3-3 - Score Sheet On-Call Civil Engineering Consulting Services RFQ - Individual.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- On-Call Civil Engineering Consulting Services
- Solicitation number
- SLCAIR26002
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for an on-call civil engineering consulting services Request for Qualification (RFQ) issued by Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA) under Solicitation Number SLCAIR26002. The solicitation seeks qualified firms to provide civil engineering consulting services at Salt Lake City International Airport, South Valley Regional Airport, and Tooele Valley Airport in Utah. Respondents must submit Statements of Qualification and Experience for consideration as on-call contractors.
The scoresheet establishes evaluation criteria divided into mandatory pass/fail requirements and scoreable technical criteria totaling 500 possible points. Mandatory requirements include permanent local resources and good standing with the City. Scoreable technical criteria are weighted as follows: Organization, Resources, and Personnel (35% of technical criteria, 175 points), Demonstrated Project Experiences (35%, 175 points), Experience Incorporating Design Concepts with Safety, Functionality and Efficiency (20%, 100 points), and Distinguishing Attributes (10%, 50 points). Proposals receive scores on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 indicating failure to address requirements, 1 indicating poor response, 2 indicating unsatisfactory response, 3 indicating satisfactory minimum response, 4 indicating good response that exceeds requirements in some respects, and 5 indicating excellent response that addresses and exceeds all requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 - On-Call Civil Engineering Consulting Services - RFQ.pdf | ||
| 1-2 - ATTACHMENT A AFFIRMATION OF GRAMA.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 3.B.1 2 3.B.2
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 5.A 35 35.0% 175.0 0.0 2 5.B 35 35.0% 175.0 0.0
3 5.C 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0
4 5.D 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0 100.0% 500.0 0.0
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 500.00 0.00
On-Call Civil Engineering Consulting Services
SOLICITATION # SLCAIR26002
RFQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Permanent Local Resources Good Standing with the City
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Organization, Resources, and Personnel Demonstrated Project Experiences Experience Incorporating Design Concepts with Safety, Functionality and Efficiency Distinguishing Attributes
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Total Technical Points
Submittal 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .