CA FLAP 03S11(1)-Reds Meadow Road - QnA-11142022.pdf

PDF 139 KB Posted

Attached to
CA FLAP 03S11(1) Reds Meadow Road
Solicitation number
6982AF22B000008
Issued by

About this file

This document contains details for a federal invitation for bid for the CA FLAP 03S11(1) Reds Meadow Road project. The project involves reconstructing and widening the upper 2.5 miles of Reds Meadow Road to a two-lane road through cut slopes, fill slopes, soil nail walls, reinforced soil slopes, and rock cuts. The lower 5.8 miles will be rehabilitated through pulverization and repaving with superelevation corrections, reconstruction of the Devil's Postpile National Monument entrance, and embankment excavation or clearing. Major work items include approximately 9,500 cubic yards of roadway embankment, 26,000 cubic yards of reinforced soil slope, 31,000 square feet of soil nail retaining wall, 4,000 cubic yards of rock excavation, 12,000 tons of roadway aggregate, and 22,000 tons of asphalt concrete pavement. The anticipated cost range is between $20-30 million. The advertisement date is October 2022, with an award date of December 2022 and construction from Spring 2023 to Fall 2024 over two seasons.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Tabulation of Bids CA FLAP 03S11(1).pdf PDF
Bid Opening Summary Sched and Opt 11.17.22.pdf PDF
A002 CA FLAP 03S11(1) Reds Meadow.pdf PDF
SF30 A003 11-16-2022.pdf PDF
A002 CA FLAP 03S11(1) Reds Meadow.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List 11.10.22.pdf PDF
CA FLAP 03S11(1)-Reds Meadow Road - QnA-11102022.pdf PDF
A001.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List 11.09.22.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List 11.03.22.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List 10.31.22.pdf PDF
CA FLAP 03S11(1)-Reds Meadow Road - QnA-10272022.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List 10.25.22.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors List.pdf PDF
05_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixC.pdf PDF
07_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixE.pdf PDF
06_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixD.pdf PDF
CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_HydraulicsReport_100_3-26-21.pdf PDF
08_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixF.pdf PDF
FP-14_Eng.pdf PDF
CA FLAP 03S11(1) Reds Meadow Road Plans.pdf PDF
06-CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_100_UtilitySummaryReport_8-2-22.pdf PDF
02_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_Figures.pdf PDF
04_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixB.pdf PDF
03_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_AppendixA.pdf PDF
01_CA_FLAP_03S11(1)_GeotechRpt_Body.pdf PDF
IFB 6982AF22B000008 CA O3s11(1) Reds Meadow.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers during Advertisement for CA FLAP 03S11(1)-Reds Meadow Road

November 14, 2022

Questions Answers 1 Plan Sht. A9 typical section Sta 10+70 To 139+09 requires 3”

HMA on 4” Aggregate Base.

a. Where is demolition/ removal of the existing asphalt to be paid?

b. Is pulverized asphalt suitable for embankment or aggregate base in this area?

a. No direct payment

b. Yes if it meets the respective specification for embankment or aggregate base.

2 I am unable to locate plan details for the Double 36” headwalls called out For Option X Sta 772+00

Please see Amendment A001

3 Work scope for the base bid requires demolition/ reconstruction of the roadway while maintaining public access per SCR 156.05.

There does not appear to be any minimum requirement for the roadway surface during reconstruction as it relates to public access (please confirm). However, SCR 108.01 (f) requires a minimum of 1.5” of asphalt be placed prior to winter shutdown.

a. In the event road reconstruction is incomplete and not ready for asphalt, why would temporary asphalt be placed/ removed when the road is closed and under snow for the winter?

b. Is there another acceptable method of stabilization which is not so costly to FHWA?

a. Refer to SCR 156.05(g); The minimum 1.5” of asphalt will be required as stated in SCR 108.01(f).

b. No, but they could submit a VE proposal may be considered during construction.

4 Is construction water available on-site? FHWA has not secured on-site water.

5 For the purpose of managing schedule impacts and liquidated damages, how will the presence of subsurface water and saturated soils be addressed. For example, Schedule A requires approx.

31,868 CY of embankment. In the event that all of the available material is saturated and must be processed to remove moisture for an unforeseeable period of time, what schedule consideration will be given?

No schedule consideration will be given.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .