Addendum to 52.212-2 Brainerd Evaluation Factors.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q702--Brainerd Multi-Specialty Clinic IOT&A
- Solicitation number
- 36C77625Q0137
About this file
This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Factors for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) solicitation (Solicitation Number: 36C77625Q0137) for a new multi-specialty clinic in Brainerd, Minnesota. The VA will evaluate quotes based on four key criteria: (1) Key Personnel (pass/fail assessment against Performance Work Statement requirements), (2) Technical Submission (evaluating approach and management methodology), (3) Past Performance (analyzing risk and performance history on federal contracts), and (4) Price (comparing pricing reasonableness across submissions). The procurement will use a best value source selection approach under FAR Part 13, meaning award will not automatically go to the lowest price or highest-rated technical proposal, but to the quote providing the best overall benefit to the government. The proposed clinic will expand an existing facility by 15,733 net usable square feet, providing approximately 41,052 total square feet with 230 parking spaces, and will enhance medical services including mental health, rehabilitation, and audiology for veterans in the Brainerd area.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
E.8 ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS
EVALUATION OF OFFERS
Basis of Award This requirement is being solicited under FAR Part 13. In accordance with FAR 13.103-1(a)(2), award will be made based on Best Value. Offerors are cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered or the most highly rated technical package. The Government reserves the right to select a response that, in providing the benefit to the Government, exceeds the minimum requirements, but is not required to do so. While responses may exceed the requirements, the Government is not requesting or accepting alternate proposals, as each response must respond to the PWS requirements.
Following receipt of quotes, the Government will perform a comparative evaluation of submitted quotes in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b). The Government will evaluate all quotes and compare them to each other. The Government Activations Team and the Contracting Officer will select for award the quote deemed to represent the best benefit to fulfill the Government’s requirement.
The Government’s comparative evaluations will be based on the following criteria:
| 1 |
| Key Personnel – The Government will evaluate that all key personnel meet the minimum requirements of the Performance Work Statement. All Key Personnel will be evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis. To achieve a “pass” rating, the offeror must meet or exceed all minimum requirements identified in the PWS (Attachment A). Any offeror that does not meet or exceed all requirements for all Key Personnel identified in the PWS (Attachment A) will result in a “fail” rating and will not be eligible for award. |
| 3 |
| Technical Submission – The Government will evaluate the technical submission based on the PWS to (1) determine the Government’s confidence in the offeror’s approach to meet the requirements; (2) the degree to which the submission describes a detailed technical/management approach for accomplishing the tasks and addresses all management aspects associated with the tasks; and (3) the offeror’s Basis of Estimate worksheet to determine if the proposed labor mix and labor hours are appropriate to accomplish each task. |
| 3 |
| Past Performance – The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past performance on active and physically completed federal contracts. The Government reserves the right to contact the offeror’s submitted references on Government contracts. Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to: Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Contracting Officer’s Representatives (CORs). The past performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with an offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the PWS requirements as indicated by the offeror’s record of past performance. |
| 4 |
| Price - The Government will evaluate Attachment S, Activation Pricing Workbook, for price reasonableness. The Government will then compare all quotes amongst the competing offerors. |
Comparative price analysis will be used to determine that the prices are fair and reasonable and realistic in accordance with FAR 13.106.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .