693KA8-23-R-00005_Amend_0002_20230426.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

0002 See block 16c

AAQ-320 ATC COMMUNICATIONS BRANCH

Orville Wright Bldg. (FOB10A), Room 506 FAA National Headquarters 800 Independence Ave., SW

AAQ320-AFN

Washington DC

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning ___________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x x

693KA8-23-R-00005

copies to the issuing office.

03/07/2023

(x)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

In accordance with AMS Clause 3.2.2.3-12 Amendments to Screening Information Requests (JULY

2004), SIR 693KA8-23-R-00005 is hereby amended as follows:

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Alessha M. Mason

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

X

X 1

AMS Clause 3.2.2.3-12

X

N/A

This is Amendment 0002 to the FAA NEXCOM V3 SIR 693KA8-23-R-00005.

This amendment provides:

1. An extension to the submission date for proposals in response to the NEXCOM V3 SIR from 3:00 PM EST on May 24, 2023 to 3:00PM EST on May 26, 2023.

2. The FAA’s response to industry questions, which are reflected in Attachment L06.

3. Amended SIR documents, updated in response to industry SIR questions. The following summary is provided:

a. SECTION C – STATEMENT OF WORK

i. C.3.6.4.1: Reference corrected from C.3.4.e to C.3.4.d.

ii. C.3.6.9.2 thru C.3.6.9.9, pages C-22-C-23: Updated to restore heading for

C.3.6.9.2 (EOSH) and subsequent headings thereafter.

iii. C.3.8.3, page C-34: Updated to add Section B.1 CLINs 0001A – 0001F, 0002, 0003, and 0004.

iv. C.3.9: Corrected Section G references to G.8.2, G.8.2.1 and G.8.2.2.

b. SECTION H – SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

i. H.25 Save Harmless and Indemnity Agreement deleted.

c. SECTION I – CONTRACT CLAUSES

i. AMS clause 3.2.2.3-74 Site and Depot Level Spare Parts deleted.

ii. AMS clause 3.2.4-28 Cancellation of Items deleted.

iii. AMS clause 3.2.4-33 fill-in updated.

d. SECTION J – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

i. Attachment J01:

- Section .3.2.3.1.1.1.d: Updated to remove the download reference.

- Tables 3-17, Parameter 2: Updated Radio Type II default setting.

- Table 4-2: Corrected a frequency typo.

ii. Attachment J02, CDRL A007: Updated Section C reference from C.3.3.4 to C.3.3.4.1.

e. SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO

OFFERORS

i. L.3.1, Table L-1: Table updated to change the proposal submission due date from May 24, 2023 to May 26, 2023.

ii. L.4.2.b: Updated to state that the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) materials do not count against page count requirement in Table L-3.

iii. L.4.2.g: Updated to state that proposal volume parts must contain a table of contents and glossary.

iv. Attachment L04:

- Header updated to be same date as SIR Attachment J01 (April 11, 2023)

- Page 4, “Should 57”: Updated to “Non-High”

- Page 7, “Should 63: Updated to include ITU M.3100.

v. Attachment L07: Updated to remove a typo on page 2 of the form.

f. SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

i. Attachment M01:

- Footers updated.

- Page A-163, “Shall 219”: Updated language to align with SIR

Attachment J01: “When performing local or remote new software uploads using the MDTS, the software upload shall219 be secure (e.g., SFTP, HTTPS).”

ii. Attachment M03:

- Header updated to the same date as SIR Attachment J01 (April 11, 2023)

- Page 41, “Shall 219”: Updated language to align with SIR Attachment

J01: “When performing local or remote new software uploads using the MDTS, the software upload shall219 be secure (e.g., SFTP, HTTPS).”

SIR documents are updated as follows:

Original SIR File (obsolete) New SIR File (current applicable) NEXV3 SIR Sect C.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect C Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect H.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect H Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect I.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect J01_PD_v2.5_FAA-E-37021.docx

NEXV3 SIR Sect J01_PD_v2.5_FAA-E-37021.pdf

NEXV3 SIR Sect J_Att J02.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect L.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect L_Att L04.pdf NEXV3 SIR Sect L_Att L07.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M01_OCT Plan.docx

NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M03_OCT VRTM.xlsx

NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M03_OCT VRTM.pdf

NEXV3 SIR Sect I Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect J01_PD_v2.5_FAA-E- 37021_Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect J01_PD_v2.5_FAA-E- 37021_Amend 2.pdf NEXV3 SIR Sect J_Att J02 Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect L Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect L_Att L04_Amend 2.pdf NEXV3 SIR Sect L_Att L07_Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M01_OCT Plan_Amend 2.docx NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M03_OCT VRTM_Amend 2.xlsx NEXV3 SIR Sect M_Att M03_OCT VRTM_Amend 2.pdf

693KA8-23-R-00005

Page L06-1

ATTACHMENT L06

CLARIFICATION / QUESTION FORM

SIR

Section or Attach ment

Page # Subsection Offerors Comment/Question FAA Response

1.

Section

L L-18 L.4.2

Proposal instructions L.4.2 f) states “A cover page must be affixed to each volume that clearly identifies each volume title, volume number, solicitation number, and Offeror’s name.” L.4.2 g) instructs “All proposal volumes must contain a table of contents, and glossary with the definitions of all acronyms and abbreviations used within the volume.”

Since each part of Volume I (Parts A through G) require separate file submissions, a volume cover page, table of contents, and associated information is not practicable. We assume, for Volume I, each part should have a cover page, table of contents, and glossary with the definitions of all acronyms and abbreviations used within the part. Please confirm this is the correct assumption.

Section L, L.4.2(g) updated to state "all proposal volume parts must contain a table of contents, and glossary with the definitions of all acronyms and abbreviations used within the volume."

2.

Section

J

10, 56,

3.2.1.1 3.4.1.8

There are several requirements verified at OCT by Analysis that per the SIR VRTM are verified by Test at FAT. We assume that due to the length of these tests, which may need to be performed at an external lab, the FAA will use a sampling plan rather than run, for example, all VHF Transmitters through all required tests. So we may adequately plan the schedule and costs, would the FAA please state the quantity of each item to be verified by test at FAT for ETSI EN300676-1 (PD 3.2.1.1.d), shock IAW MIL-STD-810H (PD 3.4.1.8.a), and vibration (PD 3.4.1.8.b)?

The 'sampling plan' (using your term) is the Contractor's responsibility to propose to the FAA via their specific approach as defined in the Contractor Master Test Plan (CMTP), Contractor Verification Requirements Traceability Matrix (CVRTM), Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Plan, FAT Procedure deliverables. The Contractor's delivered Test CDRLs are reviewed, refined and approved by the FAA prior to test conduct. With this said, the FAA cannot state a specific quantity of each item to be verified by test at FAT for ETSI EN300676-1 (PD 3.2.1.1.d), shock IAW MIL-STD-810H (PD 3.4.1.8.a), and vibration (PD 3.4.1.8.b) because it is up to the contractor to develop and propose their CMTP/FAT approaches.

Page L06-2

ATTACHMENT L06

CLARIFICATION / QUESTION FORM

SIR

Section or Attach ment

Page # Subsection Offerors Comment/Question

FAA Response

3.

Section C &

Section G

C-38 G-6

C.3.9 G.8.2

C.3.9 states: Technical Support Services will be provided through Time and Materials (T&M) Task Orders IAW Sections G.6.2, G.6.2.1 and G.6.2.2. There are no Sections G.6.2, G.6.2.1 and G.6.2.2. Please confirm correct references are G.8.2, G8.2.1 and G.8.2.2

Section C, Statement of Work has been updated to correct references to Sections G.8.2, G.8.2.1, and G.8.2.2.

4.

Section

C C-17 C.3.6.4.1 C.3.4.d

C.3.6.4.1 Provisioning Conference refers to Section C.3.4.e. C.3.4.e is titled Program Management Reviews.

Please confirm the correct reference is C.3.4.d Provisioning Conference.

references to Section C.3.4.d.

5.

Section

C C-34 C.3.8.3

Section C.3.8.3 Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) states in the second sentence “The Contractor must conduct FAT on all V3 radio items identified in Section B of this contract.”

We assume that should read Section B.1 CLINs 0001A – 0001F OT units. Is that correct?

references to Section B.1 CLINs 0001A – 0001F, 0002, 0003, and 0004 OT units and not all V3 radio items.

6.

Section

C C-22 C.3.6.9.1

The last sentence of the first paragraph of C.3.6.9.1 (Environmental Occupational Safety and Health (EOSH)) appears to be the heading for the next paragraph. If this is correct, the heading should be:

C.3.6.9.2 Environmental Occupational Safety and Health

(EOSH)

This incrementally changes the following section heading numbers (e.g., 3.6.9.2 Training Development Plan (TDP) is now 3.6.9.3 Training Development Plan (TDP), etc.).

Is this a correct assumption?

Statement of Work has been updated to restore heading for C.3.6.9.2 (EOSH) and subsequent subheadings thereafter.

Page L06-3

Section or Attach ment

7.

Section

L L-18 L.4.2

Since there is no designation for a font type for graphics, illustrations, and charts (including tables) we assume an easily readable sans serif font, such as Arial 8 point or larger, is acceptable. Please confirm this is an accurate assumption.

Section L of the NEXCOM V3 SIR does not require a specific font type for graphics, illustrations, and charts/tables, however, font must be 8 point or larger.

8. Section J, Att

J01_PD

38 Table 3-17, Row 2

The default value for Radio Type II in Table 3-17 is "Single". Using that value would mean that the radio frequency cannot be changed. Is this the FAA's intent? Please clarify rationale for not enabling multiple frequency functional requirements.

Section J, Attachment J01 Product Description (PD) has been updated to change the default value for Radio Type II in Table 3-17 from Single to Multi-frequency.

9. Section L

L-7 L.1.1 3.2.2.3-38

Please clarify that AMS Policy 3.2.3.3 (9/2020), specifically 3.2.3.1 Policy, applies to this procurement IAW the text below:

“3.2.3.1.2 Policy Added 9/2020 “When the CO determines adequate price competition exists, certified cost or pricing data must not be requested. In situations with established catalog or market prices, prices set by law or regulation, or commercial items, price analysis is sufficient and the CO must not request cost data.”

Section L.1.1 states that certified cost and pricing data is required. Later in the document Section L.5.5 states that the Government anticipates that adequate price competition will exist, so Offerors are not required to submit certified

Per AMS clause 3.2.2.3-38(a)(1), "In lieu of submitting certified cost or pricing data, Offerors may submit a written request for exception by submitting the information described in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this clause. The Contracting Officer may require additional supporting information, but only to the extent necessary to determine whether an exception should be granted, and whether the price is fair and reasonable."

Page L06-4

ATTACHMENT L06

CLARIFICATION / QUESTION FORM

SIR

Section or Attach ment

Page # Subsection Offerors Comment/Question FAA Response cost and pricing data with their proposals. Please confirm that certified cost and pricing data is not required. Please align Certified Cost & Pricing data references in the SIR accordingly.

10. Section B

B-73 B.7 Several tabs in the Section B Pricing Model are labeled "Other MISC Components, add rows as needed" but the file is locked and does not allow adding rows. Would the FAA update Section B Pricing Model file to enable offerors the opportunity to insert additional rows to address this pricing factor and unlock the worksheets accordingly?

Section B, Tab B instructions, Rows 3-4: Spelling error in row 4 should state “including”

The pricing model includes the following tabs for offeror to enter “Other Misc. Components” as NSP:

Section B, Tab E CLINs 0001-0004, Starting at Row 18, CLIN 0001A vi Section B, Tab I CLINs 1001-1005, Starting at Row 18, CLIN 1001A vi Section B, Tab K CLINs 2001-2002, Starting at Row 18, CLIN 2001A vi Section B, Tab M CLINs 3001-3002, Starting at Row 18, CLIN 3001A vi Section B, Tab Q CLINs 5001-5002, Starting at Row 18, CLIN 5001A vi Section B, Tab S CLINs 6001-6002, Starting at Row 17, CLIN 6001A vi Section B, Tab V CLINs 7001-7002, Starting at Row 17, CLIN 7001A vi Section B, Tab Y CLINs 8001-8002, Starting at Row17, CLIN 8001A vi Section B, Tab AB CLINs 9001-9002, Starting at Row 17, CLIN 9001A vi Section B, Tab AE CLINS 10001-10002, Starting at Row 16, CLIN 10001A vi

Section B updates made in Amendment 0001 of the SIR.

Page L06-5

Section or Attach ment

Also IAW Tab AH options, requires offeror to include pricing for specific order estimated quantities provided by the FAA with a roll-up of total price and no ability to insert rows identifying specific component cost that apparently are separately priced.

Please ensure changes made to the Excel version are also reflected in the PDF formatted version and visa versa.

11. Section F/ Section I

F-3 3.2.4-33 Clause 3.2.4-33 Option for Increased Quantity – Separately Priced Line Item.

Requested fill-in: “The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to the start of the option period.”

Section F clause was a duplicate to the clause in Section I.

Clause has been removed from Section F.

Clause 3.2.4-33 fill-in has been updated in Section I accordingly.

12. Section I

I-3 3.2.4-4 Given the nature of the procurement as Best Value to the government and related to ongoing inflation and supply chain issues in this market sector, we request the FAA include (on Page I-3) an additional contract clause to the benefit of both the offeror and the government, per below:

“3.2.4-4: Fixed-Price Contracts with Economic Price Adjustment-Labor and Material (Oct 2019)

The FAA will not incorporate AMS clause 3.2.4-4 Fixed- Price Contracts with Economic Price Adjustment-Labor and Material into the NEXCOM V3 SIR.

13. Section L

L-17

Section L.4.2

Please consider allowing Offerors to:

Section L, L4.2(b) has been updated to exclude IMSA scheduling software documentation (ex. MS Project) from the page counts listed in Section L.4, Table L-3.

Page L06-6

Section or Attach ment

L-24

Section L.4, Table L-3

Section L.5.2.2

(1) submit detailed IMS to support the IMSA narrative required IAW L.5.2.2, paragraph 2 for this volume that would be submitted with the volume and excluded from the page count limitation required on Page L-17 {L.4.2.b}, or

(2) increase the page count for Part B to support Offeror demonstration of its understanding of all NEXCOM V3 program milestones and requirements in order that these details may be adequately addressed.

14. Section L

L-30 L.5.6.6 Section L.5.6.6, Part F – Subcontracting Plan, states that a subcontracting plan is required for all Offerors who are not small businesses and who will subcontract a portion of the work. Will the FAA accept use of a Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan approved under the Test Program of 15 U.S.C., 637 note?

Refer to AMS clause 3.6.1.-4 Small Business Subcontracting Plan for acceptable subcontracting plan types. Offerors must ensure subcontracting plans submitted are in accordance with all requirements AMS clause 3.6.1- 4 and the NEXCOM V3 SIR.

15. Section K

K-19 K.3 Contractors are to identify the country that it will manufacture each “end product”. Does “end product” include ancillaries and software/firmware or just the Operational Test (OT) and Production radios?

"The "end products" are not ancillaries or software/firmware, the intent of Section K.3's certification is applicable to the country where the V3 OT radios and V3 production radios are manufactured.

16. Section H

H-27 H.25 Clause H.25, SAVE HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY

AGREEMENT

Please clarify the following:

1. How is the extent of the contractor’s responsibility determined, and who makes that determination?

2. Shouldn’t there be a notice provision, so that the government cannot settle with a plaintiff or perhaps have a judgment entered against it, and subsequently attempt to recover damages from the

H.25 Save Harmless and Indemnity Agreement deleted from Section H in Amendment 0002 to the SIR.

Page L06-7

Section or Attach ment contractor who may not even have been involved in the litigation?

3. How does this clause affect basic rules of civil procedure that already allow defendants to implead third parties who may be liable? In light of those existing third-party practice rules, why is this clause needed?

4. Is this the same as “contributory negligence?”

5. What is meant by “direct responsibility.” Is that to say that indirect damages are not covered?

17. Section I

I-3 3.1.7-1 Paragraph (a) of AMS clause 3.1.7-1, Exclusion from Future Agency Contracts, states the following: “Work under this contract may create a future organizational conflict of interest (OCI) that could prohibit the Contractor from competing for, or being awarded future Government contracts.” Per the prescription language this clause should be used as follows: “Must be used in all SIRs and contracts when the Contracting Officer has determined that an organizational conflict of interest could occur.” What work performed under the NEXCOM3 effort does the FAA believe may create an OCI that could prohibit a Contractor from competing for, or being awarded future contracts?

The NEXCOM V3 SIR includes AMS clause 3.1.7-1 Exclusion from Future Agency Contracts should an OCI occur in the future. Per AMS Procurement Guidance T3.1.7(A)(1) - Organizational Conflict of Interest, "The policy of the FAA is to avoid contracting with contractors who have unacceptable organizational conflicts of interest. An organizational conflict of interest means that because of existing or planned activities, (1) an offeror or contractor is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance to the agency, or (2) has an unfair competitive advantage, or

(3) the offeror or contractor's objectivity is or might be impaired. It is not the intention of the FAA to foreclose a vendor from a competitive acquisition due to a perceived Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)."

Page L06-8

Section or Attach ment

18. Section

I I-3 3.2.2.3-74 AMS clause 3.2.2.3-74, Site and Depot Level Spare

Parts, states the following: “A separately-priced recommended initial site and depot-level spare parts list for CLIN [Contracting Officer (CO) insert CLIN number here].” Does the FAA intend to identify the CLIN or CLINS requiring the separately-priced recommended initial site and depot-level spare parts list?

AMS clause 3.2.2.3-74 not applicable to the requirements of the NEXCOM V3 SIR and has been deleted from Section I in SIR Amendment 0002.

19. Section I

I-3 3.2.4-28 Paragraph (c) of AMS clause 3.2.4-28, Cancellation of Items, states the following: “If cancellation under this clause occurs, the Contractor will be paid a cancellation charge not over the cancellation ceiling specified in the "Schedule" as applicable at the time of cancellation.”

Does the FAA intend to provide a cancellation ceiling or should the contractor propose a cancellation ceiling?

AMS clause 3.2.4-28, Cancellation of Items not applicable to the NEXCOM V3 SIR and has been deleted from Section I in SIR Amendment 0002.

20. Section J_Att J02

J02-

1.0 The following CDRLs have incorrect SOW (Section C)

references listed in the CDRL Index:

• A007 – reference to C.3.3.4, should be C.3.3.4.1

• L010 – reference to C.3.6.9.3, should be C.3.6.9.2

• L011 – reference to C.3.6.9.4, should be C.3.6.9.3

• L012 – reference to C.3.6.9.5, should be C.3.6.9.4

• L013 – reference to C.3.6.9.6, should be C.3.6.9.5

• L014 – reference to C.3.6.9.7, should be C.3.6.9.6

• L016 – reference to C.3.6.9.8, should be C.3.6.9.7

• L017 – reference to C.3.6.9.9, should be C.3.6.9.8 (there is no C.3.6.9.9)

The Section C reference in CDRL A007 has been corrected. All other Section C references in J02 are correct.

21. Section L_Att L07

Form L08 Discrepancy between form number in header (L08) and opening description (L07).

Section L, Attachment L07 OCT Equipment Submission Compliance Form has been updated to correct the header.

Page L06-9

Section or Attach ment

22. Section

L_Att L07

Form L08 For acceptance of in-person OCT Equipment Submission Compliance, bullet #2 of (A) states the Offeror’s representative must be a US citizen due to the limited time for Government vetting. If a preferred individual for this activity is not a US citizen, but has been vetted for previous visits to the WJHTC, is this acceptable to the FAA?

International visitors are vetted through the FAA International Visitor Program (IVP) process. The OCT planning letter issued provides guidance on information the FAA will require to process international visitors at

WJHTC.

23. Section J_Att J01

68 4.1.3 The High UHF frequency (393.495) in Table 4-2 is not a valid 25 kHZ frequency. Please confirm validity or correct frequency.

Section J, Attachment J01 Product Description (PD) has been updated to correct the typo in Table 4-2.

24. Section J_Att J01

33 3.2.3.1.1 Paragraph (d) references “download” when doing a software upload to the radio using the MDTS. We believe this should also reference “upload” Please confirm or clarify.

Section J, Attachment J01 Product Description (PD) has been updated to delete "download" reference in paragraph 3.2.3.1.1(d).

25. Section L

L-23 L.5.1.7 For Radios with extended power it is suggested that the following naming conventions for transmitter radios VOTER test results zip-files:

OFFERORNAME_NEXV3_testresults_OCT_UHF_TX.zip

OFFERORNAME_NEXV3_testresults_OCT_VHF_TX.zip

The FAA requests that Offerors provide the transmitter Zip files as requested in L.5.1.7 (i.e., providing the radio data set for each power mode (Low and High).

The FAA understands that based on some designs the same transmitter may need to execute the M02 test cases more than once (using different power modes).

26. Section L

N/A L.1.1 & 3.2.2.3-38

For Offeror’s asserting Commercial Item as outlined in Clause 3.2.2.3-38 and other AMS Clauses should it be included in Volume V, Factor 6 Pricing and Volume 6, Miscellaneous Documents?

If an Offeror has documentation related to AMS clause 3.2.2.3-38 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data it must be submitted in Volume V, Factor 5, Price Proposal.