B05 A3-2 Pre-Proposal Inquiries 1-30 Rosebud Ext BP1_IHS Response.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rosebud Exterior Construction Project Bid Pack 1 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75H70124R00052
About this file
This document is a set of pre-proposal inquiries and responses related to Solicitation 75H70124R00052 for the Rosebud Exterior Construction Project Bid Pack 1 for the Indian Health Service (IHS).
The key details are:
- The solicitation is for a full exterior replacement of the Rosebud Hospital in Rosebud, SD, including the roof, insulation, doors, windows, siding, louvers, vestibule expansion, generator replacement, electrical system upgrade, and other exterior accessories.
- The period of performance is 540 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed. The construction magnitude is estimated between $5-10 million.
- The solicitation is a 100% set-aside for Indian Small Business Economic Enterprises under NAICS code 236220.
- The solicitation includes responses to 30 pre-proposal inquiries covering topics such as warranties, finishes, testing requirements, roofing, infection control, and access to project documents.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment of Solicitation Amendment A00003 under Solicitation 75H70124R00052 Rosebud Exterior Construction BP1
INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING SERVICE
PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES
Solicitation 75H70124R00052
| PROJECT: |
| Rosebud Exterior Construction |
Project Bid Pack 1
| LOCATION: |
| Rosebud, SD |
PROJECT NO:
| DOCUMENT OWNER: |
| Erik Lundstrom |
| Email: |
| Erik.Lundstrom@ihs.gov |
| DOCUMENTS: |
DATE:
| DEPARTMENT: |
| IHS/DES |
| Item No. |
| Reference |
Drawing, Spec, Page
| COMMENTS |
| POC |
| IHS Approved Response |
Amendment A00002 dated 08/08/2024
| 1. |
| Specs |
| 084313 Aluminum-Framed Storefront |
a. Warranty: Warranty calls for a 5-year workmanship with a 5-year finish. The standard warranty for this is 2-year workmanship with a 5-year finish. Please correct.
b. 2.02 Basis of Design is 451T. Kawneer 450 (1-3/4” x 4-1/2”) is used for ¼” glazing for the interior. Please clarify if this is acceptable.
c. 2.10 Finish: List a clear anodized finish. The existing building is dark bronze anodized. Please clarify that clear anodized is correct finish.
d. 3.04 Field Quality Control/A. Storefront Manufacture required for install. This is not a normal in the industry and can create additional costs and schedule delays. Please omit.
e. 3.04 Field Quality Control/D and E Air and Water tests. This will create additional costs. In past projects the owner usually covers the cost of the testing agency. This is usually dictated in section 014000, however there is no spec section 014000. Please clarify who is responsible for field testing costs or if testing is required.
| AE |
| a. 2 year workmanship warranty is acceptable. |
b. No, we would accept 451 (not thermally broken) for the interior storefront sections. 451 (minus T) can accept ¼" glazing and the frame will match the exterior.
c. Yes, clear anodized is the correct finish.
d. Ok to Omit this requirement.
e. Ok to Omit this requirement.
| 2. |
| Specs |
| 085113 Aluminum Windows |
a. 1.10 Warranty: Lists 20-year finish. This warranty should be the same as 084313 Aluminum-Framed Storefronts, 5 -year finish. A 20 year finish is not possible for an anodized finish.
b. 2.07 Hardware: Lists several hardware options for the windows (Cam Handle, Roto Operator, Key and lock, Pull Ring). Please clarify what kind of hardware is desired for the aluminum windows.
| AE |
| a. 5 year finish is acceptable. |
b. Manufacturer's Standard hinge with limit stop. Cast White Bronze Access Control (Custodial) Locks with Removable Handle.
| 3. |
| Drawings |
| Sheet A600.1 (Door Schedule) |
a. Openings A2620 and A2863B as 4’-10” x 7’-0” doors. Doors cannot exceed 4’-0”. Are these openings suppose to be a pair of unequal door leaves? The floor plan shows a single swinging door. Please clarify what is desired at these openings.
b. Opening 2863B shows hardware set 2 in the door schedule. However, in 087100 door 2863B is found under set 6.0. Please clarify what is the correct hardware set.
| AE |
| a. The intent is to match the door size currently provided. IHS has field verified the doors and they are 4’-0” x 7’-0” Doors. |
b. Per the hardware schedule provided in the specification section, Set 6.0.
| 4. |
| Specs |
| 075423 Fully Adhered Thermoplastic TPO Membrane System |
1.05 Applicator Qualifications: Roofing installer shall have the following:
a. Current Elevate Master Contractor status or equal by other manufacturers. Many are certified with Elevate, just not master contractor status.
b. At least ten years experience in installing specified system. Some have a documented 6 -9 years experience.
c. Capability to provide payment and performance bond to building owner. What is this actually asking for?
d. Shall have a fully staffed office within 150 miles of the job site. I am not sure this is even possible in SD. We have contractors often coming from Minneapolis or Omaha Nebraska. Hundreds of miles away.
e. Contractors are saying that the specific 3” standing seam on the metal roofing is a special order product that comes from the factory. They are suggesting a standard 1-½” standing seam vs. the 3”
| AE |
| a. Master contractor status not required for this project. |
b. Change the requirement to 5 years of experience in installing specified system.
c. Not applicable for this project as roofing contractor will be a subcontractor to the prime contractor.
d. IHS is removing this requirement from the contract.
e We are removing the special weathertight Performance Warranty requirement. The requirement for 3” high vertical ribs is replaced with 2” or larger rib height everything else in section 074113 2.04 A remains.
| 5. |
| RFP |
| Please confirm that taxes are applicable to this solicitation. |
CO
See the B01 RFP pdf at Section B - Notes and B.2, Section H – H.48, and Section I 52.229-3.
| 6. |
| RFP |
| Would the government provide information regarding the contract holder for Bid Pack 2? This information will be crucial to the execution of the work as the awardees will have to work in concert. |
| CO |
| The contract for Bid Pack 2 has not been awarded yet. |
| 7. |
| RFP |
| Factor 3 in section L states The Offeror shall provide a narrative and an example construction schedule for one of the projects submitted under Factor 1 Specialized Experience. Please clarify if it is desired that a schedule be submitted of a project, we reference in Factor 1 rather than a schedule for this project's solicitation. |
| CO |
| The Factor 3 “example construction schedule [is] for one of the projects submitted under Factor 1 Specialized Experience.” “This draft schedule will not be included as part of the award. It is merely to evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the technical requirements.” |
| 8. |
| RFP |
| Paragraph L.11 General Instructions, subparagraph (ii) outlines required contents of the technical proposal. Will the cover, table of contents, list of tables & figures, and summary of Technical proposal count towards the 15 page limit? |
| CO |
| “The technical proposal must be legible and not exceed fifteen (15) pages, single-sided, exclusive of Factor 4 and Factor 5 submissions, which includes past performance questionnaires and/or CPARS and the IEE Representation Form and supporting information.” |
| 9. |
| RFP |
| Is it possible to get an extension on this bid? I’m not sure Centria can turn around pricing in time. |
| CO |
| See SF30 extension. |
Amendment A00003 dated 08/16/2024
| 10. |
| Specs |
| I understand that the Fire Alarm contract holder is Johnson Controls. Would you provide the Johnson Controls contact information for the representative serving this facility? |
Johnson Controls Project Manager for the current fire alarm project is Matthew Morse. Matthew.morse@jci.com – (701) 639-1422
| 11. |
| Specs |
| Please advise if the commissioning is the responsibility of IHS. |
Commissioning is to be included in the bidding contractor’s scope of work.
| 12. |
| Specs |
| Please advise if the mechanical contractor can perform the TAB scope. |
The TAB company should specialize in this scope of work. A third-party testing and balancing contractor is required.
| 13. |
| RFP |
| When is the work anticipated to commence? |
Final schedule to be determined between IHS and awarded contractor. IHS anticipates construction to begin in 2025.
| 14. |
| RFP |
| It was stated during the site walk that core cuts on the roof were performed by IHS. Would you provide the results of said core cuts? |
Test cut information may be accessed on the internet as follows;
You can view and comment on "layout.pdf" at: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:4c44b125-22c0-4a0f-bb2e-515579f84439 You can view and comment on "Reduced Size Photo File.pdf" at: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:afad5dd0-97ab-48ac-aafb-58ed714e1cda
| 15. |
| Specs |
| Please advise regarding the responsibility of tying the security camera back into the system. |
Security camera is to be removed by contractor and provided to the maintenance staff. It will be reinstalled by others.
| 16. |
| Specs |
| Please advise on the responsibility of the exterior speakers on the hospital. |
Exterior speaker is to be removed by contractor and provided to the maintenance staff. It will be reinstalled by others.
| 17. |
| RFP |
| Attachment Titled: B01+RFP+75H70124R00052+Rosebud+Exterior+BP1, Section C, paragraph E, Page 6 of 65 states in part - The contractor will be required to follow the requirements of an “Infection Control Construction Permit” and any “Interim Life Safety Measures” (ILSM), which will be developed in conjunction with completion of an Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) and Pre‐Construction Risk Assessment (PCRA). Any required permits and ILSMs will be provided to the Contractor following award. |
At this time, the only information we have been provided in reference to Infection Control Risk requirements is on drawing GC101.1. We do not have a clear understanding of what may be required in the above-mentioned plans and the costs associated with the implementation. Can a copy of the ILSM, ICRA, and PCRA be provided prior to award to help us understand the requirements and the associated costs to implement these plans?
ICRA and PCRA Forms are attached. The contractor will need to fill out the PCRA and then we will have a separate infection control meeting prior to pre-con meeting. Areas impacted will most likely occur during window replacement and are usually located in a room that the contractor should be able to seal off from the rest of the hospital during construction. Most areas will fall under Type C Class III or Type C Class IV ICRA. During the infection control meeting the contractor means and methods will help the infection control officer determine how the contractor is to follow ICRA with some mitigation activities being able to be reduced or eliminated.
| 18. |
| RFP |
| Attachment Titled: B01+RFP+75H70124R00052+Rosebud+Exterior+BP1, Section C, paragraph F, Page 6 of 65 states in part: This SOW and any other standard government or IHS documents are included and considered a part of this contract. IHS Architecture and Engineering Design Manual – 2022 , FGI 2018 – Healthcare Facility Design Guide, NFPA 101 Life Safety Code – 2012, NFPA 70 National Electric Code (NEC), ASHRAE 170, ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook 2017, NFPA 99 Healthcare Facilities Codebook, 2012. This is a fully designed project issued for construction. Does this design already include the pertinent information from the referenced manuals? Or is the contractor required to review these manuals provide design to ensure compliance with the referenced manuals? |
This design was completed utilizing all of these codes. It is recommended that the contractor be knowledgeable in these codes as well.
| 19. |
| Drawings |
| a. Will the Horizontal IMP panels be radiused or segmented? Detail 08/A340.1 appears to show 5’ long segmented panels. Segmented would be the most cost-effective option (material and labor wise). Please confirm. |
b. Will the Standing Seam Roof panels be segmented or tapered? Same detail as in the question above. This appears to show 5’ long sections being segmented, therefore tapered panels aren’t necessary. This will need to be clarified for the weathertight warranty and tapered panels are more costly.
Horizontal IMP wall panels at the radiused wall area are segmented per the details on the documents
Standing seam roof panels are to be tapered by the manufacturer.
| 20. |
| Specs |
| Are we able to get CNC Metalcraft added to the 05 58 13 Column Cover spec section? They fabricate column covers for Peterson Aluminum (aka PAC-CLAD) and who we typically use locally. They do fantastic work. We would be installing their Sure-Panel CC/HL column cover system. |
The RFI submission does not provide enough comparative information for the Architect to evaluate. Specifically, we would want to know if the specified finish options can be provided. We believe the product to be comparative to what is specified, but need confirmation on the available finishes.
| 21. |
| Drawings |
| Question was asked is the temporary secured public staff entry and emergency egress door located in Conference 2167 to remain in the project. |
This door is being removed from the project. Sheet G201.1, GC100.1, GC101.1, C003.1, A101.1 and A7001.1 have comments that remove this requirement.
| 22. |
| Specs |
| Request for comparable products. 074213.19 insulated core metal wall panels – vertical |
Substitution not acceptable as request fails to show that it meets basis of design requirements.
| 23. |
| Specs |
| Request for comparable products. 074213.20 – insulated core metal wall panels – horizontal |
Substitution not acceptable as request fails to show that it meets basis of design requirements.
| 24. |
| Specs |
| Request for comparable products. Versico Versiweld TPO Adhered Roofing System |
Substitution is acceptable.
| 25. |
| Specs |
| Request for comparable products. Kohler Power Systems Generator |
Substitution not acceptable. Unable to locate service technician for potential unit.
| 26. |
| RFI |
| Electrical Whips to roof mounted equipment, would contractor need to replace broken equipment whips. |
Yes, contractor to replace broken electrical whips to roof mounted equipment during project.
| 27. |
| RFI |
| Is the lightning protection expected to be reused or replaced? |
It is anticipated that most of the lightning protection can be reused as it is in a serviceable condition. If condition is no longer viable then some areas may require replacement of the system.
| 28. |
| RFI |
| Which will occur first women’s health Bid Pack 1 or Bid Pack 2? |
Currently, it looks like bid pack 1 of the women’s health design will happen first.
| 29. |
| Specs |
| 074113 Metal Roof Panel, Standing Seam |
Imetco series 300 is acceptable.
| 30. |
| Drawings |
| There are notes on the structural plans for the vestibule addition that call to reference the geotechnical report. I did not see a geotechnical report provided in the documents. Can this be provided? |
See attached FMG Geotech report.
image1.png oleObject1.bin
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .