4-Score-Sheet-NC26-56 For Informational Purposes Only.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NC26-56-1 Golf Carts for State Parks
- Solicitation number
- NC26-56-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP Evaluation Scoresheet for Solicitation #NC26-56, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of State Parks Golf Courses, for the procurement of golf carts for rough terrain courses. The RFP requires vendors to be manufacturers or authorized resellers of golf carts capable of providing both gas and electric models with independent front and rear suspension and an 800-pound load capacity. Vendors must comply with a minimum two-year warranty on parts and labor and submit a list of offerings. The contract award will be made to the responsive and responsible vendor with the highest evaluation score. The resulting contract will have a five-year term with guaranteed pricing for the first 12 months, after which any price increases must be submitted with market research and agency approval, with subsequent increases guaranteed for one year at a time.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 1,000 points to technical criteria weighted across five categories: Compliance with Minimum Specifications and Technical Requirements (250 points, 25 percent), Product Lifecycle and Operational Value (250 points, 25 percent), Warranty, Maintenance, and Service Support (200 points, 20 percent), Delivery, Lead Time, and Order Fulfillment (150 points, 15 percent), and Vendor Experience and Qualifications (150 points, 15 percent). An additional 300 points are assigned to cost evaluation, with the lowest proposed price receiving 100 percent of cost points and other offerors receiving points proportional to the ratio of the lowest price to their proposed price. A minimum threshold of 600 technical points (60 percent) is required for further evaluation. The total evaluation is scored out of 1,300 possible points.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 5-Attachment C - Cost Proposal Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3-Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 7-Attachment D Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attachment B Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Golf Carts for State Parks | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION #NC26-56 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor MUST be the manufacturer or an authorized reseller of the proposed golf carts. | Proposal Data | ||||||||
| 2 | Vendor must be able to provide gas and electric golf carts with independent front and rear suspension and a load capacity of ≥ 800 lbs. | Proposal Data | ||||||||
| 3 | Vendor agrees to warranty and maintenance requirements (a minimum of two years on parts and labor). | Proposal Data | ||||||||
| 4 | Vendor must upload their list of offerings. | Proposal Data | ||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Compliance with Minimum Specifications & Technical Requirements | Attach. D | 50 | 25.0% | 250.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 2 | Product Lifecycle and Operational Value | Attach. D | 50 | 25.0% | 250.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | Warranty, Maintenance, and Service Support | Attach. D | 40 | 20.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 4 | Delivery, Lead Time, and Order Fulfillment | Attach. D | 30 | 15.0% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 5 | Vendor Experience and Qualifications | Attach. D | 30 | 15.0% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 60% | 600.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 300.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 0% | 300.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,300.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .