7-BW26-1 - Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet - FINAL.xls
XLS spreadsheet 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BW26-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP score sheet for Solicitation BW26-1 issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing to evaluate proposals for Breath Alcohol Testing Devices and Presumptive Drug Tests. The evaluation covers four product categories: Evidential Breath Alcohol Testing (BATs) devices, Portable BATs, Drug Tests—Toxicology, and Drug Tests—Colorimetric. The resulting contract will have a five-year term, with the potential for multiple awards based on vendors meeting both technical score thresholds and total RFP score requirements. The evaluation process requires vendors to first pass all minimum mandatory requirements, including submission of fully completed technical responses and cost sheets, before advancing to scoring.
The evaluation framework allocates 70 percent of total points (700 points) to technical criteria and 30 percent (300 points) to cost evaluation, for a total possible score of 1,000 points. Technical scoring is based on four criteria: Experience, Knowledge, and Expertise (40 points, 28.6 percent weight); Products and Services Offered (50 points, 35.7 percent weight); Ordering Process and Customer Service (30 points, 21.4 percent weight); and Warranties and Customer Resolution (20 points, 14.3 percent weight). Vendors must achieve a minimum of 65 percent (455 points) of technical points to advance to cost evaluation. Cost points are calculated using the formula: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price / Proposed Price). A minimum total RFP score of 650 points is required for contract award consideration. Vendors are required to guarantee pricing for 12 months, or if a percentage discount is awarded, that discount is guaranteed for the life of the contract. An administrative fee of 0.25 percent applies to the contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-BW26-1 - Attachment B - Scope of Work FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-BW26-1 - Attachment D - Technical Criteria - FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-BW26-1 - Attachment C - Cost Sheet - FINAL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3-BW26-1 - Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| RFP Evaluation Scoresheet: Breath Alcohol Testing and Presumptive Drug Tests |
| Solicitation #BW26-1 |
| Evaluation Process: |
1. Vendors must pass all listed minimum mandatory requirements to be considered.
2. Vendors must receive the minimum amount of technical points as stated in Attachment D - Technical Criteria, in order to advance to the cost evaluation stage.
3. Cost points are awarded and combined with the Vendor's technical score. The Cost evaluation is described in detail in Attachment C - Cost Sheet.
4. Vendors who meet the minimum total RFP score as described in the RFP information will be awarded a State of Utah Cooperative Contract.
Evaluator Instructions:
1. Copy this tab and create a tab for every proposal that will be scored
2. Complete only the Yellow Boxes
3. After scoring is complete, email the file to the State Purcahsing Agent conducting the RFP.
| Vendor Name: | |||||
| Evaluator: | |||||
| Date: | |||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | |||||
| (to be completed by the Division of Purchasing) | RFP Section | Pass/Fail | |||
| 1 | Vendor has uploaded fully completed technical response (Attachment D) | prerequisite | |||
| 2 | Vendor has uploaded fully completed cost sheet (Attachment C) | prerequisite | |||
| 0 | |||||
| Score Descriptions |
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
| TECHNICAL EVALUATION - Evidential BATs | Portable BATs | Drug Tests - Toxicology | Drug Tests - Colorimetric | |||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Experience, Knowledge, and Expertise (Same score for all categories) | Attachment D | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 1 | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 40 | 28.6% | 200.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
| 2 | Products and Services Offered (Each Category scored independently) | Attachment D | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 2 | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | 50 | 35.7% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
| 3 | Ordering Process and Customer Service (Same score for all categories) | Attachment D | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 3 | 30 | 21.4% | 150.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 30 | 21.4% | 150.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 30 | 21.4% | 150.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 30 | 21.4% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
| 4 | Warranties and Customer Resolution (Same score for all categories) | Attachment D | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 4 | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
| 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||||||||
| 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 65% | 455.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||||||
| COST EVALUATION - Evidential BATs | Portable BATs | Drug Tests - Toxicology | Drug Tests - Colorimetric | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost points will be added to a Vendor's Technical Score to determine a total RFP score. | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||||
| 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL RFP SCORE for Category (cost score + technical score) | Total for Category | Total for Category | Total for Category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SUMMARY | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | Points Possible | Points Earned | Points Possible | Points Earned | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | Technical | 700.0 | 0.0 | Technical | 700.0 | 0.0 | Technical | 700.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 300.0 | 0.0 | Cost | 300.0 | 0.0 | Cost | 300.0 | 0.0 | Cost | 300.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | Score required for award: 650 | Total | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | Total | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | Total | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Score required for award: 650 | Score required for award: 650 | Score required for award: 650 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .