10. Past Performance Questionnaire (SS)_PRIME.rtf
RTF text file 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LC13017A, Sprinkler Systems Replacement for Collections, John Adams Building (JAB), Library of Congress
- Solicitation number
- AOCACB24R0025
- Issued by
-
Architect of the Capitol
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to the Sprinkler Systems Replacement for the John Adams Building (JAB) at the Library of Congress in Washington, DC.
The Architect of the Capitol (AOC) is conducting this procurement under Solicitation No. AOCACB24R0025 for a Firm-Fixed-Price contract to furnish all supervision, labor, material, and equipment required for the sprinkler systems replacement project. The questionnaire requests the recipient to evaluate the past performance of the contractor on factors such as meeting schedules, quality of work, compliance with labor and safety standards, customer satisfaction, and overall management. The questionnaire includes a rating scale and requests the recipient to provide any additional comments. A site visit is scheduled for August 28, 2024, and the proposal submission due date is not provided. The contract will be awarded by the AOC, a civilian federal agency.
Text of this file
Sect. J, Attachment
AOC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – PRIME OFFEROR
SOLICITATION NO. AOCACB24R0025
(SOP 9-1, October 22, 2008) Sprinkler System Replacement for the John Adams Building (JAB)
The company listed below is preparing an offer on the above project for the Architect of the Capitol (AOC), Washington, DC. Your name has been provided as a customer reference regarding performance under a past contract with your agency/company. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that your response will be safeguarded to the extent cited in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.1503. FAR prohibits the release of past performance evaluations to other than other Government personnel and the company whose performance is being evaluated during the period the information may be used to provide source selection information.
This past performance questionnaire is being submitted by the contractor and you are requested complete it and return it to the Architect of the Capitol in care of Charvey Smith, Contract Specialist via e-mail at charvey.smith@aoc.gov on or before the proposal submission due date. While all elements below may not apply, please complete as much as possible.
Company/Individual Requesting Past Project Information:
Name:
Past Project Title On Which The Company Is Being Evaluated
Project Title :
Evaluator POC (for verification purposes)
Name: Agency/Company, POC Date:
Phone No.: Fax No.
AOC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. AOCACB23R0032
(SOP 9-1, October 22, 2008)
E-mail Address:
Address:
Position held or function in relation to project:
Ratings: Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:
| “O” Outstanding | The contractor’s performance clearly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” Satisfactory | The contractor’s performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” Marginal | The contractor’s performance met the minimum contract requirements but with difficulty. | |
| “U” Unsatisfactory | The contractor’s performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
Please rate and provide supporting information for the following. If the rating is Outstanding or Unsatisfactory, please provide specific contract/job performance areas which were exceeded or not performed in accordance with the contract’s minimum requirements. (Use additional sheets as needed)
1. Performance in meeting delivery/completion schedules: _____________________________
Rating:
2. What did the contractor do to improve or resolve schedule problems, if any?
Rating:
3. The contractor’s quality control (CQC).
Rating:
4. The contractor’s performance in delivering quality work in accordance with the contract:
Rating:
5. The contractor’s ability to provide the required work at a reasonable total price to include forecasting/controlling costs.
Rating:
6. The contractor’s compliance with labor standards, if applicable.
Rating:
7. The contractor’s compliance with safety standards.
AOC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. AOCACB23R0032
(SOP 9-1, October 22, 2008) Rating:
8. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice, show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
Rating:
9. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please state reasons for not recommending this contractor additional work.
Rating:
10. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?
Rating:
11. The relationship between the contractor and owner’s contract team/Contracting Officer/COR/COTR?
Rating:
12. The contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors.
Rating:
13. The contractor’s overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct.
Rating:
14. Has the contractor filed any modifications?________ How many?
And to what extent?
15. Has the contractor been provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings?
If so, what were the results?
16. Has the contractor demonstrated the ability to professionally handle unusual and adverse circumstances of the project as they arise?
If so, please describe and what were the results? ____________________________________
17. OVERALL RATING Rating:
18. Please provide any additional comments:
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .