6-ATT F - DH2676-AF RFSQ Eval Scorsht.pdf
PDF 244 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DH2676-AF
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) to establish an approved vendor list for fundraising activities. The solicitation, numbered DH2676-AF, seeks qualified vendors to provide food items or other products for fundraising activities across various schools within the district, in accordance with Utah Code 13-22 (Charitable Solicitations Act). Responses must be submitted electronically through the Bonfire/U3P platform, and vendors must complete all required documentation including general information items, W9 forms, valid business licenses, and state of Utah Department of Commerce fundraiser permits or co-venturer letters or letters of exemption.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a 500-point technical scoring system with four weighted criteria categories: Vendor Qualifications & Experience (40% weight, 200 points), Complaints/Problem Resolution (30% weight, 150 points), References (20% weight, 100 points), and Fundraiser Details (10% weight, 50 points). A minimum score threshold of 375 points (75% of total points possible) is required for approval. Scoring uses a five-point scale ranging from 1 (Fail) to 5 (Excellent), with evaluators assessing how well proposals address RFP requirements. The scoresheet explicitly notes it is a draft document intended for the evaluation committee chairperson and is not subject to public records disclosure under Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
1 = Fail, the proposal fails to address some or all of the requirements; fails to accurately address some or all of the requirements, or fails to demonstrate they can perform 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP unsatisfactorily 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP satisfactorily 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria in the RFP and may exceed some 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all requirements in the RFP and exceeds them
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2 2 SOQ Gen Info - (2.3 Items 1. thru 7.) 2.3 3 SOQ Gen Info - W9 Form (2.3 Item 8.) 2.3
4 2.3 5 Valid Business License (2.3 Item 10.) 2.3 6 2.3
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (1-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 2.4A 40 40.0% 200.0 0.0 1 2.4B 30 30.0% 150.0 0.0 1 2.4C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 1 2.4D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0
100.0% 500.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 375.0 0.0 0.0%
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
100% 500 0
100% 500 0
Vendor Docs/Proposed Contract (2.3 Item 11.)
Vendor Qualifications & Experience
Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
References
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Complaints/Problm Resolution
Required Technical Point Threshold
Fundraiser Details
SOQ Gen. Info - State of Utah DOC Fundraiser Permit, co-venturer ltr or ltr of exemp (2.3 Item 9)
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Check ALL Blocks on Attachment C
ATTACHMENT F
APPROVED VENDOR'S LIST- FUND RAISING, SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # DH2676-AF
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .