J.25 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 75FCMC19R0023
About this file
This document contains a federal solicitation for Medicare administrative contractor services for Jurisdiction E. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services intends to issue a request for proposal to obtain a contractor to provide specified health insurance benefit administration services including Medicare claims processing and payment services in support of the Medicare fee-for-service program for the states of California, Hawaii, and Nevada as well as American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The contractor will perform numerous functions including claims-related activities, establishing relationships with healthcare providers, and ensuring financial integrity of the Medicare program in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and CMS requirements. The anticipated solicitation release date is September 4, 2019 with a proposal due date of November 4, 2019 and anticipated award date of August 4, 2020. The contract will include a base year plus six one-year options. Award will be made using a best value tradeoff process considering cost and technical factors.
RFP Attachment
View the file
Other files
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J.25 Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP # 75FCMC19R0023
JE PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name and Address:
Date:
SUBJECT: RFP# 75FCMC19R0023 A/B MAC JE Contractor
Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for Proposal number Request for Proposal (RFP) # 75FCMC19R0023 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform claims processing activities in accordance with the Part A and Part B Medicare Administrative Contract (A/B MAC) requirements.
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.
Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Company Representative
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B2-14-21 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
SUBJECT: Solicitation No. 75FCMC19R0023 – A/B MAC JX Contractor, Past Performance Questionnaire
To Whom It May Concern:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS. Please be advised that neither your name, nor position or organization, nor this survey, will be divulged before, during or after this survey has been completed.
The questionnaire is arranged by the following agency goals: Customer Service, Financial Management, Operational Excellence, and Innovations and Technology. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire in one of the following manners:
Email PDF (Preferred): Lauren.Holsey@cms.hhs.gov
Mail Original: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Office of Acquisition and Grants Management Division of Medicare Support Contracts ATTN: Lauren Holsey, Contract Specialist
| 7500 Security Blvd., Mailstop B2-14-21 |
| Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 |
Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire. If you have questions, please contact me on (410) 786-3746.
Sincerely, Lauren Holsey Contract Specialist
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CMS Solicitation No. 75FCMC19R0023 - A/B MAC JE Contractor
Company Being Evaluated (Offeror)
Offeror/Contractor: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Name of Contracting Activity: ____________________________________________________ Brief Description of Work: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Type: ________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value: ___________________________________________________________ Performance Period: ____________________________________________________________ Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block. Note: Use of the term “Agency” can be interpreted as also Government/non-Government agencies or customers.
RATING SCALE
| N/A |
| Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report |
| 0 |
| Unsatisfactory: Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| 1 |
| Poor: Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Fair: Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
| 3 |
| Good: There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Excellent: There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. |
| 5 |
| Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
How did the contractor work collaboratively with the “customers” of the contract?
“Customers” may include, but are not limited to, other stakeholders (such as Medical Providers in a health insurance contract) critical to the success of the contract in question and those members of your staff responsible for the administration of the contract.
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and would you hire this contractor again?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Was the contractor timely and accurate in processing payments if the contractor administered funds and/or payments for services?
If the contractor administered funds and/or payments on this contract, was the contractor timely and accurate in submitting accounting reports?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
How was the contractor’s quality of products/services? How well did the contractor meet the standards and requirements of the contract’s Statement of Work? Was the contractor timely in meeting its contract schedule and/or requirements?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
How well was did the contractor utilize internal controls to effectively manage its staff and systems?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
INNOVATIONS
How well did the contractor develop and continually refine its internal business processes to improve the quality of the work delivered on the contract?
If the contractor did incorporate internal business processes changes, what was the impact of those changes on the daily operations?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
| Comments: |
| Yes/No: |
Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire
Agency/Company Name: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Name: _______________________
Telephone No.: ________________________
Title: ___________________________
Email Address: ________________________
January 10, 2019 Page 6 of 6 image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .