7-Attachment F - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK27-2 Pharmaceutical Services
- Solicitation number
- MK27-2
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Pharmaceutical Services (Solicitation #MK27-2) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services to provide pharmacy services for individuals at the Utah State Developmental Center. The contract is anticipated to result in a single award to the responsive and responsible vendor with the highest evaluation score, with a contract term of five years and a pricing guarantee requirement of one year.
The evaluation methodology assigns points across mandatory requirements, technical criteria, and cost proposals. Mandatory requirements include vendor certification of an active professional pharmacy license in Utah and the vendor's state of operation, active Medicaid provider enrollment with a valid National Provider Identifier (NPI), and capability to bill Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance plans. Technical evaluation comprises five scored criteria: Pre-Authorization Plan (250 points, 25% weight), Delivery Schedule (200 points, 20% weight), Customer Service Response Plan (250 points, 25% weight), Technical Integration Plan (200 points, 20% weight), and Automated Dispensing Machine capabilities and Training Plan (100 points, 10% weight), for a total of 1,000 technical points with a minimum required threshold of 700 points (70%). Cost proposals represent 30% of total evaluation points (428.6 points maximum), calculated using a formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100% of cost points and other proposals receive proportional points based on their price differential. The combined total evaluation is 1,428.6 points, with technical criteria comprising 70% and cost comprising 30% of the overall evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment B - IT Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment D - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment C - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 8-Attachment E - Mandatory Minimums Technical Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9-Attachment E - Mandatory Minimums Technical Requirements.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Pharmaceutical Services | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION #MK27-2 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | The Vendor must certify that it holds, and will maintain, an active professional license to provide pharmaceutical services in the State of Utah and the Vendor’s state of operation. (License may be requested). | |||||||||
| 2 | The Vendor must certify that it will maintain active enrollment as a Medicaid provider and hold a valid National Provider Identifier (NPI). | |||||||||
| 3 | The Vendor must certify that it has the capability to bill all Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance plans. | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Pre-Authorization Plan | 50 | 25.0% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Delivery Schedule | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Customer Service Response Plan | 50 | 25.0% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Technical Integration Plan | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Automated Dispensing Machine (e.g., Cubex) & Training Plan | 20 | 10.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 30% | 428.6 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 428.6 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,428.6 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .