5140-122P6375_Redacted.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation - Asheville
Solicitation number
693C73-20-R-000003
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for a pavement preservation project on the Blue Ridge Parkway in Buncombe County, North Carolina. The project consists of pavement preservation treatment on approximately 25.67 miles of roadway between mileposts 365.50 to 389.70 and 393.23 to 394.70. Eligible contractors may submit a proposal to perform either a stress-absorbing membrane interlayer or ultra-thin bonded wearing course treatment method. The project includes asphalt concrete patching, pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work split into multiple schedules. The estimated cost range for the entire project is $1,000,000 to $5,000,000 and must be completed by December 11, 2020. Proposals from certified small businesses will be accepted under solicitation number 693C73-20-R-000003. Bid documents will be issued on November 18, 2019 with the bid due date and location specified in block 13a of the solicitation. Offerors must submit qualifications related to their experience in pavement preservation using one of the treatment methods. The selected contractor will perform the alternative treatment method proposed. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency and work will take place on the Blue Ridge Parkway in Buncombe County, North Carolina.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0001 - NP BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
RFP Solicitation NP-BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
5140-119P1417_Redacted.pdf PDF
Plans - NP-BLRI PVT PRES Asheville.pdf PDF
NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
5140-117P1821_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-203P4250_Redacted.pdf PDF
BLRI_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
5140-173P4250_Redacted.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5140-118P1594_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-116P2125_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-186P2125_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-141P12750_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-120P638_Redacted.pdf PDF
ADV_Offeror's Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
5140-121P12750_Redacted.pdf PDF
5140-125P2550_Redacted.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NP-BLRI_PVT_PRES_Asheville.doc DOC document
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

U.S. ROUTE 25 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 200.7 FT (61.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 90.0 FT (27.4 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.3 FT (11.1 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.5 FT (8.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2R12 / 41903 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 33 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985, 2008-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-RAIL POSTS REPLACED. 2008-DECK PATCHED. 2009-DECK

SEALED

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 388.74 (KM PT 625.44)

STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 2.9 MILES TO INTERSTATE 26

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 25

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This continuous concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.

These include a 2" gap between the slope paving and breastwall at each abutment, loose joint armor angle on the east end of the south expansion joint, exposed rebar on the northwest cheekwall and west column of the north pier, vegetation growth along the wingwalls and concrete slope protection, and debris accumulation in the deck drains and along the east and west curblines. Due to traffic volume on this section of the Parkway, consideration should be given to installing Type 3 reflective object markers at the north parapet ends.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. TRIPLETT (SEH), B. ROBIN (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JASON D. TRIPLETT, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/6/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.11 SEAL GAP BETWEEN TOP OF SLOPE PROTECTION AND EACH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL.

80 LF

58.2 SECURE JOINT ARMOR ANGLE ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT AND

REMOVE SOIL ACCUMULATION FROM DECK JOINTS.

1 LS

60.6,13 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR AT NORTHWEST CHEEKWALL AND WEST

COLUMN OF NORTH PIER WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

5 SF

60.6,11 REMOVE VEGETATION ENCROACHING INTO ROADWAY AS NECESSARY. 1 LS

58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK DRAINS AND CURBLINES. 1 LS

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTH PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA

222.4 FEATHER ASPHALT FOR 10' AT BOTH APPROACHES TO ELIMINATE BUMPS ONTO

BRIDGE.

1 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 0

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORTSTRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P
U.S. ROUTE 25 BRIDGEINSPECTION DATE: 7/14/17

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 6

1. DECK SLAB F

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE N

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE F

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER (VEGETATION/STRIPING) F

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS (CONCRETE FTG)

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G G N N N N N N G G N

G N G G N F F N G G F N

G N N N G G N

58.1

58.2

58.5

58.7

58.10

59.2

60.3

60.4

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

WIDESPREAD MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING UP TO 0.060"

WIDE IN DECK SURFACE CONCENTRATED OVER PIERS. MINOR TO

MODERATE SCALING IN ISOLATED AREAS OF TOP OF DECK. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF SLAB AT RANDOM LOCATIONS.

MINOR AREA OF DELAMINATION AT SOUTH END OF DECK

OVERHANG, WEST SIDE. 2'-6" X 2'-6" AND 9"X9" PATCHES IN

SOUTHBOUND LANE OVER PIER #1.

SEVERE DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK JOINT FILLER IN A FEW

LOCATIONS WITH VEGETATION GROWTH PRESENT. LOOSE

SECTION OF JOINT ARMOR ANGLE ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH DECK

JOINT, POUNDING AS VEHICLES CROSS. MINOR TO MODERATE

SOIL ACCUMULATION IN DECK JOINTS NEAR CURBS.

SPALL ON END OF SIDEWALK AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF

CURBS.

MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG EAST CURBLINE AND

DECK DRAINS. DECK DRAIN OVER PIER #2 IS CLOGGED.

VEGETATION IS GROWING OVER END PARAPETS AND BRIDGE RAIL

ON BOTH SIDES. MINOR FADING AND PEELING OF CENTERLINE

STRIPING.

MINOR WATER STAINING ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER NEAR

PIERS. ACCESS HATCHES ARE BOLTED SHUT. SCRAPES ON BOX

GIRDER UNDERSIDE OVER NORTHBOUND UNDERPASS LANES DUE

TO VEHICULAR COLLISION. MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER,

WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH PIER.

MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS. TOP SURFACE OF BACKWALL AT EAST SIDE OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT HAS BEEN MILLED AWAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4'

(WIDE). MINOR STAINING ON EAST CORNER OF NORTH ABUTMENT.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N G G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.6 MINOR POPOUTS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BASE OF NORTHWEST

CHEEKWALL.

60.6,11 MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION ALONG WINGWALLS AND ON

CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION. BLOCK WALL AND SIDEWALK

BUILT AT BASE OF NORTH SLOPE PAVING BETWEEN 2015 AND 2017

INSPECTIONS.

60.7 EMBANKMENT IS LEACHING THROUGH WEEP HOLES.

60.11 UP TO 2" GAP BETWEEN BREASTWALLS AND TOPS OF SLOPE

PROTECTION AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR CRACKING OF SLOPE

PROTECTION BY NORTH PIER.

60.13 MINOR SPALLING AND EXPOSED WIRE ON SOUTH FACE OF WEST

COLUMN, NORTH PIER. 6"X12" AREA OF DELAMINATION ON SOUTH

FACE OF WEST COLUMN IN SOUTH PIER.

222.3 APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH ONLY.

222.4 ASPHALT PAVEMENT IS UP TO 1" LOW AT BOTH APPROACHES,

CAUSING ROUGH TRANSITION ON AND OFF BRIDGE.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING FROM PARAPET

ENDS.

36.B,C APPROACH GUARDRAIL IS NOT ATTACHED TO BRIDGE PARAPET AT

SOUTH APPROACH.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3 20 18 34 31

TYPE 3S2 25 23 41 37

TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

U.S. ROUTE 25 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/17

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 25 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 021 - BUNCOMBE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-122P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 25

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 122P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140122P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.9 MILES TO INTERSTATE 2

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2R12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 388.74 (KM PT 625.44)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 41903 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

90.0 FT (27.4 M)

200.7 FT (61.2 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.0 TONS (19.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 35.0 TONS (31.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.5 FT (8.7 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°31'10.90"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°31'42.10"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 05

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

36.3 FT (11.1 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

33 °

NO

28.5 FT (8.7 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

3 - CONCRETE/STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.83 FT (0.86 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

18.00 FT (5.50 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1001

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1985, 2008-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-RAIL POSTS REPLACED. 2008-DECK PATCHED. 2009-DECK SEALED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

SNOOPER REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:82�31'42.10 http:35�31'10.90

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-122P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD CHEROKEE STREET; NOTE

MISSING OBJECT MARKERS AT ENDS OF PARAPETS

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN SOUTH APPROACH,

SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE,

SOUTHBOUND LANE OVER NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE IN

SOUTH SPAN OF NORTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #8 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND SPALLING IN WEST END OF

NORTH EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #9 - EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTH END; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ALONG CURB

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LIGHT CORROSION OF NUTS FOR CONNECTION

HARDWARE, WEST BRIDGE RAIL IN CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT SCUPPER GRATES,

EAST CURBLINE IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE

PHOTO #13 - LOW APPROACH AT NORTH END OF NORTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO #14 - GAP UNDER JOINT ARMOR, EAST END OF SOUTH

EXPANSION JOINT SHOWN; NOTE JOINT SEAL DAMAGE

PHOTO #15 - TREE BRANCHES ENCROACHING ONTO BRIDGE RAIL AT

SOUTH END OF WEST RAIL

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #17 - WATER STAINING ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER NEAR

NORTH PIER

PHOTO #18 - VEHICULAR SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST BOX

GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN OVER WESTBOUND LANE OF UNDERPASS

ROADWAY

PHOTO #19 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON

BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE, WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - SPALLING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AROUND INSPECTION

HATCH IN NORTH SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER

PHOTO #21 - HONEYCOMBING OF BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN CENTER

SPAN

PHOTO #22 - DELAMINATION OF DECK OVERHANG AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT ON WEST SIDE; NOTE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #24 - POP OUTS AND EXPOSED REBAR AT WEST END OF

NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE CRACKING AND EXPOSED REBAR AT BASE

OF CHEEKWALL

PHOTO #25 - BACKFILL LEAKAGE THROUGH WEEPHOLES AT WEST

END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #26 - EROSION HOLE AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #27 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH ON ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #28 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE AT EAST BEARING OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE SOIL ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT

PHOTO #29 - GAP BETWEEN SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND

SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #30 - SPALLING AND EXPOSED WIRE AT SOUTH FACE OF WEST

COLUMN IN NORTH PIER

PHOTO #31 - SPALL WITH CRACK, BASE OF WEST COLUMN IN SOUTH

PIER

PHOTO #32 - SPALLING AND WATER STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX

GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN NEAR WEST COLUMN OF SOUTH PIER

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .