Amendment 1 - QA.pdf

PDF 182 KB Posted

Attached to
RFI Out of Cell Tracking for Restrictive Housing Units
Solicitation number
K13570
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is an Amendment 1 Q&A for a Request for Information (RFI) issued by the Washington State Department of Corrections. The RFI's purpose is to seek a vendor to accurately track out-of-cell time for incarcerated individuals in Restrictive Housing units across various facilities in Washington state. The key details provided in the amendment include the agency's existing offender management system (OMNI), plans to utilize Wi-Fi for real-time tracking as funding becomes available, and the approximate staffing levels and equipment needs (number of devices) for each facility.

The RFI covers multiple jurisdictions in Washington state, including several counties and cities. No pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding sources, or other salient information is provided in this amendment. The document focuses on answering vendor questions to clarify the agency's current systems and infrastructure related to the requested tracking solution.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment B - Information Requested.docx DOCX document
RFI K13570 Out of Cell.pdf.crdownload CRDOWNLOAD file
Attachment A - Requirements.docx DOCX document
RFI K13570 Out of Cell.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Washington State K13570 Page 1 of 1 Department of Corrections Amendment 1 24RCP

State of Washington RFI K13570 Department of Corrections AMENDMENT 1

Q&A

Purpose of amendment: To publish vendor questions and their corresponding answers.

1) Does they agency use a homegrown OMS, or another system? If another system, please provide the name of the OMS.

A. Yes, the system is Offender Management Network Information (OMNI)

2) Does the agency have Wi-Fi in the restrictive housing units that the vendor could utilize for uploading data? If Wi-Fi is not currently in place, does the agency plan on installing Wi-Fi in these areas to allow for real-time tracking?

A. No, however, the agency plans to utilize Wi-Fi as facility funding becomes available for installation of such Wi-Fi.

3) On average, how many staff are assigned to a restrictive housing area per shift for each facility that are responsible for conducting checks, logging meals, supplies, etc.?

A. AHCC: ~7 (10 devices) B. CBCC: ~7 (10 devices) C. CRCC: ~11 (15 devices) D. MCC-IMU: ~7 (10 devices) E. MCC-SOU: ~6 (10 devices) F. SCCC: ~6 (10 devices) G. WCC: ~7 (10 devices) H. WCCW: ~5 (8 devices) I. WSP: ~20 (25 devices)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .