PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1PC-JBNC Phase 5C Construction RFP Solicitation - Amendment 005 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F22R0027
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information about a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire requests a contractor to provide details of prior contracts including contract number, award and completion dates, value, description of products or services provided, and performance ratings in areas such as quality, schedule, cost control and customer satisfaction. The federal contract opportunity is a solicitation by the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery Phase 5C located in St. Louis, Missouri. The firm fixed price contract will be awarded for construction services with a response due date provided in the past performance questionnaire. Relevant experience and past performance will be evaluated based on completed questionnaires.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2 – Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this Questionnaire and return it via email to: Isabell Coad (isabell.coad@va.gov)
Desired Response Date: at time of proposal due date
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1a. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options): $
1b. NAME OF PRIME CONTRACTOR (If this questionnaire is for a team member)
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. PROJECT TITLE, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION (AND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VALUE AT PROJECT COMPLETION):
Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
| E = Exceptional |
| S = Satisfactory |
| U = Unacceptable |
| G = Very Good |
| M = Marginal |
| N/O = Not Observed |
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
E G S M U N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
E G S M U N/O
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
E G S M U N/O
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
E G S M U N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
E G S M U N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”.
E G S M U N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
E G S M U N/O
Comments (for any ratings of E, G, M, or U, please provide some brief comments about strengths & weaknesses you observed in this contractor that help us understand your rating. Feel free to provide additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .