5140-125P2550_Redacted.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation - Asheville
Solicitation number
693C73-20-R-000003
Issued by

About this file

This pre-solicitation notice seeks proposals from small business concerns for a pavement preservation project on the Blue Ridge Parkway in Buncombe County, North Carolina. The project consists of applying a stress-absorbing membrane interlayer or ultra-thin bonded wearing course to approximately 25.67 miles of pavement, as well as asphalt patching, pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work. Construction must be completed by December 2020. Offerors must demonstrate experience with the specified pavement preservation methods. The solicitation will provide further qualification requirements. Interested vendors should monitor the Federal Business Opportunities website for additional details.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0001 - NP BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
RFP Solicitation NP-BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
5140-119P1417_Redacted.pdf PDF
Plans - NP-BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
5140-122P6375_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-117P1821_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-203P4250_Redacted.pdf PDF
BLRI_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
5140-173P4250_Redacted.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5140-118P1594_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-116P2125_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-186P2125_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-141P12750_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-120P638_Redacted.pdf PDF
ADV_Offeror's Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
5140-121P12750_Redacted.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NP-BLRI_PVT_PRES_Asheville.doc DOC document
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

FRENCH BROAD RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/10/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 924.4 FT (281.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 98.5 FT (30.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.8 FT (10.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2R11 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 29 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009- SPALL ON DECK IN SPAN #5 REPAIRED; DECK AND DECK JOINTS SEALED

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 393.44 (KM PT 632.99)

STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 1.7 MILES TO I-26

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. FRENCH BROAD RIVER & NC ROUTE 191

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include transverse and map cracking on wearing surface plus three spalls, one with exposed rebar; damage to the west railing near the north end and at the south end, and a detached section near Pier #7; and spalling with exposed rebar in the west parapet at the north abutment breastwall, at the west overhang near the south abutment, and on the southwest wingwall. Other problems include several minor spalls with exposed rebar on the box underside throughout the structure, mostly due to lack of concrete cover, and debris accumulation at the upstream end of Piers #5 and #6.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. SASS (SEH), B. ROBIN (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NINA L. SASS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/6/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6 REPLACE BROKEN RAIL SECTIONS AT SOUTH END OF WEST RAIL AND NORTH

END OF WEST RAIL. REPAIR DISLOCATED SECTION OF WEST RAIL OVER PIER #7.

REPLACE RANDOM MISSING NUTS IN WEST RAIL.

20 LF

58.1, 59.2, 60.1

CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE WITH APPROVED

PROTECTIVE COATING.

1 LS

60.13, 61.4 REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT END OF PIERS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Hinges for hatch at Span #3 are missing; all other hatches are grouted shut.

Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 6

1. DECK SLAB F

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE N

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS F

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE F

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS (CONCRETE FTG)

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G F N N N N N N G G N

G N G N N G F N F G N N

G N N G G G N

58.1,5

58.2

58.6

58.7

59.2

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

WIDESPREAD MINOR HONEYCOMBING, SPALLING, AND POPOUTS

WITH EXPOSED REBAR THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE.

DIAGONAL, TRANSVERSE AND SHRINKAGE CRACKING

THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE. SPALL (12" DIA.) IN SPAN #5,

SOUTHBOUND LANE AND (8" DIA.) IN SPAN #3, NORTHBOUND LANE.

SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK OVERHANG UNDERSIDE ON

WEST SIDE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH MODERATE CRACK

DEVELOPING INTO SPALL. MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON OVERHANGS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR

SCALING ON DECK, CURBS, AND SIDEWALKS.

DROP-IN SPANS HAVE MINOR SOIL ACCUMULATION IN SLIDING

PLATE JOINT. MINOR DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL

AT ABUTMENT JOINTS. UNDERSIDE OF JOINTS IN NORTH DROP-IN

SPAN SATURATED THROUGHOUT. SPALLING OF CONCRETE

HEADER ADJACENT TO JOINT AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

ONE SECTION OF METAL RAILING HAS DETACHED FROM RAIL POST

IN SPAN #8 NEAR PIER #7, WEST SIDE. MINOR CRACKING AND

SPALLING OF CONCRETE PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

EXPOSED REBAR. MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST

RAIL END BEYOND BRIDGE; POST HAS SHEARED AT BASE. MISSING

NUT ON WEST RAIL 16' SOUTH OF PIER #7. DAMAGE (LIKELY FROM

FALLEN TREE) TO 8' SECTION OF WEST RAIL, 20' FROM NORTH

TRANSITION. MOSS GROWTH AT BASE OF RAILNG POSTS.

MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG

CURBLINES. ONE AREA OF VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG

SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE IN SPAN #9.

MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR THROUGHOUT BOX

GIRDER, MOSTLY DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER. ONE

AREA OF ACTIVE LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINS IN UNDERSIDE OF

BOX IN SPAN #2 NEAR PIER #2. MINOR CRACKING OF SPAN #6,

EAST SIDE. WIDESPREAD MINOR AND HAIRLINE CRACKING

THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE. AREA OF HONEYCOMBING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR NEAR EAST EDGE OF SOUTH DROP-IN SPAN. 3'X5'

AREA OF HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF SPAN #8 NEAR PIER

#7. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK AT ALL BEARING AREAS OF DROP-IN

SPANS. MINOR LEAKAGE THROUGH HINGE JOINTS OF DROP-IN

SPANS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH SPALL DEVELOPING AT

EAST AND WEST SIDES AT NORTH ABUTMENT. DELAMINATION AND

SHALLOW SPALLS ARE WORSE NEAR JOINTS OF DROP-IN SPANS.

INSPECTION DATE: 7/10/17

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

FRENCH BROAD RIVER BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

1. ALIGNMENT

61. CHANNEL 7

G G N F N

HIGH

SUFF

60 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G N F N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.9 MINOR SAGGING OF SPANS #5 AND #6 (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING

THIS INSPECTION).

60.1 MINOR CRACKING OF BREASTWALLS; MINOR SPALLING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTH SIDES OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER. MINOR

LEAKAGE THROUGH DECK EXPANSION JOINTS AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.

MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS.

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL HAS 6" DIAMETER SPALL WITH EXPOSED

REBAR NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.7 WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT PARTIALLY FILLED WITH

DEBRIS.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION ON BOTH SIDES OF NORTH ABUTMENT

SLOPE. MODERATE EROSION AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE.

60.13 MINOR SURFACE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT PIERS #1

THROUGH #3 AND PIERS #5 THROUGH #9 DUE TO INSUFFICIENT

CONCRETE COVER. MINOR SCALING IN NORMAL WATER ZONE AT

PIERS #4, #5, AND #6. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST

FACE OF PIER #8.

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON PIERS #3 AND #7; MODERATE TO

HEAVY AT BASE OF PIER #7. DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM

END OF PIER #6. (SEE 61.4)

60.16 EXPOSED TOP OF FOOTING AT DOWNSTREAM END OF PIER #4.

61.4 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT AT PIER #6; MINOR AT PIER

#5.

222.4,6 TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG

JOINT.

222.7 "FRENCH BROAD RIVER" AT NORTHWEST CORNER.

222.8 APPROACHES AND BRIDGE ARE ON A MODERATE HORIZONTAL

CURVE AND SUPERELEVATION.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 22 20 37 33

TYPE 3 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3S2 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3-3 28 25 47 42

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FRENCH BROAD RIVER BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 021 - BUNCOMBE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-125P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... FRENCH BROAD RIVER & NC

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 125P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140125P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.7 MILES TO I-26

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2R11 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 393.44 (KM PT 632.99)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

98.5 FT (30.0 M)

924.4 FT (281.8 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 22.1 TONS (20.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.8 TONS (33.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. YES

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: 60 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 4/16

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°30'02.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°35'26.00"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 20 MI (32 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

35.8 FT (10.9 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

29 °

NO

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

3 - CONCRETE/STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.83 FT (0.86 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

45.00 FT (13.70 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2009- SPALL ON DECK IN SPAN #5 REPAIRED; DECK AND DECK JOINTS SEALED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:82�35'26.00 http:35�30'02.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-125P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #2 - VIEW OF JOINT AT NORTH ABUTMENT, NOTE EDGE

SPALLING OF CONCRETE HEADER AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN

JOINT

PHOTO #3 - MINOR SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DEBRIS IN JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS IN SHOULDER

AREAS

PHOTO #5 - DAMAGE TO WEST BRIDGE RAIL NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL VIEW OF JOINT IN DROP-IN SPAN, SOUTH JOINT

IN SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - EIGHT INCH DIAMETER BY 2" DEEP POTHOLE IN DECK

SURFACE IN SPAN #3

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ALONG INTERIOR FACE OF

SIDEWALK

PHOTO #9 - ONE SQUARE FOOT DIAMETER BY 2" DEEP POTHOLE IN

DECK SURFACE NEAR MIDSPAN OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL AND SHRINKAGE CRACKS IN DECK

SURFACE, SPAN #7 SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING SPACED AT 8 TO 12 INCHES IN

DECK SURFACE OVER SPAN #8

PHOTO #12 - LIGHT TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE;

OCCURS THROUGHOUT

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SCALING OF SIDEWALK

PHOTO #14 - VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST SIDEWALK IN SPAN

#9

PHOTO #15 - VIEW OF JOINT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT, NOTE MINOR

GRAVEL ACCUMULATION

PHOTO #16 - DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST RAIL END BEYOND BRIDGE

PHOTO #17 - EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON EAST OVERHANG

NEAR MIDSPAN OF SPAN #4

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW, SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - AREA OF ROCK POCKETS AND HONEYCOMBING IN

UNDERSIDE OF BOX IN SPAN #2

PHOTO #20 - ACTIVE LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINS ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX IN SPAN #2 NEAR PIER #2

PHOTO #21 - LIGHT VERTICAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR OF BOX

GIRDERS OPEN UP TO 0.02 INCHES

PHOTO #22 - 16 INCHES OF EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX

IN SPAN #6

PHOTO #23 - ROCK POCKET UP TO 2" DEEP WITH EXPOSED

LONGITUDINAL REBAR IN UNDERSIDE OF BOX IN SPAN #7

PHOTO #24 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX ADJACENT TO NORTH JOINT IN SPAN #7

PHOTO #25 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED LONGITUDINAL REBAR ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX IN SPAN #7 NEAR SOUTH JOINT

PHOTO #26 - DELAMINATION AND SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX IN SPAN # 8

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX DUE

TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER

PHOTO #28 - AREA OF HONEYCOMBING AND ROCK POCKETS ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX IN SPAN #8

PHOTO #29 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #30 - SMALL SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND MINOR

CRACKING AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #31 - DEAD VEGETATION ON PIER #3 AND UNDERSIDE OF

GIRDER IN SPAN #4

PHOTO #32 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER, PIER #5 SHOWN

PHOTO #33 - LOGS AND DEBRIS CAUGHT ON UPSTREAM NOSE OF

PIER #6

PHOTO #34 - SCATTERED AREAS OF EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO

INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON PIERS, PIER #5 SHOWN

PHOTO #35 - HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ON LOWER HALF OF PIER

#7

PHOTO #36 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #37 - MAP CRACKING IN SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL

PHOTO #38 - LIGHT VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #39 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #40 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .