5-Attachment E- Score Sheet Reference.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MD26-18 Psychological Evaluations
- Solicitation number
- MD26-18
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation score sheet for Solicitation MD26-18 Psychological Evaluations issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Board of Pardons and Parole. The procurement seeks a single responsive and responsible vendor to provide psychological evaluation services under a 5-year contract. The evaluation will be conducted using a combined technical and cost-based scoring methodology, with contract awards determined by the offeror achieving the highest total points from both evaluation stages. Vendor pricing must be guaranteed for a minimum of 2 years.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a total possible score of 1,000 points, with technical criteria comprising 80 percent (800 points) and cost proposals comprising 20 percent (200 points). Technical evaluation focuses on three scoreable criteria: Relevant Experience (300 points), Adjacent Work Experience (250 points), and Company Mission and Contracts (250 points), with a minimum required technical point threshold of 560 points (70 percent). Two mandatory requirements must be satisfied on a pass/fail basis: the evaluator must be a licensed clinical psychologist with at least three years of professional experience, and cannot be a Department of Corrections employee or have previously treated or currently be treating inmates under evaluation. Cost points are assigned based on a comparative formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other proposals receiving points proportionally based on their price relative to the lowest bid.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 7-Attachment B- Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment D- Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 6-Attachment C- MMRs Tech Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment A- Agency Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet - for Reference
| Attachment E |
| Psychological Evaluations |
| SOLICITATION # MD26-18 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET - For REFERENCE |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | The evaluator provided by the Offeror MUST be a licensed clinical psychologist with at least three years of professional experience. | ||
| 2 | The evaluator provided by the Offeror CANNOT be an employee of the Department of Corrections and cannot have previously treated or currently be treating inmates who they would be evaluating. |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Relevant Experience | 60 | 37.5% | 300.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Adjacent Work Experience | 50 | 31.3% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Company Mission and Contracts | 50 | 31.3% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 70% | 560.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 20% | 200.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 80% | 800.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 20% | 200.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .