7. Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 193 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Telecommunication System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA466125Q0025
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire form designed to collect detailed feedback about a contractor's performance across multiple assessment categories. The form provides space for comprehensive evaluation of a contractor's performance, with rating options ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional for nine key areas: quality of product/service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, reliability, customer support, overall performance, and two additional custom areas. The questionnaire requires detailed information about the contract, including the firm/agency providing feedback, contract number, period of performance, contract award date, and contact information for the assessing official, with a section for additional comments to provide qualitative context for the numerical ratings.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4. BTS Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions and Answers Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 4. BTS Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 5. Instructions to Offerors Addendum.pdf | ||
| RFQ FA466125Q0025.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2. FAR 52.212-5 Clause.pdf | ||
| 8. WD 2015-5211 Rev. 29.pdf | ||
| 1. FAR Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| 5. Instructions to Offerors Addendum.pdf | ||
| RFQ FA466125Q0025.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4. BTS Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3. Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| 6. Questions Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
1. NAME OF FIRM/AGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
PROJECT NAME:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
AWARDED VALUE:
CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):
SERVICES PERFORMED/DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)
4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A
a. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
b. SCHEDULE
c. COST CONTROL
d. BUSINESS RELATIONS
e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
f. RELIABILITY
g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT
h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE
i. OTHER AREAS:
(1)
(2)
CONTRACT NUMBER:
PRIME OR SUBCONTRACTOR:
| 1 NAME OF FIRMAGENCY PROVIDING FEEDBACK: |
| PROJECT NAME: |
| PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: |
| CONTRACT TYPE if applicable: |
| CONTRACT AWARD DATE: |
| CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: |
| AWARDED VALUE: |
| CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE: |
| 2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL: |
| EMAIL: |
| PHONE NUMBER: |
| ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role: |
| CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER if applicable: |
| Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Marginalb SCHEDULE: |
| Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Very Goodb SCHEDULE: |
| Exceptionalb SCHEDULE: |
| NAb SCHEDULE: |
| Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Marginalc COST CONTROL: |
| Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Very Goodc COST CONTROL: |
| Exceptionalc COST CONTROL: |
| NAc COST CONTROL: |
| Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Marginalf RELIABILITY: |
| Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Very Goodf RELIABILITY: |
| Exceptionalf RELIABILITY: |
| NAf RELIABILITY: |
| Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Marginali OTHER AREAS: |
| Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Very Goodi OTHER AREAS: |
| Exceptionali OTHER AREAS: |
| NAi OTHER AREAS: |
| 1: |
| Unsatisfactory1: |
| Marginal1: |
| Satisfactory1: |
| Very Good1: |
| Exceptional1: |
| NA1: |
| 2: |
| Unsatisfactory2: |
| Marginal2: |
| Satisfactory2: |
| Very Good2: |
| Exceptional2: |
| NA2: |
| 4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
| Text1: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .