6181 att D Reference Check.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP for High Throughput Weapons Detection System
- Solicitation number
- S-44300-00014901
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This is a Reference Check Form for Oregon's RFP #6181 for a High Throughput Weapons Detection System, issued through OregonBuys under Bid # S-44300-00014901. The form serves as an evaluation tool to assess offerors' past performance and service quality. The document provides two optional approaches for reference checks: Option 1 allows references to self-assign scores on a 0-10 scale across three dimensions—overall quality of services and relationship, service delivery, and responsiveness to customer service issues—while Option 2 requires references to provide narrative responses to nine questions covering service type, customer service quality, business relationship satisfaction, problem resolution methods, likelihood of future engagement, areas of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, timeline adherence, and cost variance between proposed and final project costs.
The Reference Check Form does not specify pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, funding sources, or contract duration information. This document functions solely as an attachment to the RFP and is designed to be completed by references selected by offerors, with evaluators using the responses to inform their assessment of contractor qualifications and past performance. The form does not contain information regarding bidder meetings, site visits, response deadlines, or award dates.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFPAttA~1.pdf | ||
| 6181 att A final.pdf | ||
| 6181 Att H final final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6181-0 final.pdf | ||
| 6181 att C Info and Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6181 Proposer QA final.pdf | ||
| 6181 att F COBID.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6181 att B.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6181 att E.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6181 att G.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
OregonBuys Bid # S-44300-00014901: RFP #6181 HIGH THROUGHPUT WEAPONS DETECTION SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
| Offeror Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: | __________________________________________ |
[Select one option, delete the other, and edit to fit] [OPTION 1 – Reference assigns a score] Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.
How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ How would you rate the Offeror’s delivery of service?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ [OPTION 2 – Reference answers questions. Evaluators assign score] Please respond to the following questions:
1. For what type of services did you engage Offeror?
Describe the services listed in response to question 1.
Describe Offeror’s customer service.
Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror.
Describe Offeror’s methods for problem resolution.
How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again?
With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the most satisfied?
With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the least satisfied?
How well did Offeror stay within the proposed timeline?
How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?
Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 Page 1 of 2
6181-0 Page 1 of 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .