4_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_D_REFERENCE_CHECK_FORM.docx

DOCX document 54 KB Posted

Attached to
Web-based Software as a Service (SaaS) Solution - OLCC Integrated Distilled Spirits Supply Chain
Solicitation number
S-DASOBO-00008678
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an Integrated Distilled Spirits Supply Chain Solution for the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) Distilled Spirits Program. The RFP is being issued by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services (DAS) and OLCC. The RFP seeks proposals for a web-based software as a service (SaaS) solution to meet the goals of the OLCC Distilled Spirits Program. The RFP covers Marion County and the City of Salem, Oregon. The document outlines a reference check form for the proposer, including questions related to the type of solution and services provided, customer service, business relationship, problem resolution, and project timelines and costs.

The RFP does not provide details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or other salient information beyond the reference check form. The key focus of the RFP is to obtain a comprehensive web-based SaaS solution to support the OLCC Distilled Spirits Program across the specified jurisdictions in Oregon.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMENDMENT NO 1 to RFP S-DASOBO-00008678_FINAL FOR RELEASE.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT No 5_RFP S-DASOBO-00008678_OLCC DSSC NITA_FINAL RELEASED.docx DOCX document
10_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment J_STATEWIDE SECURITY STANDARDS-corrected.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
11_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment K Deliverable Expectation Document.docx DOCX document
3_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_C_PROPOSER INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATION SHEET.docx DOCX document
5_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_E_PRICE_PROPOSAL DOJ FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20231214 2019-27 Bid Summary.pdf PDF
1_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_A_SAMPLE_CONTRACT DOJ FINAL.docx DOCX document
7_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_G_RESPONSIBILITY_INQUIRY.docx DOCX document
Intent to Award_S-DASOBO_00008678_OLCC DSSCS_FINAL RELEASED.doc DOC document
12_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_L_THIRD_PARTY_VENDOR_INFORMATION.docx DOCX document
2_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_B_DISCLOSURE_EXEMPTION_CERTIFICATION.docx DOCX document
6_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_F_CERTIFIED_DISADVANTAGED_BUSINESS_OUTREACH_PLAN.docx DOCX document
8_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP_Attachment_H_DSSC_SOLUTION REQUIREMENTS- corrected.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
9_S-DASOBO-00008678_RFP Attachment_I_DSSC_SCOPE OF SERVICES DOJ FINAL.docx DOCX document
Bid Amendment No 3_RFP S-DASOBO-00008678_OLCC DSSC_RELEASED.docx DOCX document
OLCC RFP S-DASOBO-00008678 AMENDMENT 1 Q&A_FINAL FOR RELEASE.docx DOCX document
S-DASOBO-00008678_OLCC DSSC RFP_12-05-2023 RELEASED~1.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT No 4_RFP S-DASOBO-00008678_OLCC DSSC_FINAL FOR RELEASE.docx DOCX document
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OLCC DISTILLED SPIRITS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTION

OregonBuys Bid Solicitation: S-DASOBO-00008678

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:__________________________________________
Reference Entity:__________________________________________
Reference Contact Name:__________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number:__________________________________________
Contact Email Address:__________________________________________

Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.

Please respond to the following questions:

1. For what type of Solution and/or Services did you engage Proposer?

Describe the Solution and/or Services listed in response to question 1.

Describe Proposer’s ongoing support customer Service.

Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.

Describe Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.

How likely would you be to use Proposer’s Services again?

With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s Services are you the most satisfied?

With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s Services are you the least satisfied?

How well did Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?

How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title] Page 1 of 65

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .