QA Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- National Cross Dock & Incident Support Base Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70FB7020R00000001
- Issued by
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
About this file
This document contains a questionnaire template and related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The questionnaire template includes questions and government responses pertaining to planning and logistical support requirements for disaster response efforts. Specifically, it seeks clarification on roles and responsibilities for supporting planning activities. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 70FB7020R00000001 issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The solicitation seeks proposals for National Cross Dock and Incident Support Base services on an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity basis. Offerors must demonstrate the ability to develop and employ a nationwide transportation and emergency logistics network to provide life-sustaining supplies to areas impacted by national emergencies. Services include management and support for cross dock sites, empty trailer yards, and incident support bases. The contract type is a hybrid firm-fixed price with a one year base period and four option years. Awards will be made to responsible and responsive offerors providing the best value to the government. The NAICS code is 488999.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 00001 Signed.pdf | ||
| ATTCH B CLIN & Pricing Structure - CrossDock & ISB Support 1-24-20.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q_As FEMA Cross Dock TMB 012220 PM.pdf | ||
| ATTCH D Sample Task Order Price Proposal 12-4-19.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTCH F Oral Presentation Instructions - 10-24-19.pdf | ||
| RFP 70FB7020R00000001.pdf | ||
| ATTCH C Sample Task Order - Cross Dock-ISB - 11-08-19.pdf | ||
| ATTCH E QASP - Cross Dock - ISB - 12-04-19.pdf | ||
| ATTCH B CLIN & Pricing Structure - CrossDock & ISB Support 11-08-19.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTCH G DHS 700-23 Subcontracting Plan Review Checklist.pdf | ||
| ATTCH A PWS - Cross Dock & ISB Support.pdf | ||
| Synopsis for National Cross Docking and Incident Support Base.pdf | ||
| PWS - CrossDock & ISB Support.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contractor Questions
| Attachment National Cross Dock /ISB RFP Questionnaire | ||||||||
| Question # | PWS Objective | PWS Paragraph | Contractor Question/Comment | Government Response | Comments | |||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | Tied to No. 33. | |||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | PRS Chart | |||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | Remove Clause/not applicable. Tied No. 15 | |||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | The Evaluation Criteria will be modified. | |||||||
| 40 | Sam is looking a template to evaluate the scenarios. | |||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | It is our intent to work collaborately with the whole community to address any gaps or shortfalls with contracted resources. Each disaster and each jurisdiction is unique and will provide many unknown challenges. Distribution items may vary, and depend on the need of the community. Requirements that are established in response to a disaster will be determined at the task order level. This includes any augmentation of NGO/Whole Community Support. | |||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | Confirm with OCPO | |||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | The requirement for this SOO has been modified from "planning and logistical support" to "planning support" only. Offerors are expected to propose a solution that meets our requirement to include establishing roles and responsibilities for staff who support planning. This needs to be described in detail in the proposed PWS and subject to evaluation criteria described in Section M. | |||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | Remove Clause/not applicable. Tied No. 15 | |||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | Clarify the Submission Requirements in Section L regarding the Scenario | |||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 | ||||||||
| 101 | The government will clarify the submission requirements for the scenarios. The clarifications will be posted in the final solicitation. | |||||||
| 102 | ||||||||
| 103 | ||||||||
| 104 | ||||||||
| 105 | ||||||||
| 106 | ||||||||
| 107 | ||||||||
| 108 | ||||||||
| 109 | ||||||||
| 110 | ||||||||
| 111 | ||||||||
| 112 | ||||||||
| 113 | ||||||||
| 114 | ||||||||
| 115 | ||||||||
| 116 | ||||||||
| 117 | ||||||||
| 118 | ||||||||
| 119 | ||||||||
| 120 | ||||||||
| 121 | ||||||||
| 122 | ||||||||
| 123 | ||||||||
| 124 | ||||||||
| 125 | ||||||||
| 126 | ||||||||
| 127 | ||||||||
| 128 | ||||||||
| 129 | ||||||||
| 130 | ||||||||
| 131 | ||||||||
| 132 | ||||||||
| 133 | ||||||||
| 134 | ||||||||
| 135 | ||||||||
| 136 | ||||||||
| 137 | ||||||||
| 138 | ||||||||
| 139 | ||||||||
| 140 | ||||||||
| 141 | ||||||||
| 142 | ||||||||
| 143 | ||||||||
| 144 | ||||||||
| 145 | ||||||||
| 146 | ||||||||
| 147 | ||||||||
| 148 | ||||||||
| 149 | ||||||||
| 150 | ||||||||
| 151 | ||||||||
| 152 | ||||||||
| 153 | ||||||||
| 154 | ||||||||
| 155 | ||||||||
| 156 | ||||||||
| 157 | ||||||||
| 158 | ||||||||
| 159 | ||||||||
| 160 | L.8 | Alternate Proposals | Offerors are required to propose to the requirements as stated in the objectives. Their capabilities shall be described in detail in its proposed PWS. Offerors solutions to the hypothetical scenarios need to be consistent with their capacity as described in their proposed PWS. The hypothetical scenarios are provided for evaluation purposes only. | OCPO/TEAM | ||||
| 161 | M.5 | Factor 1 | ||||||
| Page 86 | The government will clarify the submission requirements in the final version of the RFP. | Agree; should be corrected. |
&P of &N &Z&F
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .