Albuquerque Service Unit Building 21 Asbestos Report.pdf
PDF 524 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Door Inspection, Assessment, and Maintenance at the Albuquerque Area IHS Healthcare Facilities
- Solicitation number
- 75H70727Q00003
About this file
This is an asbestos survey report conducted for the Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service, Division of Health Facilities, documenting bulk sampling and laboratory analysis of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in Building No. 21 at the Albuquerque Service Unit.
The survey was performed on April 14, 2006, by Ms. Stephanie Jury of Federal Occupational Health (FOH), who holds current AHERA accreditation as an Asbestos Building Inspector. The inspection covered both the original 1930 section (four stories with penthouse) and the 1980 addition (two stories) of the building. A total of 152 samples were collected from the 1930 section and 71 samples from the 1980 addition, with analysis conducted by FOH EH Environmental Laboratory in Denver, Colorado, which is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Laboratory findings identified various ACMs in both sections, including floor tiles and mastics, sheet vinyl flooring and mastic, sink undercoating, window/door frame caulk, fire doors and frames, exterior stucco, and roof penetration mastic containing chrysotile and amosite asbestos. Materials are classified as either friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) or non-friable NESHAP Category I or II materials, with all identified materials currently in good condition.
The programming cost estimate for asbestos abatement totals $617,349.45, comprising $559,662.20 for the 1930 section and $59,840.75 for the 1980 addition, including an 18% logistical markup. Removal work requires appropriately trained and certified personnel, and disposal must be conducted at EPA-approved landfills accepting the respective asbestos waste classifications. The report emphasizes that conclusions are based on discrete sampling locations and may not represent conditions at non-sampled locations, with final risk acceptance decisions remaining with the client.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ASBESTOS SURVEY
At
ALBUQUERQUE SERVICE UNIT
Building No. 21
For
Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service Division of Health Facilities 5300 Homestead Road, NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110
By
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health
2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx-21 Seattle, Washington 98121-2500
June 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page No.
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Description of Inspected Area
3.0 Survey Procedures
4.0 Findings
5.0 Abatement Cost Estimate
6.0 Project Limitations……………………………
Appendices
1 Location of Functional Spaces and Bulk Sample Logs
2 Laboratory Results
3 Certifications
Area Wide Asbestos Building Inspection Indian Health Service Facilities
Albuquerque Service Unit
Albuquerque, New Mexico
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As requested by the Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service, bulk sampling of suspect asbestos-containing building materials was conducted in the original 1930 section and the 1980 addition of Building No. 21, located at the Albuquerque Service Unit, Albuquerque, New Mexico, on April 14, 2006. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were collected throughout the interior and exterior of the building.
Ms. Stephanie Jury, representing Federal Occupational Health (FOH), performed the asbestos inspection of the subject property. Ms. Jury holds current Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accreditation as an Asbestos Building Inspector. Sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials was conducted using procedures similar to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AHERA regulations, 40 CFR 763. The Federal Occupational Health EH Environmental Laboratory in Denver, Colorado, performed the laboratory analysis of the asbestos samples.
Laboratory analysis indicates that various floor tiles and mastics, sheet vinyl flooring mastic, sink undercoating, interior and exterior window/door frame caulk, fire doors, fire door frames, exterior stucco, and roof penetration mastic in the original 1930 section of Building No. 21 contain asbestos. Laboratory analysis also indicates that floor tile mastic, sheet vinyl flooring, sink undercoating, and cements asbestos panels in the 1980 addition contain asbestos. Fire doors and fire door frames throughout the 1980 addition are assumed to be positive for asbestos.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF INSPECTED AREA
This inspection focused on the original 1930 section and the 1980 addition of the entire interior and exterior of the building. The 1930 section of the building is four stories with a penthouse and a stucco exterior built slab-on grade. The roof consists of a membrane roofing system with various penetration mastics. The 1980 addition is two stories built slab on grade with a stucco exterior and a membrane roof.
Suspect building materials identified and sampled in the subject property included the following: various floor tiles and associated mastics, sheet vinyl flooring and associated mastics, carpet mastic, various floor and wall ceramic tile grout, various gypsum drywall materials, plaster materials, wall sheet vinyl, concrete masonry unit (CMU), CMU mortar, various bricks, brick mortar, various ceiling tiles, fireproofing, fireproof caulk, fire doors, fire door frames, exterior stucco, various covebase mastics, sink undercoating, interior/exterior window and door frame caulk, exterior window putty, various caulks, cement asbestos panels and various roof mastics.
3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES
Each room was assigned unique functional space numbers. Each functional space was visually inspected for suspect asbestos-containing materials. Materials were mapped and quantified on maps provided by the IHS or hand drawn maps.
Each suspect ACM was designated as a distinct homogeneous area, which is a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material. The inspector touched each suspect material in order to determine friability.
A sufficient number of samples were collected of each material to satisfy the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) regulations for the determination of asbestos content. A total of 152 samples were collected from the original 1930 section. 71 samples were collected from the 1980 addition of Building 21.
Each sample was assigned a unique sample identification number and assessed for damage and friability classifications. The samples, with Chain of Custody documentation were delivered to FOH EH Environmental Laboratory for analysis. The FOH EH Environmental Laboratory is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for bulk-asbestos sample analysis conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
A description of the samples taken, location, and summary of laboratory results are located in Appendix 1.
The asbestos laboratory reports are included as Appendix 2.
4.0 FINDINGS
Results of the asbestos inspection are as follows:
Table 1:
Albuquerque Service Unit Building No. 21
Original 1930 Section Bulk Sample Results
April 14, 2006
HA # Material Functional Space ACM Condition Quantity
1A 12”x12” Floor Tile &
Mastic (White w/ Gray)
102, 104-111, 127-132, 122-125, 119D, C101, C102, C104, C105, S102, 201, 202, 204-206, 209, 210, 224, 226, 228, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, C201- C203, E-204, S201, C301,301-311, 321-323, C302, C304, S302
No Good 16,756 sf
1B 12”x12” Floor Tile & Mastic (Lt. Green)
114, 121, C105A, 313, 313B, 314, 314B, 315, 316, 318, 318A, 319, 320, C303, 401, 404, 406, 410-
416, 418-421, C403, C404
Yes: 5- 10%
Chrysotile Good 5,300 sf
1C 12”x12” Floor Tile & Mastic (Lt. Brown) 116, C-104 No Good 700 sf
1D Sheet Vinyl Flooring (Blue/White) 115, 117 No Good 268 sf
1E 12”x12” Floor Tile & Mastic (Green/Dark) 117, 118
Yes: 10- 15%
Chrysotile Good 450 sf
1F Ceramic Tile Grout 230B No Good 150 sf
1G Sheet Vinyl Flooring Gray 201, 208, 211
Yes: 5- 10%
Chrysotile (mastic only)
Good 450 sf
1H 12”x12” Floor Tile &
Mastic (Green/Brown/Gray)
121, C105A No Good 152 sf
1I 12”x12” Floor Tile & Mastic (Blue/Black)
203, 204, 214-217, 217A, 218-220, 220A, 221, 222, 235, 313B, 314,314- 316A, 318B, 405, 407, 408, 413A, 415A, 416A, 418A, 419A
No Good 4,252 sf
1J 12”x12” Floor Tile & Mastic (Beige) C404A
Yes: 3-6% Chrysotile
(mastic only)
Good 100 sf
1K White Ceramic Tile Grout (Gray) 402A, 407A, 408A, 410A No Good 400 sf
2A Gypsum Drywall Throughout No Good 35,400 sf 2B Joint Compound Throughout No Good 35,400 sf
2C Drywall Texture 1 (Bumpy)
104, 105, 106A, 108, 124, 125, 125A, 125C, 129, 129A&B, 130, 131, C105A, 224A, 321A, 401, 402, 405-408, 408A, 410, 410A, 412-422, C403, C404, C404A
No Good 10,784 sf
2D Drywall Texture 2 (Thick Orange Peel) 130 No Good 200 sf
2E Drywall Texture 3 (Thick Blotchy) 132, 132A No Good 224 sf
2F Plaster Skin Coat
102, 104B, 106, 109-113, 113A, 119, 119A&B, 121-127, 130, C101, C102, C105, S101, S102, 201-205, 205B, 206-211, 226, 226A, 227-229, 230A, 232, 233, C201, C202, C203, 301, 301A, 303-309, 309B, 310, 311, 316, 320, 321, 323, C301, C302, C304, S302, 402, 404, 411, 415, 416, 420, C403, 501
No Good 70,363 sf
2G Plaster Brown Coat
102, 104B, 106, 109-113, 113A, 119, 119A&B, 121-127, 130, C101, C102, C105, S101, S102, 201-205, 205B, 206-211, 226, 226A, 227-229, 230A, 232, 233, C201, C202, C203, 301, 301A, 303-309, 309B, 310, 311, 316, 320, 321, 323, C301, C302, C304, S302, 402, 404, 411, 415, 416, 420, C403, 501
No Good 70,363 sf
2H 4”x4” Ceramic Wall Tile Grout (White)
230, 402A, 407A, 408A,410A 415A, 416A, 421, 422 No Good 1,014 sf
2I Wall Tile Grout (Gray) C201 No Good 40 sf
2J CMU 108A, 502 No Good 1,000 sf
2K CMU Mortar 108A, 502 No Good 1,000 sf
2L Orange Brick Mortar 112, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119,119A, 119D, 120, 120A No Good 8,000 sf
2M Orange Brick 112, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119,119A, 119D, 120, 120A No Good 8,000 sf
2N Exterior Stucco Exterior Yes: 2-4% Chrysotile Good 150,000 sf
2O Wall Sheet Vinyl C102, C105, C202, C203 No Good 2,550 sf 2P Exterior Green Block Exterior No Good 500 sf
3A 2’x4’ Fissured Ceiling Tile
102, 104-111, 116-119, 119D, 120, 122-125, 127- 132, C101, C102, C104, C105, 201-206, 209-211, 214-222, 224A, 226, 226A, 228-230, 230A&B, 232-235, C201-C203, 301-310, 313-318, 320- 323, 323B, C301-C304, C304A, 401, 402, 402A, 404, 406-408, 410, 410A, 411, 413, 413A, 415- 419,421, 422, C403, C404, C404A
No Good 50,000 sf
3B 2’x2’ Pinhole Ceiling Tile C201 No Good 400 sf
3C 2’x4’ Drywall Ceiling Tile 203 No Good 24 sf
6A Fireproofing (Gray) 119D, 120, 120A, No Good 10,000 sf
6B Red Fireproofing Caulk 501 No Good 500 sf
6C Fire Doors
C101, S101, C102, S102, C104, C105, 109, 112, 119, 119D, C210, S201, S202, C203, 211, 224A, 230, 301, C301, S302, 303, 308, 309, 317, 323B, S403, C404, 405
Yes: 1-2% Chrysotile
5-10% Amosite
Good 37 Doors
6D Fire Door Frame
C101, S101, C102, S102, C104, C105, 109, 112, 119, 119D, C210, S201, S202, C203, 211, 224A, 230, 301, C301, S302, 303, 308, 309, 317, 323B, S403, C404, 405
No Good 37 Door Frames
7A Covebase Mastic (yellow)
Throughout Except:
C101.C102, C105 501, 502, 503, 504 No Good 1,316 sf
7B Window/Door Caulking (White) Throughout No Good 300 sf
7C Sink Undercoating 129, 218, 229, 232, 233, Yes: 4-8% Chrysotile Good 10 sinks
7D Exterior Window Putty Exterior No Good 20 sf
7E Covebase Mastic (Brown) C101, C102, C105 No Good 200 sf
7F Interior Door/ Window Caulk Throughout Penthouse Yes: 1-2%
Chrysotile Good 10 sf
7G Vent Caulk 502 No Good 5 sf
7H Exterior Door/ Window Caulk Exterior Penthouse Yes: 2-4%
Chrysotile Good 5 sf
7I Exterior Green Block Caulk (White) Roof No Good 200 sf
8A Roof Penetration Mastic Roof No Good 400 sf
8B Silver Roof Penetration Mastic Roof
Yes: 10- 20%
Chrysotile Damaged 200 sf
1980 Addition April 14, 2006
1A 5”x5” Orange Ceramic Tile Grout 53 No Good 950 sf
1B 12”x12” Floor Tile &
Mastic (White w/ Blue)
50 No Good 270 sf
1C 12”x12” Floor Tile &
Mastic (White w/ Brown)
Throughout except:
18A, 19, 20, 22, 25, 30, 31, 36, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 45A, Yes: 3-6% Chrysotile
(mastic only) Good 17,305 sf
1D Ceramic Tile Grout 22, 31, 36, 45, 48, 49 No Good 1,448 sf
1E Sheet Vinyl Flooring (Beige) 19, 20, 23 Yes: 10-20%
Chrysotile Good 900 sf
1F Carpet Mastic 27 No Good 3,400 sf 2A Gypsum Drywall Throughout No Good 30,000 sf 2B Joint Compound Throughout No Good 30,000 sf
2C Drywall Texture 1 (Bumpy) Throughout Walls No Good 30,000 sf
2D Wall Tile Grout 18A, 22, 30, 31, 36, 45A, 48, 49 No Good 3,104 sf
2E CMU 50, 52 No Good 800 sf 2F CMU Mortar 50, 52 No Good 800 sf 2G Exterior Stucco Exterior No Good 38,200 sf
3A 2’x4’ Pinhole Ceiling Tile
18, 20, 25, 27, 29, 37, 45, 46 No Good 18,000 sf
3B 2’x4’ Fissured Ceiling Tile 48, 49 No Good 280 sf
6A Fire Doors Throughout Assumed Good 60 doors
6B Fire Door Frames Throughout Assumed Good 60 door frames
7A Covebase Mastic (Yellow/Brown) 50 No Good 700 sf
7B Sink Undercoating 26, 30, 31 Yes: 2-4% Chrysotile Good 5 sinks
7C Interior Window Caulk (Gray) Throughout No Good 100 sf
7D Cement Asbestos Panels
S103, S203, S303, S403
Yes: 25-35% Chrysotile Good 150 sf
8A Black Roof Penetration Mastic Roof No Good 200 sf
8B White Roof Penetration Mastic Roof No Good 200 sf
Laboratory analysis indicates that various floor tiles and mastics, sheet vinyl flooring mastic, sink undercoating, interior and exterior window/door frame caulk, fire doors, fire door frames, exterior stucco, and roof penetration mastic in the original 1930 section Building No. 21 contain asbestos. Laboratory analysis also indicates that floor tile mastic, sheet vinyl, sink undercoating, cement asbestos panels, fire doors, and fire door frames in the 1980 addition contain asbestos.
Floor tile is classified as a non-friable NESHAP Category I material. This material is currently in good condition and intact floor tile poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed flooring material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Floor tile mastic is classified as a non-friable NESHAP Category I material. This material is currently in good condition. Floor tile mastic that is beneath floor tile, i.e., inaccessible, poses little to no health threat.
Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed flooring material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Sheet vinyl flooring and associated materials are classified as friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos- Containing Material (RACM). The material is currently in good condition and intact sheet vinyl flooring poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed sheet vinyl flooring and associated materials should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Sink undercoating is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and undamaged sink undercoating poses little to no health threat. Removal of this material typically involves the physical removal of the sink and should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Cement-asbestos materials are classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and undamaged cement-asbestos poses little to no health threat. Removal of this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel using intact removal methods. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste.
Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Exterior stucco is classified friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM). Stucco is an exterior material; therefore, building occupants will likely not be affected. The material is currently in good condition and undamaged stucco poses little to no health threat. Removal of this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
In an intact condition, asbestos-containing fire doors are classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. Asbestos material is inside the doors, i.e., inaccessible; therefore, intact fire doors pose little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance (e.g. installing hardware) to the doors should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. If removal is required, the doors should be treated as friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM). Removed fire doors should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Window and door frame caulking is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and intact window frame caulking poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed caulking material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Roof penetration mastic is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category I material. The penetration mastic is an exterior material; therefore, building occupants will likely not be affected. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed penetration mastic should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
5.0 ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATE
The programming cost estimate for the removal of asbestos-containing materials follows below.
Identified asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) for the original 1930 section of Building 21 consist of:
floor tile (5,750 sf), floor tile mastic (5,850 sf), sheet vinyl flooring mastic (450 sf), exterior stucco (150,000 sf), fire doors and frames (37doors/frames), sink undercoating (10 sinks), interior/exterior window/door caulk (15 sf) and roof penetration mastic (200 sf). Identified asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) for the 1980 addition of Building 21 include: floor tile mastic (17,305 sf), sheet vinyl flooring (900 sf), sink undercoating (5 sinks) cement asbestos panel (150 sf) fire doors (60 doors), and fire door frames (60).
This programming cost estimate was derived by use of the Means Cost Guide and by consultation with experienced local contractors. It reflects current industry pricing. Future fluctuations in industry pricing, both natural and seasonal, may affect this estimate. In addition, Service Units outside of metropolitan areas may incur additional costs due to travel requirements on the part of abatement contractors. For purposes of this estimate, an 18% mark-up for logistical costs is included.
This estimate is for abatement contractor costs only. Additional costs, which are not included in this estimate, are those of an environmental consultant and replacement of materials that have been removed.
Table 2:
Building No. 21 Original 1930 Section
Programming Cost Estimate
Asbestos-Containing Material Quantity of Material (sf)
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 5,850 sf $2.50 18% $17,257.50
Sheet Vinyl Flooring Mastic 450 sf $2.50 18% $1,327.50 Sink Undercoating 10 sinks $200.00 18% $2,360.00
Exterior Stucco 150,000 sf $3.00 18% $531,000.00 Interior Exterior Window/Door Caulk 15 sf $8.00 18% $ 141.60
Roof Penetration Mastic 200 sf $21.00 18% $4,956.00 Fire Doors and Fire Door Frames 37 $60.00 18% $2,619.60
Total $559,662.20
Table 3:
Building No. 21 1980 Addition
Programming Cost Estimate
Asbestos-Containing Material Quantity of Material (sf)
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile Mastic 17,305 sf $2.50 18% $51,049.75
Sheet Vinyl Flooring 900 sf $2.50 18% $2,655.00 Sink Undercoating 5 sinks $200.00 18% $1,180.00
Cement Asbestos Panels 150 sf $4.00 18% $ 708.00 Fire Doors and Fire Door Frames 60 $60.00 18% $4,248.00
Total $59,840.75
The grand total cost estimate for Building 21 is $617,349.45.
6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS
This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by industrial hygiene and environmental consultants performing similar services.
The procedures used in this investigation attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time, and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all environmental or occupational hazards have been identified and fully evaluated. Where sample collection and testing have been performed, FOH's professional opinions are based in part on the interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at non-sampled locations. FOH assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of FOH or from omissions or errors in public records.
Furthermore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since FOH is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action
APPENDIX 1
Location of Functional Spaces
Bulk Sample Log
APPENDIX 2
Laboratory Results
APPENDIX 3
Certifications
| ASBESTOS SURVEY |
| At |
| ALBUQUERQUE SERVICE UNIT |
| Building No. 21 |
| For |
| By |
| U.S. Public Health Service |
| Federal Occupational Health |
| 2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx-21 |
| Seattle, Washington 98121-2500 |
| June 2007 |
| 1.0INTRODUCTION |
| 2.0DESCRIPTION OF INSPECTED AREA |
| FINDINGS |
Albuquerque Service Unit
| Albuquerque Service Unit |
| Building No. 21 |
| 1980 Addition |
| April 14, 2006 |
| The grand total cost estimate for Building 21 is $617,349.45. |
| 6.0PROJECT LIMITATIONS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .