About this file

J-6 Reference/Past Performace Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
amendment 5.pdf PDF
Route Survey for Honey Creek Part C Thompson Ditch.pdf PDF
Amendment 4 to Solicitation AG-52KY-10-S-0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 to AG-52KY-S-10-0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 2 to Solicitation.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 to AG-52KY-10-S-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment J1.pdf PDF
Attachment J4.pdf PDF
FBO solicitation package.pdf PDF
Attachment J2 plans.pdf PDF
Attachment J3.pdf PDF
Attachment J5.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Attn: Alyson Keaton 6013 Lakeside Blvd.

Indianapolis, IN 46278

FAX: 317-290-3225

Email: alyson.keaton@in.usda.gov

N/O-No Opinion - No opinion can be offered based on your experience with the contractor.

EX-Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG-Very Good-Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S-Satisfactory-Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MG-Marginal-Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US-Unsatisfactory-Performance does not meet those contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. Completion Date:

7. Description of Contract Requirements

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

5. Contract Value:

6. Type of Contract:

1. Contractor Name & Address:

Please circle the response code which best reflects your experience with this contractor.

8. EVALUATION: a. Evaluator's Name, Position (PCO/COTR/Other) and Address

b. Evaluator's Phone Number c. Duration of business relations with named firm:

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

2. Contract Number:

3. Contract Initiation Date:

PAST PERFORMANCE/REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection/best value analysis.

Please complete this Questionnaire and mail or send by email or fax to the following not later than close of business May 26, 2010:

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

A. Working Relationship of Contractor with Project Owner EX VG S MG US N/O Cooperative Behavior EX VG S MG US N/O Cooperation/Communication with Project Owner EX VG S MG US N/O Cooperation/Communication with Subcontractors EX VG S MG US N/O Problem Resolution EX VG S MG US N/O Commitment to Project Owner Satisfaction EX VG S MG US N/O Responsiveness EX VG S MG US N/O Attendance at Project Meetings EX VG S MG US N/O

Personnel Technical Knowledge in Subject EX VG S MG US N/O Knowledge of and Compliance with Awarding Authority Standard EX VG S MG US N/O Knowledge of Work Performed EX VG S MG US N/O

C. Adherence to Schedule Adherence to Project Schedule Including Project Completion EX VG S MG US N/O Response to Directive EX VG S MG US N/O Submission of Project Schedule and Updates EX VG S MG US N/O Submission of Shop Drawings EX VG S MG US N/O Ordering/Delivery of Material EX VG S MG US N/O Payment to Subcontractors/Suppliers EX VG S MG US N/O Submission of Certified Payroll Affidavits EX VG S MG US N/O

D. Quality of Contractor's Team Staffing of Project Administration (Supervisory Personnel) EX VG S MG US N/O Contractor provided a superintendent as required in the conract EX VG S MG US N/O Accuracy (of product description and work) EX VG S MG US N/O Quality of Contractor's Required Documentation EX VG S MG US N/O Quality of Supervisory Personnel EX VG S MG US N/O Quality of Contractor's Work EX VG S MG US N/O Adequate Equipment to Perform Work EX VG S MG US N/O Thoroughness EX VG S MG US N/O Overall Quality EX VG S MG US N/O

E. Effectiveness of Management

Contractor’s Ability to Work Within Contractor’s Allotted Cost EX VG S MG US N/O

Accuracy of Contractor’s Billing EX VG S MG US N/O

Number and Cause of Change Orders EX VG S MG US N/O

Manner in Which Contractor Determined Price on the Change Order EX VG S MG US N/O

F. Compliance with Labor Standards

Thoroughness EX VG S MG US N/O

Accuracy (of product description and work) EX VG S MG US N/O

G. Compliance with Safety Standards

Quality of Contractor’s Safety Program EX VG S MG US N/O

Adherence to OSHA Requirements EX VG S MG US N/O

Adherence to Contractor’s Safety Program EX VG S MG US N/O

Adherence to Security Rules of Awarding Authority EX VG S MG US N/O

9. Overall Assessment: (a) Exceptional (b) Very good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not Observed

10. Any unsatisfactory performance identified above has been shared with the contractor. ( ) Yes: written/oral ? ( ) No

Please provide comments to identify specific Strengths/Weaknesses in each area

B. Prior Experience

Please add a continuation page if necessary.

a. Specific Strenghs/Weaknesses Related to Part 8 Above--Please Cite the Alpha-Numeric Code

b. Two or Three Best Corporate "Traits" or Skills Observed

c. Any areas of performance that are most troublesome.

Please provide comments to identify:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .