AMENDMENT 0005 DOG KENNEL.pdf

RESIDENT OFFICER IN CHARGE OF CONTRACTS

NDW/ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 3198 BOX 47

1 SAN DIEGO LOOP

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5518

ACQR5871178

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40080-21-R-1178-P3009 Military Working Dog Kennel (Joint Base Andrew s, Maryland)

Incorporated are RFI Responses.

Continue on Page 2

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Feb-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008021R1178

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Dec-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Feb-2022

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N40080

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008021R1178

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDEMENT 0005

1. The RFP refers to drawings but none seem to be included on sam.gov. Can drawing be provided?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: THE DRAWINGS WERE ISSUED IN AMENDMENT 0001

2. The RFP says: “Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the Solicitation is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. [highlighting added]. Section 00600 is not included in the RFP. However, pages 27 – 35 and 47 – 49 in the RFP include Representations and Certifications. Are offerors to include these in the proposal?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: YES

3. Factor 1.a.1.2 (Experience: Scope): In order to qualify, the RFP requires submitted projects (at least 2 and no more than 5) to include the following: “New construction of a military working dog facility or comparable facilities, e.g. police working dog kennels, dog training center or dog support facilities.” This is a very limited scope in which to demonstrate relevancy, and may limit unnecessarily the number of well qualified offerors. Most new construction projects will have covered the vast majority of the new construction requirements associated with this proposed project. To require a new construction project to also include dog training features would require offerors to ignore projects that demonstrate most or nearly all new construction requirements applicable. Would the government consider changing the language to focus on relevant new construction requirements specifically (structural, civil, infrastructure, et al) and moving all current scope language to the strengthening features section?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: NO

4. Photographs were not allowed at the site walk, requesting that photographs of the existing Working Dogs facility (interior and exterior) and site designated for demolition be provided for purposes of evaluation by bidders.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: YES

5. Due to the specialized nature of the facility, request that the period of consideration for relevant projects be extended to 15 years to allow for qualified contractors with experience to participate and demonstrate full capabilities of construction experience.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: NO

6. Please advise what is meant by thermal insulation in all exterior frames per Section 08 11 13 ¶2.6. The way it is stated is interpreted to be an insulation or potentially grout stuffed in the backside of the frame. If that’s the case.

This is something that is supplied and done by others.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: INSULATION OF EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL FRAMS WILL BE

PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

7. Section 08 11 13 does not specifically address interior hollow metal frames. Please confirm interior hollow metal frames can be 16 gage cold rolled steel.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: YES, INTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAMES ARE 16 GAGE

COLD ROLLED STEEL.

8. Should Door #116 have 6’0” in the door size in the door schedule?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: YES, THE CORRECT #116 DOOR OPENING SIZE IS 6’-0” WIDE WITH 2

LEAF DOUBLE DOORS.

9. Please advise where Door 123 is to be found?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: DOOR #123 IS LOCATED AT THE AHU SPACE IN THE ATTIC.

10. Please advise what the unmarked door is at the AHU in the attic.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: DOOR OPENING SHOWN ON A-313 IS DOOR #123. DOOR AND FRAME

MAY NEED TO BE FIELD MODIFIED WHERE TOP CORNER OF DOOR MAY INTERFERE WITH

SLOPED ROOF FRAMING.

11. Please advise the STC rating of Doors 114A, 114B & 115. Section 08 14 00 ¶2.1.2 directs the rating to be found in door schedule; however, there is no STC rating shown in the door schedule.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: STC RATING FOR DOORS 114A, 114B & 115 IS

STC-45.

12. Please advise if the door cores can be structural composite lumber (SCL) in lieu of stave lumber core. Some factories have dropped the stave lumber core due to issues like telegraphing/photographing the core for one. Also, SCL has less light lock conflicts.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: SCL DOOR CORES ARE NOT APPROVED. PROVIDE STAVE LUMBER

CORES AS SPECIFIED.

13. Section 08 14 00 ¶2.1.1.1 directs good grade natural birch for a painted finish. The finish specified at wood doors in the door schedule is clear. Please advise if the doors are not a painted finish by others, what veneer is desired for a clear finish.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CLEAR FINISH FOR INTERIOR WOOD DOORS AS SPECIFIED IN

DOOR SCHEDULE IS CORRECT. FINISH ALL INTERIOR WOOD DOORS WITH CLEAR SEMI-

GLOSS SHEEN.

14. Spec section 01 22 00, 3.2.1.1 calls for a coverboard on top of any Polyiso within a roof assembly. Typical assembly from the drawings does not show one. Question, what is required? See below.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: TYPICAL ROOF ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.

PROVIDE AND INSTALL ROOF ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON DETAILS AND ASSEMBLY

ACCORDING TO SELECTED MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS.

15. Typical assembly calls for 3 layers of 2” ISO for R-30. Those things are not the same. R-30 is achieved with 5.2” of ISO, and would typically be installed in 2 layers, not 3. Question, are 3 layers required? Is R-30 the requirement? Or is do they want 3 layers of 2” ISO for an R-value of R-34.2?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: MIN R-30 WITH 6” RIGID INSULATION.

16. Roof panel spec calls for 050 aluminum panels, wall panel spec calls for 22 ga steel panels. Dark Bronze on an Aluminum substrate is not an exact match to Dark Bronze on a Steel substrate. Question, Was it the intent to have these specified as different materials, or should they both be the same, either .050 aluminum or 22 ga steel?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ROOFING AND WALL MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED IN THE

DOCUMENTS IS CORRECT. ROOF HAS ALUMINUM PANELS AND WALLS HAVE STEEL PANELS.

MINOR DIFFERENCES IN THE DARK BRONZE FINISH COLOR SHOULD NOT BE SIGNIFICANT

CONCERN.

17. I do not see a specification for the roof specific air and vapor barrier, the thermal barrier, or the synthetic underlayment. Question, Can a specification please be provided for each?

GOVERNMEN RESPONSE: SEE SPEC SECTION 07 22 00, PARA. 2.1.1 FOR THERMAL ROOF

INSULATION. SEE SPEC SECTION 07 27 19.01, PARA. 2.1 FOR SELF-ADHESIVE AIR BARRIER.

ASSEMBLY AND TIE-IN TO BE REVIEWED WITH DESIGNER OF RECORD WITH MOCK UP THAT

CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO THE WORK.

18. Please confirm the graphic scale on the electrical site drawings as they do not match the graphic scale on the civil utility drawings?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CIVIL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE ADEQUATELY

REPRESENTED AND MATCH THE CORRESPONDING GRAPHICS SCALES. THE ELECTRICAL

AND CIVIL DRAWINGS DO NOT NEED TO BE AT THE SAME SCALE AS THEY SERVE SPECIFIC

PURPOSE FOR EACH DISCIPLINE.

19. Can the Navy confirm the STC (sound transmission class) rating required for the openings 114A, 114B & 115?

Door schedule note #2 references a ‘sound retardant core door,’ however there doesn’t seem to be a rating/level specified anywhere else in the plans or specs.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: SEE RESPONSE TO #11.

20. Section 28 10 05 - What is the manufacturer of the system the base currently uses?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE CAPABILITY (I.E. DIALER) TO

COMMUNICATION THE BASE IDS CENTRAL STATION.

21. Section 28 10 05 ‐ What is the manufacturer of the system the base currently uses?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE CAPABILITY (I.E. DIALER) TO

COMMUNICATION THE BASE IDS CENTRAL STATION.

22. Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders indicated “19 January 2022. Proposals shall be submitted utilizing the Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). Department of Defense (DoD) training for industry partners is available at https//dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitationmodule.

Additional Web Based Training is available at https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml”. I have never used this system, how do I go about getting registered?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: PRICE PROPOSAL AND NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS PROPOSAL -

THE PRICE PROPOSAL AND THE NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS PROPOSAL SHALL BE

SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BELOW: PROPOSALS ARE TO BE

SUBMITTED TO OFFICE LISTED BELOW: NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

(NAVFAC), WASHINGTON ATTN: DAMILA ADAMS AND CYNTHIA CROWDER. USING THE DOD

SECURE ACCESS FILE EXCHANGE SERVICES (SAFE), DROP-OFF FEATURE IN DOD SAFE

(HTTPS://SAFE.APPS.MIL). ONLY DOD SAFE IS AUTHORIZED FOR THE SUBMISSION OF

PROPOSALS IN RESPONSE TO THIS SOLICITATION. INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF DOD SAFE

ARE PROVIDED BELOW:

*USING DOD SAFE DROP-OFF. UPON DETERMINING THAT YOU WILL SUBMIT A PROPOSAL IN

RESPONSE TO THIS SOLICITATION, THE OFFEROR SHALL SUBMIT THEIR POINT OF CONTACT

(POC) NAME AND EMAIL ADDRESS TO THE ASSIGNED CONTRACTING OFFICER AND

CONTRACT SPECIALIST VIA EMAIL TO DAMILA.A.ADAMS.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL AND

CYNTHIA.Y.CROWDER.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL . IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE POC INFORMATION

REMAINS VALID THROUGHOUT THE LIFETIME OF THE SOLICITATION. UPON RECEIPT OF

THIS INFORMATION, THE CONTRACTING OFFICER OR CONTRACT SPECIALIST WILL

“REQUEST A DROP-OFF” PROCEDURE IN DOD SAFE, OBTAIN A “REQUEST CODE” AND

PROVIDE THE REQUEST CODE TO THE OFFEROR’S POC EMAIL ADDRESS. ONLY THE

IDENTIFIED POC WILL BE ABLE TO DROP-OFF PROPOSALS OR PROPOSAL REVISIONS IN DOD

SAFE. FAILURE TO PROVIDE ACCURATE POC INFORMATION WILL PRECLUDE THE OFFEROR

FROM USING DOD SAFE. TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL, THE OFFEROR WILL LOG INTO DOD

SAFE AT HTTPS://SAFE.APPS.MIL, CLICK DROPOFF AND ENTER THE REQUEST CODE THAT

WAS PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACT SPECIALIST OR CONTRACTING OFFICER. THE SYSTEM

WILL ALLOW FOR INCLUSION OF A SHORT NOTE TO THE RECIPIENT AND THEN THE

OFFEROR WILL CLICK TO ADD FILES OR DRAG AND DROP THEM. CLICK “DROP-OFF FILES”

TO SEND THE FILES TO THE RECIPIENT. THE FILE(S) ARE UPLOADED AND AN EMAIL WILL BE

SENT TO THE RECIPIENT NOTIFYING THEM OF THE “DROP-OFF”. [ADDITIONAL DETAILS CAN

BE VIEWED IN THE DOD SAFE USER GUIDE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://SAFE.APPS.MIL]. NOTE

THAT THE SUBMISSION OF ANY PROPOSAL MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN THE TIME

INDICATED ABOVE. THE DOD SAFE SYSTEM WILL RECORD THE DATE AND TIME OF

PACKAGE SUBMITTAL. THE DATE AND TIME OF PACKAGE SUBMITTAL RECORDED IN DOD

SAFE SHALL GOVERN THE TIMELINESS OF ANY PROPOSAL SUBMISSION. OFFERORS SHALL

ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME TO UPLOAD FILES WHICH MAY BE SLOWER FOR NON-DOD USERS

AND TO AVOID OTHER TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED. OFFERORS

ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING FILES IN THE FORMAT SPECIFIED CONSISTENT

WITH REQUIREMENTS STATED ELSEWHERE IN THIS SOLICITATION. FILES THAT CANNOT BE

OPENED, OR ARE OTHERWISE MISSING THE REQUIRED CONTENT ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY

OF OFFERORS. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO OBTAIN THE RFP

FILES, ALONG WITH ANY AMENDMENTS, FROM OPPORTUNITIES (WWW.BETA.SAM.GOV).

UNPROTECTED EDITABLE ELECTRONIC FILE COPIES OF THE RFP DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING

WORD, EXCEL, AND/OR ADOBE FILES WILL NOT BE PROVIDED. PLEASE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.

23. REF: CS507 The CL fence detail page attached (CS507) has typicals for both 3 and 6 strand barbwire. Is barbwire required? If so, where and at what strand? – the specifications provide no clarity.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: NO BARBED WIRE. MINIMUM HEAVY DUTY 8 FT HIGH CHAIN LINK

FENCE TO TOP OF FABRIC SUPPORT WITH THREE (3) STRANDS OF STRAIGHT WIRE (NO

BARBED) AT THE TOP FACING INWARD TO PREVENT A MWD FROM CLIMBING OR JUMPING

OUT.

24. SPEC 32 31 13 Do any of the gates need operators, or will they be manually operated?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: GATES SHOULD BE MANUALLY OPERATED. PADLOCK AND KEY

TYPICAL. TURNSTILE ENTRIES WILL NEED A CAC CARD READY.

25. According the to the Evaluation Factors for Award section Factor 1 – Experience - we are required to use the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet; however this is not a design bid project. Please verify this is the correct form and/or that we are required to only submit construction projects.*

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: THIS IS THE CORRECT FORM.

26. Missing The Sheet List includes sheet CU102 Utility Plan – Old Kennel and sheet FY700 Camera Views. These sheets are not included in the plans posted on sam.gov. Can these drawings be provided?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: SHEET CU102 WAS A UTILITY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING KENNEL

SITE. NO NEW UTILITIES WERE EXTENDED TO THE EXISTING KENNEL SITE, SO THE SHEET

WAS REMOVED FROM THE SET.

27. Drawings ES100, ES101, ES102 and ES103 Please confirm the graphic scale on the electrical site drawings as they do not match the graphic scale on the civil utility drawings.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CIVIL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE ADEQUATELY

REPRESENTED AND MATCH THE CORRESPONDING GRAPHICS SCALES. THE ELECTRICAL

AND CIVIL DRAWINGS DO NOT NEED TO BE AT THE SAME SCALE AS THEY SERVE SPECIFIC

PURPOSE FOR EACH DISCIPLINE.

28. Layout Drawing CS101, fence elevation on a1/CS507.Layout drawing CS101 shows fence and refers to fence elevation on A1/CS507. ~ A1/CS507 shows 3 different types of fences. Please clarify which elevation is applicable.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: PERIMETER / OUTSIDE FENCE: MINIMUM HEAVY DUTY 8 FT HIGH

CHAIN LINK FENCE TO TOP OF FABRIC SUPPORT, NO TOP/OUTRIGGER UNLESS CUSTOMER

REQUIRES. INNER TRAINING AREAS/FIELDS: MINIMUM HEAVY DUTY 8 FT HIGH CHAIN LINK

FENCE TO TOP OF FABRIC SUPPORT WITH ADDITIONAL TOP/OUTRIGGER CONSISTING OF

THREE (3) STRANDS OF STRAIGHT WIRE (NO BARBED) FACING INWARD AT THE TOP TO

PREVENT A MWD FROM CLIMBING OR JUMPING OUT.

29. Which specification is being used for fence? Chain Link Fences and gates 32 32 13 (This fence specification talks about 2 different coating for the fence, Please clarify coating if using this specification); High- Security Fences (Chain link and Ornamental) and gates 32 31 13.53?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: THIS IS NOT A “HIGH” SECURITY AREA, BUT A SECURE AREA

NEEDING SECURITY FENCING. THE REQUIREMENTS OF 32 31 13.53 APPEAR MORE

APPROPRIATE FOR INTENDED USE AND SECURITY FOR THIS AREA THAN THE STANDARD 32

31 13 SPEC FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING. PRIMARY CONCERN IS TO KEEP DOGS FROM GETTING

OUT AND PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS. CABLE REINFORCING FOR VEHICLE

THREATS IS NOT REQUIRED. COATING REQUIREMENT ISN’T A SECURITY ISSUE, IT IS A

CORROSION PROTECTION ISSUE AND IS DEPENDENT ON LOCATION AND INSTALLATION

REQUIREMENTS. AS IT RELATES TO #3 BELOW, PER UFC 1-200-01, APPENDIX A, JB ANDREWS

HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION (ESC) RATING OF C3, WHICH

INDICATES THE NEED FOR ADDED CORROSIVE PROTECTION. THE RECOMMENDED

CORROSIVE PROTECTION FOR BASES WITH A RATING OF C3 OR HIGHER IS EITHER

“ALUMINUM-COATED STEEL FABRIC OR CLASS 2B (FUSED AND ADHERED) PVC-COATED

OVER ZINC-COATED STEEL FABRIC. USE EITHER CLASS 2 ALUMINUM PIPE OR INCLUDE PVC

COATING ON ZINC-COATED STEEL PIPE POSTS AND RAILINGS. WHEN SPECIFYING STEEL

PIPE POSTS, USE GRADE A PIPE WHICH HAS THE HEAVIER ZINC-COATED INTERIOR”.

END OF AMENDMENT 0005

(End of Summary of Changes)