Anclote Road Roadway and Stormwater Improvement Project Scope of Services

SCOPE OF SERVICES

ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES

Contract No.: xxxxxx-CN Professional Engineering Services for Environmental Analysis and PER Anclote Road Stormwater and Roadway Improvement Project (Anclote Boulevard to Alternate US 19) County PID 003897A

Prepared for:

Pinellas County Public Works Capital Improvements Division – Transportation 14 S. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756

Table of Contents

SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING

This Exhibit forms an integral part of the agreement between Pinellas County (hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY) and xxxxxxx. (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT) relative to the Professional Engineering Services for EPA NEPA Analysis described in this document.

Project Title The project title is Professional Services for EPA NEPA Analysis and PER for Anclote Road Stormwater and Roadway Improvement Project from Anclote Boulevard to Alternate US 19 - County PID 003897A.

Objective The objective of this document is to define the scope of work and responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY for Professional Engineering Services for EPA NEPA Analysis and PER for the roadway and stormwater improvement project for Anclote Road, from Anclote Boulevard to Alternate US 19 within the City of Tarpon Springs, Pinellas County, Florida.

Project Description The COUNTY previously conducted a Preliminary Engineering Study from 2021 to 2024 to evaluate alternatives for roadway and drainage improvements along Anclote Road from US 19 to Anclote Blvd. A Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) dated June 20, 2024, was prepared to document the analysis and results of this study. The previous study did not include an environmental assessment in accordance with NEPA.

The COUNTY received an earmarked State and Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG) (Clean Water State Revolving Funds) through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Anclote Road project. Before the funds can be awarded, an environmental assessment in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and preparation of an Environmental Information Document (EID) Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) that meets EPA’s guidelines is required.

Proposed work in this scope of services includes additional evaluation and refinement of two previously developed Build Alternatives and the No Build Alternative. The evaluation will include a NEPA environmental assessment and alternatives evaluation in accordance with EPA requirements, updating existing project reports from a previous County study, and preparation of updated or new project reports as needed. A Preferred Alternative will be selected based on this evaluation. This scope does not include development of additional alternatives.

Background Anclote Road is a continuous 2.4-mile two-lane collector road serving underdeveloped industrial and commercial areas, employment centers, and residential areas in unincorporated Pinellas County and the City of Tarpon Springs. The COUNTY has identified this area as a Target Employment Center for economic development which will allow increased density for uses such as manufacturing, office, and research and development. The transportation objectives for improving this corridor are to provide multimodal access to industrial, workforce, and residential areas, improve safety, and enhance stormwater management.

Proposed improvements will include rehabilitation of roadway pavement, drainage improvements, and improved bicycle pedestrian facilities. The existing roadway pavement in many locations is in poor condition and requires rehabilitation. The project area currently experiences localized flooding along Anclote Road, Center Avenue, Savannah Avenue, and other locations along the project limits. The drainage infrastructure improvements include roadway, sidewalk, and shoulder grading and regrading to improve stormwater conveyance, roadway cross-slope corrections, and the addition of a drainage system in flood prone areas. The project proposes the addition of offsite stormwater management facilities (SMF) and/or floodplain compensation (FPC) sites to meet flood compensation, flood control, and water quality requirements. The project will also provide improved access to Elfers and Coastal Anclote Trails.

It is anticipated that project will be divided into design and/or construction segment as outlined below.

Construction Phase 1 - From Alternate US 19 to the intersection of Anclote Road and L&R Industrial Boulevard including outfalls. Also includes Center Avenue from Anclote Road to Fulton Street.

Construction Phase 2 - From intersection of Anclote Road and L&R Industrial Boulevard to intersection of Anclote Road and Wesley Avenue (includes the 90-degree bend north of the intersection of Wesley Avenue and Anclote Road intersection and outfalls). Also includes Savannah Avenue from Anclote Road to Brady Road.

Construction Phase 3 - From the 90-degree bend north of the intersection of Wesley Avenue and Anclote Road Intersection to Anclote Boulevard, including outfalls.

Construction Phase 4 - Brady Road - From Anclote Road to Work Release Center.

Construction Phase 5 - Brady Road Trail - From Work Release Center to L&R Industrial Boulevard.

Project Scope of Work The County is seeking the professional services of an engineering and environmental CONSULTANT to evaluate two previously developed build alternatives and a “No -Build” alternative in accordance with NEPA, prepare a PER and EID which meet EPA’s grant requirements, and recommend a preferred alternative which will move forward to design.

The scope of this work assignment includes, but not limited to, the following:

General Tasks Data Collection and Existing Conditions Assessment Engineering Analysis and Documentation Environmental Analysis and Documentation Alternatives Analysis Public Involvement Required Deliverables Preliminary Engineering Report (PER to meet EPA requirements) Conceptual Drainage Technical Memorandum Pond Siting Report (Optional Services) Traffic Analysis/Safety Report Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurrence Contamination Technical Memorandum Seasonal High Groundwater and Asphalt Pavement Evaluation Environmental Information Document (EID) Tree Inventory, Condition, Risk and Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum Conceptual plans for all Build Alternatives Preliminary Cost Estimate for all Build Alternatives Public Involvement Summary Report Other Deliverables as specified within the tasks below Task 1: Project General Tasks

1.1 Project Management

The CONSULTANT will be responsible for general project administration, and project coordination with other disciplines, subconsultants, and the COUNTY.

1.2 Contract Maintenance

This task includes project management efforts for complete setup and maintenance of files, electronic folders, and documents, developing technical monthly progress reports, and schedules. The design schedule for this project is anticipated to be 12 months. The CONSULTANT shall setup and submit monthly invoices along with an updated schedule and project status report.

1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control

The COUNTY requires that all Project documents, technical studies, calculations, maps, reports, conceptual plans, design, and the Environmental Document are correct and complete, appropriate for the intended purposes, and conform to requirements of this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT is responsible for the quality of all (including the subconsultants) deliverables. The CONSULTANT will independently and continually review deliverables for accuracy and completeness. The CONSULTANT will develop and follow an internal Quality Control (QC) process. The QC process is intended to ensure that quality is achieved through checking, reviewing, and verifying work activities and deliverables by qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work.

Within twenty (20) business days from the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall submit its QC Plan to the COUNTY Project Manager for approval. The QC Plan will identify the deliverables, the personnel to perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. The QC Plan will be signed by the CONSULTANT Project Manager and the CONSULTANT QC Manager.

The CONSULTANT shall include document reviews and written resolution of comments with each submittal or deliverable to show the QC process was followed. At a minimum, a quality review checklist shall be provided and should include letters, exhibits, technical studies, reports, design calculations, Environmental Document or any documents used or referenced in the QC Plan. The CONSULTANT will maintain documentation which show the QC Plan process was followed. The COUNTY Project Manager may request from the CONSULTANT document reviews and written resolution of comments at any time during the PD&E Study.

1.4 Project Meetings & Schedule

The CONSULTANT will attend meetings with COUNTY staff and /or resources agency staff, other consultants, or other miscellaneous meetings as needed. The CONSULTANT shall provide a meeting agenda prior to each meeting and shall provide written minutes of each meeting within 7 business days after the meeting for COUNTY approval prior to distribution to attendees.

Anticipated Meetings include:

NTP Meeting (1) Typical Sections, Concepts and Alternatives (2) Linear and Offsite Pond Systems (1) Drainage for Roadway/Culvert (1) Structures for Culvert Crossing and Walls (1) Water Management District (1)

USACE (1)

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (1) Right-of-Way (1) Traffic Analysis including Multimodal (1) Utilities (1) Local Governments/Other Entities (2) Progress Meetings (Bi-monthly) (6) PER Phase Review Meetings (2) Miscellaneous Meetings (2) Other meetings can take place of progress meetings as needed.

The CONSULTANT will prepare a project schedule in Microsoft Project.

1.5 Public Involvement

The CONSULTANT will provide support to the COUNTY’s public involvement efforts. Refer to Task 11 below for requirements.

Task 2: Roadway Analysis

2.1 Data Collection and Existing Conditions Assessment

The CONSULTANT will assess existing conditions within the project study limits. Applicable data collected for the project corridor during the prior study and documented in the Preliminary Engineering Report, or other existing project reports and technical memoranda, will be used and included in the documentation. Existing conditions will be documented in the PER, updated project reports, and the EID.

The CONSULTANT will review available information and conduct site reviews to help facilitate the delivery of this project. New or updated data that may be collected and reviewed includes, but is not limited to:

Roadway and sidewalk pavement conditions Driveways/curb cuts Street lighting locations and conditions Crosswalks, ramps, and ADA assessment Locations of stormwater infrastructure Land use context (existing and future) GIS information Surveys and track Maps (to be provided by the COUNTY) Existing aerials COUNTY’s Stormwater Inventory (to be provided by the COUNTY) Previously prepared reports (to be provided by the COUNTY) Crash data Traffic counts Transit Recreational trails and sidewalks (existing and proposed) School bus use of the project corridor (number of school buses and destinations) Utility atlases (GIS shape files to be provided by the COUNTY) Utility designations As-built drawings (to be provided by the COUNTY if available) Anclote River Watershed Management Plan (WMP) and associated data Soils information Wetlands -location and quality Wildlife habitat and occurrences For data provided by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information.

2.2 Design Controls and Criteria

The CONSULTANT shall prepare design controls and criteria for developing Project alternatives and designing initial geometrics and other roadway elements according to the COUNTY standards.

2.3 Typical Section Analysis

The CONSULTANT shall develop conceptual typical sections for the Project alternatives which address transportation needs and context. Development of typical sections will consider Context Sensitive Solutions and the needs of all Project users.

2.4 Geometric Design

The CONSULTANT shall perform geometric design using the established Project design controls and criteria. The CONSULTANT will also use Project traffic data and results of traffic analysis to design appropriate roadway elements. The CONSULTANT will establish both preliminary vertical profile and horizontal alignments of the mainline. The design of Project alternatives will consider environmental constraints, physical constraints, Context Sensitive Solutions, and any additional information, as required.

For each alternative evaluated in detail, the CONSULTANT shall prepare sketches of plan, profile, and typical sections as appropriate to show existing features, proposed geometry, and location of any environmental and geometric design constraints.

2.5 Multimodal Accommodations

The CONSULTANT will review, evaluate, and document the location and condition of existing pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit accommodations and freight services in the Study Area. This activity includes reviewing existing plans, reports, and studies that outline strategies or define projects associated with alternative modes of travel.

The CONSULTANT will consider freight, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit in the development and evaluation of Project alternatives commensurate with the context with a goal of improving overall mobility, access, connectivity, safety, and efficiency. The CONSULTANT will consider and evaluate the existing and anticipated future use of the Project by bicyclists and pedestrians, the potential impacts of the Project alternatives on bicycle and pedestrian travel.

2.6 Maintenance of Traffic

The CONSULTANT will evaluate alternatives for constructability and the ability to maintain traffic during construction. The CONSULTANT will include the estimated cost to maintain traffic in the construction cost estimate for the Project alternative.

2.7 Cost Estimates

Construction Cost Estimates The CONSULTANT will develop construction cost estimates using the Florida Department of Transportation's Long Range Estimate (LRE) program. Pay Items and unit costs should be consistent with Pinellas County estimates. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for reviewing and updating the cost estimate when scope changes occur, at project milestones, and during the COUNTY's annual Capital Improvements Plan update cycle. Construction costs will include traffic management and right of way costs.

Right of Way Cost Estimates Based on typical section analysis and design standards, the CONSULTANT will establish construction limits and determine the minimum (proposed) right of way requirements throughout the limits of the Project. Establishment of construction limits will consider location drainage features, the transportation management plan, utility relocations, stormwater pond requirements, and identified environmental issues, among other factors.

The CONSULTANT will compare the existing right of way width with the proposed right of way requirements to estimate the amount of right of way that the COUNTY must acquire.

The CONSULTANT will estimate the cost for right of way acquisition, and cost estimates for relocations and business damages, if any. The CONSULTANT will submit concept plans for the Build Alternative that include the parcel identification number, existing right of way lines, proposed right of way lines and acreage of property required. Additionally, the CONSULTANT will provide a spreadsheet with the following parcel information: owner, address, acreage of parent parcel and required amount of property for the Project, estimated business damages and right of way property costs.

The CONSULTANT will conduct an interactive field trip to review conditions in the corridor as they pertain to actual conditions that might impact the cost of right of way acquisition for the Project.

Task 3. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis

3.1 Data Collection/Analysis

The CONSULTANT shall review the existing Transportation/Traffic Analysis Report (included as Appendix G in the PER). The CONSULTANT shall determine if additional traffic data is needed. If needed, the CONSULTANT will collect traffic data, including crash reports and 24-hour machine counts. The CONSULTANT shall also conduct field observations of bicycle usage and pedestrian activity including pedestrian crossings at proposed mid-block locations.

The CONSULTANT shall use the existing information, additional data collection, field observations, and aerial maps to evaluate two Build Alternatives.

The CONSULTANT shall conduct an engineering study for the installation of marked pedestrian crosswalks and/or treatments with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at appropriate locations. The guidelines provided in the latest County Transportation Design Manual will be used for developing this study.

The CONSULTANT shall document the traffic analysis methodology, analysis and results in a Traffic Analysis/Safety Report.

3.2 Traffic Data for Air Quality Analysis – Optional Services Traffic Data for Air Analysis is only needed if the total vehicular delay time (veh-hours) at an intersection in the design year build condition is projected to increase when compared to the design year no-build condition and/or the project is expected to have community controversy regarding air quality. (Coordination with FDOT District specialists may be required to determine potential community controversy.)

The CONSULTANT shall be provided all traffic data required for the air quality analysis which will include the following:

Intersection type and approach speeds Intersections - peak hour volumes for each approach

3.3 Crash Data

The CONSULTANT shall obtain the most recent five (5) years of available data from the Signal 4 crash database and other local sources for this Project. The crash data will include the number and type of crashes, crash locations, number of fatalities and injuries, and estimates of property damage and economic loss. Fatal and severe injury crashes, as well as crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists will be highlighted and discussed.

3.4 Safety Analysis

Based on the information obtained from the crash data, the CONSULTANT will identify project safety needs associated with the existing and future conditions. The CONSULTANT will use the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) procedures to estimate the safety performance of the Project alternatives as agreed upon in the Traffic Analysis Methodology. The CONSULTANT shall document the results of the safety analysis in a Traffic Analysis/Safety Report.

3.5 Maintenance of Traffic

The CONSULTANT will evaluate alternatives for constructability and the ability to maintain traffic during construction. The CONSULTANT will include the estimated cost to maintain traffic in the construction cost estimate for the Project alternative.

Task 4: Drainage Analysis

4.1 Data Collection

Data Collection: The CONSULTANT shall review the existing drainage analysis documentation in the PER (July 2024) and other pertinent drainage documentation, and if needed, existing plans, available GIS data, Anclote River Watershed Management Plan, and model data to determine current drainage patterns and systems.

The CONSULTANT shall perform field reviews during rainfall events to document existing on-site and off-site drainage patterns including any drainage problems that may be occurring within the project limits.

The CONSULTANT shall gather floodplain data from the WMP, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps, and other drainage related data needed to obtain permits from relevant sources including local government, local agencies, and regulatory agencies. Portions of this project fall within the 100-year floodplain. The Pinellas County Code, Chapter 158, "Floodplain Management," prohibits the loss of floodplain volume. The mitigating of any fill placed with the floodplain must comply with Chapter 158.

4.2 Analysis

The CONSULTANT shall delineate the basin boundaries by using the existing WMP, the latest LiDAR information, existing survey data, and field observations. The CONSULTANT shall analyze and determine high water elevations in each basin and use the information to establish the preliminary roadway profile. Drainage analysis shall also include checking the capacity and structural adequacy of existing cross drains, preliminary design of potential cross drains and outfall structures and identifying the recommended conceptual drainage design for the project.

4.3 Stormwater Management Analysis

The CONSULTANT shall calculate the stormwater quality and attenuation requirements and estimate the stormwater management facility needs for each roadway alternative. Treatment and attenuation must meet the requirements of the County’s Stormwater Manual as well as state requirements. Incorporation of Green Infrastructure shall be considered.

Pinellas County stormwater requirements for water quality may be stricter and more specific than State requirements. Obtaining a permit or exemption from a state agency will not exempt a project from Pinellas County regulations. See Pinellas County Code of Ordinances, Land Development Code, especially Chapter 154 and the Pinellas County Stormwater Manual.

The CONSULTANT shall review the existing drainage analysis documentation in the PER (July 2024) and other pertinent drainage documentation, and if needed, will identify potential viable pond sites with capacity to meet stormwater requirements for each project alternative, estimate construction cost, compare the sites, and identify (in coordination with the COUNTY) a preferred pond site for each basin. Additionally, the CONSULTANT shall identify inflow or outfall easement requirements for each pond site.

If it is determined that additional stormwater ponds are required, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY personnel to identify the most economical and viable sites. Preparation of a Pond Siting Report will be considered optional services if the COUNTY determines that detailed investigation of alternative pond sites is required.

4.4 Hydraulics

No bridges occur within the project corridor. Cross drains within the project corridor range from 24 inches to 42 inches. Existing drainage conditions are presented in the PER (July 2024). The CONSULTANT will review this information and determine if hydraulics analysis is necessary.

4.5 Sea Level Rise Analysis

Following a review of the existing drainage analysis (included in the PER July 2024), the CONSULTANT will coordinate with the COUNTY to determine if additional sea level rise (SLR) analyses are required. If required, the CONSULTANT shall use the COUNTY’s Flood Resiliency Tool to determine potential SLR impacts and associated risks.

4.6 Documentation

The Drainage Analysis will be documented in a technical memorandum.

Task 5: Structures Analysis There are no bridges within the project limits. Cross drains within the project limits range from 24 inches to 42 inches. Existing drainage conditions are presented in the previous PER (July 2024). The CONSULTANT shall evaluate reports from the previous study that address the condition of existing culverts within the project limits, conduct a field review and make recommendations for repair or replacement.

If repair or replacement of culverts is recommended, the CONSULTANT shall prepare preliminary cost estimates for recommended repairs or replacement.

Task 6: Utility Coordination The CONSULTANT will prepare a Utility Assessment Package. The Utility Assessment Package must contain items specified in Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E Manual.

The CONSULTANT shall notify the UAOs within the Project area and request existing and planned utility information for major above ground and subsurface facilities within the Project area.

The CONSULTANT will coordinate with the COUNTY Utility Coordinator each UAO as necessary, to understand utility conflicts and project potential impacts on utilities. The CONSULTANT will evaluate and consider potentially significant utility conflicts as they may affect the chosen corridor and/or alignment. While evaluating potential impacts and recommending mitigation strategies, the CONSULTANT should refrain from making any compensability determinations in any of the documentation/ assessments that they create.

Task 7: Geotechnical The CONSULTANT shall provide a geotechnical study to obtain the information necessary for the study. The geotechnical study shall provide information necessary to determine the suitability of soils for future improvements, existing ground water levels and estimation of seasonal high groundwater table. The CONSULTANT shall also review the US Department of Agriculture soil data, Natural Resource Conservation Service (NCRS) maps, US Geological Survey (USGS) maps, and summarize the findings.

The CONSULTANT shall also perform a review of previously completed geotechnical surveys and compile available boring data from previous projects within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will perform field reconnaissance of the Project area to determine conditions that may affect development of Project alternatives. The CONSULTANT will prepare a Geotechnical Technical Memorandum summarizing the geotechnical investigation that will be used to facilitate the data for final design.

Task 8: Preliminary Engineering Report The CONSULTANT will prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) in accordance with EPA guidelines.

The CONSULTANT shall include sufficient back up information related to all computer programs and parameters used in the analyses to facilitate the review of the engineering documentation. The engineering documentation shall be neatly and logically presented. The final engineering analysis documentation prepared by the CONSULTANT shall be signed and sealed by a Florida-licensed professional engineer.

Task 9: Resiliency Analysis The CONSULTANT will perform an analysis to determine the current and future risk related to flooding and other stressors (such as extreme heat) for each of the Project alternatives. The CONSULTANT shall also evaluate the project utilizing the Pinellas County’s Flood Resiliency Tool, [as required]. The analysis will identify risks related to sea level/tidal flooding, storm surge, precipitation, groundwater, and heat, assessing the potential impacts.

The CONSULTANT shall also consider material selection/sourcing, construction requirements, operational requirements, and infrastructure orientation, together with other considerations, in developing a resilient design that is consistent with the schedule and budget. The CONSULTANT shall first consider the used of nature-based and/or hybrid solutions in the design alternatives, to the maximum extent feasible, and evaluate the cost-benefit of their use. The use of free tools such as Climate Positive Design-Pathfinder, should be considered to assess how simple material substitutions can minimize environmental impacts and increase asset longevity without significant impact to budget.

Strategies that are feasible to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the impacts as described above should be included in the evaluation and documented in the Natural Resources Evaluation Documentation.

Task 10: Environmental Analysis and Documentation The CONSULTANT shall collect pertinent environmental data, conduct analyses, and document the analyses and results in an Environmental Information Document (EID) as required by EPA. The CONSULTANT will analyze all Build Alternatives and the No Build Alternative with respect to impacts to natural, cultural, social and physical resources in accordance with the procedures in the current NEPA guidance from EPA.

Wherever appropriate the CONSULTANT shall describe proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate project impacts to the environment.

10.1 Natural Resources

Water Quality The CONSULTANT will address impacts to water quality in accordance with EPA guidelines including:

Public health problems due to water quality Water quality problems, fish kills, etc.

Water quantity problems (i.e., drought, arid conditions, groundwater overdrafts, location of water source from site, if applicable) Surface and ground water hydrology Drinking water sources and supply Wetlands and Other Surface Waters The CONSULTANT will identify and quantify impacts to wetlands and other surface waters located within the project corridor. The jurisdiction limits of all wetlands shall be flagged in the field by the CONSULTANT within the project area. The CONSULTANT shall provide GPS data for the limits of all wetlands and/or surface water limits.

The CONSULTANT will utilize the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) to determine the type, quality, and function of wetlands that will be impacted by the project. The CONSULTANT will evaluate direct and indirect impact to wetlands, including functional loss for each Build Alternative, and identify measures that avoid wetland impacts. Where wetland impacts are unavoidable, the CONSULTANT will identify practicable measures to minimize impacts, as required. The CONSULTANT will identify conceptual mitigation options to address potential impacts if applicable.

Floodplains The CONSULTANT will gather floodplain data from FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps, and other drainage related data needed to obtain permits from relevant sources including local government, local agencies, and regulatory agencies. For each roadway alternative, the CONSULTANT will determine base floodplain elevations and estimate encroachments and appropriate compensation provisions, including incorporating floodplain compensation site requirements into the Pond Siting Report.

Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species The CONSULTANT will evaluate the magnitude of potential impacts to protected species, and designated or proposed critical habitats within the project study area. Information should also be collected on habitat connectivity, areas that are ecologically important, and species that are otherwise protected by regulation.

The CONSULTANT will perform literature review, field reviews, surveys, and coordination necessary to determine project involvement with, and potential impacts to, protected species and their habitats including proposed conservation measures as required.

Essential Fish Habitat The CONSULTANT will review the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) mapping tool to verify EFH presence and determine if the NMFS recommends conducting an essential fish habitat (EFH) analysis.

If required by NMFS, the CONSULTANT will conduct an EFH analysis. This task will be considered optional services. The analysis shall verify the location and type of EFH, and the related federally managed species to be addressed. The CONSULTANT shall determine the potential for impacts associated with all alternatives, and identify conceptual mitigation options to address potential impacts, if appropriate. Review of GIS data, field reviews, and surveys will be used to collect data for this analysis.

10.2 Cultural Resources

The CONSULTANT will review the existing Draft CRAS (February 2023), and if needed, analyze the impacts of the proposed alternatives to cultural resources, to update the document. All work shall be conducted by a professional qualified under the provisions of 36 CFR 61 in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665, as amended) and the implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) as well as with the provisions contained in Chapter 267, Florida Statutes.

The CONSULTANT will review the existing CRAS, and if needed, identify any archaeological sites within the APE, including those previously recorded, to update the document. If applicable, the CONSULTANT will excavate the appropriate number of shovel tests to delineate the boundaries of the site. If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall identify any existing historic resources that are 45 years of age or older within the project area, including those previously recorded. Enough data will be collected to document each site or resource’s significance in terms of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The APE must include potential pond sites (if applicable).

An updated Draft CRAS will be prepared with the appropriate level of documentation detailing the results of the survey, including the final assessments of resource significance, and including a Florida Master Site File (FMSF) form for all identified resources and a Survey Log, if needed. The Draft CRAS will be coordinated with SHPO, and following this coordination, a Final CRAS will be prepared. Concurrence from SHPO with the conclusions of the CRAS is required.

10.3 Physical

Air Quality The CONSULTANT will gather and review data pertinent to air quality within the limits of the project.

(Optional Service). The CONSULTANT will gather data, perform the air quality screening analysis, and prepare the Air Quality Technical Memorandum, to document the results of the screening analysis in accordance with EPA requirements and guidance. Traffic data shall be prepared by the project’s Traffic Engineer. The CONSULTANT will coordinate air quality modeling if the project fails the Screening Test.

Physiography, Topography, Geology, and Soils The CONSULTANT will document the physiography, topography, geology, and soils within the study area.

Contamination The CONSULTANT will gather updated information, review data, and investigate contamination issues within the limits of the project and identify any new potentially contaminated sites. The CONSULTANT will update the existing Contamination Technical Memorandum (February 28, 2022) as needed. The CONSULTANT will determine if Phase II contamination testing is required.

Land Use and Development, Percent Impervious Cover, Pollutant Sources The CONSULTANT will include information on existing site conditions including land use and development, percent impervious cover, and pollutant sources. The CONSULTANT will evaluate the project’s consistency with the physical character of the area and applicable community plans. Related data and analysis will be documented in the EID, and summarized in the PER.

10.4 Identify Permit Needs

The CONSULTANT will identify the permits required for the project and summarize the permits anticipated in the EID.

It is anticipated that permits may be required from the US Army Corps of Engineers/Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and the Southwest Florida Water Management District.

Task 11: Tree Inventory, Condition, and Impact Assessment The CONSULTANT will perform a tree inventory on the provided tree survey data on Anclote Road from Anclote Boulevard to Alternate US 19.

Data collected for tree inventory will include species identification and tree rating category per Sec. 138-3654 (1) (4) of the Pinellas County municipal code.

The CONSULTANT will provide a tree impact analysis and tree mitigation estimates associated with each roadway alternative and potential stormwater pond sites:

Impacts to existing trees associated with roadway and stormwater improvements.

Tree impact analysis will include a summary of the trees to be removed for each of the alternatives proposed.

Tree impact analysis will be in a table form with proposed tree mitigation associated with tree removal calculated per Sec. 138-3654 (1) (4) The CONSULTANT will perform a tree impact analysis associated with the proposed alternatives based on the tree inventory. The tree impact analysis for the proposed alternatives will include canopy impact estimates based on DBH measurements from the survey (i.e. 1 inch tree DBH = 1 foot canopy radius). Tree mitigation will be calculated per Sec. 138-3654(a)(4), Pinellas County Land Development Code (LDC).

The alternatives should be designed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate tree impacts, in that order of precedence. The tree protection buffers available as part of the Pinellas County CAD kit should be used to assess tree impacts and assist with the design process. For trees impacts that cannot be avoided, the analysis for each alternative will include a summary of trees to be removed, their associated canopy area reduction, and the recommended mitigation plan, in the form of a table.

The CONSULTANT will prepare a Tree Inventory, Condition, Risk and Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum which documents the methodology and results of the assessment.

Task 12: Alternatives Evaluation

11.1 Comparative Alternatives Evaluation

The CONSULTANT shall establish evaluation criteria at the beginning of the Project, which will be agreed upon with the COUNTY and EPA before use in the comparative evaluation of alternatives. After developing the viable alternatives, analyzing alternatives and estimating costs, the CONSULTANT will prepare a matrix which compares the impacts, performance, and costs of the alternatives evaluated. Sustainability, including water and energy efficiency and potential use of green infrastructure shall be considered in the development of alternatives. The matrix will include the performance of the No Build Alternative as the baseline for comparison.

12.2 Selection of a Preferred Alternative

The CONSULTANT will recommend a Preferred Alternative for the COUNTY’s approval based on review and analysis of engineering, environmental, and public involvement issues related to this Project.

Task 13: Concept Plans The CONSULTANT will prepare concept plans for all viable Project alternatives in appropriate scales overlaid on the base map.

13.1 Base Map

The CONSULTANT will produce a base map of the project area using COUNTY's CADD standards. The base map will contain an aerial photo and existing characteristics for the project. The base map will show environmental issues that are specific to the project area such as cemeteries, wetlands, historic properties, high-risk contamination sites, public parks, and property lines.

The CONSULTANT will prepare base maps for the following uses (at noted scales):

Overall Project Location Map 1:2000 Overall Drainage Map 1:500 Corridor Base Maps (Roll Plots) 1:50

13.2 Alternative Concept Plans

The CONSULTANT will prepare and overlay the alternative concept plans for all viable alternatives on the base map. The concept plan will show potential location of bridges, culverts, retaining walls, right of way lines (existing and proposed), major utility facilities, intersections, critical driveways, and median openings, among other roadway elements, at appropriate scale in accordance with the PINELLAS COUNTY-CADD Toolkit.

13.3 Design Exceptions and Design Variations

The CONSULTANT will identify Design Exceptions and Design Variations required for the preferred alternative for approval in accordance with the FDM. This information will be included in the PER and Typical Section Package.

Task 14: Public Outreach The CONSULTANT will identify stakeholders, develop content for a project website page, prepare presentation and meeting materials for public meetings, and assist the COUNTY in advertising public outreach opportunities through mailouts, social media, press releases and other appropriate methods.

Local Government Coordination Coordination with local government staff of the City of Tarpon Springs will occur throughout the design of the project. Coordination will include, but is not limited to:

Preparation of presentations and/or display boards Attendance to support the COUNTY as needed Project Website The COUNTY will establish and maintain a project link on the COUNTY’s website. The public will be able to submit comments via the website.

The CONSULTANT will provide project information to be posted on the website including, but not limited to:

Project location map Project description Project schedule Information about upcoming and past public meetings Information updates as needed (Project Newsletters) All presentations, exhibits and graphics prepared for any on-line meeting and for the project website will meet requirements of WCAG 2.1 Level AA Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Project Kick-Off Post Card The COUNTY will prepare a post card to notify property owners along the project corridor and other stakeholders that the project is underway. The COUNTY will prepare, mail, and pay for the postage of postcards which will serve as an invitation/notification of the public meeting(s). This post card will be mailed after the project website is developed and live.

Public Meetings The CONSULTANT will assist the COUNTY with scheduling and conducting one on-line (zoom) project information meeting with local residents, businesses and other stakeholders along the project corridor. The purpose of this meeting is to present the Build Alternatives and Preferred Alternative to the public.

The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the following tasks:

Identification of Stakeholders Preparation and maintenance of a mailing list for public outreach activities which includes residents, business owners, elected officials, and other stakeholders Preparation of graphics, power point presentations, and/or display boards Preparation of meeting handout (for in-person meeting) Provide staff to assist the COUNTY during the on-line (zoom) public meeting Public Involvement Summary Report The CONSULTANT will prepare a Public Involvement Summary Report which includes the following:

Summary of comments received during, and in response to the public meeting, as well as any other comments received for the duration of the project.

A description of all public involvement activities, including copies of handouts, meeting materials, attendee lists, and presentations.

Other Public Involvement Tasks The CONSULTANT will prepare any graphics or related information needed to discuss the project with stakeholders and adjacent property owners/occupants for one-on-one discussions as needed.

V. COMPENSATION

Invoicing shall take place monthly and will include a progress report summarizing the work completed during the invoice period as well as a schedule update. The CONSULTANT shall pre-submit invoices to the project manager prior to an official monthly submittal. The final invoice shall be marked “FINAL” and be accompanied by a letter from the CONSULTANT stating that this is the final invoice and that compensation for tasks completed as described in the Scope of Services is now completed.

VI. SCHEDULE

The CONSULTANT'S services shall commence upon receipt of written notice to proceed issued by the COUNTY. The estimated time to complete the project is 12 months.

The CONSULTANT shall provide a Microsoft Project Schedule with updates to be included with each monthly invoice submittal. The schedule assumes 21 days for the COUNTY to review deliverables.

image1.jpg image2.emf