5140-120P638_Redacted.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-R-000003
About this file
This document summarizes a federal contract opportunity and bridge inspection report. The contract opportunity is for pavement preservation work on approximately 25 miles of the Blue Ridge Parkway in Buncombe County, North Carolina. The work includes one of two pavement preservation treatment methods, asphalt patching, pavement markings, and other miscellaneous tasks. The total cost is expected to be between $1 million to $5 million, and work must be completed by December 11, 2020. The solicitation number is 693C73-20-R-000003 and proposals from certified small businesses will be accepted. The bridge inspection report provides details on the condition of Structure Number 5140-120P, a three-span concrete box girder bridge over US Route 25A on the Blue Ridge Parkway. Inspection findings include cracking and scaling of the deck surface and minor issues with the superstructure and substructure. Maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations are provided.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 219.9 FT (67.0 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 97.0 FT (29.6 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.8 FT (10.9 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.1 FT (8.6 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2R12 / 41920 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 42 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-DECK SEALED
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 74
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 25A
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This continuous concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. The main problems include moderate scaling and cracking of the deck especially over the piers which allows moisture penetration into interiors of box girders, and some hairline cracks at both webs of the box girder, some extending to the underside of the box girder. Other problems include a 3" gap between the slope paving and breastwall at each abutment, minor debris accumulation along the curblines, and exposed rebar in the northbound lane near the north abutment. Due to traffic volume on this section of the Parkway, consideration should be given to installing Type 3 reflective object markers at the parapet ends.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. TRIPLETT (SEH), B. ROBIN (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JASON D. TRIPLETT, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/6/17
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.11 SEAL GAP BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND ABUTMENTS. 60 LF
58.7 CLEAN DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES. CLEAN DEBRIS FROM ABUTMENT
BEARING SEATS.
1 LS
58.1 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE
COATING.
1 LS
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE. 6,200 SF
59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION/STRIPING)
G F N N N N N N G
N G
G N G G G G G N G G F N
G N N N G G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
(CONCRETE FTG)
58.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE TRANSVERSE CRACKING UP TO 0.050"
WIDE, SPACED ON TOP OF DECK SURFACE OVER PIERS AND ON
UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ESPECIALLY
NEAR PIERS. MODERATE SCALING OVER SOUTH PIER AND IN
NORTHBOUND LANE CURBLINE NEAR MIDSPAN OF CENTER SPAN;
MINOR SCALING IN OTHER LOCATIONS. EXPOSED REBAR IN
NORTHBOUND LANE ABOVE NORTH ABUTMENT DUE TO
INSUFFICIENT COVER. 4'X2' AND 5'X4' PATCHES IN SOUTHBOUND
LANE OVER MIDDLE OF SPAN #2.
58.1, 59.2 MINOR STAINING ALONG EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX GIRDER
NEAR SOUTH PIER AND ALONG WEST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX
GIRDER NEAR NORTH PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AT BOTH
EXTERIOR WEBS OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH AND CENTER SPANS,
SOME CRACKS EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE. SPALL WITH EXPOSED
REBAR IN UNDERSIDE OF SPAN #2 OVER WESTBOUND LANE DUE
TO INADEQUATE COVER.
58.2 DECK JOINT SEALS OVER ABUTMENTS ARE IN GOOD CONDITION
WITH MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT JOINT ENDS.
58.5 MINOR SPALL ON WEST CURB, 6' NORTH OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
58.7 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.
59.1 MISSING ANCHOR BOLT NUT AT BEARING #2, NORTH ABUTMENT.
DIRTY AT EXTERIOR BEARINGS.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SEATS AT INTERIOR, UP TO 6"
OF DIRT AT SIDES.
N G G G G N
G
G
G
F
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
N G F G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
60.6,11 MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG ALL
WINGWALLS, MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SLOPE
PROTECTION.
60.11 3" WIDE GAP ALONG BREASTWALL AT TOP OF SLOPE PROTECTION
AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
222.3 VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST PARAPET OF NORTH APPROACH.
VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTH APPROACH CURBS.
222.4 POTHOLE FORMING AND MINOR CRACKING AT SOUTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 22 20 37 33
TYPE 3 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3S2 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/17
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 021 - BUNCOMBE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-120P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 25A
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 120P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140120P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 7
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2R12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 41920 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
97.0 FT (29.6 M)
219.9 FT (67.0 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.9 TONS (19.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.6 TONS (33.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.1 FT (8.6 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°31'29.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°31'06.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 15 MI (24 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
35.8 FT (10.9 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
42 °
NO
28.1 FT (8.6 M)
2.7 FT (0.8 M)
2.7 FT (0.8 M)
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
3 - CONCRETE/STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.75 FT (0.84 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
17.83 FT (5.43 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2009-DECK SEALED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
SNOOPER OR BUCKET TRUCK REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:82�31'06.40 http:35�31'29.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD ASHEVILLE
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - EXPOSED REBAR IN NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR NORTH
EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE EDGE SPALLS ALONG TOP OF ABUTMENT
BACKWALL
PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, NORTH
SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - SCALING OF WEARING SURFACE IN SOUTHBOUND LANES;
NOTE PREVIOUS PATCHING REPAIRS
PHOTO #7 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND ABRASION OF WEARING
SURFACE IN SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #8 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE ABOVE
SOUTH PIER
PHOTO #9 - ABRASION OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG EAST CURBLINE
OF CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG APPROACH CURB
AND OVER APPROACH PARAPET, NORTH END OF WEST PARAPET
SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND FATIGUE CRACKING OF
SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #13 - VERTICAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR WEB ON WEST SIDE
OF SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #14 - WATER STAINING AND FULL HEIGHT HAIRLINE CRACK ON
WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #15 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX
GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER AND EAST COLUMN
PHOTO #16 - WATER STAINING ON EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX
GIRDER NEAR SOUTH PIER; NOTE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN
OVERHANG AND IN WEB OF EAST GIRDER
PHOTO #17 - WATER STAINING ON EAST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER NEAR
NORTH PIER
PHOTO #18 - TRANSVERSE HAIRLINE CRACKING, WEST SIDE OF BOX
GIRDER UNDERSIDE NEAR MIDSPAN OF CENTER SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SOIL ACCUMULATION AT BEARING SEAT ENDS,
WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - MISSING ANCHOR NUT ON BEARING #2 AT NORTH
ABUTMENT; NOTE BACKFILL LEAKAGE THROUGH WEEPHOLES
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL GAP BETWEEN ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION
AND BREASTWALL, WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #25 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT AT WEST END
OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; NOTE DEAD
VEGETATION ON PIER COLUMNS AND VEGETATION ON SLOPE PAVING
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .