Appendix B. Sandia Crest Geotechnical Evaluation report.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 127EAU26Q0036
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This is a Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the Sandia Crest Recreational Complex located on State Highway 536 in Sandia Crest, New Mexico, prepared by Western Technologies Inc. for DOWL (client contact: Nicholas Westphal, P.E.). The report documents subsurface conditions and provides engineering recommendations for proposed entrance and parking reconstruction along with replacement of existing retaining walls. Nine borings were drilled to depths ranging from 1.5 to 6.5 feet below existing grade, with three borings in retaining wall areas and six in paved parking and drive areas. Laboratory analyses included water content, dry density, gradation, and plasticity testing on representative soil samples. Subsurface exploration revealed medium-dense silty sand, silty clayey sand, and clayey sand in upper layers (1 to 6.5 feet depth) overlying hard limestone bedrock. Groundwater was not encountered during exploration.
The report provides comprehensive design recommendations including an allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf for shallow foundations on dense native soil, properly compacted fill, or limestone, with a minimum 36-inch frost protection depth for soil foundations. Lateral earth pressure recommendations specify active pressures of 35 psf/ft for undisturbed subsoil and 30 psf/ft for compacted granular backfill, with passive pressures of 250 psf/ft for shallow wall footings and 400 psf/ft for shallow column footings. Seismic design parameters per IBC 2018/ASCE 7-16 are provided with Soil Site Class B classification. Pavement sections designed for a 20-year life using AASHTO procedures recommend 2.5 inches of asphalt concrete and 4.0 inches of base course for passenger car parking, and 3.0 inches of asphalt concrete and 4.0 inches of base course for access roads. Earthwork specifications require fill compaction to 95 percent for on-site or imported soil and 96 percent for aggregate base, with materials placed in 10-inch maximum lifts at moisture content within 3 percent of optimum. The report emphasizes the importance of observation and testing during construction compliance and notes that recommendations are valid for one year from the August 12, 2021 issuance date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GEOTECHNICAL
EVALUATION REPORT
SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
State Highway 536 Sandia Crest, New Mexico WT Reference No. 3221JJ075
PREPARED FOR:
DOWL
1300 Cedar Street Helena, Montana Attn: Nicholas Westphal, P.E.
August 12, 2021
Kyel Newberry, E.I. Jeff M. Boyd, P.E.
Project Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer
DOWL i Job No. 3221JJ075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PURPOSE
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Field Exploration
3.2 Laboratory Analyses
3.3 Analyses and Report
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS
4.1 Surface
4.2 Subsurface
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES & ANALYSIS
5.1 Laboratory Tests
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 General
6.2 Lateral Design Criteria
6.3 Seismic Considerations
6.4 Pavements
7.0 EARTHWORK
7.1 General
7.2 Site Clearing
7.3 Excavation
7.4 Pavement Preparation
7.5 Materials
7.6 Placement and Compaction
7.7 Compliance
8.0 PLAN REVIEW
9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
10.0 LIMITATIONS
11.0 CLOSURE
BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM .......................................................................................................... Plate 1
DOWL ii
APPENDIX A
Definition of Terminology ............................................................................................................ A‐1
Method of Classification .............................................................................................................. A‐2
Boring Log Notes .......................................................................................................................... A‐3
Boring Logs ...................................................................................................................... A‐4 to A‐12
APPENDIX B
Soil Properties .................................................................................................................... B‐1 & B‐2
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
STATE HIGHWAY 536
SANDIA CREST, NEW MEXICO
JOB NO. 3221JJ075
1.0 PURPOSE
This report contains the results of our geotechnical evaluation for a proposed entrance and parking reconstruction, along with replacing existing retaining walls to be located in Sandia Crest, NM. The purpose of these services is to provide information and recommendations regarding:
• Subsurface conditions • Retaining walls
• Lateral earth pressures • Pavement sections
• Earthwork guidelines • Excavation conditions
• Seismic conditions
Results of the field exploration, field tests, and laboratory testing program are presented in the
Appendices.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project information supplied by Nicholas Westphal, P.E. indicates the project will include drive areas and parking reconstruction, and replacing existing retaining walls. Should this information not be correct we should be notified immediately.
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Field Exploration
Three borings were drilled to depths ranging from about 1.5 to 3.0 feet below existing site grade in the proposed retaining wall areas. In addition, six borings were drilled to depths ranging from about 2.5 to 6.5 feet below existing site grade in the proposed paved parking and drive areas. The borings were at the approximate locations shown on the attached
Boring Location Diagram. A field log was prepared for each boring. These logs contain visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling as well as interpolation of the
DOWL 2
subsurface conditions between samples. Final logs, included in Appendix A, represent our interpretation of the field logs and may include modifications based on laboratory observations and tests of the field samples. The final logs describe the materials encountered, their thickness, and the locations where samples were obtained.
The Unified Soil Classification System was used to classify soils. The soil classification symbols appear on the boring logs and are briefly described in Appendix A. Local and regional geologic characteristics were used to estimate the seismic design criteria.
3.2 Laboratory Analyses
Laboratory analyses were performed on representative soil samples to aid in material classification and to estimate pertinent engineering properties of the on‐site soils for preparation of this report. Testing was performed in general accordance with applicable standard test methods. The following tests were performed and the results are presented in Appendix B.
• Water content
• Dry density
• Gradation
• Plasticity
3.3 Analyses and Report
This geotechnical engineering report includes a description of the project, a discussion of the field and laboratory testing programs, a discussion of the subsurface conditions, and design recommendations as appropriate to its purpose. The scope of services for this project does not include, either specifically or by implication, any environmental assessment of the site, discovery of underground storage tanks or other underground structures, or identification of contaminated or hazardous materials or conditions. If there is concern about the potential for such contamination, other studies should be undertaken.
We are available to discuss the scope of such studies with you.
DOWL 3
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS
4.1 Surface
At the time of our exploration, the site was developed as an existing recreation area, with buildings, walkways, drive areas, and parking. The ground surface was hummocky and sloping down towards the east and contained asphalt pavement in poor condition with numerous longitudinal and transverse cracks. The area of the site not within the paved areas contained moderate growth of trees, brush, and grass. Site drainage trended to the east as sheet surface flow. A photograph of the site at the time of our exploration is provided below.
View of the site taken on 7‐27‐21.
DOWL 4
4.2 Subsurface
As presented on the Boring Logs, surface soils to depths of 1 to 6.5 feet consisted of medium dense Silty SAND, Silty Clayey SAND, and Clayey SAND. Near surface soils are of low plasticity. The materials underlying the surface soils and extending to the full depth of exploration consisted of hard LIMESTONE. Groundwater was not encountered at the time of exploration. A detailed description of the soils encountered can be found on the boring logs in Appendix A.
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES & ANALYSIS
5.1 Laboratory Tests
Near‐surface soils are granular, non‐plastic to low plasticity. These soils are provide fair to good quality subgrade support for pavements.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 General
Recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the project criteria described in Section 2.0 and the assumption that the soil and subsurface conditions are those disclosed by the explorations. Others may change the plans, final elevations, number and type of structures, foundation loads, and floor levels during design or construction. Substantially different subsurface conditions from those described herein may be encountered or become known. Any changes in the project criteria or subsurface conditions shall be brought to our attention in writing.
6.2 Lateral Design Criteria
Lateral loads may be resisted by concrete interface friction and by passive resistance. For shallow foundations bearing on dense native soil, properly compacted fill, or limestone, an allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf may be utilized. If foundations are bearing on soil, a minimum depth of embedment for frost protection of 36 inches should be utilized.
If footings bear on the LIMESTONE, frost protection does not apply. In this case, footings should bear on undisturbed intact LIMESTON.
DOWL 5
For this site we recommend the following lateral equivalent fluid pressures and coefficients of base friction for unrestrained elements are:
• Active:
Undisturbed subsoil ................................................................................................ 35 psf/ft
Compacted granular backfill .................................................................................. 30 psf/ft
• Passive:
Shallow wall footings ............................................................................................ 250 psf/ft
Shallow column footings ...................................................................................... 400 psf/ft
• Coefficient of base friction (active) ............................................................................... 0.40
The equivalent fluid pressures presented herein do not include the lateral pressures arising from the presence of:
• hydrostatic conditions, submergence or partial submergence
• sloping backfill, positively or negatively
• surcharge loading, permanent or temporary
• seismic or dynamic conditions
We recommend a free‐draining soil layer or manufactured geosynthetic material be constructed adjacent to the back of any retaining walls. A filter may be required between the soil backfill and drainage layer. This drainage zone should help prevent development of hydrostatic pressure on the wall. This vertical drainage zone should be tied into a gravity drainage system at the base of the wall. It is important that all backfill be properly placed and compacted. Backfill should be mechanically compacted in layers. Flooding or jetting should not be permitted. Care should be taken not to damage the walls when placing the backfill. Backfills should be observed and tested during placement.
Fill against footings, stem walls, and any retaining walls should be compacted to densities specified in EARTHWORK. Compaction of each lift adjacent to walls should be accomplished with hand‐operated tampers or other lightweight compactors. Over‐ compaction may cause excessive lateral earth pressures that could result in wall movements.
DOWL 6
6.3 Seismic Considerations
Structures should be designed in accordance with applicable building codes. The seismic design parameters presented in the following table, in accordance with the IBC 2018 OR
ASCE 7‐16 are applicable to the project site:
Seismic Design Parameters
International Building Code IBC 2018/ASCE 7‐16
Soil Site Class B
Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2 sec period (Ss) 0.416g
Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1.0 sec period (S1) 0.137g
Site Coefficient for 0.2 sec period (Fa) 0.9
Site Coefficient for 1.0 sec period (Fv) 0.8
Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2 sec period (SDS) 0..25g
Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 1.0 sec period (SD1) 0.073g
6.4 Pavements
The on‐site soils are considered as fair to good quality materials for support of pavements.
The types of traffic anticipated to use the facility include passenger vehicles and small to medium size trucks. On this basis, a daily traffic value of two Equivalent 18‐kip Single Axle
Loads (ESAL) was estimated for passenger car parking and a daily traffic value of five ESALS were used for access road. A resilient modulus (Mr) of 10,000 pounds per square inch was assigned to the on‐site soil. A reliability value of 80 percent was assigned to the facility that corresponds to occasional interruption of traffic for pavement repairs. Based upon these parameters, the resulting pavement sections according to the AASHTO procedure for a 20‐year design life are:
Traffic Area Asphalt Concrete
Pavement (inches)
Base Course
(inches)
Passenger car parking 2.5 4.0
Access Road 3.0 4.0
DOWL 7
Base course and asphalt concrete should conform to New Mexico Department of
Transportation (NMDOT) Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction.
Bituminous surfacing should be constructed of dense‐graded, central plant‐mix, asphalt concrete of an SP‐IV or SP‐III mix design.
Material and compaction requirements should conform to recommendations presented under EARTHWORK. The gradient of paved surfaces should ensure positive drainage. Water should not pond in areas directly adjoining paved sections.
The "design life" (20 years) of a pavement is defined as the expected life at the end of which reconstruction of the pavement will need to occur. Normal maintenance, including crack sealing, slurry sealing, and/or chip sealing, should be performed during the life of the pavement.
7.0 EARTHWORK
7.1 General
The conclusions contained in this report for the proposed construction are contingent upon compliance with recommendations presented in this section. Any excavating, trenching, or disturbance that occurs after completion of the earthwork must be backfilled, compacted and tested in accordance with the recommendations contained herein. It is not reasonable to rely upon our conclusions and recommendations if any future unobserved and untested trenching, earthwork activities or backfilling occurs.
If any unobserved and untested earthwork, trenching or backfilling occurs, then the conclusions and recommendations in this report may not be relied on. We recommend that Western Technologies Inc. be retained to provide services during these phases of the project. Observation and testing of all foundation excavations should be performed prior to placement of reinforcing steel and concrete to confirm that foundations are constructed on satisfactory bearing materials.
Underground utilities were observed on the site. Previously placed fill and backfill, and disturbed soils are likely to be encountered during construction. These features should be handled in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer and/or any applicable regulatory requirements. Any loose or disturbed soils resulting from demolition should be removed or recompacted as engineered fill and any excavations should be backfilled in accordance with recommendations presented herein.
DOWL 8
7.2 Site Clearing
Strip and remove any existing fill material, vegetation, debris, and any other deleterious materials from the retaining wall and pavement areas. The retaining wall area is defined as that area within the wall footprint plus 5 feet beyond the perimeter of that footprint. All exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions that could prevent uniform compaction.
Sloping areas steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:vertical) should be benched to reduce the potential for slippage between existing slopes and fills. Benches should be level and wide enough to accommodate compaction and earth moving equipment.
7.3 Excavation
We anticipate that excavations for shallow foundations and utility trenches for the proposed construction can be accomplished with conventional equipment. Excavations penetrating the underlying LIMESTONE may require the use of heavy‐duty, specialized equipment to facilitate removal. The speed and ease of excavation is dependent on the nature of the deposit, the type of equipment used, and the skill and experience of the equipment operator.
7.4 Pavement Preparation
The subgrade should be scarified, moistened as required, and recompacted for a minimum depth of 10 inches prior to placement of fill and pavement materials.
7.5 Materials
Clean on‐site soils with low expansive potentials and maximum dimension of 6 inches or imported materials may be used as fill material for the following:
• Retaining wall areas
• Pavement areas
• Backfill
Frozen soils should not be used as fill or backfill.
DOWL 9
Imported soils should conform to the following:
• Gradation (ASTM C136): percent finer by weight
6"
4" ............................................................................................................................... 85‐100
¾” .............................................................................................................................. 70‐100
No. 4 Sieve ................................................................................................................ 50‐100
No. 200 Sieve ......................................................................................................... 30 (max)
• Maximum Plasticity Index
• Maximum soluble sulfates (%) ...................................................................................... 0.10
Base course should conform to NMDOT Specifications.
7.6 Placement and Compaction
a. Place and compact fill in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended water contents and densities throughout the lift.
b. Uncompacted lift thickness should not exceed 10 inches.
c. Materials should be compacted to the following:
Minimum Percent
Material Compaction (ASTM D1557)
• On‐site or imported soil, reworked and fill
• Aggregate base below pavement
• Nonstructural backfill
On‐site and imported soils should be compacted within a water content range of 3 percent below to 3 percent above optimum.
DOWL 10
7.7 Compliance
Recommendations for retaining walls and pavements supported on compacted fills or prepared subgrade depend upon compliance with the EARTHWORK recommendations.
To assess compliance, observation and testing should be performed under the direction of a WT geotechnical engineer. Please contact us to provide these observation and testing services.
8.0 PLAN REVIEW
Foundation and grading plans were not available at the time of this report. WT should be retained to review the final plans to determine if they are consistent with the recommendations presented in this report. If the Client does not retain WT to review the plans and specifications, WT shall have no responsibility for the suitability of the plans for project application.
9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that a sufficient schedule of tests and observations will be performed during construction to verify compliance.
At a minimum, these tests and observations should be comprised of the following:
Observations and testing during site preparation and earthwork, Observation of foundation excavations, and
Consultation as may be required during construction.
Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the best way to verify compliance and to help you manage the risks associated with unanticipated conditions.
DOWL 11
10.0 LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared assuming the project criteria described in 2.0 PROJECT
DESCRIPTION. If changes in the project criteria occur, or if different subsurface conditions are encountered or become known, the conclusions and recommendations presented herein shall become invalid. In any such event, WT should be contacted in order to assess the effect that such variations may have on our conclusions and recommendations. If WT is not retained for the construction observation and testing services to determine compliance with this report, our professional responsibility is accordingly limited.
The recommendations presented are based entirely upon data derived from a limited number of samples obtained from widely spaced explorations. The attached logs are indicators of subsurface conditions only at the specific locations and times noted. This report assumes the uniformity of the geology and soil structure between explorations, however variations can and often do exist. Whenever any deviation, difference, or change is encountered or becomes known, WT should be contacted.
This report is for the exclusive benefit of our client alone. There are no intended third‐party beneficiaries of our contract with the client or this report, and nothing contained in the contract or this report shall create any express or implied contractual or any other relationship with, or claim or cause of action for, any third party against WT.
This report is valid for the earlier of one year from the date of issuance, a change in circumstances, or discovered variations. After expiration, no person or entity shall rely on this report without the express written authorization of WT.
11.0 CLOSURE
We prepared this report as an aid to the designers of the proposed project. The comments, statements, recommendations and conclusions set forth in this report reflect the opinions of the authors. These opinions are based upon data obtained at the location of the explorations, and from laboratory tests. Work on your project was performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and practices utilized by professionals providing similar services in this locality. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.
3221JJ075
SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
JOB NO.:
PLATE
NOT TO SCALE
Approximate Boring Location
BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM
PROJECT:
Created in TurboCAD LTE, (www.IMSIDesign.com)
Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity The recommended maximum contact stress developed at the interface of the foundation element and the supporting material.
Backfill A specified material placed and compacted in a confined area.
Base Course A layer of specified aggregate material placed on a subgrade or subbase.
Base Course Grade Top of base course.
Bench A horizontal surface in a sloped deposit.
Caisson/Drilled Shaft A concrete foundation element cast in a circular excavation which may have an enlarged base (or belled caisson).
Concrete Slabs‐On‐Grade A concrete surface layer cast directly upon base course, subbase or subgrade.
Crushed Rock Base Course A base course composed of crushed rock of a specified gradation.
Differential Settlement Unequal settlement between or within foundation elements of a structure.
Engineered Fill Specified soil or aggregate material placed and compacted to specified density and/or moisture conditions under observations of a representative of a soil engineer.
Existing Fill Materials deposited through the action of man prior to exploration of the site.
Existing Grade The ground surface at the time of field exploration.
Expansive Potential The potential of a soil to expand (increase in volume) due to absorption of moisture.
Fill Materials deposited by the actions of man.
Finished Grade The final grade created as a part of the project.
Gravel Base Course A base course composed of naturally occurring gravel with a specified gradation.
Heave Upward movement.
Native Grade The naturally occurring ground surface.
Native Soil Naturally occurring on‐site soil.
Rock A natural aggregate of mineral grains connected by strong and permanent cohesive forces. Usually requires drilling, wedging, blasting or other methods of extraordinary force for excavation.
Sand and Gravel Base Course A base course of sand and gravel of a specified gradation.
Sand Base Course A base course composed primarily of sand of a specified gradation.
Scarify To mechanically loosen soil or break down existing soil structure.
Settlement Downward movement.
Soil Any unconsolidated material composed of discrete solid particles, derived from the physical and/or chemical disintegration of vegetable or mineral matter, which can be separated by gentle mechanical means such as agitation in water.
Strip To remove from present location.
Subbase A layer of specified material placed to form a layer between the subgrade and base course.
Subbase Grade Top of subbase.
Subgrade Prepared native soil surface.
DEFINITION OF TERMINOLOGY
PLATE
A‐1
81WTI
091614
COARSE‐GRAINED SOILS
LESS THAN 50% FINES
FINE‐GRAINED SOILS
MORE THAN 50% FINES
GROUP
SYMBOLS
DESCRIPTION MAJOR
DIVISIONS
GROUP
SYMBOLS
DESCRIPTION MAJOR
DIVISIONS
GW
WELL‐GRADED GRAVEL OR WELL‐GRADED
GRAVEL WITH SAND, LESS THAN 5% FINES
GRAVELS
MORE THAN
HALF
OF COARSE
FRACTION
IS LARGER THAN
NO. 4
SIEVE SIZE
ML
SILT, SILT WITH SAND OR GRAVEL, SANDY SILT, OR
GRAVELLY SILT SILTS
AND
CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT
LESS
THAN 50
GP
POORLY‐GRADED GRAVEL OR POORLY‐GRADED
GRAVEL WITH SAND, LESS THAN 5% FINES CL
LEAN CLAY OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY,
SANDY CLAY, OR GRAVELLY CLAY
GM
SILTY GRAVEL OR SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND,
MORE THAN 12% FINES OL
ORGANIC SILT OR ORGANIC CLAY OF LOW TO
MEDIUM PLASTICITY
GC
CLAYEY GRAVEL OR CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH
SAND, MORE THAN 12% FINES MH
ELASTIC SILT, SANDY ELASTIC SILT, OR GRAVELLY
ELASTIC SILT SILTS
AND
CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT
MORE
THAN 50
SW
WELL‐GRADED SAND OR WELL‐GRADED SAND
WITH GRAVEL, LESS THAN 5% FINES SANDS
MORE THAN
HALF
OF COARSE
FRACTION
IS SMALLER
THAN
NO. 4
SIEVE SIZE
CH
FAT CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, SANDY FAT CLAY, OR
GRAVELLY FAT CLAY
SP
POORLY‐GRADED SAND OR POORLY‐GRADED
SAND WITH GRAVEL, LESS THAN 5% FINES OH
ORGANIC SILT OR ORGANIC CLAY OF HIGH
PLASTICITY
SM
SILTY SAND OR SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL,
MORE THAN 12% FINES
PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
HIGHLY
ORGANIC
SOILS SC
CLAYEY SAND OR CLAYEY SAND WITH GRAVEL,
MORE THAN 12% FINES
NOTE: Coarse‐grained soils receive dual symbols if they NOTE: Fine‐grained soils may receive dual classification contain 5% to 12% fines (e.g., SW‐SM, GP‐GC). based upon plasticity characteristics (e.g. CL‐ML).
SOIL SIZES CONSISTENCY
COMPONENT SIZE RANGE CLAYS & SILTS BLOWS PER FOOT
BOULDERS Above 12 in. VERY SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
STIFF
VERY STIFF
HARD
0 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 8 9 – 15 16 – 30
OVER 30
COBBLES 3 in. – 12 in.
GRAVEL
Coarse Fine
No. 4 – 3 in.
¾ in. – 3 in.
No. 4 – ¾ in.
SAND
Coarse
Medium Fine
No. 200 – No. 4
No. 10 – No. 4
No. 40 – No. 10 No. 200 – No. 40
RELATIVE DENSITY
SANDS & GRAVELS BLOWS PER FOOT
VERY LOOSE
LOOSE
MEDIUM DENSE
DENSE
VERY DENSE
0 – 4 5 – 10 11 – 30 31 – 50 OVER 50 Fines (Silt or Clay) Below No. 200
NOTE: Only sizes smaller than three inches are used to classify soils
NOTE: Number of blows using 140‐pound hammer falling 30 inches to drive a 2‐inch‐OD
(1⅜‐inch ID) split‐barrel sampler (ASTM D1586).
PLASTICITY OF FINE GRAINED SOILS DEFINITION OF WATER CONTENT
PLASTICITY INDEX TERM DRY
SLIGHTLY DAMP
DAMP
MOIST
WET
SATURATED
1 – 7
8 – 20
Over 20
NON‐PLASTIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION
A‐2
81 WTI
090414
The number shown in "BORING NO." refers to the approximate location of the same number indicated on the "Boring Location Diagram" as positioned in the field by pacing or measurement from property lines and/or existing features, or through the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) devices. The accuracy of GPS devices is somewhat variable.
"DRILLING TYPE" refers to the exploratory equipment used in the boring wherein HSA = hollow stem auger, and the dimension presented is the outside diameter of the HSA used.
"N” in “BLOW COUNTS" refers to a 2‐inch outside diameter split‐barrel sampler driven into the ground with a 140 pound drop‐ hammer dropped 30 inches repeatedly until a penetration of 18 inches is achieved or until refusal. The number of blows, or “blow count”, of the hammer is recorded for each of three 6‐inch increments totaling 18 inches. The number of blows required for advancing the sampler for the last 12 inches (2nd and 3rd increments) is defined as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) “N”‐Value.
Refusal to penetration is considered more than 50 blows per 6 inches. (Ref. ASTM D1586).
"R" in “BLOW COUNTS" refers to a 3‐inch outside diameter ring‐lined split barrel sampler driven into the ground with a 140 pound drop‐hammer dropped 30 inches repeatedly until a penetration of 12 inch is achieved or until refusal. The number of blows required to advance the sampler 12 inches is defined as the “R” blow count. The “R” blow count requires an engineered conversion to an equivalent SPT N‐Value. Refusal to penetration is considered more than 50 blows per foot. (Ref. ASTM D3550).
“CS” in “BLOWS/FT.” refers to a 2½‐in. outside diameter California style split‐barrel sampler, lined with brass sleeves, driven into the ground with a 140‐pound hammer dropped 30 inches repeatedly until a penetration of 18 inches is achieved or until refusal.
The number of blows of the hammer is recorded for each of the three 6‐inch increments totaling 18 inches. The number of blows required for advancing the sampler for the last 12 inches (2nd and 3rd increments) is defined as the “CS” blow count. The “CS” blow count requires an engineered conversion to an equivalent SPT N‐Value. Refusal to penetration is considered more than 50 blows for a 6‐inch increment. (Ref. ASTM D 3550)
"SAMPLE TYPE" refers to the form of sample recovery, in which N = Split‐barrel sample, R = Ring‐lined sample, “CS” = California style split‐barrel sample, G = Grab sample, B = Bucket sample, C = Core sample (ex. diamond bit rock coring).
"DRY DENSITY (LBS/CU FT)" refers to the laboratory‐determined dry density in pounds per cubic foot. The symbol "NR" indicates that no sample was recovered.
"WATER (MOISTURE) CONTENT” (% of Dry Wt.) refers to the laboratory‐determined water content in percent using the standard test method ASTM D2216.
"USCS" refers to the “Unified Soil Classification System” Group Symbol for the soil type as defined by ASTM D2487 and D2488. The soils were classified visually in the field, and where appropriate, classifications were modified by visual examination of samples in the laboratory and/or by appropriate tests.
These notes and boring logs are intended for use in conjunction with the purposes of our services defined in the text. Boring log data should not be construed as part of the construction plans nor as defining construction conditions.
Boring logs depict our interpretations of subsurface conditions at the locations and on the date(s) noted. Variations in subsurface conditions and characteristics may occur between borings. Groundwater levels may fluctuate due to seasonal variations and other factors.
The stratification lines shown on the boring logs represent our interpretation of the approximate boundary between soil or rock types based upon visual field classification at the boring location. The transition between materials is approximate and may be more or less gradual than indicated.
BORING LOG NOTES
A‐3
©81WTI
091614
G
N
SC-
SM
SC-
SM
G
N
10.7
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Silty Clayey SAND; dark brown, very dense, moist LIMESTONE; dark brown, very dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 2.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
10.7 SC-
SM
SC-
SM
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Silty Clayey SAND; dark brown, very dense, moist LIMESTONE; dark brown, very dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 2.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 1
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-4
BORING LOG
N
SCG
N
12.7
50/1"
2" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; brown, very dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 1.5 FEET ON LIMESTONE
12.7 SC
50/1"
2" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; brown, very dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 1.5 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 2
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-5
R
N
SM
SM
G
R
N
6.4
6.8 32
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Silty SAND; dark brown, medium dense, moist LIMESTONE; dark brown, medium dense, moist very dense
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
6.4
6.8 118
SM
SM32
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Silty SAND; dark brown, medium dense, moist LIMESTONE; dark brown, medium dense, moist very dense
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 3
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-6
G SC-
SM
G14.5 3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, very dense, moist dark brown, very dense, wet
AUGER REFUSAL AT 4.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
14.5 SC-
SM
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, very dense, moist dark brown, very dense, wet
AUGER REFUSAL AT 4.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 4
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-7
N
SC-
SM
G
R
N
8.8
9.5 43
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; dark brown, medium dense, moist very dense
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
8.8
9.5 117
SC-
SM
25/0"
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; dark brown, medium dense, moist very dense
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 5
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-8
N
SC-
SM
G
R
N
11.1
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, medium dense, moist dense
BORING TERMINATED AT 6.5 FEET
11.1
NR
SC-
SM
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, medium dense, moist dense
BORING TERMINATED AT 6.5 FEET
NR
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 6
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-9
SCG
R
9.1
2.2 28
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, medium dense, moist damp
AUGER REFUSAL AT 2.5 FEET ON LIMESTONE
9.1
2.2 116
SC
3" Asphalt, No Base Course LIMESTONE; light brown, medium dense, moist damp
AUGER REFUSAL AT 2.5 FEET ON LIMESTONE
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 7
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-10
N
SC
SC
G
R
N
5.4
12.5 23
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Clayey SAND; light brown, medium dense, damp
LIMESTONE; light to dark brown, medium dense, moist
BORING TERMINATED AT 6.5 FEET
5.4
12.5 114
SC
SC23
3" Asphalt, No Base Course Clayey SAND; light brown, medium dense, damp
LIMESTONE; light to dark brown, medium dense, moist
BORING TERMINATED AT 6.5 FEET
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 8
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-11
SC
SC
G
R
9.7
2.5" Asphalt, No Base Course Clayey SAND; light brown, medium dense, moist
LIMESTONE; dark to light brown, medium dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
9.7
NR
SC
SC30
2.5" Asphalt, No Base Course Clayey SAND; light brown, medium dense, moist
LIMESTONE; dark to light brown, medium dense, moist
AUGER REFUSAL AT 3.0 FEET ON LIMESTONE
NR
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
SA
M
PL
E
TY
PE
US
CS
GR
AP
HI
C
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
B-
See Location Diagram
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
DR
Y
DE
NS
IT
Y
SOIL DESCRIPTION
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
NOTES: Groundwater Not Encountered
(L
BS
/C U
FT
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
FIELD ENGINEER: J.Liberman
BUCKET SAMPLE
N-
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
CO
NT
EN
T
M
OI
ST
UR
E
R-
NO SAMPLE RECOVERY
LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT TYPE: CME-75
G-
LO
CA
TI
ON
S
AN
D M
AY
C
HA
NG
E
AT
T
HI
S
LO
CA
TI
ON
W
IT
H
T
IM
E.
D
AT
A
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
IS
A S
IM
PL
IF
IC
AT
IO
N.
B-
See Location Diagram
DATE DRILLED:
DRILLING TYPE: 7"HSA
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
DE
PT
H (F
EE
T)
GRAB SAMPLE
RING SAMPLE
NR-
ELEVATION:
BL
OW
CO
UN
TS
7-27-21
O
F
DR
Y W
T.
SA
M
PL
E
TH
IS
S
UM
M
AR
Y
AP
PL
IE
S
ON
LY
A
T
TH
IS
L
OC
AT
IO
N
AN
D
AT
T
HE
T
IM
E
OF
L
OG
GI
NG
CO
ND
IT
IO
NS
M
AY
D
IF
FE
R
AT
O
TH
ER
BORING NO. 9
PLATE
JOB NO.: 3221JJ075JOB NO.: 3221JJ075
Not DeterminedNot Determined
A-12
0.0010.010.1110100
3 10024
Sample Identification D D
C
%Gravel
PROJECT NO.: 3221JJ075
medium c u m
1.87 2.34 1.37 2.80 2.08
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
2.0 ft
1.5 ft
3.0 ft
4.0 ft
3.0 ft
PIPLLL C F
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
SAND
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Sample Identification
100 60
SILT OR CLAY
fine
Symbol Classification
LOCATION:
%Sand %Silt %Clay
10 501/2 16 301 2006
4.523 1.772 9.462 0.335 2.225
HYDROMETER
6 60 coarse fine
SC-SM
SC
SM
SC-SM
SC-SM
39.5 30.7 54.2 17.9 29.2
PLATE
0.159
0.754
0.217
GRAVEL
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
1.5 8
Silty Clayey SAND Clayey SAND Silty SAND
Silty Clayey SAND Silty Clayey SAND coarse
2.0 ft
1.5 ft
3.0 ft
4.0 ft
3.0 ft
143/4 3/8
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
34.3 27.4 27.6 33.3 49.1
D D30
B-1
1403 4 20 40
COBBLES
0.0010.010.1110100
3 10024
Sample Identification D D
C
%Gravel
PROJECT NO.: 3221JJ075
medium c u m
2.08 2.29 1.46 1.85
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
5.0 ft
7.5 ft
5.0 ft
3.0 ft
PIPLLL C F
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
SAND
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Sample Identification
100 60
SILT OR CLAY
fine
Symbol Classification
LOCATION:
%Sand %Silt %Clay
10 501/2 16 301 2006
4.178 1.877 6.824 4.63
HYDROMETER
6 60 coarse fine
SC-SM
SC
SC
SC
39.0 27.3 47.5 39.7
PLATE
0.77 0.102
GRAVEL
PROJECT: SANDIA CREST RECREATIONAL COMPLEX
1.5 8
Silty Clayey SAND Clayey SAND Clayey SAND Clayey SAND coarse
5.0 ft
7.5 ft
5.0 ft
3.0 ft
143/4 3/8
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
23.5 36.1 33.5 31.9
D D30
B-2
1403 4 20 40
COBBLES
| 1JJ075Report |
| 1JJ075SitePlan |
| Plates A-1, A-2 & A-3, 091614 |
| 1JJ075BoringLogs |
| B-1&B-2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .