8 Fort Fairfield LPOE - Communications Plan_Update 050525_R1.pdf

Communications Plan

Document no: 002 Revision no: 002

General Services Administration – New England Region 1 R1

Fort Fairfield Land Port of Entry – Fort Fairfield, Maine 5 May 2025

Client name: General Services Administration – New England Region 1

Project name: Fort Fairfield Land Port of Entry – Fort Fairfield, Maine

Client reference: R1 Project no: FDFZ2502

Document no: 002 Project Manager: Miguel Alvarez, CCM

Revision no: 002 Prepared by: Miguel Alvarez, CCM / Diana Rogers

Date: 5 May 2025 File name: Communication Plan

Building Name: Fort Fairfield Land Port of Entry Building Address: 4 Boundary Line Road, Fort Fairfield, ME 04742

Jacobs Technology, Inc.

1100 North Glebe Road Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22201 United States

T +1.571.218.1000 www.jacobs.com

© Copyright 2023 Jacobs Technology Inc. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs.

Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright.

Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party.

002 iii

Contents Acronyms and abbreviations

1. Introduction

1.1 Fort Fairfield LPOE Project Overview

1.2 Communication System Structure

2. Fort Fairfield LPOE Level Communications

2.1 Formal Communications (Meeting) Requirements

2.2 Protocol Requirements

Appendices

Appendix A. Project Point of Contact

002 1

Acronyms and abbreviations

Acronyms Description

A/E Architect/Engineer

BLM Bureau of Land Management

CM Construction Manager

CMa Construction Management as Advisor

CO Contracting Officer

COBie Construction Operations Building Information Exchange

COR Contracting Officer Representative

CBP Customs and Border Protection

CXa Commissioning Agent

CxE Envelope Commissioning

DBB Design-Bid-Build

DBC Design-Build Contractor

FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

GSA General Services Administration

HSPD-12 Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12

Jacobs Jacobs Technology, Inc.

LPOE Land Port of Entry

OAC Owner, Architect, Contractor

OMS Operations and Maintenance Staff

OTS Over the Shoulder

PM Project Manager

PMIS Project Management Information System

SR State Route

SBU Sensitive But Unclassified

U.S. United States

SOW Scope of Work

002 2

1. Introduction

1.1 Fort Fairfield LPOE Project Overview

The Fort Fairfield Land Port of Entry in Fort Fairfield Maine is an international border crossing between the towns of Fort Fairfield, Maine and Southern Victoria, Canada. The LPOE was built in 1933 and listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1914. Increased traffic, site constraints and outdated facilities have rendered the existing RHC LPOE insufficient to meet current demands.

The Fort Fairfield LPOE is located 4 Boundary Line RD, Fort Fairfield ME. It is situated about 100 feet west of the U.S./Canada border, on the northside of Main State Route (SR) 161 and overlooks the Aroostook River Valley to the west. The Fort Fairfield LPOE is a Colonial Revival style edifice from 1931 and 1937.

The New Fort Fairfield Land Port of Entry will supplement the existing LPOE. Programming for the new LPOE will expand its functionality by bringing new and existing tenants with operationally aligned missions into a shared facility. The current LPOE is obsolete and cannot accommodate modern inspection and border security technologies. The existing facility is undersized and outdated as it relates to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. When completed, the new LPOE will provide adequate operational space, reduced traffic congestion, and safe conditions for employees and travellers.

1.1.1 Communication Plan Review

This Plan and the processes contained within will be reviewed at regular, documented intervals to ensure it remains current and promote continual improvement.

The CMa, in coordination with GSA, will be responsible for maintaining this communication plan.

1.2 Communication System Structure

The Plan covers the scope of work for the Fort Fairfield LPOE project. Its objective is to provide assurance to the GSA that Jacobs meets the requirements of the contract. The governance management system hierarchy is shown below:

1.2.1 OWNER: GSA PROJECT TEAM/PERSONNEL

The project participants are identified below by entity with a brief description of role and responsibility. Titles for individuals are project specific and refer to a functional role on the project, rather than actual titles as identified within respective entity organizational structure. Also, professional credentials are omitted for sake of brevity and to avoid inadvertent inaccuracies.

Owner: General Services Administration As the owner of the facility, GSA represents the funding government agency for the project and thus assumes overall responsibility for full execution of all aspects of the project design and construction.

A. Project Manager (PM): TBD New England Region 1 The GSA PM will serve as the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). This person will manage the day-to-day project activities and oversee the delivery of the project. The GSA PM will facilitate coordination between the CMa and other entities participating on the project. This may include other GSA personnel, the Design-Build contractor, and customer agency representatives and other stakeholders. The GSA PM will be the primary point of contact for the CMa.

B. Contracting Officer (CO): Sotheavy Khon New England Region 1 The GSA CO has the overall responsibility for the administration of this contract. The CO alone is authorized to act on behalf of GSA to amend, modify, or deviate from the contract terms, conditions, requirements, specifications, details, and/or delivery schedules; make final decisions on disputed

002 3 matters for non-performance or unsatisfactory performance. Final acceptance of all items submitted under this contract is to be the responsibility of the CO.

C. GSA Operation & Maintenance Staff (OMS)

The GSA OMS will assist in the development of the Systems Acceptance Criteria and Functional Test Procedures and participate in the necessary contractor-provided training. The OMS may also participate in functional performance testing and at the direction of the GSA PM participate in the commissioning process.

1.2.2 OWNER REPRESENTATIVE/AGENCY CMa: Jacobs

Providing management, administrative and technical support to the Government throughout all phases of the project. Referred to as Construction Management as Advisor (CMa) in contract document language, Jacobs is formally designated by GSA as the entity providing technical, contractual, and administrative representation and assistance for the Government on all matters pertaining to the project. Project Commissioning (CXa) and delivery of COBie are also part of CMa’s scope of work.

1.2.3 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER (A/E): AECOM

GSA is contracted directly with AECOM as the Architect/Engineer (A/E) to provide Construction Documents for the Fort Fairfield LPOE. The A/E will define the scope of work and develop a cohesive master plan for this project. Additionally, the A/E will confirm and update the project program requirements provided within the completed 2019 Parsons Feasibility Study. GSA will utilize the Program of Requirements (POR), final master plan, and final Construction Documents to solicit the best Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc).

1.2.4 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS CONSTRUCTOR (CMc): TBD

“As a general matter, the CMc shall review and become familiar with the scope of services under the A/E’s contract, especially the various standards, guidelines, policies, and documents that the A/E must follow in developing the design and construction documents. This review and familiarization are vitally important during the Pre-Construction Phase Services because, as outlined in more detail below, the main tasks of the CMc Contractor during the Pre-Construction Phase Services are to provide constructability and cost estimation reviews of the A/E’s design-related submissions. At its core, the CMc Contractor will help to ensure that the design and construction documents will enable the Government to exercise the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Option at a price that is at or below the GMP.” (CMc Final SOW, Section A.8)

002 4

2. Fort Fairfield LPOE Level Communications

2.1 Formal Communications (Meeting) Requirements

Team members are required to communicate with Client representatives and internal team members on a regular basis to support Project Delivery.

All original ‘decision making’ incoming/outgoing communications including letters, memos, e-mails, and recordings of MS Teams meetings relating to the project shall be stored on the common data environment, i.e. Kahua and Dr. Checks, in the appropriate folders.

Concept Design Phase

During the Concept Design Phase, Jacobs will participate in and monitor the design development process. As part of the process, Jacobs will develop and maintain a design review log to compile all design review comments from the GSA, Jacobs, and other design reviewers. This log will be utilized to ensure time resolution of all design review comments.

The below table is for the minimum level of meetings and communications to be conducted during the Design Phase:

Meeting Purpose Interval/Frequency Lead Venue Participants

GSA-CMa Team Bi-Weekly Jacobs Virtual GSA, Jacobs

Commissioning/Special System/COBie TBD Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs (Procon)

Design Review/Comment Resolution TBD GSA Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

OAC Hosted by A/E Bi-Weekly A/E Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

Recurring Design Progress TBD A/E Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

Design Excellence Peer Reviews TBD GSA Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant.

Partnering meetings TBD Jacobs TBD GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

Site Visits TBD CBP/GSA In-person GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

BIM Review Meetings and Workshops As Needed Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant

Design Stage Commissioning TBD Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs

Design Development (DD) and Construction Document (CD) Phase

During the Construction Document Phase, Jacobs will work actively with GSA to quickly confirm all project participants and their “need to know” level for inclusion in the GSA’s Communications Plan. All meetings with non-GSA agencies (tenant agencies/stakeholders, non-regional GSA personnel, Federal, State, and Local entities, etc.) must

002 5 be coordinated through the GSA Project Manager. Dictated by the entity leading each meeting or working session, the meeting organizer will provide notices (e-calendar invitations), prepare the agenda, and record the meeting minutes for each.

Jacobs will provide a CXa that will provide commissioning services throughout the project, beginning in the DD Phase. The CXa will support the efforts to achieve the LEED Fundamental and Enhanced Commissioning credits and ensure the P100 commissioning requirements are met. The CMa will develop a Preliminary Commissioning Plan during the Bridging Document Phase for incorporation into the Design-Build solicitation, plan will continue to be updated it for the duration of the project.

Jacobs will provide COBie review of A/E’s design submission throughout this phase.

The below table is for the minimum level of meetings and communications to be conducted during the DD and CD Phases:

Meeting Purpose Interval/Frequency Lead Venue Participants GSA-CMa Team Recurring Bi-Weekly Jacobs Virtual GSA, Jacobs Commissioning/Special System/COBie TBD Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs OAC Hosted by A/E Bi-Weekly A/E Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Recurring Design Progress TBD A/E Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Design Development 100% Milestone DD Review/Comment Resolution TBD GSA/Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Construction Document 65% Milestone CD 65% Review/Comment Resolution TBD GSA/Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Construction Document 95% Milestone CD 95% Review/Comment Resolution TBD GSA/Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Construction Document Final Milestone CD Final Review/Comment Resolution TBD GSA/Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Peer Reviews TBD GSA TBD GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant.

Partnering meetings TBD Jacobs TBD GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant Site Visits TBD CBP/GSA In-person GSA, A/E, Jacobs, Tenant BIM Review Meetings and Workshops As Needed Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs Design Stage Commissioning TBD Jacobs Virtual GSA, A/E, Jacobs

Construction Phase

During the Construction Phase, Jacobs will provide Construction Administration to assist the GSA with the review and implementation of the approved contract and construction documents to ensure the successful delivery of the overall project.

The below table is for the minimum level of meetings and communications to be conducted during the Construction Phase:

002 6

Meeting Purpose Interval/Frequency Lead Venue Participants Pre-Construction Conference Milestone Jacobs Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

GSA-Cma Team Weekly Jacobs Site/Virtual GSA, Jacobs

Schedule Review Monthly Jacobs Virtual GSA, CMx, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Pay Application Reviews Monthly Jacobs Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs

RFI, Submittal, and ASI Reviews Weekly CMc Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Commissioning Monthly Jacobs Site/Virtual GSA, CMx, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Preparatory and Pre-Installation TBD CMc Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs

Special Issue(s) As Needed TBD Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Operation Impact Plan (OIP) As Needed CMc Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Owner Architect Contractor (OAC) Weekly CMc Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant Partnering TBD CMc TBD GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Construction Excellence Peer TBD CMc Site/Virtual GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Safety As Needed CMc Site GSA, A/E, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Closeout Phase

During the Closeout Phase, Jacobs will continue the statement of work tasks from the DB Construction Phase as well assist the GSA with the closeout of the project and ensure that once project personnel conclude their work all GSA issued access cards and project badges are collected and returned to the HSPD-12 Program Management Office.

The below table is for the minimum level of meetings and communications to be conducted during the Closeout Phase:

Meeting Purpose Interval/Frequency Lead Venue Participants GSA-CMa Team Weekly Jacobs Site GSA, Jacobs

Pay Application Reviews Monthly Jacobs Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs

RFI, Submittal, and ASI Reviews Weekly CMc Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs

Commissioning Monthly Jacobs Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Interim Commissioning As Needed Jacobs Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Special Issue(s) As Needed Jacobs Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Owner Architect Contractor (OAC) Weekly CMc Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Safety As Needed CMc Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Construction Excellence Lessons Learned TBD CMc TBD GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

Project Closeout meetings Weekly CMc Site GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

002 7

Meeting Purpose Interval/Frequency Lead Venue Participants Partnering TBD CMc TBD GSA, CMc, Jacobs, Tenant

2.2 Protocol Requirements

The CMa’s contractual responsibility is with GSA and not to the tenant agencies, consultants, or local community and stakeholders where the project is located. CMa will not respond to questions regarding the project work from any tenant agencies, consultants, or local community & stakeholders. All requests for information concerning the project will be referred to GSA’s Project Manager or Contracting Officer for response.

The CMa will treat all communications on this project between various stakeholder parties, GSA and CMa as confidential project information and will not share that information with any party outside the core Project Delivery Team.

Method Audience Protocol

Email External/Internal Emails are considered an appropriate form of correspondence to the Client taking into consideration the content above regarding the sharing of sensitive information / approvals.

It should not be assumed that emails are read immediately or acted upon particularly with security firewalls in place

The following protocols should be recognised:

Sending an email does not transfer responsibility.

Email distribution needs to be appropriate and focused; all ‘decision making’ emails should be retained and stored in the appropriate folders within Kahua.

Emails from the Client, requesting additional work should be identified and brought to the attention of the Programme Director/Project Manager. No action is to be taken until such time that an agreement is in place and covered by the required approved change control.

Telephone Call & Instant Message (text, WhatsApp etc.)

External/Internal Used for urgent communication or if a one to one is sufficient.

The following protocols should be recognised:

Telephone communication is verbal and therefore not a recorded record of communication. It does not transfer responsibilities.

002 8

Method Audience Protocol

If communication received via text or call, instructing work outside of documented process, work shall not commence until the formal process is met.

PMIS - KAHUA and ProjNet (Dr. Checks) Internal The following PMIS systems should be used in the project life cycle for all project information, including sensitive but unclassified (SBU) documents:

Kahua – the primary, web-based, electronic project management system used through design and construction phases. An HSPD-12 security clearance is required for access.

Dr. Checks – Collaboration of design reviews

002 9

Appendices

Appendix A. Project Point of Contact

CONTACT

NAME

AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT ROLE ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL

GOVERNMENT TEAM

GSA

Sotheavy Khon GSA Region 1 GSA Administrative Contracting Officer

O’Neill Federal Building, 11th Floor 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 0222

617.513.6954 sotheavy.khon@gsa.gov

Eugene Mozzoni GSA Design and Construction

GSA Project Executive O’Neill Federal Building, 11th Floor 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 0222

617.416.6378 Eugene.mozzoni@gsa.gov

Pam Howe GSA Region 1 GSA Director, R1 LPOE PMO O’Neill Federal Building, 11th Floor 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 0222

617.824.0120 pam.howe@gsa.gov

Matt Heiman GSA Facilities Office GSA Program Coordinator O’Neill Federal Building, 11th Floor 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 0222

612.615.6172 Matthew.heiman@gsa.gov

Liz Mees GSA Facilities Office GSA Regional Historic Preservation Officer, 1PCT

O’Neill Federal Building, 11th Floor 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 0222

617.571.0546 Elizabeth.mees@gsa.gov

Matt Welch GSA Region 1 Electrical Engineer

275 Chestnut St., Manchester, NH 03101-2411

ST

matthew.welch@gsa.gov

Sara Massarello GSA Region 1 Realty Specialist 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 617. 894.5184 sara.massarello@gsa.gov

Brian Schaefer GSA Region 1 Building Manager Specialist 27 Customs Loop, Houlton, ME 04730 207.694.3808 brian.schaefer@gsa.gov

Xavier Ramirez GSA Region 1 Supervisory Building Manager Specialist

40 Western Ave, Augusta, ME 04330 207.922.3010 xavier.ramirez@gsa.gov

Paul Hughes GSA Region 1 Public Affairs Specialist 617.283.6142 paul.hughes@gsa.gov

Chris Pless GSA Region 1 Construction Analyst 2 Exchange Terr, Providence, RI 02903 570.575.8178 christopher.pless@gsa.gov

Naima Prince GSA Region 1 Budget Analyst 312.353.4671 naima.prince@gsa.gov Marshall Popkin GSA Region 1 Regional Environmental

Program Specialist 100 S Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106

215.606.1763 Marshall.popkin@gsa.gov

Dale Cullivan GSA Region 1 Lead Operational Excellence

SME

156 Federal St, Portland, ME 04101 207.254.4002 Dale.cullivan@gsa.gov

Quanda Taliaferro

GSA Region 1 Realty Specialist 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 617.565.8965 Quanda.taliaferro@gsa.gov

Karen Curran GSA Region 1 Supervisory Energy Program Specialist

10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 617.694.6832 Karen.Curran@GSA.gov

Jason Rubitsky GSA Region 1 General Engineer 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 Jason.rubitsky@gsa.gov

002 10

Tim Rousset GSA Region 1 Branch Chief 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 202.714.5476 Timothy.rousset@gsa.gov

Bill Winger GSA Region 1 Smart Building Specialist 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 William.winger@gsa.gov

Kate Gill GSA Region 1 National Relocation Program Manager

10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 Kate.gill@gsa.gov

Emily Jackson GSA Region 1 Contract Specialist 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 Emily.jackson@gsa.gov

Simeon Berry GSA Region 1 Contract Specialist 10 Causeway St, Boston, MA 0222-1048 Simeon.berry@gsa.gov

CBP

Lawrence Comiskey

CBP Fort Fairfield General Engineer/Operational Support Facilities Division

Indianapolis Regional Office 6650 Telecom Drive, Suite 210 Indianapolis, IN 46278

202.993.3753 lawrence.a.comiskey@cbp.dhs.gov

Dan MacMunn CBP Fort Fairfield PM Field Support Branch U.S. Customs and Border Protection 180 International Avenue Calais, ME 04619

202.706.0818 Daniel.s.macmunn@cbp.dhs.gov

Paul Anderson CBP Fort Fairfield Deputy Assistant Director of Facilities

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 180 International Avenue Calais, ME 04619

617.565.6294 Paul.d.anderson@cbp.dhs.gov

Christopher Doughty

CBP Fort Fairfield Port Director U.S. Customs and Border Protection Fort Fairfield, Maine Port of Entry Fort Fairfield, ME 04742

207.473.7474 207.538.0043

Christopher.m.doughty@cbp.dhs.gov

Michael Hansen CBP Fort Fairfield Michael.h.hansen@cbp.dhs.gov

Jonathan Sang CBP Fort Fairfield jonathan.m.sang@cbp.dhs.gov

Melissa Wiedenfeld

CBP Fort Fairfield melissa.wiedenfeld@cbp.dhs.gov

Jason Gilpatrick CBP Fort Fairfield jason.a.gilpatrick@cbp.dhs.gov

Ryan Cote CBP Limestone OIT Ryan.j.cote@cbp.dhs.gov

Stephen Lanfear CBP Fort Fairfield Stephen.d.lanfear@cbp.dhs.gov

Donny Slothower

CBP Fort Fairfield OIT Donald.s.slothower@cbp.dhs.gov

Thomas Scungio

CBP Fort Fairfield OIT Thomas.j.scungio@cbp.dhs.gov

Ghislaine Montes De Oca

CBP Fort Fairfield FOF PMO 571.969.8402 Ghislaine.n.montesdeoca@cbp.dhs.gov

Shawn Seitz CBP Fort Fairfield OPR Shawn.r.seitz@cbp.dhs.gov

Mark Winslett CBP Fort Fairfield Marc.a.winslett@cbp.dhs.gov

Olivia Dunn CBP Fort Fairfield Olivia.dunn@associates.cbp.dhs.gov

Thomas Horton CBP Fort Fairfield Facility Operations Specialist 207.405.7125 Thomas.r.horton@cbp.dhs.gov

002 11

JACOBS

Jeffrey Smith Jacobs Manager of Projects 1100 North Glebe Rd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

410.245.2341 jeffrey.smith@jacobs.com

George Bartlett Jacobs Project Executive 1100 North Glebe Rd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

202.345.5595 george.bartlett@jacobs.com

Miguel Alvarez Jacobs Project Manager 1100 North Glebe Rd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

646.639.6862 miguel.alvarez@jacobs.com

Diana Rogers Jacobs Project Support 1100 North Glebe Rd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

703.955.6335 Diana.rogers@jacobs.com

William Hardiman

Jacobs Commissioning Lead 120 St. James Ave, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02116 William.hardiman@jacobs.com

Sherlock Banks Jacobs Project Engineer 1100 North Glebe Rd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

757.751.5594 sherlock.banks@jacobs.com

A/E DESIGN TEAM

AECOM

Kevin Hubbard AECOM Sr. Project Manager 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

703.682.1645 kevin.hubbard@aecom.com

Jason Olsen AECOM Architect Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201 jason.olsen@aecom.com

Mike Arnold AECOM Landscape Dept Head 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

703.682.9138 Mike.arnold@aecom.com

Rob Ainslie AECOM Civil Engineer 12420 Milestone Center Drive, Suite 150, Germantown, MD 20876

301.250.4791 Rob.ainsle@aecom.com

Kennedy Okonkwo

AECOM Electrical Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

703.682.4955 Kennedy.okonkwo@aecom.com

Wade Yeary AECOM Mechanical Designer 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

434.294.9837 Wade.yeary@aecom.com

Iovana Willett AECOM Structural Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

210.912.2875 Iovana.willett@aecom.com

Christian Nielsen

AECOM Transportation Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

860.263.5802 Christian.nielsen@aecom.com

Shane Parson AECOM Resiliency Planning Lead 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

540.250.6799 Shane.parson@aecom.com

Michael Watkins AECOM LIDAR 3101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22201

302.781.5900 Michael.watkins@aecom.com

Mark Kasprzyk Harboe Architects Historic Preservation 630.402.7661 kasprzyk@harboarch.com

Brad Knutson Parsons Brad.knutson@parsons.com

Sean Buckley Parsons Sean.buckley@parsons.com