8-MD26-17 Evaluation Scoresheet (Reference Only).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MD26-17
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for RFP MD26-17, a movie viewing public performance license solicitation issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Department of Corrections. The RFP seeks to contract with a single responsive and responsible vendor to provide licenses covering motion pictures shown in prisons, community correctional centers, and other correctional facilities throughout Utah. The resulting contract will have a term of five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of two years.
The evaluation framework consists of three mandatory prerequisite requirements and three scoreable technical criteria weighted as follows: Media Licensing & Copyright Compliance (50 percent, 500 points), Correctional Content Curation (30 percent, 300 points), and Clean Content Creation & Licensing (20 percent, 200 points), for a combined technical evaluation total of 1,000 points. Vendors must achieve a minimum of 700 technical points (70 percent) to advance to cost evaluation. Cost proposals are valued at 200 points and will be awarded based on a formula where the lowest-priced offeror receives 100 percent of cost points, with other offerors receiving a proportional share based on their price relative to the lowest bid. The total evaluation is worth 1,200 points, and contract award will be made to the offeror with the highest combined technical and cost score.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-MD26-17 Attachment D - Technical Criteria ada.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-MD26-17 Attachment B - UDC-Standard-Terms-and-Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-MD26-17 Attachment A - Agency-Terms-and-Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-MD26-17 Attachment E - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 5-MD26-17 Attachment C - Scope of Work (solicitation).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Movie Viewing Public Performance License | |||
| SOLICITATION #MD26-17 | |||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | |||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | |||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offerer's licensing must include the 'Big Five' studios: Walt Disney, Warner Brothers, Universal Pictures, Sony Pictures, Paramount Pictures. | Prerequisite | |
| 2 | Offerer must provide 24/7 Licensing coverage per inmate. | Prerequisite | |
| 3 | Offerer must have a website that can verify movie licensing compliance. | Prerequisite |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Media Licensing & Copyright Compliance | 100 | 50.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Correctional Content Curation | 60 | 30.0% | 300.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Clean Content Creation & Licensing | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 200.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | Other cost evaluation methods may be used as long as they are within Procurement Code/Rule. Ensure the method for awarding points is clearly stated on the score sheeet and within the solicitation documents. | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 0% | 200.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,200.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .