RFIs 1-141 36C25820B0003 10 Sep.docx
DOCX document 175 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25820B0003
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for emergency bus and switchgear modifications at the San Diego VA Healthcare System. Key requirements include general construction work such as demolition and repairs as well as electrical work supplying and installing new switchgear, switchboards, automatic transfer switches, protective relays, metering equipment, conduits, wiring and commissioning. Proposers must follow instructions in block 10 of the SF1442 form and all attachments. The period of performance is 360 days from notice to proceed with an estimated start date of October 30, 2020 and end date of October 25, 2021. The solicitation was issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration VISN 22.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment 0009 - Last updated: 9/4/2020 5:19 PM PST
IFB/Solicitation # 36C25820B0003
EMERGENCY BUS AND SWITCHGEAR MODIFICATIONS
Project # 664-16-301
RFIs – Questions (Q) & Answers (A)
Q1: On the beta.sam.gov website the pre-solicitation for this project was classified with the NAICS Code of 236220 which is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. When the solicitation was issued on 4/14/2020, the project was posted with the NAICS Code of 238210 Electrical Contractors and other Wiring Installation Contractors, Size Standard $16.5M. This project is relatively large with an Order of Magnitude of $5M-$10M and will require intense coordination and scheduling with the VA San Diego. The project scope of work will require the establishment of infection control measures, architectural demolition, saw cutting, core drilling, asphalt removal, concrete removal, repairs to finishes such as gypsum board, painting, floor repair, louvers, new door, frame & hardware installation, concrete work, asphalt, landscaping and fencing. None of these activities are performed by electrical specialty contractors. These activities are generally performed and/or managed by general contractors under NAICS Code of 236220. Will the VA consider changing the NAICS Code back to 236220 as it was originally listed on beta.sam.gov? This will allow for greater competition for this important and difficult project, and likely a better value to the Government?
A1: Yes, the NAICS is changed to 236220 as previously posted in Pre-Solicitation Notice.
Q2: Specification Section 31 20 00, Page 599, 3.2.A.4 It reads as follows "The Contractor is required to hire a Professional Geotechnical Engineer to provide inspection of excavations and soil/groundwater conditions throughout construction. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be responsible for performing pre-construction and periodic site visits throughout construction to assess site conditions. The Geotechnical Engineer shall update the excavation, sheeting and dewatering plans as construction progresses to reflect changing conditions and shall submit an updated plan if necessary. A written report shall be submitted, at least monthly, informing the Contractor and Contracting Officer’s Representative of the status of the plan and an accounting of the Contractor's adherence to the plan addressing any present or potential problems. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be available to meet with the Contracting Officer’s Representative at any time throughout the contract duration." Will the VA confirm this clause will be applicable to this project and if so, will the VA provide the requisite Geotechnical Report for this project in order to facilitate the Geotechnical Engineering work for this requirement?
A2: No, this specification is not applicable. Attached are geotechnical surveys that have been conducted in the past for other projects on site. Unfortunately, we do not have a survey specifically for this project. See 4 attachments to Amendment 0002.
Q3: 800A Circuit Breaker for existing SWBD D, reference Note 8 on drawing E-602. Manufacturer of the existing SWBD D? Is it Square D? I-Line, Direct Replacement, Retro fill?
A3: The panel is manufactured by Zinsco and will be a retrofit.
Q4: Are there requirements for a A or B license, or are you just taking electrical licenses?
A4: This project requires that the prime or prime’s electrical subcontractor must possess an active California class C-10 license to meet specification 1.15(B). If your firm is awarded the contract, the C-10 license must remain active for the duration of the award.
Q5: We are planning to bid as a subcontractor for the Emergency Bus and Switchgear Modifications, San Diego VA Healthcare System. I don’t see a bidder’s List of which GC’s are bidding. I may have overlooked but would you please be able to direct me where to obtain or provide me a bidder’s list?
A5: Sign-in sheets from the Pre-Bid Site Walks will be uploaded to Contract Opportunities with Amendment 0003 on Wednesday 29 Jul 2020. If you have already created an account on Contract Opportunities, you can also access the Interested Vendors Lists. There are two; one list accessible on the Pre-Solicitation Notice and another Interested Vendors List on the IFB / Solicitation.
Q6: This Pre-Bid request is in regard to the proposed 360-day performance period.
The proposed performance period of 360 is not reasonable considering the complexity of the subject project for the following reasons:
| • | The electrical equipment for this project is all custom or made to order equipment. Some of the equipment must is going to be installed in very old equipment whose manufacturers are out of business. The procurement and engineering of the replacement equipment will take a substantial period of time. This period of time will be approximately 180 days when you factor in purchase order issuance, field investigation, engineering/submittal preparation, submittal review time, fabrication and delivery. |
| • | The unpredictable nature of the supply chain given the COVID-19 outbreak has added time to most equipment orders of this type. |
| • | This project effects the hospital wide critical electrical systems and requires a significant number of power outages with a potential for serious operational disruptions. As such, these outages must be highly planned and requires the VA to plan outages which I know form firsthand experience in San Diego can take months to execute because of the operational needs the Medical Center. |
| • | This is a highly technical project which requires thoughtful execution. This is not the type of project that is conducive to a high rate of production. This is more of a marathon rather than a sprint to the finish line. |
| • | An unreasonably short period performance will only lead to unnecessary conflict on the project site and will lead to strained relations between all parties. |
Therefore, we propose a 684-day period of performance.
A6: The Government has re-visited the 360-day period of performance and has determined 360 days is an accurate assessment of the timeframe required to complete the project. Refer to Attachment 6 of the IFB/Solicitation for a sample schedule. It does not include all details required for the project. It is a sample for educational purposes only.
Q7: The bid date is currently shown for September 7th. Please confirm you need to have the bids submitted on Labor Day. If not, then please move bid. Bid days and times in the construction industry are Tuesday through Thursday 1 pm to 5 pm. The reasons are long and varied as to why those are the bid day and times, but it is part of the industry and not just one company’s policy.
A7: Revised bid due date is Sep 8, 2020, 2:00 pm Pacific Time. See Amendment 0005.
Q8: I was reviewing the IFB for Emergency Bus and Switchgear Modifications, Project 664-16-301, San Diego VA Healthcare System. I was hoping you might be able to inform me if this is a new effort or if there was a previous contractor that performed these requirements?
A8: This is a new effort.
Q9: What type of contractor’s license is required to bid as prime contractor?
A9: The prime must hold one of the following licenses: A, B, or C-10 (C-10 must be Active and issued in the state of California). If your firm is awarded the contract, the licenses must remain active for the duration of the award.
Please also reference RFI Q4 and A4 on page 2 of this document for more details on licenses.
Q10: How will we transport equipment in/out buildings, especially larger equipment on higher floors? Cranes required?
A10: The method used is for the firm awarded the contract to decide and the VA to approve. The means and methods must comply with all applicable guidance. The only items going to the higher floor is control and data cabling and related conduits.
Q11: If we pull wire and it gets stuck in existing conduit, will repairs be part of change orders or part of bid?
A11: This is a risk that should be factored into your bid.
Q12: What quantity, how much power, and what length of time would be necessary for using temporary power generators?
A12: The loads of the transfer switches are listed on sheet E-002. These readings were taken in early 2017. Add 25% to these loads to account for load increases. The temporary generators will be required to provide emergency power during the replacement of switchboards, switchgear and the existing generator switchgear. The length of time must be determined by the contractor based on the length of time to replace and commission the new equipment.
Q13: Is removal of the large cooler/switchgear stub-up vent on the scope of work?
A13: Yes, it is to be included in this contract. The firm awarded the contract will be responsible for relocating the intake plenum to another location on site. This site will be designated by the VA.
Q14: I read through this solicitation and have been trying to learn how we may be included in your list for any specific emergent or routine maintenance requests that may ever be needed in San Diego. Our facility is in San Diego and we are relatively new in the Federal marketplace, so just trying to learn how we may be able to work with you to support the hospital's electrical needs. We specialize in Low and Medium Voltage Circuit Breakers (Stock New and Reconditioned). We offer Test & Inspect, Report, and Repair / Recondition Services with same-as-factory or Better Warranties. As a Full Voting Dealer and Services Member of the Professional Electronic Apparatus Reconditioning League, we can certainly assist 24/7, 365 days a year.
A14: Please reference RFI 5. Sign-in sheets from the Pre-Bid Site Walks were uploaded to Contract Opportunities with Amendment 0003 on Wednesday 29 Jul 2020. If you have already created an account on Contract Opportunities, you can access the Interested Vendors Lists. There are two lists: one list accessible on the Pre-Solicitation Notice and another on the Interested Vendors List on the IFB / Solicitation.
Q15: Sheet E-602 shows Existing conduit with 6 cables in a 4” conduit with note P-E1-01 from the existing emergency generator control switchgear to the new EPGI Switchgear, the wire and conduit schedule on sheet E-606 for P-E1-01 shows 5 existing conductors and one new conductor. Is there one conductor that needs to be removed from the existing 4” conduit? Or do we follow the wire and conductor schedule which shows only 5 existing cables and adding one, i.e. no 6th cable to be removed? We also assume the conduit is existing and in the above example no new conduit is required. There are other notes like this on the one line diagram that are shown as existing but the existing cable count is different on the wire and conductor schedule. Please confirm we are to follow the wire and conduit schedule as shown.
A15: The cable quantities has been updated in the drawings. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q16: Sheet E-203 sheet note 1 calls for CAT 6 for ATS communication, please clarify if this is CAT 6A or regular CAT6?
A16: The cable type has been revised on the drawings. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q17: Please confirm the VA will be hiring the Commissioning Agent as stated in Specification Section 01 91 00 part 1.8.C.1 A17: For this project the prime contractor/firm will be responsible for retaining an independent/ third party commissioning agent.
Q18: Specification Section 07 84 00 part 1.5.B requires the firestopping installer to be from a firm approved by FM Global or evaluated by UL. Part C also requires 3rd party inspection of all firestopping. Please confirm these requirements will be enforced in lieu of the trades fire stopping their own work?
A18: Section 07 84 00 part 1.5.B and 1.5.C will be fully enforced as written. Only qualified installer can install fire stopping on this project. If the firm has the required training outlined in 1.5.B then they may install fire stopping on their own work.
The firm must retain and use a qualified inspector for this project in accordance with 1.5.C.
Q19: On sheet E-602 there appear to be lines that are heavier/darker than others. Has the Electrical Engineer defined any meaning to this or is this just an effect of producing the PDF?
A19: The notation of light lines for existing and dark lines for new is a VA standard. This has been changed on the Addendum drawings to dashed for existing and solid for new.
Q20: Drawing E-606. Does the (N) mean new conduit/cable or does it mean Neutral as indicated?
A20: (N) means new conduit/cable.
Q21: Note 3 on E-301 specifies to add two (2) sets of 4-600KCMIL + 1-500KCMIL EG for a total of seven (7) filled conduits whereas on the conduit schedule (E-606) the number of new conductors are shown as (N) 1 x [4-600KCMIL + 1-500KCMIL EG]. Should there be a total of two new sets added or 1? Additionally, drawing E-301 shows 7 existing conduits for P-E1-01, however detail A depicts only 6. Drawing E-602 shows 6 existing conduits. Please clarify.
A21: Will clarify for a total of six (6) filled conduits. Feeder schedule and sheet notes have been revised. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q22: On the conduit schedule (E-606) circuit number P-E1-08 is shown as (N) 4 x [4-600KCMIL + 1-250KCMIL EG] on the CONDUCTORS column, on the same page on the remarks section is shown as, REUSE EXISTING 5X[600KCMIL + 1-500KCMIL EG].
A22: There are five (5) existing sets of conductors in the circuit. Feeder schedule and notes have been revised. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q23: Drawing E-103 shows circuit C-E1/E11-02. However, the circuit schedule (E-606) only lists C-E1/E11-02A. Are these the same circuit?
A23: The designation of circuit C-E1/E11-02 has been revised. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q24: There are several circuits which have that are on drawings but are not on the cable/conduit schedule. For example, circuits with the P-E11 notation on drawing E-404. There are other circuits such as C-E1-13 C-E1-19 P-E2-09. Are these circuits to be included in the work? If so please provide information regarding these circuits.
A24: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q25: Circuit numbers; C-E1-08, C-E1-09, C-E1-03, C-E1/E11-01 and C-E1/E11-02 are labelled as multi-conductor cables in a 2” conduit on the conduit schedule (E-606). The nominal O.D. of the cable 12C12 is 0.763 in. Per the NEC, the allowable fill percentage for more than 2 cables is 40 percent. The circuits mentioned above have more than 2 and are in then a code violation and will require to up size the conduit, the alternative would be to add new conduits or utilize the spare 4” conduits.
A25: Multi-conductor cables are not required or specified. Individual 12 AWG conductors are acceptable. The cable/conduit schedule calls out the grouping of 12 conductors that would be routed to each transfer switch.
Q26: Drawing E-605 identifies BEL8723 and a CAT 6 cable on the wiring diagram, note 4 of the same drawing calls for BEL9841. Is the BEL9841 in addition to the other cables?
A26: The cable type for the metering has been revised. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q27: Missing the BLDG 2 POWER PLAN – ELECTRICAL ROOM 101.
A27: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q28: Need clarification, P-E1-18 on drawing number E-201 is routed from SWBD EPEE1 to ATS-16, the conduit schedule has this circuit marked as NOT USED. From looking at the other equipment in the electrical room I’m assuming that it should be like the feed going to ATS-8 circuit P-E1-13, (N) 2 x [4-600KCMIL + 1#1/0 EG]. Should this circuit be P-E1-24? Please provide additional detail.
A28: The feeder schedule and notes have been revised. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q29: Please provide existing schematic of 12kV main switchboard. This will provide the required detail to understanding location of PT/CT terminal blocks and other possible control circuits.
A29: The VA does not have shop drawings of the 12kV switchgear. It is not possible to provide schematic diagrams of the switchgear.
Q30: Will the power monitors for the existing equipment required to be tested and installed by the manufacturer supplying the equipment or can they be tested and installed by the electrical contractor?
A30: The power monitors can be tested and installed by the electrical contractor.
Q31: Are there any other signals from the temporary emergency generator required for the control room other than the low fuel annunciation alarms noted in E-001.
A31: Sheet E-001, Note 4 of Temporary Generator Installation Requirements remote annunciation of alarms in the Building 2 Control Room with interconnecting cabling.
Q32: Please provide further detail regarding the conduit lengths from PB11-1 to SWBD K MB. The partial plan drawing E-208 does not provide enough detail to estimate the cable/conduit lengths.
A32: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q33: The portable generator tap box on the single line on E-703 is not shown on the site drawings. Is there a drawing available that will show the location of the tap box and the location of the temporary emergency generator?
A33: The existing portable generator tap box is on the north exterior of Bldg 1 adjacent to the building rear loading dock. This tap box is truck accessible with space for a portable generator.
Q34: The ethernet homeruns between buildings for the new power meters are longer than the allowed cable length of 94 meters per specification section 25 10 10 3.4.E.2. Please advise on how to proceed.
A34: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q35: Drawing E-203 contains references to a Note 2, however the there is not a Note 2 on the drawing. Please clarify.
A35: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q36: Regarding circuit breakers in existing equipment; will the government consider a retrofill solution if not specified in E Drawing Sheet Notes?
A36: Switchboard D2 was retrofit in 2001 with Eaton bussing and circuit breakers. Contractor shall provide new equipment.
Q37: Since ZINSCO did not manufacture MV Breakers, could we get nameplate information on the existing breakers in the ZINSCO MV Switchgear?
A37: Information currently unavailable.
Q38: Is it possible to allow another site visit? We would like to visit your site with our field service technician.
A38: Not at this time due to COVID. The VA has already provided 5 separate site walks on Jul 27 & 28.
Q39: Is there an existing Power Monitoring System and/or Building Automation system at the site? If yes, who is the manufacture for each system?
A39: Metasys by JCI Q40: Does VA IT Department allow the communication between VA National Energy Management system and a local system?
A40: The VA is currently seeking clarification from OIT.
Q41: Are main meters and feeders from each switchgear/substations/ATS’s required to integrate into VA National Energy Management System? Or only the main meters?
A41: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q42: Sheet E002 and Specifications 26 13 13 2.2.C call for Multifunction Digital Metering on the 12kV Main Medium Voltage Circuit Breaker Switchgear, however Sheet E401 does not show Electric Metering. Please clarify if metering is to be provided on the 12KV Main Medium Voltage Switchgear.
A42: Separate meters are not required to be installed in the 12kV Switchgear. The proposed feeder protection relays have integral meters. Sheet E-002, Scope of Work item 2 will be deleted.
Q43: Note D of Proposed Sequence of Construction calls for Power Monitoring and Data Cables to each ATS as shown on Sheet-605, however metering is called out for the following ATS’s:
0. ATS-3 located in BLDG 11
0. ATS-14 on the 7th floor of BLDG 1
0. ATS-14 located in BLDG 2 (Note duplicate ATS-14)
0. ATS-1 located in the parking structure Please confirm which ATS’s are to receive meters? All or just the ones with the callout on the drawings and identified above.
A43: On sheet E-605, there are 19 ATSs and 5 unit substations identified to receive power monitors and related cabling (BEL and cat6). This is the correct number of ATSs receiving meters. All transfer switches and unit substations shown on sheet E-605 shall be provided with new power monitors . Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q44: Specification section 260519 “LV Cables” under 2.3.A indicates Mechanical Lugs and under 2.3.B indicates Compression Lugs. Please advise which lugs are required for this project.
A44: Mechanical lugs are acceptable for circuit breakers and factory provided bus lugs. If lugs are provided in field, contractor shall use compression lugs. All connectors and terminations must be used in accordance with the most recent version of the VA Master Specification and of the National Electrical Code.
Q45: Specification section 262413 “Switchboards” under 2.6.B.2.g indicates that Arc Flash Reduction Maintenance mode is required on ALL feeders. According to NFPA70E Section 240.87 “Arc Energy Reduction” is required where the trip unit in a circuit breaker is rated or can be adjusted to 1200 amps or higher. Should we include Arc Flash Reduction Maintenance Mode on every feeder regardless if it’s less than 1200A?
A45: Provide arc flash reduction maintenance mode for all feeder breakers 1200A and above.
Q46: The Veterans Affairs has a National Schneider Electric EEM System that requires that the main incoming of the Switchgear/Switchboards have a Power Meter integrated into the system. The one-lines do not show metering in Switchgear EPGI or Switchboards EPC1 and EPEE1. Will Power Meters be required on the main incoming of this equipment?
A46: Not in scope.
Q47: Specification sections 262413 “Switchboards” and 262300 “Low-Voltage Switchgear” under 3.5A and 3.6.A indicates that a one-line diagram needs to be provided under acrylic glass. Would it be possible to provide a 8.5” x 11” custom plastic engraved nameplate of the Switchgear/Switchboard one-lines mounted to the front of the gear?
A47: Provide one-line diagram per specifications.
Q48: There is a Specification Section 262416 “Panelboards” and there is a Panel PLSB shown on contract drawing E-603. Is this panel new? If so, can you please provide panelboard schedules for all new panels that need to be provided as part of this project?
A48: Panel PLSB is existing. There are not new panelboards in the project.
Q49: Does EPG1 need to be stainless?
A49: Switchgear EPG1 is not required to be stainless steel. Provide high salt-spray resistant coating equivalent to epoxy coating.
Q50: What manufacturer is the building2 12kgear
A50: The manufacturer is Zinsco with a Square D load interrupter switch added to the load end.
Q51: What manufacturer is substation a-k?
A51: The manufacturer is Zinsco retrofit with Cutler-Hammer circuit breakers.
Q52: Are the TEMPORARY GENERATORS installed to feed EPG1 and EDB1 loads to be standby or running?
A52: They will be on standby and run if a transfer switch is required to transfer to emergency power.
Q53: What is the location of the 1000kw gen feeding EPCL-T?
A53: The portable generator is to be located as shown on Detail 1/E-102 adjacent to the service road. The callout Temporary Generator PG1 will be changed to Temporary Generator GEN2.
Q54: Where is GEN-2 DISCONNECT located
A54: The GEN-2 disconnect will be install as part of the project behind Swgr EPG1 per Detail 1/E-301.
Q55: What is the location of the 1500kw gen feeding EPEE-1?
A55: The portable generator will be installed adjacent to the existing generator tap box on the north side of the building adjacent to the loading dock.
Q56: What is Generator PG1 shown on E-102
A56: See Answer to RFI 53. This will be relabeled GEN-2 portable generator.
Q57: Do the feeders for ats 13 &14 [B1] cross thru area with asbestos?
A57: Contractor is to splice into the ATS feeders at junction boxes located in the B-231 electrical room. The feeders leaving the electrical room to route though interstitial spaces on each floor that contain asbestos materials.
Q58: What hours can ATS 13 & 14 [B1] be worked on?
A58: At this time normal working hours unless the situation dictates otherwise i.e. evenings and weekends.
Q59: Is ATS 14 on sheet E-207 The same ATS as reference on E-201
A59: No. These are separate ATSs. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q60: The plans on sheet E-201 show both JB1-9 and JB1-10 feeding ATS 13&14, shows existing and the other has no note signifying new, please clarify A60: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q61: Does the route to the mezzanine at building 2 E-203 for the power monitoring cross areas with asbestos?
A61: No. All work is in exposed areas with no asbestos.
Q62: Are EPG2 &11 existing as shown on E-304?
A62: EPG2 and EPG11 are not in scope. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q63: Are the oil filled switches going to removed and if so have they been tested for hazardous materials?
A63: The oil filled switches are not to be removed.
Q64: Is there a hazardous material report?
A64: The only hazardous materials likely to be encountered would be asbestos in the interstitial spaces. No oil filled equipment is to be removed.
Q65: Is asbestos or any other hazardous materials known to be on site?
A65: There is asbestos containing materials in all the interstitial spaces of the hospital.
Q66: Where is the new proposed location of DC-01?
A66: The proposed location of DC-01 is shown on detail 2/E-201
Q67: Where is the new proposed location of T-57?
A67: The proposed location of T-57 is shown on detail 2/E-201.
Q68: Are we to assume (New) ATS 8 will be placed in existing ATS 8 location.
A68: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q69: Where is location of ATS 17 (spare,) that existing ATS 8 is to be placed and renamed?
A69: The location of ATS-18 (changed name) is shown on detail 2/E-201. ATS-8 is not relocated. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q70: Where is new CEM3 located?
A70: There is no new CEM3. CEM3 is in Bldg. 1 Rm B166.
Q71: Please confirm 2hr. fire rated cable is not required for this project.
A71: The spaces above the ceiling are on an automatic sprinkler system. And the exposed areas are on an automatic sprinkler system.
Q72: Please confirm concrete encased conduit above ground is not required for this project.
A72: Concrete encased conduit above ground is not required.
Q73: Please confirm phenolic conduit and raceway is not required for this project.
A73: All conduits shall be UL listed for their use. PVC Schedule 40 conduit is required for underground installations. Metallic conduit is required for above ground installations.
Q74: Request as-builts for the conduit routing for ATS 13 &14 from Basement to 7th floor.
A74: This information is not available. Approximate dimensions are shown on detail 2/E-206.
Q75: Request catwalk /interstitial as-builts per floor from Basement to 7th floor.
A75: Available record drawings will be provided after award of contract.
Q76: Request CCD extension due to loss of productivity for asbestos work in interstitial from Basement to 7th floor.
A76: Request will be taken under advisement however and extension is not granted at this time
Q77: Request CCD extension due to loss of productivity for working around existing infrastructure on catwalk interstitial from Basement 7th floor.
A77: Request will be taken under advisement however and extension is not granted at this time Q78: Provide the Instructions to Bidders to identify bid package requirements. This was not included with the original solicitation.
A78: Instructions are included on the SF1442, Section L, and throughout the Invitation for Bids (IFB) solicitation.
Q79: Form 1442, Box 10 states “All bid must include Atch1 and Atch 2” Atch was issued. Please issue Atch 2.
A79: The request for Atch 2 with the bid is a typo on the SF1442 Form. Atch 2 is not required to be submitted with the bid. Atch 2 is the Wage Determination.
Q80: Please provide Hazmat Report A80: The only hazardous materials likely to be encountered would be asbestos in the interstitial spaces. No oil filled equipment is to be removed.
Q81: General Note 1 on ED101 states “Coordinate project phasing of demolition and new work. See specification section 010000 for general order of work . . . .” Neither phasing or a general order of work is listed in 01 00 00. Please provide.
A81: Refer to E-002 for Proposed Sequence of Construction and included general scope of work. Refer to Spec Section 013216.15 for Project Schedule requirements to be prepared by the Contractor.
Q82: Drawings E-102, E-103 and E-104 states “conduit and ductbanks are existing, provide wiring” but plans indicate sawcut and removal of asphalt and curb/gutters for trenching. Please clarify if this area needs to be trenched.
A82: The majority of the underground work shown on the drawings is existing. The duct bank sections are for reference. New underground work in shown in detail 1/E-301 for the generator termination cabinet (notes 4 and 5).
Q83: The specifications include 31 20 00 Earthwork for trenching but specifications for asphalt and concrete are not part of project documents. Please clarify scope of work and provide any missing specifications for work to be included in project.
A83: It is not anticipated that asphalt or concrete will be required for the trenching noted in Answer 82.
Q84: Please provide civil drawings showing areas that require sawcut and removal of asphalt/concrete.
A84: No removal of asphalt or concrete is anticipated.
Q85: Please provide civil drawings showing areas of trenching with details including depth, sizes of duct banks, any import bedding and backfill.
A85: The only trenching required is a short run for the temporary generator connection switchboard located in detail 1/E-301. This trenching is in a topsoil/dirt area adjacent to Bldg 1.
Q86: Drawing E-209 Sheet Note 2 states “Use existing communications conduit to route CAT6 cable . . . “indicating no asphalt removal and trenching required between Parking Structure and Main Building. Please confirm.
A86: Asphalt removal or trenching is not required for the work. Refer to notes on sheet E-209.
Q87: If trenching is required between the parking structure and Building 1 for the CAT6 cable, please provide civil plans with details showing areas of trenching with details including depth, sizes of ductbanks, any import bedding and backfill.
A87: No trenching is required.
Q88: If curb, gutter, sidewalk and asphalt require patch back, please provide specifications for concrete and asphalt.
A88: No curb, gutter, sidewalk or asphalt patching is required.
Q89: I am trying to find if there are any liquidated damages for this project and if so at what cost. As well as a retention percentage to be used on this contract.
A89: No liquidated damages for this project. 10% retention percentage in accordance with VAAR Clause 852.232-70 (a)(3).
Q90: We cannot find/determine the location of the Portable Generator tap box feeding GEN-1 disconnect switchboard.
a. Where is the Portable Generator tap box feeding GEN-1 disconnect switchboard located?
b. Is it Existing or not?
c. And If the feeder from it to GEN-1 switchboard is existing?
A90: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q91: Meant to also inquire about whether both prime contractor project assigned a) direct onsite/field labor and b) direct offsite/office labor support apply to make-up the prime contractor’s 15% self-performance requirement? REFERENCE: 13 CFR 125.6 Prime contractor performance requirements (limitations on subcontracting). “(2) In the case of a contract for general construction, the SDVO SBC spends at least 15% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel on the concern’s employees or the employees of other SDVO SBC”.
A91: Reference FAR Clause 52.219-27. Paragraph (d)(3) states, (d) Agreement. A service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern agrees that in the performance of the contract, in the case of a contract for— (3) General construction, at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract performance incurred for personnel will be spent on the concern’s employees or the employees of other service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns. Information for Joint Ventures (JV) is in paragraph (e)(1) through (e)(4).
Q92: Please clarify feeder count for feeder ID# ‘P-E1-06’, Conductor counts indicate (E) 5 and (N) 1 (total of 6), but remarks say use (E) 5 feeders and add 2 more sets (total of 7) please clarify.
A92: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q93: Please clarify feeder count for feeder ID# ‘P-E1-08’, Conductor counts indicate (N) 4 (total of 4), but remarks say to use (E) 5 feeders, are we adding additional feeders to this? Please clarify.
A93: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q94: There is a large mechanical hood setting on the equipment pad where EPG11 & EPG2 are to be installed, who will be responsible for removing this before the installation of the new equipment?
A94: The contractor is responsible for moving the hood to another location on site. Site will be determined by the VA.
Q95: How long is the warranty period for project?
A95: Warranty period will be in accordance with FAR Clause 52.246-21 Warranty of Construction and Alternate I. Paragraph (b) states, “… 1 year from the date of final acceptance of the work”, but reference the Clause and Alternate I for all details.
Q96: What are the insurance requirements?
A96: Insurance requirements shall be in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-5 and FAR 28.307-2.
Q97: Please see below to what we have discovered. All drawing that concern P-E1-06 are very contradictory. Sheet E-704 shows 4 lines which indicate 4 feeders, note 4 references 4 conduits yet the power conduit schedule [E-608] STATES [7]. Also the note references EPG1-B that we cannot find.
A97: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q98: In regards to RFI response A69, there is no ATS listed on sheet E-201 that has the label of #17, there is however a new ATS labeled #16.
A98: ATS 17 is next to ATS 11 on sheet E-201 of updated drawings. Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q99: Sheet ED603 sheet note ‘7’ states to disconnect ATS-8 and install new ATS-8, and reinstall ATS and rename it ATS-17 (spare). Please clarify if we are relocating ATS-8 as stated, please clarify the intent of this note.
A99: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q100: Please provide details on Power center PC-2 shown on E-304, listed as existing, assuming this is same as EPG2 and EPG11 listed as existing but it is new.
A100: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q101: Please provide as built drawings showing the existing conduit routing between B-231 electrical room and the 7th floor electrical room, both power and data conduit runs.
A101: Available record drawings will be provided after award of contract.
Q102: Please confirm that there will only be the need for one (1) temporary generator.
A102: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009. Sheet E-703 calls for two temporary generators one 1000KW minimum and one 1500KW minimum.
Q103: Please confirm equipment downstream of EPG11 & EPG2 shown on sheet ED601 is in fact existing (SWBD-EDA, ATS-02-521, ATS-04-523, ATS-01-520, ATS-8-522, ATS-14, ATS-10-524, ATS-9-52B, ATS-CG), and if new feeders are required to be installed feeding this equipment. If equipment is existing, what is it being fed from currently?
A103: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q104: RFI response #2 requires Contractor to hire a Professional Geotechnical Engineer to provide inspection of excavations and soil/ground water conditions. However, RFI response 85 states “the only trenching required is a short run for the temporary generator connection switchboard . . .This trenching is in a topsoil/dirt area adjacent to Bldg 1”. Appears to be a costly expense to have a geotechnical engineer observe trenching in topsoil. Can this requirement be removed?
A104: A2 has been updated. A professional geotechnical engineer will not be required.
Q105: For pricing purposes, will the relocation of intake plenum in RFI 13 require cutting open an exterior wall or roof and will access require scaffold?
A105: No, the new location will be outdoors and at ground level.
Q106: DRAWING E-102-1, NOTE # 1, This note shows the location of Temporary Emergency Generator "PG1" just north of outdoor gear EPG1. Have not been able to locate a spec or detail that indicates if the connection between the Temporary generator is to be in exposed temporary cabling/conduits, or underground conduits, etc.
A106: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q107: Drawing E-301, Note # 4&5, Feeders P-E1-15T and P-E1-5T are shown as underground from a new concrete pad to an unnamed box on the exterior of Bldg 1. Single line and conduit schedule describe these conduits from TEMP GEN to EPCL-T. connection between unnamed jbox to EPCL-T not clear.
A107: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q108: Drawing E-103/1 shows EPG2 and EPG11 switchgears as existing. Job walk Photos do not show any existing gear at the location shown on the plans.
A108: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q109: Drawing E-103/1 page calls out detail 1 on E-303 for EPG2, but detail 1 on E-303 shows EPG1. maybe E304?
A109: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q110: Drawing E-203, page shows signal plan in Bldg 2. Need routing of existing conduits within building for feeders P-E1-01 and P-E1-04 to jboxes on exterior of building wall.
A110: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q111: Drawing E-702 Note 5, Feeder P-E1-05T & P-E1-15T run all the way over to SWGR 'EPG1'. 405' total length of each run. ( will need new conduit per sheet E-105 note 3 & 4 feeders shown on this sheet as P-E1-05 & P-E1-15 see clarification written above feeder call out on this sheet adjacent to double doors/exit from electric room"(Typical) Shown as A111: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q112: Drawing E-703 Note 7, 2 temp generators shown on single line.1000KW and 1500KW. Only 1 shown on E102. Where is the 1500KW Generator and the Portable Generator Tap Box mentioned?
A112: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q113: Drawing E-703 Note 7, Temp Generator Connections: Gnerator Tap Box shown @ BLDG 1 exterior not shown on drawings, see RFI #90 on Addendum #6 (not answered)
A113: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q114: Drawing E-704 Note 1, Note reads provide SWGR 'EBG1' that gear does not exist, should be 'EPG1' A114: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q115: Drawing E-704 Note 2, Feeders P-E1-06 & P-E1-08 are existing and already tied into existing Gear see sheet E-301, adding (2) new sets of feeders per feeder schedule, take off for these on sheet E-702. "Reroute" of feeders to new 'EPG1' will be done on Sheet E-301/E-302 A115: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q116: Drawing E-704 Note 3, Feeder P-E1-05 & P-E1-15 are existing and already tied into existing Gear see sheet E-301, note mentions JB1-2 but feeder schedule shows JB1-3. 'Extending Feeders" will be done on Sheet E-301/E-302 A116: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q117: Drawing E-704, Notes 4 & 6, Extending Feeders P-E1-06 & P-E1-08 in Electric Room 'B-167': feeder call outs on this page are confusing, reference single line for clarity on this page and E-603. P-E1-08 extends with conduit and wire from "TAP BOX" to NEW SWGR 'EPCL1' approx 10' and P-E1-06 extends with conduit and wire from "TAP BOX" to NEW SWGR 'EPEE1' approx 50'.
A117: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q118: E-704, Note 8, This note mentions providing 'ATS-16' and feeder P-E1-21: Feeder Schedule on E-606 shows ATS-16 being fed from NEW SWGR 'EPEE1', drawing shows the feeder designation on the middle of the room from NEW SWGR 'EPCL1' to NEW JB1-8. Single line on this sheet shows being fed from correct location NEW SWGR 'EPEE1' (P-E1-21) and Existing 'SWBD D' (P-E1-24). Drawing E-603 supports the single line on this sheet.
A118: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q119: E-705 Note 1, Disconnect Temp Feeders: note mentions disconnect of temp and reconnection of "Existing Feeders" from JB1-8 to 'EPG1-A'/'EPCL-T'. Sheet E-704 shows new feeders from NEW SWGR 'EPCL1' to ATS-15,14,12,5, &6. Assumed feeders are existing, previously disconnect from 'EDB1' (see sheet E-703 note 6) and they just need to be cut over.
A119: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q120: Drawing E-705 Note 3, Note is in the wrong location, fedders will be disconnected from temporary SWGR 'EPCL-T' and JB1-8.
A120: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q121: Drawing E-705 Note 4, Note not shown on drawing and does not make sense A121: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q122: E-705 Note 7, Note is not shown on drawing but references ATS-16. (SWBD D????)
A122: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q123: Drawing E-705 Note 9, Note references "Provide Feeder P-E1-07" from 'EPG1' to JB1-8 , Feeder Schedule shows this feeder as Existing from EPG1 to JB1-2. Sheets E-701-E706 also reference this feeder as existing: see clarification written above feeder call out on this sheet above double doors/exit from electric room. Additionally, Sheet E-105/Note 7 shows intercepting existing conduits/stub outs for this feeder P-E1-07 along with P-E1-05, and P-E1-15 as new conduit and wire approx 240' through corridors leading up to wall/existing exterior JB1-2. What do we assume????
A123: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q124: Drawing E-706, Feeder P-E1-21: drawing shows call out for this feeder above NEW SWGR 'EPEE1' and does not show where this feeder goes, single line and feeder shcedule shows this feeder from 'EPEE1' to 'ATS-16'. Will assume as shown on single line and feeder schedule.
A124: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q125: The Phase 4 drawings [E-705] need clarification. The notes reference unknown gear, have feeders going to unknown locations, splice feeders to empty conduits and deal with ATS-16 in a confusing manner.
A125: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q126: What is the conduit path at the 1000kw generator for the 2wire to the temporary annunciator at building 2 control booth?
A126: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q127: Does the 1000kw generator need start stop [2wire] wiring for each ATS? if so what is the path?
A127: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q128: What is the conduit path at the 1500kw generator for the 2wire to the temporary annunciator at building 2 control booth or is temporary wiring in place between the portable generator tap box and the control booth?
A128: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q129: Does the 1500kw generator need start stop [2wire] wiring for each ATS? if so what is the path?
A129: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q130: Please locate the portable generator tap box at building 1 exterior on a plan.
A130: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q131: Where is the building fire alarm system panel for Temp Generators connections located?
A131: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q132: In lieu of providing auxiliary fuel tanks for a 72 hour run time will it be acceptable to have a refueling service on standby to refuel generator standard fuel tanks to provide the 72 hour runtime indicated on E-001?
A132: No, must have 72 hours (at max load) of fuel on site.
Q133: Which panels should the circuits for the battery charger and water jacket heater for both temporary generators come from? please show routing
A133: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q134: Will temporary fencing be required around each temporary generator?
A134: Yes
Q135: Do you have a bidders list for this project?
A135: Sign-in sheets from the Pre-Bid Site Walks were uploaded to Contract Opportunities with Amendment 0003 on Wednesday 29 Jul 2020. If you have already created an account on Contract Opportunities, you can access the Interested Vendors Lists. There are two lists: one list accessible on the Pre-Solicitation Notice and another on the Interested Vendors List on the IFB / Solicitation. Please reference A5 and A13 on this RFI document.
Q136: Wanted to clarify the answer to RFI #69.
Please clarify that you mean ATS-16 In Answer 69. ATS 17 is not shown on E-201. However E-607 id's C-E1-02F going to ATS17 which is shown terminating at ATS 8 on sheet E-202.
A136: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q137: The existing chase that is to be used to run new conduit up to the 7th floor for control and power monitoring (per E-206), does this existing chase contain asbestos?
A137: Yes
Q138: There is a phasing schedule mentioned in the drawings and specs, (spec section 01.00.00 1.6 H) but it seems to be incomplete, does the VA intend on providing a complete phasing schedule?
A138: A preliminary schedule has been provided. The contractor will modify and add the remaining details to the proposed schedule which will then be submitted to the VA for approval.
Q139: Per RFI 17 response, the prime contractor will be responsible for retaining an independent/ third party commissioning agent, will there be an update made to the spec section 01.91.00 1.8.C.1 that clarifies the requirements for the third party agency as well as section 01.91.00 1.9 redefining the VA’s responsibilities in regards to the commissioning?
A139: Yes
Q140: At the existing temp generator tap box, is there provisions for hook up of low voltage cable or existing chase for the annunciator and start command tying back into building 2?
A140: Please refer to the updated drawing set (Addendum 01) that has been posted with Amendment 0009.
Q141: Is it acceptable to the VA to utilize smaller generators that are paralleled together (use of two smaller units instead of one larger unit)? The smaller units are more readily available, the larger unit is in higher demand and will be harder to come by at this given time.
A141: No image2.png image3.png image4.png image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .