Past Performance questionnaire.doc

DOC document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Construction Inspection IDIQ (MATOC)
Solicitation number
693C73-20-R-000016
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire for federal contractors and a related federal contract opportunity for construction inspection services. The past performance questionnaire seeks input on a contractor's performance on previous projects, inquiring about factors such as thoroughness, project management, cost control, quality, and whether the reference would recommend or work with the contractor again. The federal contract opportunity is a Request for Qualifications for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity construction inspection multiple award task order contract issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Statements of Qualifications are due on October 29, 2020 by 2:00 PM EST. The contract will provide construction inspection services on an as-needed basis.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONAIRE

Firms Name and Project Number:

Today’s date:

Reference’s name, phone number, and title

Name of Firm:

Project Name and what agency was the work performed for:

Nature of work performed:

Date work was performed and if completed with in original work schedule:

Was this Contractor the Prime or Sub on this contract:

If Prime, were Subs used:

If Subs used, Type and Extent of Subcontracting:

Did the Prime have good relations and control of subs:

Were there problems on the project?

Was the contractor cooperative in addressing problems and changes? In what ways?

Did they submit many claims?

Evaluate the firm as outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory in the following areas:

Thoroughness of site investigations

Project management and adherence to schedules

Meeting cost limits/cost control

Cooperativeness and responsiveness

Quality assurance and quality control Overall ranking (outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory) If you had the opportunity, would you want to work with this contractor again? Why? Why not?

Would you recommend this firm for future work? With or without reservations?

Any additional comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .