ATT_4_-Mahogany_Grove_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 56 KB Posted

Attached to
Mahogany Grove Group Campground Reconstruction Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-0261-S-13-0012
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service R4-Intermountain Region

About this file

ATT 4 - Past Performance Question

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Mahogany Grove Group Campground Reconstruction Project, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATTACH_1_Amendment_0002_-_Section_C_Replacement_Pages.pdf PDF
Amend_002_-_AG-0261-S-13-0012.pdf PDF
ATTACH_2_-_Amendment_0002_-_Mahogany_Specifications_04-10-2013.pdf PDF
Amend_001_-_AG-0261-S-13-0012.pdf PDF
03-05-13_Mahogany_Grove_RFP.pdf PDF
ATT_3_-_NV100034_Highway_01-04-13.pdf PDF
ATT_1_-Mahogany.Spec.FINAL.12.7.2012_-2.pdf PDF
ATTACH_5_-_Mahogany_Grove_Construction_Cost_Estimate_Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATT_2_-_Mahogany.dwgs.Final.12.11.2012.signed.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Mahogany Grove Group Campground Reconstruction Project Solicitation No. AG-0261-S-13-0012 Attachment 4

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

**NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS**

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Region 4 – Humboldt-Toiyabe NF, Las Vegas, NV is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.

Past Performance Information:

Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated: _____________________________________________

Contract No.:________________________ Type of Contract:_______________________________ Project Title:_________________________ Date of Award:_______________________ Completion Date:_______________________________ Location:____________________________ Initial Amount:_______________________ Final Amount:__________________________________ Description:____________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data)

Name of Evaluator:__________________________________________________________ Company/Agency Name:______________________________________________________ Address:___________________________________________________________________ Phone Number:_____________________________________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________ Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:

Rating: If the rating is “Unacceptable”, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.

“G” Good Performance exceeded the contract requirements.

“A” Acceptable Performance met the contract requirements.

“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.

“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.

Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information for the following:

1 The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team: O G A M U N/A 2 The firm’s management and coordination of subcontractors/consultants: O G A M U N/A

3 Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct:

O G A M U N/A

4 Timeliness and quality of reports, deliverables, and other required submittals and documents:

O G A M U N/A

5 The firm’s business integrity: O G A M U N/A 6 Responsiveness to client/customer’s requirements: O G A M U N/A 7 Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price: O G A M U N/A 8 Contract Compliance: O G A M U N/A 9 Contract Management: O G A M U N/A 10 Reasonable costs for modifications and changes: O G A M U N/A 11 Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable:

O G A M U N/A

12 Performance of Public Relations related to construction: O G A M U N/A 13 Quality Control Procedures: O G A M U N/A 14 Campground/Picnic area construction/reconstruction: O G A M U N/A 15 Construction of water systems: O G A M U N/A 16 Construction of roads and parking lots: O G A M U N/A 17 Construction of trails (paved & native surface): O G A M U N/A 18 Experience with prefabricated structures and coordination/installation O G A M U N/A 19 Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes please explain:

Yes No

20 Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated: If no, please explain:

21 Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain:

22 Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

23 Additional Remarks:

24 Overall rating for this firm: O G A M U N/A

Printed Name of Evaluator

Signature of Evaluator Date

This questionnaire should be submitted to the US Forest Service via email to Marge Schafer at msschafer@fs.fed.us.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .