8-ATT F - DH2652-AF RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf

PDF 201 KB Posted

Attached to
Approved Vendor List Fundraiser Vendors Pursuant to Utah Code 13-22
Solicitation number
DH2652-AF
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This document is an evaluation scoresheet for the Salt Lake City School District's (SLCSD) Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) to establish an approved vendor list for fundraising activities pursuant to Utah Code 13-22, the Charitable Solicitations Act. The RFSQ solicits qualified vendors to provide food items or other products for fundraising activities at various schools within the district. Vendors must submit responses electronically through the Bonfire/U3P platform, and all questions must be submitted in writing through this system. The evaluation process requires vendors to meet mandatory minimum requirements including submission of general information (items 1-7), a W9 form, a valid business license, a State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit or co-venturer letter or letter of exemption, vendor documents/proposed contract, and completion of all required attachments. The solicitation closing date and time are specified in the solicitation documents, with responses ending precisely at the designated deadline.

The evaluation scoresheet employs a five-point scoring scale (1=Fail through 5=Excellent) and allocates 500 total possible points across four weighted technical criteria sections: Vendor Qualifications & Experience (40% weight, 200 points), References/Complaints/Problem Resolution (30% weight, 150 points), Fundraiser Details (20% weight, 100 points), and an unnamed fourth criterion (10% weight, 50 points). A minimum mandatory threshold of 75 percent (375 points) is required to pass technical evaluation. The scoresheet is marked as a draft document and is not subject to GRAMA (Government Records Access and Management Act) pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2), and should be returned to the evaluation committee chairperson rather than the Purchasing Department. No pricing information, set-asides, or contract term details are specified in this evaluation document.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).

Score will be assigned as follows:

1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them

RFP

Section

Evaluation (Pass/Fail)

1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3

4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3

RFP

Section

Evaluator Score (1-5)

Criteria Weight

% of Tech Criteria

Points Possible Points Earned

1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0

100.0% 500.0 0.0

RFP

Section

Min Percent

Min Points Required

Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation

4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%

Percent of Total

Points Possible

Points Earned

100% 500 0

100% 500 0

Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)

Vendor Qualifications & Experience

Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points

Total Evaluation Points

References

Scoreable Technical Criteria

Complaints/Problm Resolution

Required Technical Point Threshold

Fundraiser Details

SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C

ATTACHMENT F

APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET

Firm Name:

Evaluator:

Date:

SOLICITATION # DH2652-AF

Score Sheet

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .