8-RR26-18 Interactive-Score-Sheet-Informational Only.xls
XLS spreadsheet 73 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RR26-18 Armored Car Services (Cash Transport)
- Solicitation number
- RR26-18
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Armored Car Services (RR26-18) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing to solicit proposals for armored car services throughout the State of Utah. The RFP evaluation process utilizes a two-stage methodology: Stage 1 involves an initial review to eliminate non-responsive proposals that fail to meet mandatory minimum requirements, including confirmation that offerors are currently licensed as armored car companies in Utah with personnel meeting all required state and federal licensing standards and firearm authorization requirements; Stage 2 involves technical proposal evaluation by a committee against four criteria—Security & Operations Plan, Personnel & Training, Reporting, and Customer Service & Account Management—each worth 200 points for a total of 800 possible technical points. Offerors must achieve a minimum threshold score of 560 technical points to advance to cost evaluation. The scoresheet is designed to accommodate evaluation by up to five evaluators and can assess up to 20 competing offerors.
The RFP evaluation methodology allocates 80 percent of total points (800 of 1,000 possible points) to technical criteria and 20 percent (200 points) to cost. Cost points are awarded based on a comparative formula in which the lowest-priced offeror receives the maximum 200 points, while all other offerors receive points proportional to how their total proposed price compares to the lowest proposal price using the formula: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). The RFP may result in multiple awards. Offerors must submit cost proposals separately from technical proposals pursuant to Utah Code Annotated 63G-6a-707(7). The scoresheet includes separate sections for mandatory requirements verification (pass/fail determination) and detailed scoring grids for each technical criterion with individual evaluator scores and weighted calculations to determine final technical scores before cost evaluation integration.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Armored Car Services | |||||||
| RR26-18 | |||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||
| 1 | Offeror confirms they are currently licensed as an armored car company in the State of Utah and all personnel meet all required state and federal licensing standards, including the authorization to carry a firearm, as required by the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL)? | Attach- D | |||||
| 2 | Offeror confirms they understand Attachment A - Standard Terms & Conditions are the applicable terms if vendor proposal does not include any Value Add - Smart Safe options. | Attach- D | |||||
| 3 | Offeror confirms their understanding that if proposal includes value-add options including Smart Safe, Attachment B will be the applicable terms and conditions. | Attach- D | |||||
| 4 | Offeror confirms they understand if proposal includes Smart Safe options, GovRamp authorization status is required per 3.3 in Attachment C - Scope of Work | Attach- D | |||||
| 0 | |||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Security & Operations Plan | Attch - D | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | Personnel & Training | Attch - D | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | Reporting | Attch - D | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | Customer Service & Account Management | Attch - D | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| Attch - D | 70% | 560.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| Attch - C | 20% | 200.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | Other cost evaluation methods may be used as long as they are within Procurement Code/Rule. Ensure the method for awarding points is clearly stated on the score sheeet and within the solicitation documents. | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 80% | 800.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 20% | 200.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
Scoresheet Summary
| RR26-18 Armored Car Services | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Signatures: | Date: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | __________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | __________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | __________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | __________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | __________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| 1 | Offeror confirms they are currently licensed as an armored car company in the State of Utah and all personnel meet all required state and federal licensing standards, including the authorization to carry a firearm, as required by the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL)? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Offeror confirms they understand Attachment A - Standard Terms & Conditions are the applicable terms if vendor proposal does not include any Value Add - Smart Safe options. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Offeror confirms their understanding that if proposal includes value-add options including Smart Safe, Attachment B will be the applicable terms and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Offeror confirms they understand if proposal includes Smart Safe options, GovRamp authorization status is required per 3.3 in Attachment C - Scope of Work | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Technical Scores | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Criteria #1 |
Security & Operations Plan
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40.0 | Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 200) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #2 |
Security & Operations Plan
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40.0 | Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 200) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #3 |
Reporting
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40.0 | Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 200) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #4 |
Customer Service & Account Management
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40.0 | Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 200) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = 800) Minimum Threshold = 1,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Cost Points | Cost Scores | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 200.0 | Cost Points | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Score Summary | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible = 800) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Cost Points (Total Possible = 200) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Grand Total Points (Total Possible = 1,000) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .