8-ATT F - DH2704 -AFV RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf

PDF 244 KB Posted

Attached to
RFSQ - Approved Vendor List for Fundraiser Vendors Pursuant to Utah Code 13-22
Solicitation number
DH2704-AFV
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) to establish an approved vendor list for fundraising activities. The RFSQ seeks qualified vendors to provide food items or other products for fundraising activities at various schools within the district in accordance with Utah Code 13-22, the Charitable Solicitations Act. The solicitation requires electronic submission through the Bonfire/U3P platform, with responses subject to specific closing dates and times as outlined in the solicitation documents. Vendors must submit all required documentation, including Statements of Qualifications with general information, W-9 forms, valid business licenses, Department of Commerce fundraiser permits or co-venturer letters, and vendor documentation with proposed contract terms.

The evaluation scoresheet establishes a technical scoring framework with maximum points of 500 distributed across four weighted criteria: Vendor Qualifications and Experience (40 percent, 200 points), Complaints and Problem Resolution (30 percent, 150 points), References (20 percent, 100 points), and Fundraiser Details (10 percent, 50 points). Vendors must meet a minimum mandatory requirements threshold of 75 percent (375 points) to advance in the evaluation process. Scores are assigned on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 representing failure to address requirements, 2 representing unsatisfactory proposals, 3 representing satisfactory proposals, 4 representing good proposals, and 5 representing excellent proposals that exceed all RFP requirements. The evaluation scoresheet is designated as a draft document not subject to public records requests under Utah Administrative Code and is to be returned to the evaluation committee chairperson rather than the Purchasing Department.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).

Score will be assigned as follows:

1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them

RFP

Section

Evaluation (Pass/Fail)

1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3

4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3

RFP

Section

Evaluator Score (1-5)

Criteria Weight

% of Tech Criteria

Points Possible Points Earned

1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0

100.0% 500.0 0.0

RFP

Section

Min Percent

Min Points Required

Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation

4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%

Percent of Total

Points Possible

Points Earned

100% 500 0

100% 500 0

Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)

Vendor Qualifications & Experience

Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points

Total Evaluation Points

References

Scoreable Technical Criteria

Complaints/Problm Resolution

Required Technical Point Threshold

Fundraiser Details

SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C

ATTACHMENT F

APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET

Firm Name:

Evaluator:

Date:

SOLICITATION # DH2676-AF

Score Sheet

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .