6-Attachmnet E - Score Sheet.Purchasing.xls
XLS spreadsheet 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK26-32 ORS Genetic Testing
- Solicitation number
- MK26-32
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for SOLICITATION #MK26-32 ORS Genetic Testing issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing, with the Department of Health and Human Services as the conducting procurement unit. The RFP seeks to contract with a single responsive and responsible vendor to provide laboratory and genetic testing services. The contract term is five years, and vendors must guarantee pricing for a minimum of one year.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a weighted scoring system totaling 1,714.3 possible points, comprised of 70% technical evaluation (1,200 points) and 30% cost evaluation (514.3 points). Technical scoring is based on six criteria: Service Areas and Collection Site Logistics (300 points), Testing Procedures, Reporting, and Record Retention (250 points), Experience (250 points), Training (200 points), Quality Assurance and Customer Service Requirements (100 points), and Data Transmission and sFTP Configuration (100 points). A minimum technical score threshold of 840 points (70% of technical evaluation) is required for proposal advancement. Ten mandatory requirements must be met for consideration, including proof of applicable licensing and accreditation by AABB or similar federal designee for a minimum five years, submission of a W-9 form, five years of government child support enforcement agency experience, ability to transmit results via sFTP, and submission of both a Technical Proposal and Cost Sheet. Cost points are calculated using a formula where the lowest proposed price receives 100% of cost points, with all other proposals receiving proportional points based on their price differential relative to the lowest bid.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 7-Attachment D- Cost Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment C - Mandatory Minimums Technical Requirements.Purchasing (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| ORS Genetic Testing | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION #MK26-32 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor must meet all applicable licensing or other standards required by Federal and State laws, regulations and ordinances of the City/County in which services and/or care is provided and will continue to comply with such licensing or other applicable standards and ordinances for duration of the contract period. Please include copies of the appropriate licenses. | |||||||||
| 2 | Vendor must be accredited by the Association for the Advancement for Blood and Biotherapies (AABB), the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics or an accrediting body designated by the federal Secretary of Health and Human Services for a minimum of the last five years. Please include copies of the required accreditations. | |||||||||
| 3 | Vendor must include a signed and dated copy of its W-9 Form. (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. | |||||||||
| 4 | Vendor must acknowledge that it will perform laboratory genetic testing for no charge if a specimen collection is unsuccessful for reasons directly related to Vendor’s services (re-draw required). | |||||||||
| 5 | Vendor must have a minimum five years’ experience working with a government child support enforcement agency. | |||||||||
| 6 | Vendor must acknowledge that it has the ability to transmit the genetic test results to DHHS through sFTP configuration for the transmission of .pdf files. | |||||||||
| 7 | Vendor must state the following concerning its staff: | |||||||||
| • | Vendor must state its main contract contact and its main staff for this contract. | |||||||||
| • | Vendor must state whether sub-contractors shall be used for services in the state of Utah, and identify those services. | |||||||||
| 8 | Vendor must attest to using ORS’s invoice requirements as described in the Scope of Work. | |||||||||
| 9 | Vendor MUST upload a Technical Proposal. | |||||||||
| 10 | Vendor MUST upload a Cost Sheet. | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Service Areas and Collection Site Logistics | 60 | 25.0% | 300.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Testing Procedures, Reporting, and Record Retention | 50 | 20.8% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Experience | 50 | 20.8% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Training | 40 | 16.7% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Quality Assurance and Customer Service Requirements | 20 | 8.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 6 | Data Transmission and sFTP Configuration | 20 | 8.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1200.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 840.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 30% | 514.3 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 1,200.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 514.3 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,714.3 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .