5-Att 4.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFQ 265X901171
- Issued by
- Hamilton County, Ohio
About this file
This is an Attachment 4 document related to the Owner's Advisor and Design Services procurement for the Mercy West Advanced Treatment System (MWATS) Project by the Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) of Greater Cincinnati in Ohio. The document outlines the technical and project management support requirements for an Owner's Advisor who will serve as the site designer and provide oversight throughout all phases of the project lifecycle, including study, planning, design, and construction closeout. The Owner's Advisor will be responsible for ensuring successful execution of the MWATS Project through comprehensive technical guidance and project management across the entire development timeline.
The specific scope, pricing structure, contract term, and detailed evaluation criteria contained within this attachment establish the framework for bidder qualifications and proposal requirements. The document serves to clarify MSD's expectations regarding the Owner's Advisor's responsibilities and the deliverables needed to support this complex infrastructure project. Additional details regarding budget allocation, funding sources, contract duration, and renewal options would be specified in the primary solicitation documents and bid instructions accompanying this attachment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 7-Att 5.docx | DOCX document | |
| 16-Corporate Resolution 2 Authorized to Sign - Instructions.pdf | ||
| 8-Affidavit of Accuracy Signature Page.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Att 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 10-RFP-Q Subconsultant Utilization Plan.pdf.pdf | ||
| 1-Complete QQ 265x901171 - Att. 0-5 AA.docx | DOCX document | |
| 15-AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING AUTHORITY (template).docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Att 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18-AMR Treatment at Mercy West Pump Station Initial Project Concept.pdf | ||
| 17-PA-Draft 2026.pdf | ||
| 3-Att 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 14-AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING AUTHORITY (Instructions).pdf | ||
| 2-RFQ 265X901171.pdf | ||
| 12-CorporateResolution2AuthorizedtoSign.doc | DOC document | |
| 9-Att 0.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19-Mercy West PS - Drawings.pdf | ||
| 11-Professional Services Small Business Enterprise Rating Rubric 11.6.19.pdf | ||
| 13-SBE Statement of Intent to Contract Perform.pdf.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MSDGC QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RFQ # RFQ 265x901171
OWNER’S ADVISOR AND DESIGN SERVICES
SIMILAR PROJECTS (ATTACHMENT 4 TO RFQ)
(Note: Similar Projects = 15%)
The applicability of and successful performance on completed MSDGC and non-MSDGC projects similar in scope to the one identified in this RFQ shall be evaluated for scoring this category. Projects should demonstrate experience with wastewater system planning, design, project management, and owner’s advisor services. Projects are not required to include all elements.
List of Similar Completed Projects: List no more than three (3) similar projects Offeror has completed (or has key tasks completed) in the past five (5) years, giving the name of project, owner, contract amount, and date of completion. If the project is not completed, indicate clearly which tasks are completed and which are future. Identify the relevant portions of larger projects. You may attach this information to your submittal in lieu of completing this spreadsheet. However, your attachment MUST contain ALL elements in this spreadsheet (column headings and data requested). If your attachment does not mirror this spreadsheet, your submittal may be deemed incomplete. Please list the involvement of the key personnel on the projects provided.
| Project Name |
| Owner |
| Contract Amount |
| Completion Date |
ATTACHMENT 4
MSDGC QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RFQ # RFQ 265x901171
ATTACHMENT 4
Detailed Project Descriptions: Using the format below, provide the requested information on each project included on the List of Similar Completed Projects in Attachment 4 that are most similar to the work described in this RFQ. Projects must have been performed under Offeror's current legal name or immediately-previous legal name (within past five years), whether as a prime consultant or as a subconsultant, and involve principals employed at the time of this submittal. Additional Project Summary: Attach separate sheets (maximum 2 sheets per project) to provide additional information related to the project description – specifically the type of expertise provided. The examples should include the nature of involvement in the project and any special environmental, political, or technical problems resolved during the project. Highlight key personnel from Attachment 2.
Clarification: For each project, there are two required sheets below (Detailed Project Descriptions); two additional sheets (Additional Project Summary) may be provided at your discretion.
| 1. | Offeror Name: ___________________________________________________________________ |
| Project Manager Name: _____________________________________________________________ |
| 2. | Name of Project: ___________________________________________________________________ |
| Contract No.: _____________________________ Project No.: __________________________ | |
| Project Description _________________________________________________________________ |
| 3. | Owner Name: _____________________________________________________________________ |
| Address: _________________________________________________________________________ |
Contact Person: ____________________________________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________________________________________________ Email Address: ____________________________________________________________________
| 4. | Contract Dates - Attach additional information if project was not on schedule. |
| Started: _____________________________________ | |
| Contractual Completion: _______________________ | |
| Actual Completion: ___________________________ |
| 5. | Original Contract Value: $ _____________________ |
| Final Contract Value: $ ________________________ | |
| Value of: Change Orders/Amendments to Date $ ____________________ | |
| Outstanding Claims to Date $ ________________________ |
| 6. | Major Subconsultant(s) | |||
| Name: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Address: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Contact Person: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Telephone Number: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Email Address: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Role in Project: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| (Add others as necessary) |
| 7. | Was contract completed on or before the date specified in the contract for contract completion as adjusted by agreement of the parties? | |
| Yes ( ) No ( ) |
If not, explain why, including the original contract period and the final contract period.
8. Key personnel listed in Attachment 2 that worked on this project and their roles.
ATTACHMENT 4
Deviation of the submitted QQ from compliance with the Attachment 4 instructions and requirements may render the Offeror’s submittal as “non-responsive” by the City.
MSDGC QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RFQ # RFQ 265x901171
ATTACHMENT 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .