AMENDMENT0007DOGKENNEL.pdf
PDF 315 KB Posted
- Attached to
- P-3009, MILITARY WORKING DOG KENNEL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 5871178
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for a Military Working Dog Kennel project located at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. The project includes construction of an administrative building, dog kennel, quarantine kennel, and dog training/support fenced areas. The administrative building will house kennel master offices, a conference room, multi-purpose room, handlers' offices, and a sleep room, kitchen/break room, and treatment room. The dog kennel contains dog houses, interior and exterior kennels, and a food storage/preparation area. The quarantine kennel covers four interior kennels. Support areas include outdoor storage, dog break areas, and an optional portable explosive storage and obedience course. The scope also includes demolition of existing kennel buildings. Proposals are due by February 24, 2022 and shall be submitted electronically. The contract will be awarded on a firm-fixed price basis. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RESIDENT OFFICER IN CHARGE OF CONTRACTS
NDW/ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 3198 BOX 47
1 SAN DIEGO LOOP
ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5518
ACQR5871178
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
SOLICITATION N4008021R1178- P3009 Military Working Dog Kennel, Joint Base Andrew s Maryland
The purpose of the amendment is the follow ing;
The proposal date is hereby extended until February 24, 2022, at 2:00 pm.
Proposal submitted shall be submitted via PIEE.
Incorporated is the current w age rate.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 25
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 22-Feb-2022
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008021R1178
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
15-Dec-2021
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
22-Feb-2022
CODE
NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON
1314 HARWOOD ST
WASHINGTON DC 20374
N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE N40080
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N4008021R1178
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0007
24 February 2022 at 2:00 pm. Proposals shall be submitted utilizing the Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). Department of Defense (DoD) training for industry partners is available at https//dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module. Additional Web Based Training is available at https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml.
Please allow SUFFICENT TIME for your proposal to be received within the Government’s electronic system prior to the proposed cutoff date/time. All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be documented with the date and hour of receipt and may be held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 15.208.
General Decision Number: MD20220044 02/18/2022 Superseded General Decision Number: MD20210044 State: Maryland Construction Type: Building County: Prince George's County in Maryland.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).
Note: Contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.
Please note that these Executive Orders apply to covered contracts entered into by the federal government that aresubject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60).
If the contract is entered into on or after January 30, 2022, or the contract is renewed or extended (e.g., an option is exercised) on or after January 30, 2022, Executive Order 14026 generally applies to the contract. The contractor must pay all covered workers at least $15.00 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on that contract in 2022.
If the contract was awarded on or between January 1, 2015 and January 29, 2022, and the contract is not renewed or extended on or after January 30, 2022, Executive Order 13658 generally applies to the contract. The contractor must pay all covered workers at least $11.25 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on that contract in 2022.
The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. If this contract is covered by one of the Executive Orders and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must still submit a conformance request.
Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.
Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/07/2022 1 01/14/2022 2 02/11/2022 3 02/18/2022
ASBE0024-007 04/01/2021
Rates Fringes
ASBESTOS WORKER/HEAT & FROST
INSULATOR........................$ 39.27 18.67+a
Includes the application of all insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings and finishes to all types of mechanical systems
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day,the day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Day provided the employee works the regular work day before and after the paid holiday.
ASBE0024-010 04/01/2021
Rates Fringes
ASBESTOS WORKER: HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL HANDLER (Removal of hazardous material from ceilings, floors, mechanical systems, and walls)..............$ 24.46 8.69+a
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day,the day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Day provided the employee works the regular work day before and after the paid holiday.
BRMD0001-006 05/02/2021
Rates Fringes
TILE SETTER......................$ 31.18 12.60
BRMD0001-011 05/02/2021
Rates Fringes BRICKLAYER (Excluding Pointing, Caulking and Cleaning)........................$ 34.00 12.59
BRMD0001-012 05/02/2021
Rates Fringes
MASON - STONE....................$ 40.81 19.43
BRMD0001-013 05/02/2021
Rates Fringes
TERRAZZO WORKER/SETTER...........$ 31.18 12.60
CARP0197-001 05/01/2021
Rates Fringes CARPENTER (Including Acoustical Ceiling Installation, Drywall Hanging, Metal Stud Installation and Form Work)......$ 30.34 13.80
CARP0219-001 05/01/2021
Rates Fringes
MILLWRIGHT.......................$ 35.34 13.53
ELEC0026-021 09/07/2020
Rates Fringes ELECTRICIAN (Communication and Sound Equipment).............$ 29.05 11.39
ELEC0026-022 06/07/2021
Rates Fringes ELECTRICIAN (Including low voltage wiring for and installation of alarms, HVAC controls)........................$ 49.00 20.26+a a.PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Inauguration Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, the day after Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
ELEV0010-001 01/01/2022
Rates Fringes ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 50.27 36.885+a+b
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and the Friday after Thanksgiving.
b. VACATIONS: Employer contributes 8% of basic hourly rate for 5 years or more of service; 6% of basic hourly rate for 6 months to 5 years of service as vacation pay credit.
ENGI0077-017 05/01/2021
Rates Fringes
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR:
Backhoe.....................$ 33.36 10.55+a Bulldozer...................$ 33.36 10.55+a
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Inaugural Day, Decoration Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after Thanksgiving and Christmas Day.
IRON0005-005 06/01/2021
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL AND
ORNAMENTAL.......................$ 33.90 24.19
IRON0005-014 05/01/2021
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 29.20 22.83
LABO0011-016 06/15/2020
Rates Fringes LABORER (Common or General)......$ 17.77 8.63 LABORER: Mason Tender - Cement/Concrete..................$ 25.88 8.63 LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 25.88 8.63
* PAIN0051-014 06/01/2021
Rates Fringes
GLAZIER
Glazing Contracts $2 million and under...........$ 29.02 12.80 Glazing Contracts over $2 million.....................$ 33.26 12.80
PAIN0051-019 06/01/2021
Rates Fringes
PAINTER
Brush, Roller, Spray and Drywall Finisher/Taper......$ 25.50 11.27 Industrial..................$ 32.70 13.18
PLAS0891-005 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
PLASTERER........................$ 30.53 7.93
PLAS0891-006 02/01/2020
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 28.82 11.68
PLAS0891-008 08/01/2016
Rates Fringes PLASTERER (Fireproofing Including Sprayer, Mixer, and Handler) Handler.....................$ 16.50 4.89 Mixer/Pump..................$ 18.50 4.89 Sprayer.....................$ 23.00 4.89
PLUM0005-010 08/01/2021
Rates Fringes
PLUMBER..........................$ 45.92 20.35+a
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, Memorial Day and the Fourth of July.
PLUM0602-011 08/01/2021
Rates Fringes PIPEFITTER (Including HVAC Pipe and System Installation)....$ 45.39 23.12+a
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's
Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Day.
* ROOF0030-016 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
ROOFER...........................$ 31.26 14.56
* SFMD0669-001 01/01/2022
Rates Fringes SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire Sprinklers)......................$ 36.95 24.56
SHEE0100-015 11/01/2021
Rates Fringes SHEET METAL WORKER (Including HVAC Duct Installation)..........$ 44.37 21.33+a
a. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day
SUMD2010-092 08/04/2010
Rates Fringes
LABORER
Grade Checker...............$ 16.00 2.90 Landscape...................$ 9.23 0.00 Mason Tender - Brick........$ 13.28 2.95 Mason Tender - Stone........$ 14.03 0.00 Mason Tender for Pointing, Caulking and Cleaning.......$ 14.15 0.00 Mortar Mixer................$ 16.61 9.08
POINTER, CAULKER, CLEANER,
Includes pointing, caulking, cleaning of existing masonry, brick, stone and cement structures (restoration work); excludes pointing, caulking, cleaning of new or replacement masonry, brick, stone or cement...........................$ 19.14
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR:
Asphalt Roller..............$ 21.35 5.38 Bobcat/Skid Loader..........$ 18.05 8.78 Boom........................$ 21.44 8.29 Crane.......................$ 20.95 6.18 Excavator...................$ 20.00 0.00 Forklift....................$ 16.00 5.12 Gradall.....................$ 20.50 8.42 Grader/Blade................$ 14.50 5.18 Loader......................$ 24.00 5.40 Paver.......................$ 17.47 6.36 Roller excluding Asphalt....$ 17.60 3.88
TILE FINISHER....................$ 17.87 7.32
TRUCK DRIVER
Dump Truck..................$ 15.90 1.12 Tractor Haul Truck..........$ 17.87 9.98 WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.
Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.
Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.
Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).
The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).
Union Rate Identifiers
A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:
PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union, which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.
Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.
Survey Rate Identifiers
Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.
Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.
Union Average Rate Identifiers
Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.
A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour
Division National Office Branch of Wage Surveys. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.) and 3.) should be followed.
With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:
Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
END OF GENERAL DECISION
END OF AMENDMENT 0007
SECTION 00 21 13 - INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
1. TITLE: P-3009 MILITARY WORKING DOG KENNEL, JOINT BASE ANDREWS, CAMP
SPRINGS, MD
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Military working dog housing, administrative offices, conference rooms, transient rooms for handlers required to stay overnight, kitchen/break room, restrooms/showers with a locker area, utility space, fire detection and alarm system, communications networks (computer/phone VOIP), utilities (electrical, water, sanitary sewer),storm water management, security perimeter fence, lighting, parking (staff, visitors, three MWD trailers, five patrol cars, support vehicles),access roads, outdoor fenced areas (one large area for exercising MWDs and two small areas as holding spaces), overhang to protect MWD transport trailers and patrol cars, landscaping, and other required site improvements and incidental related work. In addition, this project includes the demolition works of the existing Military Working Dog Kennel facilities including existing administrative building, kennel structures and other related facilities as shown on the drawings.
3. POINT OF CONTACT: The primary point of contact for this procurement is Damila Adams at Damila.a.adams.civ@us.navy.mil. The secondary point of contact is Cynthia Crowder at Cynthia.y.crowder.civ@us.navy.mil
4. DISCLOSURE OF MAGNITUDE: In accordance with DFARS 236.204(ii), the construction magnitude of this project is between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000.
5. TYPE OF CONTRACT: Firm-Fixed Price
6. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: This procurement is Unrestricted, Full and Open
7. NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODE: 236220 –
Commercial and Institutional Building Construction with a size standard of $39.5M.
8. SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS: Best Value Trade Off
9. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Work under this contract shall commence 15 days after award and shall be completed within 563 calendar days after contract award (this includes time for bond approval).
10. PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE PERIOD: The Offeror’s price is valid for 90 days from the receipt of proposals.
11. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT
Will be issued via amendment.
12. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI): Offerors are required to review the entire solicitation package before submitting questions. All inquiries must be submitted NLT January 10th 2022 by 2:00 PM EST. All inquiries must be submitted in writing and emailed to Damila Adams Damila.a.Adams@us.navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder at cynthia.y.crowder.civ@us.navy.mil with inquiries attached as a WORD document. No tables please.
13. DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal shall be electronically no later than 2:00 PM EST on
19 January 2022. Proposals shall be submitted utilizing the Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). Department of Defense (DoD) training for industry partners is available at https//dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module. Additional Web Based Training is available at https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml.
Please allow SUFFICENT TIME for your proposal to be received within the Government’s electronic system prior to the proposed cutoff date/time. All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be documented with the date and hour of receipt and may be held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 15.208.
Facsimile copies and hard copies will NOT be accepted. NO HAND DELIVERY IS
ALLOWED.
14. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT: The proposal submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clear, concise, and shall contain sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposals should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather should demonstrate convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the RFP. Nonconformance with the solicitation requirements, specified organization and content may result in elimination or misevaluation of the proposal. All claimed technical capabilities to meet the requirements shall be realistic and are subject to verification by the Government. Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s business and that the Government will base its evaluation on the information contained in the offeror’s proposals.
Cross-Referencing: To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.
Volume I: Technical Proposal: Volume I shall contain the Offerors entire technical proposal in a single pdf., sectioned appropriately by major evaluation factor with the following characteristics: (1) Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font. (2) Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address. (3) Technical Factors 1-4 Volume II: Price Proposal: Volume II shall contain the Offerors price proposal in a single pdf.
With the following information in the pricing volume, the Offeror shall provide the following information:
1. Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.
2. Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.
3. Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged.
4. Completed Price Schedule.
5. Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM)
6. Confirmation of filing of VETS-4212 and/or VETS report for the cycle.
7. Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee.
8. Responsibility Determination Information (see below).
9. Small Business Subcontracting Plan. (see below).
The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Schedule that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00010 – Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.
(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal.
(ii) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442.
(iii). SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the Solicitation is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.
(iv). FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters. VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS- 4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.
(v). VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL
PACKAGE: RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. The offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:
- One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).
- The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.
- Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.
- Other offeror’s work presently under contract.
Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.
SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN INFORMATION:
In accordance with FAR 19.7, all other than small businesses shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) utilizing the attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template.
Acceptability of the SBSP will be considered a responsibility matter. The SBSP will not be evaluated or rated by the SSEB, but reviewed by a Small Business Professional/Authorized Representative and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. The SBSP shall be negotiated and/or accepted within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to negotiate an acceptable subcontracting plan within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer will render the offeror ineligible for award of the contract. The SBSP will be incorporated into the resulting contract.
NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging, small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition consistent with efficient and effective performance of the contract. These targets are based on a percentage of total planned subcontract dollars.
Small Business: 37.44% HUBZone: 8.75%
SDVOSB: 4.22%
SDB: 23.57%
WOSB: 6%
The SBSP shall be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Utilization and Participation Factor. In accordance with DFARS 215.304©(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, those small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in the SBSP.
Please note that SMSP goals and the participation rates provided in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) WILL NOT be the same. The participation rates within the SBPCD are provided as percentages of the total contract value; subcontractor plan goals are provided as a percentage of planned subcontracting dollars. While the percentages will differ, the types of products/services identified in the SBSP, should be the same as those products/services identified in the SBPCD. Likewise, the planned small business subcontract dollars in the SBSP will be equal to (or in some cases greater than) the extent of small business participation identified in the SBPCD.
15. BASIS OF AWARD:
a. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
b. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
c. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.
d. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.
e. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.
16. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD:
a. The solicitation requires the evaluation of Price and the following non-price factors:
Factor 1 - Experience Factor 2 - Past Performance Factor 3 - Safety Factor 4 - Small Business Utilization
The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance relates to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contract.
2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors 1, 3, and 4 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor 2.
When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.
The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered
3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.
Price:
(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Provide pricing for each CLIN on the SF1442 or other pricing sheet(s) provided.
(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price.
Total price consists of the base bid and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision of FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:
(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.
(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.
(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.
(iv) Comparison of market survey results.
(b) Non-cost/price Factors:
Factor 1 – Experience:
(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The Offeror shall submit the following information:
(1) Construction Experience:
Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.
For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:
1. Size: Approximately 10,000 SF or larger and final construction cost of $12,000,000 or more.
2. Scope: New construction of a military working dog facility or comparable facilities, e.g. police working dog kennels, dog training center or dog support facilities.
3. Complexity: New construction of facilities that meet the Size and Scope criteria, above, inclusive of one or more of the following:
a. Experience with obtaining permits from local regulatory agencies for storm water management and erosion and sediment control.
b. Experience with new construction projects with comparable size, scope and complexity which required contingency planning due to unscheduled limited site access and/or work stoppage due to airfield operations.
c. Demolition of existing facilities with hazardous material abatement from and area larger than 2,000 SF.
Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years prior to the date of issuance of this RFP.
A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract.
For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.
The attached Construction Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) 8 1/2” x 11” double-sided page or two (2) 8 1/2” x 11” single-sided pages.
For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.
If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.
If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.
(b) Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant aggregate experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. A minimum of two (2) and maximum of five (5) projects for construction must be submitted. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.
Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance.
Proposals may be strengthened if submitted construction projects possess:
a. Demonstrate experience with the new construction on military installations.
b. Experience with obtaining permits from Maryland Department of Environment for storm water management and erosion sediment control may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate said experience.
c. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with military working dog facilities may be considered more favorably than those that do not.
d. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience on military installations may be considered more favorably than those that do not.
e. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not.
Factor 2 – Past Performance:
If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1, Experience. If a completed CPARS evaluation is not available for a project that was submitted under Factor 1, Experience, the offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for that project. The Offeror shall provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).
The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s points of contact, Contract Specialist Damila Adams at damila.a.adams.civ@us.navy.mil and Cynthia Crowder at Cynthia.y.crowder.civ@us.navy.mil.
Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided 8 1/2” x 11” pages (or four (4) 8 1/2” x 11” single-sided pages) in total.
The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.
Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.
(b) Basis of Evaluation:
This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.”
The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.
Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.
Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.
Factor 3 – Safety
The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate for the specified five (5) calendar years; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.
The attached Safety Data Sheet (Attachment E) SHALL be used to submit the Offeror’s safety information below.
NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.
1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ CY2020, CY2019, CY2018, CY2017, and CY2016 worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate or a “0” DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.
a. Dart cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.
b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.
𝑫𝑨𝑹𝑻 𝑹𝑨𝑻𝑬
Number of DART Incidents x 200,000
Total Number of Enployee Labor Hours Worked
2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ CY2020, CY2019, CY2018, CY2017, and CY2016 worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate or a “0” TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.
a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.
b.Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.
𝑻𝑪𝑹 𝑹𝑨𝑻𝑬
Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000
Total Number of Enployee Labor Hours Worked
3. Technical Approach for Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:
a. Describe the Offeror’s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.
b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.
c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout the performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).
d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided 8 ½ X 11 pages or one (1) double-sided size 8 ½ X 11 page.
4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.
(b) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.
1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Any negative trends require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.
a. Missing data or “0” responses without an explanation is considered a deficiency.
b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.
c. An…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .