3-Attach-D Example-Scoresheet MW26-13.pdf
PDF 724 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MW26-13
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for workforce development training services. The solicitation (MW26-13) seeks a vendor to provide training specific to the Universal Prevention Curriculum Coordinator Series (UPC-C) professional education program, developed by Zili Sloboda. The contract term is five years, and vendors are instructed not to include pricing information in their submissions. Potential vendors must submit their Statement of Qualifications either through the U3P system or via email to mwoodward@utah.gov with the subject line "MW26-13 Statement of Qualifications submission," with all submissions required to meet the posted deadline as confirmed by email timestamp.
The scoresheet establishes six scoreable technical criteria weighted across 600 total possible points, with a minimum required threshold of 390 points (65 percent) for advancement. Evaluation criteria include resumes of key personnel (23 points, 19.2 percent weight); experience teaching prevention science training (13 points, 10.8 percent); governmental and consulting experience (13 points, 10.8 percent); customer service and administrative accuracy (13 points, 10.8 percent); quality of training model and trainers' qualifications (45 points, 37.5 percent); and vendor capacity to accomplish the scope of work (13 points, 10.8 percent). Mandatory requirements include holding a doctorate degree in behavioral health, research, or education and possessing experience providing training on applying prevention science to address substance use and behavioral problems. The highest-ranked vendor will be selected to negotiate a contract at fair and reasonable compensation as determined by the state.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Attach-A DHHS Terms and Conditions MW26-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attach-B SOW MW26-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attach-C Questions-for-potential-vendors MW26-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Date:
Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 23 19.2% 115.0 0.0
2 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
Vendor and its staff members, collectively as a team, must possess the following qualifications… Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
0 = Fail, the statement of qualification(s) fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to missing information;
1 = Poor, the statement of qualification(s) inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information;
2 = Unsatisfactory, the statement of qualification(s) addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in an unsatisfactory manner;
Vendor:
ATTACHMENT D - EXAMPLE SCORESHEET
Training for Substance Use Prevention Professionals
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Solicitation # MW26-13
Experience teaching training on applying prevention science to address substance use and other behavioral problems (see attachment C question 2 for more detail)
Have expertise in providing an evidence-based curriculum or framework that encompass prevention knowledge, skills, and competencies needed for today’s prevention professionals
Evaluator:
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Hold a Doctorate degree in behavioral health, research, or education
Have experience providing training on applying prevention science to address substance use and other behavioral problems
3 = Satisfactory, the statement of qualification(s) addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in a minimum satisfactory manner;
4 = Good, the statement of qualification(s) addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ and in some respects exceeds them;
5 = Excellent, the statement of qualification(s) addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ.
Score will be assigned as follows:
Resumes of key people (see attachment C question 1 for more detail)
Exa mple
3 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
4 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
5 45 37.5% 225.0 0.0
6 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
100.0% 600.0 0.0
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Status
65% 390.0 0.0 0.0%
Ensure quality customer service and accuracy in administrative tasks (see attachment C question 4 for more detail)
Quality of training model and trainers' qualifications / experience in the model (see attachment C question 5 for more detail)
Experience working for governmental entities and consulting for government professionals (see attachment C question 3 for more detail)
Totals:
Required Technical Point Threshold
Vendor has the capacity (time and resources) to accomplish the scope of work (SOW) (see attachment C question 6 and attachment C for more detail)
Exa mple
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .