36C26219R0026-013.docx
DOCX document Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26219R0026
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 22 is seeking to procure primary care and administrative support services through five Community Based Outpatient Clinics located in Corona, Murrieta, Rancho Cucamonga, Victorville, and Palm Desert, California. The contractor will provide clinical staff, facilities, equipment, and labor to serve an estimated veterans population of over 20,000. The contract will have a base year and nine option years and utilize an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity approach. The completed past performance questionnaire must be returned by September 13, 2019 to assist in contractor evaluation.
36C26219R0026 D3 - Past Performance Questionnarie 02.docx
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 85 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
D. 3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. The Contractor identified below has requested that you complete a past performance questionnaire on their behalf. This questionnaire will be used by the Contracting Officer identified in paragraph 6 to assess the likelihood that the Contractor will perform successfully on an impending requirement for the VA Loma Linda Healthcare System. Your prompt completion and return of this questionnaire is greatly appreciated.
CONTRACTOR NAME _________________________________________
REFERENCED CONTRACT # _________________________________________
2. Background. The VA Loma Linda Healthcare System (VALLHS) requires five (5) Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOC) services providing Primary Care (PC), space and administrative support for Telehealth (TH), Mental Health (MH), and Audiology services in a clinic environment to veterans, primarily residing in San Bernardino and Riverside County California.
3. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Completed by Reference of Contractor being evaluated)
Name of Government or Commercial Organization:
Name of Person Completing Response: __________________________________________
Title: Phone E-mail:
Address of Record:
Contractor Performed as: |_|Prime Contractor |_|Sub-Contractor
Dollar Amount of contract identified in paragraph 1 above.
Dates of Performance (if current include expiration) ____________________________________
4. Please answer the following questions pertaining to the relevancy of the services provided to you as compared to the description in paragraph 2 above.
Q1. Did the contractor provide CBOC services to your agency / organization? (Y/N) ___________
Q2. If no, please provide a short description of the type of services the Contractor provided including the number of FTE and/or number of patients served.
5. Please use the below matrix to answer questions relating to performance using the following template.
Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the rating is Excellent, Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“E” = Excellent = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements
“G” = Good = Performance exceeded the contract requirements
“S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements
“M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory
“U” = Unsatisfactory = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements
Please write in “not applicable” or “neutral” if unable to rate a certain question. For any E, G, M, or U rating please provide a short summary explanation of rating.
Please rate and provide information/comments for the following:
Circle one
Q1. To what extent did the contractor comply with overall contract requirements?
E G S M U
Q2. How successful was the Contractor in filling all staffing and clinical service requirements?
E G S M U
Q3. How would you rate the quality of the providers and services provided by this Contractor in terms of technical competence, reliability, and demeanor with patients and staff?
E G S M U
Q4. To what extent was the Contractor able to meet unexpected and short notice changes and/or requirements (e.g. increase in patient census, training requirements)?
E G S M U
Q5. How would you rate the Contractor’s administrative staff as pertains to communication with your organization’s key personnel, their ability to complete credentialing and privileging, billing and invoicing processes, and overall contract management?
E G S M U
Q6. Did you issue any cure notices, show cause letters, or suspension of payment? If yes, please explain.
Yes No
Q7. Would you award another contract to the Contractor being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes No
Q8. Additional Comments pertaining to contractor performance:
Printed Name & Signature of Evaluator
Date
6. Thank you for your time. Please return completed questionnaire to Chelsea Black, Contracting Officer for this acquisition, at Chelsea.black@va.gov not later than September 13, 2019.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .