRC 3NA1
250.0 A
MCB MCC WELL 18
SIEMENS
LD, Sensitrip IV, GF Mod
600.0 A
EXISTING MTS
480.0 V
Open
EXISTING DIST PANEL 18
480.0 V
MCB MCC WELL 15
SIEMENS
LD, Sensitrip IV, GF Mod
600.0 A
F EXISTING SERVICE METER 15
(1) Size 350 kcmil
55.0 ft Ampacity 310.0 A
EXISTING SERVICE METER 15
480.0 V
F EXISTING SERVICE METER 18
(1) Size 1/0 AWG
30.0 ft Ampacity 150.0 A
EXISTING SERVICE METER 18
480.0 V
ONE LINE
| WD-09-20 LBWD Power system studies com wells 15 and 18 |
| CONTRACTOR’S SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM |
| Project Name: |
| Rehabilitation of Wells Commission 15 and 18 |
| Contract Docs No. |
| WD-09-20 / EO-3489 |
| P.O. No. |
| 32200333 |
| Submittal No.: |
| 132 ☒ New Submittal ☐ Resubmittal ☐ Additional Information |
| Date of Submittal: |
| 10-4-2024 |
| Contractor: |
| Best Drilling and Pump, Inc. |
| Contractor PM: |
| Chris Brown |
| Owner: |
| Long Beach Water Department |
| Owner PM: |
| Myung Chun |
| Engineer: |
| KYLE Groundwater, Inc. |
| Engineer PM: |
| Russell Kyle |
| Submittal Type: |
| ☐ Shop Drawing ☒ Administrative ☐ As-Builts ☐ Sample ☐ Data ☐ Additional Information |
Submittal Response / Comments:
| SUB-C22-016-026 Rev - |
| C22-016 Cover Page |
| 1. Introduction |
| 1.1 Major objectives |
| 1.2 Input data and assumptions |
| 1.3 Executive Summary |
| 2 Analysis Description |
| 2.1 Short Circuit Analysis |
| 2.2 Protective Device Coordination Study |
| 2.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Evaluation |
| 2.3.1 110-16 Flash protection |
| 2.3.2 1910.132 (d) Hazard assessment and equipment selection |
| 2.3.3 1910.335 (a) (1) (i) Personal Protective Equipment |
| 2.3.4 1910.132 (f) Training |
| 2.3.5 1910.132 (f) (3) Proficiency & Retraining |
| 2.4 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis According to IEEE Std 1584TM-2018 |
| 2.4.1 Model Configurations |
| 2.4.2 Enclosure Dimensions |
| 2.4.3 Equipment selections for this report |
| 3 Discussion and Recommendations |
| 3.1 Short Circuit Analysis |
| 3.2 Protective Device Coordination Study |
| 3.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results |
| 4 Glossary of terms |
| 4.1 Short Circuit Analysis |
| 4.2 Protective Device Coordination Study |
| 4.3 Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis Results |
| Appendix 1. Device Evaluation table |
| Appendix 2. Recommended device settings |
| Appendix 3. Coordination curves |
| Appendix 4. Input Data |
| Appendix 5. Output Data |
| Appendix 6. Arc Flash Summary and data labels |
| Appendix 7. One-line Diagram |
| Insert from: "Utility Fault Information_RFI 1 BDPI 6-7-2022.pdf" |
| RFI 1 BDPI 6-7-2022 |
| C22-016-RFI-002 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .