8-ATT F - DH2634-AFV RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf
PDF 288 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DH2634-AF
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) to establish an approved vendor list for fundraising activities pursuant to Utah Code 13-22, the Charitable Solicitations Act. The solicitation, numbered DH2634-AFV, seeks qualified vendors to provide food items or other products for fundraising activities at various schools within the district. Vendors must submit responses electronically through the Bonfire/U3P platform, and all official communications, including answers to questions and any modifications to the solicitation, will be issued through this system or via authorized addendum only. Responses must be submitted by the specified closing date and time, with the system automatically terminating submissions at the deadline.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a scoring methodology with a pass/fail section addressing mandatory requirements and a technical scoring section worth a total of 500 points. Mandatory requirements include verification of general information, W9 forms, valid business licenses, and other documentation outlined in section 2.3 of the RFP. Technical evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: section 2.4A (40% weight, 200 points), 2.4B (30% weight, 150 points), 2.4C (20% weight, 100 points), and 2.4D (10% weight, 50 points). Proposals are scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with a minimum threshold of 75 percent or 375 points required to proceed. The document notes it is a draft not subject to public records disclosure under Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2) and should be returned only to the evaluation committee chairperson.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3
4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (1-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0
100.0% 500.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
100% 500 0
100% 500 0
Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)
Vendor Qualifications & Experience
Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
References
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Complaints/Problm Resolution
Required Technical Point Threshold
Fundraiser Details
SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C
ATTACHMENT F
APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # DH2634-AFV
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .