The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
SB26-12
| Consultant JOC for Construction Services |
| SOLICITATION # SB26-12 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Score will be assigned as follows: |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information |
| Company Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) |
| 1 | Vendor must upload completed Attachment C: Cost Sheet | Attach C | |
| 2 | Vendor must upload Completed Attachment D: Technical Criteria Questions | Attach D | |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1.a | What is your firm’s historical track record in developing and maintaining custom JOC programs for public entities? | Attach B | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 1.b | How extensive and dynamic is the Construction Cost database you will utilize for the State of Utah? | Attach B 3.2 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.a. | How will you ensure the Construction Task Catalog (CTC) reflects the actual local market conditions in Utah? | Attach B 3.2 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.b. | How does your catalog handle demolition costs and quantity-based pricing to reduce the need for negotiations? | Attach B 3.2 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.c | How do your pricing catalog and technical specifications work together to guarantee quality? | Attach B 3.2 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.d | How are costs verified and established for non-pre-priced items that are not currently in the Construction Task Catalog? | Attach B 3.2 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.a. | How are project costs verified, and take-offs performed from approved plans or the Detailed Scope of Work? | Attach B 5 | 10 | 6.7% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.b. | What specific workflows will be implemented to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse within the JOC lifecycle? | Attach B 3.1 | 10 | 6.7% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.c. | What is your strategy for attracting the local Utah JOC Subcontractor community to build and maintain your firm's independent roster for this program? | Attach B 3.1 | 10 | 6.7% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.d | Describe your independent process for vetting, qualifying, and onboarding local JOC Subcontractors without relying on a State-run solicitation. | Attach B 3.3 | 10 | 6.7% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.e | What systems do you have in place to ensure JOC Subcontractors are paid within the mandated windows after you receive State funds? | Attach B 5.b | 10 | 6.7% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.f | How do you track the performance and progress of JOC Subcontractors currently active in the program? | Attach B 6 | 10 | 6.70% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 4.a | What core functionalities does your JOC software program provide to help the State manage project milestones and approvals? | Attach B 3.3 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 4.b | How does your proprietary software meet State data security requirements and ADA accessibility standards? | Attach B 3.3 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 5.a | Can you demonstrate a proven ability to move from contract award to a fully operational program within 60 calendar days? | Attach B 3.3 | 10 | 6.66% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 12 | | | | | | 0.00 |
100.0% 750.00 0.00
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Attach D | 65% | 487.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Attach C | | | 25% | 220.0 | 0.0 |
Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each Vendors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The Vendor with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other Vendors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 65% | 750.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 35% | 250.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
TO BE AWARDED: Proposal must obtain a total score of 650/1000 possible points. Total Score = Technical Criteria + Cost Points