RFI LOG AMENDMENT 0002.pdf
PDF 57 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24726R0026
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) Log for the VISN 7 Construction MATOC (36C24726R0026), Amendment #0002, containing clarifications and government responses to ten contractor questions regarding two construction projects: SEED #2 (Relocate Radiology & Nuclear Medicine to 5A, Dublin GA, Project 557-20-101) and SEED #1 (Project 534-23-910 involving renovations to restrooms, stairwells, doors, and flooring).
The responses address technical specifications and requirements across multiple construction elements. For SEED #2, clarifications were provided regarding drawing accessibility, door schedule corrections (confirming doors shall be SCW rather than SCV), RF shielded door specifications (to be provided by the RF shielding company), and STC ratings (doors do not require STC ratings despite wall requirements). For SEED #1, responses clarified riser height compliance for terrazzo installation (existing stairs must be field-verified to meet code standards), terrazzo thickness basis of design (3/8" per Terrazoco detail PTZ-T-2), flooring adhesive abatement requirements (existing flooring must be demolished and substrate prepped per manufacturer recommendations), and terrazzo installation methods (precast is acceptable). Additionally, the government modified the past performance evaluation criteria in Solicitation 1.2.3.1(a)(3)c and 1.2.3.2(1)(1)(3), clarifying that all submitted projects must have been awarded, executed, or completed within the preceding five years, with a minimum of two projects exceeding $1,000,000 in value. The document notes that additional unanswered questions will be addressed in future amendments.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C24726R0026
VISN 7 CONSTRUCTION MATOC
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) LOG
AMENDMENT #0002
QUESTION #
RELATED
SECTION/CLAU
REQUESTED CLARIFICATION/INFORMATION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
SEED #2_Project 557-20-101 Drawings
Unable to open/receiveing error messages when opening drawings for SEED #2 (Relocate Radiology & Nuclear Medicine to 5A,Dublin GA).
Please try attached drawings titled "SEED 2 -
SPECIFICATION COMBINED - FINAL BID DOCUMENTS".
SEED #2_Project 557-20-101 Door Schedule
On the door schedule on drawing page A600, most of the doors are listed as door material "SCV". In the list of abbreviations on the drawing page A001, there is no SCV.
There is an SCW abbreviation for solid core wood. Should all of the doors on the door schedule shown as SCV actaully be
SCW?
Yes, doors shall be SCW. See attached drawing sheet titled "NCS-VISN 7-MATOC-SEED 2-RFI 1 - 2 A600" with revised Door Schedule.
SEED #2_Project 557-20-101 - Door Schedule
Door number A154 is shown to be an RF Shielded door on the door schedule. We could not locate any specific;ations for RF Shielded doors. Is there a specification for this door type or do we need to price what we think is best to quilify our bid?
RF Sheilded Door should be provided by the RF shieding company.
SEED #2_Project 557-20-101- Door Schedule
On drawing page G001, quite a few of the wall types show an STC50 requirement. The door schedule does not show any doors needing to be STC rated nor is there a specification for STC doors. Do any of the doors on this project require an STC Rating?
Doors do not have a STC rating.
Solicitation 1.2.3.1
Technical Evaluation Factor: Subfactor 1 – What would be the proper protocol if the COR and CO are both retired? We have CPAR’s for the projects.
Provide CPARs.
SEED 1_Project 534-23-910 - Flooring
What Existing Riser Height where the Terrazzo is going? Code says height cannot be more than 7". If more, then the concrete stair treads will need to be grinded down.
All the existing stairs need to be field verify and they are required to comply riser height and tread to meet standards.
SEED 1_Project 534-23-910 - Flooring
The thickness shown of the Terrazzo is 3/8" on plan A-509.
Standard thickness of terrazzo for stair treads is 3/4".
Basis of design was Terrazoco detail - precast tread structure supported. PTZ-T-2.
36C24726R0026
VISN 7 CONSTRUCTION MATOC
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) LOG
AMENDMENT #0002
QUESTION #
RELATED
SECTION/CLAU
REQUESTED CLARIFICATION/INFORMATION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
SEED 1_Project 534-23-910 - Renovate Restrooms, Stairwells and Doors
Will the Rubber flooring adhesive need to be abated ? If so, a chemical treatment will need to be put down before the Terrazzo is installed.
The existing finished flooring is required to be demolished and prep substrate to receive terrazzo in accordance with manufacture recommendations to existing conditions. All surfaces of concrete slabs to receive terrazzo must be cleaned of any foreign matter.
SEED 1_Project 534-23-910 - A-
A-509 shows both precast and pour in place terrazzo. Does this have to be a requirement ? I was told the proper way to do this would be to precast everything. No pour in place.
Precast is acceptable.
Solicttation 1.2.3.1(a)(3)c and 1.2.3.2(1)(1)(3)
The solicitation states "At least two projects submitted must be valued at more than $1,000,000 AND within the last five years." This statement implies that not all projects need to be within five years and/or more than $1M. The solicitation also states, "The Contracting Officer will consider references from either inside or outside the federal government, so long as the performance is recent (within the last five years)..." Can the government please confirm the recency and magnitude requirements for all six past performance references?
Change "At least two projects submitted must be valued at more than $1,000,000 AND within the last five years." to read "All projects submitted must have been awarded, executed, or completed within the preceding five (5) years.
Additionally, a minimum of two projects must have a value exceeding one million dollars ($1,000,000)."
ALL OTHER QUESTIONS RECEIVED BUT NOT YET ANSWERED IN THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE ANSWERED IN A FUTURE AMENDMENT
RFI LOG
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .