Past Performance questionnaire.doc
DOC document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction Inspection IDIQ (MATOC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-R-000016
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire for federal contractors and a related federal contract opportunity for construction inspection services. The past performance questionnaire seeks input on a contractor's performance on previous projects, inquiring about factors such as thoroughness, project management, cost control, quality, and whether the reference would recommend or work with the contractor again. The federal contract opportunity is a Request for Qualifications for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity construction inspection multiple award task order contract issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Statements of Qualifications are due on October 29, 2020 by 2:00 PM EST. The contract will provide construction inspection services on an as-needed basis.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0004 693C73-20-R-000016.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0003 693C73-20-R-000016.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 693C73-20-R-000016.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 693C73-20-R-000016.pdf | ||
| EFL CI IDIQ 2020 Request for Qualifications REVISED 10.15.2020.pdf | ||
| Draft Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| SF330-16f.pdf | ||
| Federal Lands Highway Construction Manual.pdf | ||
| EFL CI IDIQ 2020 Request for Qualifications.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONAIRE
Firms Name and Project Number:
Today’s date:
Reference’s name, phone number, and title
Name of Firm:
Project Name and what agency was the work performed for:
Nature of work performed:
Date work was performed and if completed with in original work schedule:
Was this Contractor the Prime or Sub on this contract:
If Prime, were Subs used:
If Subs used, Type and Extent of Subcontracting:
Did the Prime have good relations and control of subs:
Were there problems on the project?
Was the contractor cooperative in addressing problems and changes? In what ways?
Did they submit many claims?
Evaluate the firm as outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory in the following areas:
Thoroughness of site investigations
Project management and adherence to schedules
Meeting cost limits/cost control
Cooperativeness and responsiveness
Quality assurance and quality control Overall ranking (outstanding, above average, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory) If you had the opportunity, would you want to work with this contractor again? Why? Why not?
Would you recommend this firm for future work? With or without reservations?
Any additional comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .