7-Evaluation Score Sheet (final).pdf
PDF 117 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USBE - Continuous Improvement Experts Prequalification List (add vendors and recertify current vendors)
- Solicitation number
- USBE-MI26069-RFSQ
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation score sheet for a Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) to establish a prequalified vendor list of Continuous Improvement Experts (CIE) to serve USBE-designated Elevate and Springboard schools. The RFSQ seeks to add new vendors to the prequalified list and recertify current vendors who must resubmit complete responses to verify continued compliance with minimum mandatory requirements. The evaluation criteria consist of eight scored sections weighted across technical evaluation, with scoring ranges from 0 to 10 points per section and a total possible score of 650 points. A minimum threshold of 75 percent of total points (487.5 points) is required to pass evaluation. The approved vendor list operates on an indeterminate term, with USBE conducting verification that vendors continue to meet applicable requirements no less frequently than every 18 months. The state retains the right to reopen the solicitation to accept additional vendors at any time during the term.
The evaluation criteria include mandatory minimum requirements and scoreable technical criteria addressing vendor experience in coaching school administrators on data-driven improvement plans, designing and implementing data-driven instructional systems, protecting student-level data, coordinating services with other providers, delivering professional development in instructional effectiveness, demonstrating credible track records of improving student academic achievement, and willingness to partner with any Elevate or Springboard school regardless of location. Vendors must provide resumes and CVs for proposed staff and demonstrate compliance with Section 504 and 508 accessibility requirements. Individual Elevate and Springboard local school boards will independently contract with vendors on the approved list, with all expenses including travel to be determined by the contracting school boards.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-53E-5 Part 3.pdf | ||
| 4-Att. A - USBE Standard TsCs for Goods and Services (rev. 3-2026).docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-PII Questionnaire.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-GRAMA Claim of Business Confidentiality.pdf | ||
| 8-RFSQ Prerequisites Document.pdf | ||
| 5-Scope of Work CIE (final).pdf | ||
| 6-Technical Evaluation Criteria (final).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows:
RFSQ
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFSQ
Section
Evaluator Score (0-10)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
10 15.4% 100.0 0.0
10 15.4% 100.0 0.0
10 15.4% 100.0 0.0
5 7.7% 50.0 0.0
5 7.7% 50.0 0.0
10 15.4% 100.0 0.0
5 7.7% 50.0 0.0 8 10 15.4% 100.0 0.0
100.0% 650.0 0.0
Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned
Evaluation
75% 487.5 0.0 0.0% Fail
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Percent
Required
Minimum Points
Required
Evaluation Result
100% 650.0 0.0 75% 487.5 FAIL
100% 650.0 0.0 75% 487.5 FAIL
Proposed team
Experience coaching public school administrators and teachers on designing data-driven school improvement plans
Experience designing, implementing, and evaluating data-driven instructional systems in public schools
Protects student level data, if applicable
Experience working with the various education entities that govern public schools Experience coordinating the services provided to participating schools by other experts or providers Experience delivering high-quality professional development in instructional effectiveness to public school administrators and teachers
Credible track record of improving student academic achievement
Must be willing to partner with any elevate or springboard school in the state, regardless of location
Experience delivering high-quality professional development in instructional effectiveness to public school administrators and teachers
Must be willing to partner with any elevate or springboard school in the state, regardless of location
0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
Experience designing, implementing, and evaluating data-driven instructional systems in public schools
10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements
Credible track record of improving student academic achievement
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Section 504 & 508 compliance
Experience coaching public school administrators and teachers on designing data-driven school improvement plans Experience working with the various education entities that govern public schools Experience coordinating the services provided to participating schools by other experts or providers
Must provide resumes/CVs for proposed staff
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT EXPERT PREQUALIFICATION LIST
EVALUATION SCORE SHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # USBE-MI26069-RFSQ
NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria.
Total Evaluation Points* Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Required Score Threshold
Master
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .