36C10G26R0003 0018 CCN Next Gen - Medical Amendment.pdf

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

1 16

0018 04-03-2026

36C10G

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs OPAL | Strategic Acquisition Center

10300 Spotsylvania Ave | STE 400 Fredericksburg VA 22408-2697

36C10G

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs OPAL | Strategic Acquisition Center

10300 Spotsylvania Ave | STE 400 Fredericksburg VA 22408-2697

To all Offerors/Bidders

36C10G26R0003

12-15-2025

X

X X x

The purpose of this amendment (0018) is to:

1. Update language in the RFP.

2. Publish and provide CCN NG Medical Open Mic Session Response to Industry 4.3.2026

3. Publish and provide 36C10G26R0003 Next Gen Medical_Conformed Copy 04032026

4. Please see continuation page.

All other Terms and Conditions remain the same.

Jessica Portillo Contracting Officer

CONTINUATION PAGE 36C10G26R0003 0018

This amendment provides a conformed copy of the CCN Next Generation Medical solicitation, noticed as 36C10G26R0003. The following revisions have been incorporated into the updated conformed copy and are detailed below for your reference.

Note: The words struck out in the “From” sections of each change denote the language that will be removed in each revision. The words in red font in the “To” sections of each change denote the new language to be added in each version.

CHANGE 1:

The following language in section C.22 VAAR 852.211-76 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES –

REIMBURSEMENT FOR DATA BREACH COSTS (FEB 2023) ALTERNATE I (FEB

2023), is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

C.22 VAAR 852.211-76 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES – REIMBURSEMENT

FOR DATA BREACH COSTS (FEB 2023) ALTERNATE I (FEB 2023)

(a) Definition. As used in this clause, contract’’ means any contract, agreement, order or other instrument and encompasses the definition set forth in FAR 2.101.

(b) Non-disclosure requirements. As a condition of performance under a contract, order, agreement, or other instrument that requires access to sensitive personal information as defined in VAAR 802.101, the following is expressly required—

(1) The Contractor, subcontractor, their employees or business associates shall not, directly or through an affiliate or employee of the Contractor, subcontractor, or business associate, disclose sensitive personal information to any other person unless the disclosure is lawful and is expressly permitted under the contract; and

(2) The Contractor, subcontractor, their employees or business associates shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) of any security incident that occurs involving sensitive personal information.

(c) Liquidated damages. If the Contractor or any of its agents fails to protect VA sensitive personal information or otherwise engages in conduct which results in a data breach, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of $37.50 per affected individual in order to cover costs related to the notification, data breach analysis and credit monitoring. In the event the Contractor provides payment of actual damages in an amount determined to be adequate by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer may forgo collection of liquidated damages.

(d) Purpose of liquidated damages. Based on the results from VA’s determination that there was a data breach caused by Contractor’s or any of its agents’ failure to protect or otherwise engaging in conduct to cause a data breach of VA sensitive personal information, and as directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying to the VA liquidated damages in the amount of $50.00 per affected individual to cover the cost of the following:

(1) Notification related costs.

(2) Credit monitoring reports.

(3) Data breach analysis and impact.

(4) Fraud alerts.

(5) Identity theft insurance.

(e) Relationship to termination clause, if applicable. If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Termination for cause paragraph, FAR 52.212– 4(m), Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, the Contractor is liable for damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These damages are in addition to costs of repurchase as may be required under the Termination clause.

(End of Clause)

TO:

C.22 VAAR 852.211-76 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES – REIMBURSEMENT

FOR DATA BREACH COSTS (FEB 2023) ALTERNATE I (FEB 2023)

(a) Definition. As used in this clause, contract’’ means any contract, agreement, order or other instrument and encompasses the definition set forth in FAR 2.101.

(b) Non-disclosure requirements. As a condition of performance under a contract, order, agreement, or other instrument that requires access to sensitive personal information as defined in VAAR 802.101, the following is expressly required—

(1) The Contractor, subcontractor, their employees or business associates shall not, directly or through an affiliate or employee of the Contractor, subcontractor, or business associate, disclose sensitive personal information to any other person unless the disclosure is lawful and is expressly permitted under the contract; and

(2) The Contractor, subcontractor, their employees or business associates shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) of any security incident that occurs involving sensitive personal information.

(c) Liquidated damages. If the Contractor or any of its agents fails to protect VA sensitive personal information or otherwise engages in conduct which results in a data breach, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of $37.50 per affected individual in order to cover costs related to the notification, data breach analysis and credit monitoring. In the event the Contractor provides payment of actual damages in an amount determined to be adequate by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer may forgo collection of liquidated damages.

(d) Purpose of liquidated damages. Based on the results from VA’s determination that there was a data breach caused by Contractor’s or any of its agents’ failure to protect or otherwise engaging in conduct to cause a data breach of VA sensitive personal information, and as directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying to the VA liquidated damages in the amount of $37.50 per affected individual to cover the cost of the following:

(1) Notification related costs.

(2) Credit monitoring reports.

(3) Data breach analysis and impact.

(4) Fraud alerts.

(5) Identity theft insurance.

(e) Relationship to termination clause, if applicable. If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Termination for cause paragraph, FAR 52.212– 4(m), Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, the Contractor is liable for damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These damages are in addition to costs of repurchase as may be required under the Termination clause.

(End of Clause)

CHANGE 2:

The following language in section E.3 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES, C.

Instructions, Conditions, and Notice to Offerors, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

h. File Packaging: Do not compress (zip) proposal files. VA Network Security Operations Center (NSOC) has temporarily blocked email attachments with the “.zip” extension as a mitigation measure against the ongoing world-wide ransomware event impacting many organizations. During this time, zip file extensions will be permanently stripped from email traffic and will not be recoverable. Due to VA email file size restrictions (10 MB), Offerors shall separate their proposals into separate emails and attempt to contain complete Volume within single email transmissions (and not split Volumes). Offerors are encouraged to review and ensure that sufficient bandwidth is available on their end of the transmission.

TO:

h. File Packaging: Do not compress (zip) proposal files. VA Network Security Operations Center (NSOC) has temporarily blocked email attachments with the “.zip” extension as a mitigation measure against the ongoing world-wide ransomware event impacting many organizations. During this time, zip file extensions will be permanently stripped from email traffic and will not be recoverable. Due to VA email file size restrictions (10 MB), Offerors shall separate their proposals into separate emails to contain complete Volume within single email transmissions. Volumes exceeding 10 MB shall be split into clearly labeled, sequential emails. Offerors are encouraged to review and ensure that sufficient bandwidth is available on their end of the transmission.

CHANGE 3:

The following language in section E.3 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES, C.

Instructions, Conditions, and Notice to Offerors, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

e. Page Limitations: Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. The cover letter, title page, Table of Contents, Table of Figures, List of Tables, organizational chart and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms do not count against page count limitations. However, be advised that all information contained within any Table of Contents and/or glossary of abbreviations or acronyms submitted with an Offeror’s response will not be evaluated by the Government. Proposal contents that exceed the stated page limitations will be removed from the proposal by the CO, prior to turning the proposal over to the Government evaluation teams and will not be considered in the evaluations. If the offeror submits annexes, documentation, attachments or the like, not specifically required by this solicitation, such will count against the Offeror’s page limitations unless otherwise indicated in the specific Volume instructions below. Pages in violation of these instructions, either by exceeding the margin, font or spacing restrictions or by exceeding the total page limit for a Volume, will not be considered in the evaluations. Pages not evaluated due to violation of the margin, font or spacing restrictions will not count against the page limitations. The page count will be determined by counting the pages in the order they come up in the print layout view. A single sheet of paper printed on both sides constitutes two pages.

TO:

e. Page Limitations: Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. The cover letter, title page, Table of Contents, Table of Figures, List of Tables, organizational chart and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms will be considered as Contract Documents and do not count against page count limitations. However, be advised that all information contained as Contract Documents submitted with an Offeror’s response will not be evaluated by the Government as a part of the proposal. Proposal contents that exceed the stated page limitations will be removed from the proposal by the CO, prior to turning the proposal over to the Government evaluation teams and will not be considered in the evaluations. If the offeror submits annexes, documentation, attachments or the like, not specifically required by this solicitation, such will count against the Offeror’s page limitations unless otherwise indicated in the specific Volume instructions below.

Pages in violation of these instructions, either by exceeding the margin, font or spacing restrictions or by exceeding the total page limit for a Volume, will not be considered in the evaluations. Pages not evaluated due to violation of the margin, font or spacing restrictions will not count against the page limitations. The page count will be determined by counting the pages in the order they come up in the print layout view. A single sheet of paper printed on both sides constitutes two pages.

CHANGE 4:

The following language in section E.3 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES, C.

Instructions, Conditions, and Notice to Offerors, Table 1: IDIQ Proposal Volume Requirements is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

Factor Content Delivery Method

Volume Page Limit

Contracts Documents

Contracts Documents

Written I

Completed Reps & Certs

Executed Proposal, to include SF1449 and SF 30 Amendments

Points of Contact

OCI Information

N/A

Factor 1

Technical Evaluation

Corporate Experience Written Proposal

I No more than 3 contract/TO references

Reference narrative of no more than 25 pages

Factor 2 Veteran Involvement/Subcontracting Plan

Written

II 10

Factor 3 Price Written

III 20

TO:

Factor Content Delivery Method

Volume Page Limit

Contracts Documents

Contracts Documents

Written Contract Documents:

Cover Letter

Table of Contents

Table of Figures

List of Tables

Organization Chart

Glossary

Completed Reps & Certs

Executed Proposal, to include SF1449 and SF 30 Amendments

Points of Contact

OCI Information

N/A

Factor 1

Technical Evaluation

Corporate Experience Written

I No more than 3 contract/TO references

Reference narrative of no more than 25 pages

Factor 2 Veteran Involvement/Subcontracting Plan

Written Proposal

II 15

Factor 3 Price Written

III 20

CHANGE 5:

The following language in section E.3 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES,

FACTOR 2: VETERANS’ INVOLVEMENT/ SUBCONTRACTING PLAN, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

All large business Offerors shall include their Small Business Subcontracting Plan in their submission. The page limitation for the Subcontracting Plan is 10 pages.

TO:

All large business Offerors shall include their Small Business Subcontracting Plan in their submission. The page limitation for the Subcontracting Plan is 15 pages.

CHANGE 6:

The following language in section E.3 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES,

FACTOR 2: VETERANS’ INVOLVEMENT/ SUBCONTRACTING PLAN, VA

Socioeconomic Subcontracting Goals, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

* The Subcontracting goals listed above shall be calculated based on the percentage of contract dollars, excluding subcontracted supplies (as defined in FAR 2.101).

TO:

* The Subcontracting goals listed above shall be calculated based on the percentage of subcontracted dollars, excluding subcontracted supplies (as defined in FAR 2.101).

CHANGE 7:

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES,

FACTOR 3: PRICE, Table 3: Price Volume Table, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

Labor Category Base Year

Option Year 1

Option Year 2

Option Year 3

Option Year 4

Program Manager Senior

Customer Service Representative, Journeyman

Trainer, Senior

TO:

Labor Category Base Year Option

Year 1 Option Year 2

Option Year 3

Option Year 4

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Year

Program Manager Senior

Customer Service Representative, Journeyman

Trainer, Senior

CHANGE 8:

TO OFFERORS — COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES,

FACTOR 1: Technical Evaluation: Corporate Experience, is here by changed as follows:

FROM:

FACTOR 1: Technical Evaluation: Corporate Experience

In support of the scope of this IDIQ, VA requires evidence of prior contracts, as either a prime or subcontractor or member of a Joint Venture, which demonstrates the capability to support the scope of this work, as related to the Offeror’s service line and population served.

The Offeror shall provide contract or task order references relevant to the requirements described in Section 1.2 in “Attachment 1- CCN Next Gen – Medical IDIQ PWS _02_25_26_v2” of this RFP that demonstrate:

1. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that meets $200,000,000 in healthcare and/or pharmacy claims paid within a 12-month period; OR

2. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that includes a minimum of nine (9) U.S. states; OR

3. Corporate experience demonstrating performance of a cross section of services or a particular service providing the implementation, program management, and IT integration capabilities that covers multiple U.S. states. A contract or task order reference may address one or more of the relevancy criteria listed below (3a, 3b, 3c). However, each relevancy criteria below must be addressed at least once across all the references submitted:

a. Performance providing implementation of the related service/services covering multiple states

b. Performance providing overall program management of the related service/services covering multiple states

c. Performance supporting IT integration with the customer/client IT system to operate the related service/services covering multiple states

For corporate experience #3, failure to provide contract or task order references covering each of relevancy criteria described above (3a, 3b, 3c) will result in a rating of Unacceptable, thereby rendering the Offeror ineligible for award, and ineligible for other volume evaluation.

Performance for all contract or task order references provided shall be ongoing or have occurred within five years from the date of this solicitation.

The Offeror shall include a summary or narrative of the references provided, including the description of the work, the contract number, contract amount, period of performance, and customer/client information. The summary shall be supported with a SOW, PWS or equivalent requirements document applicable to commercial contracts for each relevant corporate qualification contract or task order provided. The Offeror must provide, within their Summary or narrative, page references to the applicable SOW/PWS/Requirements document pages including the relevant experience, and which corporate experience criteria (1, 2, and/or 3) the references are demonstrating.

(SOW/PWS/Requirements documents are not included in page limitations listed above).

The Offeror may provide work they performed as a subcontractor, however, the SOW/PWS/Requirements document submitted must be associated with their subcontract, not the prime contract if they were not the prime contractor.

Examples provided must be for the experience of the Offeror, not a team member, except in the case of a Joint Venture. Joint Venture experience can be submitted provided that the referenced experience was performed by the Offeror. If a small business offeror cannot independently demonstrate the required relevant experience, the Government will permit the offeror to submit experience from the first-tier subcontractors for evaluation. The Offeror shall provide no more than three contract or task order examples, as instructed above.

Failure to provide contract examples covering each relevancy criteria (1,2 and

3) described above will result in a rating of Unacceptable, thereby rendering the Offeror ineligible for award, and ineligible for other volume evaluation.

TO:

FACTOR 1: Technical Evaluation: Corporate Experience

In support of the scope of this IDIQ, VA requires evidence of prior contracts, as either a prime or subcontractor or member of a Joint Venture, which demonstrates the capability to support the scope of this work, as related to the Offeror’s service line and population served.

The Offeror may also submit experience performed by a parent company, subsidiary, or affiliate. For purposes of this provision, an “affiliate” includes any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Offeror.

When submitting experience performed by an entity other than the Offeror, the Offeror shall “connect the dots” between itself and any parent, subsidiary, affiliate, or JV member. At a minimum, the Offeror shall:

• Identify and describe the relationship between the Offeror and the entity that performed the referenced work (e.g., parent, subsidiary, affiliate, or JV member), including the nature of the affiliation and any relevant ownership, control, or organizational structure;

• Describe the specific resources that will be provided by or shared with the Offeror for performance of the instant requirement; and

• Explain how those resources will be made available to the Offeror and will meaningfully impact contract performance, including how they will enhance the Offeror’s ability to successfully perform the requirements.

Failure to clearly demonstrate the relationship and the impact of the affiliated entity’s resources will result in the affiliate’s experience not being considered. If the offeror relies solely on an affiliate’s experience and fails to provide the required relationship and impact justification, that will result in a rating of Unacceptable thereby rendering the Offeror ineligible for award, and ineligible for other volume evaluation.

The Offeror shall provide contract or task order references relevant to the requirements described in Section 1.2 in “Attachment 1- CCN Next Gen – Medical IDIQ PWS _02_25_26_v2” of this RFP that demonstrate:

2. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that meets $200,000,000 in healthcare and/or pharmacy claims paid within a 12-month period; OR

3. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that includes a minimum of nine (9) U.S. states; OR

4. Corporate experience demonstrating performance of a cross section of services or a particular service providing the implementation, program management, and IT integration capabilities that covers multiple U.S. states. A contract or task order reference may address one or more of the relevancy criteria listed below (3a, 3b, 3c). However, each relevancy criteria below must be addressed at least once across all the references submitted:

b. Performance providing implementation of the related service/services covering multiple states

c. Performance providing overall program management of the related service/services covering multiple states

d. Performance supporting IT integration with the customer/client IT system to operate the related service/services covering multiple states

For corporate experience #3, failure to provide contract or task order references covering each of relevancy criteria described above (3a, 3b, 3c) will result in a rating of Unacceptable, thereby rendering the Offeror ineligible for award, and ineligible for other volume evaluation.

Performance for all contract or task order references provided shall be ongoing or have occurred within five years from the date of this solicitation.

The Offeror shall include a summary or narrative of the references provided, including the description of the work, the contract number, contract amount, period of performance, and customer/client information. The summary shall be supported with a SOW, PWS or equivalent requirements document applicable to commercial contracts for each relevant corporate qualification contract or task order provided. The Offeror must provide, within their Summary or narrative, page references to the applicable SOW/PWS/Requirements document pages including the relevant experience, and which corporate experience criteria (1, 2, and/or 3) the references are demonstrating.

(SOW/PWS/Requirements documents are not included in page limitations listed above).

The Offeror may provide work they performed as a subcontractor, however, the SOW/PWS/Requirements document submitted must be associated with their subcontract, not the prime contract if they were not the prime contractor. If a small business offeror cannot independently demonstrate the required relevant experience, the Government will permit the offeror to submit experience from the first-tier subcontractors for evaluation. The Offeror shall provide no more than three contract or task order examples, as instructed above.

CHANGE 9:

The following language in section E.4 ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION—

COMMERICAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES, C. EVALUATION

CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY, Factor 1: Technical – Corporate Experience, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

The proposal will be evaluated to consider whether the Offeror has adequate corporate experience, that demonstrate:

1. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that meets $200,000,000 in healthcare and/or pharmacy claims paid within a 12-month period; OR

2. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that includes a minimum of nine (9) U.S. states; OR

3. Corporate experience demonstrating performance of a cross section of services or a particular service providing the implementation, program management, and IT integration capabilities that covers multiple U.S. states.

The following Technical ratings will be used for the evaluation:

Table 4 – Written Submission Ratings Rating Definition Outstanding Proposal demonstrates exceptional corporate experience, including operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes significantly more than $200M in claims; or provides coverage in a geographic area of more than nine U.S. states; or repeatedly meets all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c.

Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Acceptable Proposal demonstrates adequate corporate experience, including operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes a minimum of $200M in claims; or provides coverage in at least nine U.S. states; or meets all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.

Unacceptable Proposal does not have the required corporate experience that includes operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes a minimum of $200M in claims; or provides coverage in at least nine U.S. states; or fails to meet all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c. The proposal contains one or more deficiencies and is not awardable.

An “Unacceptable” technical rating will render the Offeror ineligible for award and being excluded from further evaluations. No other volumes will be evaluated.

TO:

The proposal will be evaluated to consider whether the Offeror, any parent, subsidiary, affiliate, or JV member has adequate corporate experience, that demonstrate:

1. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that meets $200,000,000 in healthcare and/or pharmacy claims paid within a 12-month period; OR

2. Corporate experience in operating a healthcare and/or pharmacy network that includes a minimum of nine (9) U.S. states; OR

3. Corporate experience demonstrating performance of a cross section of services or a particular service providing the implementation, program management, and IT integration capabilities that covers multiple U.S. states.

The following Technical ratings will be used for the evaluation:

Table 4 – Written Submission Ratings Rating Definition Outstanding Proposal demonstrates exceptional corporate experience, including operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes significantly more than $200M in claims; or provides coverage in a geographic area of more than nine U.S. states; or repeatedly meets all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c.

Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Acceptable Proposal demonstrates adequate corporate experience, including operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes a minimum of $200M in claims; or provides coverage in at least nine U.S. states; or meets all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.

Unacceptable Proposal does not have the required corporate experience that includes operation of a healthcare/pharmacy network that processes a minimum of $200M in claims; or provides coverage in at least nine U.S. states; or fails to meet all three relevancy requirements 3a, 3b, 3c. The proposal contains one or more deficiencies and is not awardable.

An “Unacceptable” technical rating will render the Offeror ineligible for award and being excluded from further evaluations. No other volumes will be evaluated.

CHANGE 10:

The following language in section B.5 TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATION DATA, Task Order Procedures, is hereby changed as follows:

FROM:

The CO will issue a Task Order Proposal Request (TOPR) via email to the contractor, in accordance with the procedures outlined below. While CCN Next Gen – Medical contractors are not required to propose on all TOPRs for which they are afforded the opportunity, they are expected to respond to all. Contractors unable to perform the requirements as stated in a TOPR must submit a "no-bid” statement to the CO with a brief, yet specific, explanation.

TO:

The CO will issue a Task Order Proposal Request (TOPR) via email to the contractor, in accordance with the procedures outlined below. While CCN Next Gen – Medical contractors are not required to propose on all TOPRs for which they are afforded the opportunity, they are expected to respond to all. Contractors unable to perform the requirements as stated in a TOPR must submit a "no-bid” statement to the CO via email with a brief, yet specific, explanation.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////End of RFP changes////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Community Care Network – Next Generation Medical Open Mic Session

Attached to this document are responses to feedback received relative to the CCN Next Gen - Medical Open Mic Session for Request for Proposal (RFP) 36C10G26R0003.

Offerors are hereby notified that all comments/feedback provided to the Government has been reviewed and considered by the Government but may not be specifically addressed herein due to duplicative content. Please be advised that the information provided in attachment “CCN NG Medical Open Mic Session Response to Industry 4.3.2026” may differ from information provided upon issuance of the RFP on 12/15/25 or as amended thereafter. Please also be advised that any information provided in the attachment is for informational purposes only and is offered in response to feedback provided by Offerors during the Open Mic session. Accordingly, in the event that there is any discrepancy between the information contained within the attachment, any Question and Answer document(s), and/or the Solicitation, Offerors are hereby advised that the terms and conditions contained within the final Solicitation control. If indicated in the attachment, updated information is incorporated into the RFP via amendment to the

RFP.

ATTACHMENTS:

- 36C10G26R0003 Next Gen Medical_Conformed Copy 04032026

- CCN NG Medical Open Mic Session Response to Industry 4.3.2026

//////////////////////////////////////////////////// NOTHING FOLLOWS /////////////////////////////////////////////////