19E0001_Synopsis_Conference_Presentation_20181224.pptx

95332419E0001 DCO TVS Abidjan Transport Project (ATP) A-E Service in Côte d’Ivoire Synopsis Conference The following contents are subject to change as determined solely by the Government

Title slide

Lee, Andrew E (AF/CGM) (AEL) -

Abidjan Transport Project Overview

Title slide

Abidjan Transport Project Constraint and Problem Statement Limited mobility of goods and people around Abidjan Poor quality of roads Inefficient utilization of existing road infrastructure Inefficient use and integration of transport modalities Increased travel times and costs

Some MCC-funded contracts and assistance awards are administered directly by MCC headquarters. These contracts and grants support MCC headquarters operations and country oversight and are compliant with U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations.

The majority of MCC-funded program procurements and grants are administered by partner country accountable entities—or Millennium Challenge Accounts, often known as MCAs. These procurements are overseen by MCC staff and comply with MCC’s Program Procurement Guidelines, which are based on international procurement standards.

Activity 1: Transport Infrastructure Blvd du VGE :

Blvd du Port/Blvd de Vridi/Blvd du Petit Bassam:

Blvd de la Paix:

Yopougon Expressway:

TOTAL Budget: $238.7 million

Some MCC-funded contracts and assistance awards are administered directly by MCC headquarters. These contracts and grants support MCC headquarters operations and country oversight and are compliant with U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations.

The majority of MCC-funded program procurements and grants are administered by partner country accountable entities—or Millennium Challenge Accounts, often known as MCAs. These procurements are overseen by MCC staff and comply with MCC’s Program Procurement Guidelines, which are based on international procurement standards.

Major Transport Infrastructure Works Planned in Abidjan

Promotion of New Technologies & Approaches New Technologies Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC);

High Modulus Asphalts and Pavement Recycling;

Performance Based Asphalt Mix Design (i.e. Superpave or equivalent)

Approaches Lifecycle costing for design selection;

Maintaining the existing right of way;

Providing technical assistance and capacity building (10 courses);

IFC Performance Standards;

MCA-CI and MCC

MCA-CI Team: Recruitment underway, completion expected by Spring 2019;

ESOC: Expected on Board early 2019;

4 Senior Consultants: Expected on Board early 2019;

Partner University: Shortlist ongoing, expected on board by Summer 2019;

CTCTR: Established in August 2018;

IEA Manager: Expected on Board late 2018/early 2019;

MCC: Supported by Independent Engineer

Procurement Procedures

Title slide

FAR subpart 36.6 Selection of Architects and Engineers statute (formerly called Brooks Act) Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) Two phases: 1. Synopsis and 2. Solicitation

Procurement Phases Phase 1: Synopsis Firms must submit completed SF-330 Parts I and II by 28 January 2019 at 5:00 pm ET.

(Questions are due via email by 20 December 2018 at 2:00pm ET.)

MCC Evaluation Board will evaluate all responsive SF-330s to select a minimum of three (3) most highly qualified firms.

The selected firms will be invited for an oral presentation/interview.

MCC Evaluation Board will rank the top three (3) firms and make recommendation to the Selection Authority The Selection Authority will make the final determination of the ranking.

Phase 2: Solicitation MCC will issue a solicitation (RFP) to the highest ranked firm to submit a cost proposal.

The firm will submit a certified cost/price proposal.

MCC will evaluate cost/price proposal to be fair and reasonable.

MCC may enter into a technical and/or cost/price proposal negotiation with the firm.

Award for successful negotiation; if unsuccessful, MCC will engage the next highest ranked firm for the Phase II process.

Cover Page (2 pages) Synopsis number and title Firm’s official name;

Firm’s DUNS number;

Firm’s main point-of-contact, who has signatory authority, including her/his name, phone and email; and Statement that the submission is valid for one year.

SF-330 Part I Contract-Specific Qualifications (Sections A through G has no page limits; Section H has a 30-page limit) Section D: Organizational Chart of Proposed Team Section E: Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for This Contract Section H: Technical Narrative and Levels-of-Effort by Deliverables Commitment Letters

SF-330 Part II General Qualifications (No page limits) Submitted for the prime and each of the partner firm(s) and subcontractor(s).

Synopsis Submission Requirements (cont.)

Synopsis Submission Requirements (cont.)

II. SF-330 Part I: Contract Specific Qualifications Section A: Contract Information (No page limit);

Section B: A-E Point of Contact (No page limit);

Section C: Proposed Team (Prime and Subcontractors) (No page limit);

Section D: Organizational Chart of Proposed Team (No page limit);

Section E: Resumes of Key Personnel (No page limit);

May use form provided or provide resumes with all relevant information noted in synopsis.

Section F: Example Projects which Best Illustrate Proposed Teams Qualifications for this Contract. (No page limit);

Section G: Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; (No page limit);

Section H: Additional Information (30 pages);

Section A, B, C & D

Section E

Section F

Section G

Qualification Factor 1: Proposed team professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services:

Three (3) References for each of the proposed Key Personnel;

Project teams organization, mobilization and deployment to perform tasks while maintaining sufficient stakeholder engagement;

Demonstration of Project Manager/Team Leaders experience demonstrates ability to integrate and manage a large multi-disciplinary team, communicate with stakeholders and perform QA/QC;

Proposed teams adaptation to meet the conditions and challenges of working in Abidjan and any past experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction and use of recovered materials;

NB: Commitment letters for each of the proposed Key Personnel is required. This is not included in the page limit requirement.

Synopsis Submission Requirements: Qualifications (cont.)

Qualification Factor 2: Methodology and workplan:

Workplan, WBS, and LOE Methodology Traffic Demand and Simulation Modelling;

Geometric Reconfiguration and Structural Rehabilitation Design;

Technical Training and Coursework;

Mitigating Port Congestion;

Integration of Environmental, Resettlement and Social Tasks with the Engineering Process;

Maintaining and Integrating Community Welfare and Needs;

Subcontracting Plan Must complete the Attachment Levels-of-Effort (LOEs) by Deliverables.

Qualification Factor 3: Firms specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required including capacity to accomplish the work;

Firms relevant urban transport engineering experience;

Firms geometric reconfiguration and structural rehabilitation design experience, including pavement recycling and rolled compacted concrete, relevant to the project over the last ten (10) years;

Firms urban traffic demand modelling and simulation experience and relevance to the project over the last tend (10) years;

Firms specialized experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction and use of recovered materials;

Firms capability, including financial resources, to demonstrate technical bench and financial capability to satisfy the requirement Additional relevant supporting information.

Qualification Factor 4: Past Performance on contracts with any government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules;

Provide at least three (3) past performance references that can speak to the following:

Transport engineering experiences in highly congested urban environments;

Geometric reconfiguration and structural design in comparable urban environment;

Projects for urban traffic demand and simulation modelling in similar complexity;

Use of IFC PS or equivalent in urban transport environments in similar size and complexity No references past 2008.

Qualification Factor 5: Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project.

II. SF-330 Part II: General Qualifications (No page limit) The prime and each of the partner firm(s) and subcontractor(s).

Synopsis Submission Requirements (end)

Five Evaluation Factors, in order of importance from the most to least important:

Proposed team professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of required services;

Methodology and Workplan (and Subcontractor Plan);

Firms specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required including capacity to accomplish the work;

Firms past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules; and

Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project.

Evaluation Factors

Questions image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.emf image12.png image13.png image14.emf image15.emf image16.emf image17.emf image18.emf image2.png image3.png